Comments on: Eagles Forever

By: Hillary

Hillary — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:22:58 +0000

All information on this site is represented
preten nude pics
I glad too see this interest site, I tell my friends about it! They like sites like that: site
This is a cool site!

By: Helga

Helga — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:53:05 +0000

Hi! Guys how you manage to make such perfect sites?
[url=hhtp://jaswhit85.55fast.com/freegaya52/palicedshi.html] free gay desktop wallpaper [/url]
free gay gang bang
gay boys in amsterdam
[url=hhtp://jaswhit85.55fast.com/freegaya52/mandove.html] gay nude latino dicks [/url]
Good fellows!

By: Bush2

Bush2 — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:48:26 +0000

Hi everyone.
set2 2 [url=2]2[/url]
set2 2 [url=2]2[/url]
set2 2 [url=2]2[/url]
set2 2 [url=2]2[/url]
Great site.

By: Ilona

Ilona — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:24:33 +0000

Well, the way I look at it, if the F-22 is going to be able to replace the F-117 at certain Air Force Bases (which has been announced elsewhere), that means it’s capabilities are higher, which means you don’t need as many.

By: Bill

Bill — Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:09:37 +0000

Let’s can the F-22 and F-35 and spend the money on upgrades the F-15 fleet and A-10 fleet.
Maybe Boeing could develop an FA-18 E/F for the Air Force.
This would be reminiscent of the F-4 Program

By: Bill Ribblett

Bill Ribblett — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:02:29 +0000

Let’s buy about a couple hundred more F-22s to fill our air-to– air needs and turn all the
f-15s into attack jets. With the USA selling
f-15s to countries like Saudi Arabia, we may need the f-22’s to fight them someday.
P/S If the us goverment wants to put a box on my w-4 form to give an additional $10 -$20 a week out of my pay check for an f-22 fund , I will put a check in the box!!!

By: Mark

Mark — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:31:17 +0000

it not like the F-15s are bad planes for fighting. one accident in Israel an F-15 hit another plane and lost a wing in a training accident and the training pilot managed to land the plane at a near by landing strip. so they can take damage and still live.

By: JSAllison

JSAllison — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:49:08 +0000

Gee, so now that it’s become apparent that they’re not going to get all the pointy nosed single seat supercruisin wunderwaffen on their critical need gotta have it or we’re all doomed, doomed I tell you list it comes out that well, perhaps maybe we can upgrade some F15s after all, shucks whoda thunk it? I guess when it starts to become a choice between flying ‘mature’ airframes or becoming UCAV operators, things start coming into focus…

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:11:21 +0000

Good Morning Folks,
Before we start finding a new mission for the F-15C consideration should be given to fixing the structural flaw in the air frame that has restriced the F-15C from being “all it can be”.
This was addressed a year ago and found to be to expensive by the Air Force. I guess now it’s back the tradition of making once hot fighters ground attack in there ol’ age.
Oh well what was to expensive in 2005 is a budget item in 2006, unless of course the Air Force decides not to address the problem and let the attack pilots ride around in flying coffins, they wouldn’t do that now would they?
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
“Stewart’s Platoon”

By: DS

DS — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:47:20 +0000

Well, the way I look at it, if the F-22 is going to be able to replace the F-117 at certain Air Force Bases (which has been announced elsewhere), that means it's capabilities are higher, which means you don't need as many. No big deal if you don't get as many 'magic bullets'. The F-15 is an awesome performer, and it'd be a shame to overlook it in favor of new, 'whiz-bang' technology demonstrators. Hell...give those F-15's a RAM paintjob, improved radar, and arm it with some AGM-129's, and you're in business.