DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ships and Subs » F.O.B.s Afloat

F.O.B.s Afloat

There’s a quiet revolution afoot in the Navy and Marine Corps, a new way of doing things that promises massive leaps in capability. It’s called Seabasing, and nobody outside of the services seems to know anything about it.
In a nutshell, Seabasing involves grouping together cargo ships and amphibious assault ships into a huge offshore logistics and aviation base. Think traditional amphibious operations times ten, and sustainable for a month or more. Or think a huge Forward Operating Base (FOB), only afloat.
seabas1.jpg The idea behind Seabasing is to avoid the diplomatic complications of basing ground troops and aircraft in host countries. Turkey showed us back in 2003 that even seemingly staunch allies can waver at the last minute when they blocked the 4th Infantry Division from opening a northern front in Iraq. Seabasing sticks to international waters and grants us flexible, sustainable access to most of the world’s trouble spots.
Seabasing hinges on hardware, oh yes, but it’s mostly old hardware. In contrast to the pet projects of other services like the Air Force’s F-22 or the Army’s Future Combat Systems, there is no single Seabasing budget line to attract the attention of critics. Rather, Seabasing calls for using existing big-deck assault ships — the Tarawas and Wasps and their eventual replacements, the LHA®s — to support the aviation component, and San Antonio–class LPDs and Maritime Prepositioning Ships (MPSs) to support the people and cargo part. Lewis and Clark–class logistics ships, designed to support carrier battle groups, will shuttle between ports and the Seabase with fuel, dry goods and ammo. You see? Every piece of the puzzle has a traditional use that disguises its future major role in the Seabase. Clever, huh?
Besides the big ships, the most important component of the Seabase is what the Navy-Marine Corps team calls “connectors”. These are the smaller platforms that shuttle people and stuff between the Seabase ships and between the Seabase and the beachhead. There are some connectors already in widespread use in the fleet, such as Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCACs), traditional landing craft and helicopters. Emerging connectors include catamarans and V-22 tilt-rotors. There has been some talk of designing new tilt-rotors and air-cushions for the connector role, too.
Really, Seabasing is a concept — or, to use an Army phrase, a “system of systems”. The inherent modularity of the idea means you can swap new platforms into the Seabase as necessary. Want a larger aviation component? Add an aircraft carrier or two. Want more forcible entry in a dense air-defense environment? Plug in some submarines carrying SEALs plus more LCACs and Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles. Need to sustain ground operations against an armored opponent? Base an Army division aboard your amphibs in place of the traditional Marine Expeditionary Force. Is it a natural disaster you’re dealing with and not some rogue state? Convert berthing into medical wards, detach medevac choppers to the assault ships and maybe even add a hospital ship.
The possibilities are endless.
One problem: Just one quiet, lurking diesel sub could mean serious trouble for your big, fat immobile Seabase. That means work for flotillas of Littoral Combat Ships equipped with anti-sub modules, I imagine.
In March, Marine Commandant Michael Hagee addressed the Senate Appropriations Committee on the subject of connectors. Read his testimony …


High-speed connectors will facilitate the conduct of sustained sea-based operations by expediting force closure and allowing the persistence necessary for success in the littorals. Connectors … will link bases and stations around the world to the Seabase and other advanced bases, as well as provide linkages between the Seabase and forces operating ashore. High-speed connectors are critical to provide the force closure and operational flexibility to make Seabasing a reality.
* Joint High Speed Sealift. The Joint High Speed Sealift (JHSS) is an inter-theater connector that provides strategic force closure for CONUS-based forces. The JHSS is envisioned to transport the Marine Corps non self-deploying aircraft, personnel, and high demand-low density equipment, as well as the Armys non self-deploying aircraft and personnel, and Brigade Combat Team rolling stock and personnel, permitting rapid force closure of this equipment. Additionally, the JHSS will alleviate the need to compete for limited strategic airlift assets, and reduce closure timelines by deploying directly to the sea base rather than via an intermediate staging base or advanced base. The JHSS program is currently in the early states of capability development and has merged with the Armys Austere Access High Speed Ship program. Current fielding of the JHSS is projected in Fiscal Year 2017.
* Joint High Speed Vessel. The Joint High Speed Vessel (JHSV) will address the Combatant Commanders requirements for a forward deployed rapid force closure capability to support the Global War on Terror. The JHSV will enable the rapid force closure of fly-in Marine forces to the sea base from advanced bases, logistics from pre-positioned ships to assault shipping, ship-to-ship replenishment, and in appropriate threat environments, maneuver of assault forces to in-theater ports and austere ports. Army and Navy programs were recently merged into a Navy-led program office with an acquisition strategy intended to leverage current commercial fast ferry technology, and acquisition of a modified non-developmental item (NDI). Contract award for new vessels is expected in Fiscal Year 2008, with delivery in 2010. To meet the current and near-term Combatant Commanders requirements, the Department of the Navy continues to lease foreign built vessels until the JHSV is delivered.
* Westpac Express (WPE) is providing support to III MEF and other Okinawa-based forces, enabling III MEF to expand off-island training and engagement while reducing battalion-training days spent off island. Additionally, WPE played a key role supporting the Indian Ocean tsunami relief effort. HSV-2 Swift provides a test bed for research and development prototypes as well as an operational platform in support of current real world requirements. Most recently, HSC-2 played a key role in support of JTF Katrina, providing high-speed delivery of supplies, equipment, and personnel to ships and ports along the US Gulf Coast.
* Joint Maritime Assault Connector. The Joint Maritime Assault Connector (JMAC), previously known as the Seabase-to-shore connector, will replace the venerable legacy landing craft air cushion (LCAC) as a critical tactical level platform supporting Marine Corps assault forces, as well as joint forces operating within the Sea Base. In comparison to the LCAC, the JMAC is envisioned to have many enhanced capabilities, such as the ability to operate in higher sea states, increased range, speed, and payload, increased obstacle clearance, and reduced operating and maintenance costs. The JMAC is planned for fleet introduction in Fiscal Year 2015.
Marine aviation will undergo significant transformation over the next ten years as we transition from 13 types of legacy aircraft to seven new platforms. We developed a new transition strategy to better balance numbers of assault support and TacAir aircraft based on operational requirements. This strategy supports our Seabasing concept and enables Ship-to-Objective Maneuver utilizing the Joint Strike Fighter, MV-22, and Heavy Lift Replacement, recently designated CH-53K. At a distance of 110 nautical miles, a squadron of MV-22s will lift a 975-Marine battalion in four waves in under four hours. Similarly, the CH-53K will replace our aging, legacy CH-53E helicopter, lifting more than twice as much over the same range and serving as the only sea-based air assault and logistics connector capable of transporting critical heavy vehicles and fire support assets. An Assault Support Capability Analysis is underway to determine the optimal mix of MV-22 and CH-53K aircraft required to support Ship-to-Objective Maneuver and Distributed Operations. Similarly, the Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing variant of the Joint Strike Fighter represents a transformational platform that will generate 25 percent more sorties and provide a multi-spectral engagement capability for the Expeditionary Strike Force.
* CH-53K. The CH-53K is our number one aviation acquisition priority. Consequently, the CH-53K received full funding in 2005 and has reached “Milestone B” statusinitiation of system development and demonstrations. Our current fleet of CH-53E Super Stallion aircraft enters its fatigue life during this decade. The CH-53K will deliver increased range and payload, reduced operations and support costs, increased commonality with other assault support platforms, and digital interoperability for the next 25 years. The CH-53K program will both improve operational capabilities and reduce life-cycle costs. Commonality between other Marine Corps aircraft in terms of engines and avionics will greatly enhance the maintainability and deployability of the aircraft within the Air Combat Element. The CH-53K will vastly improve the ability of the MAGTF and Joint force to project and sustain forces ashore from a sea-based center of operations in support of EMW, Ship-to-Objective Maneuver, and Distributed Operations.
* Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle. The Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) is our number one ground acquisition program, and it replaces the aging Assault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV) that has been in service since 1972. It will provide Marine surface assault elements with better operational and tactical mobility both in the water and ashore, and will exploit fleeting opportunities in the fluid operational environment of the future. Designed to launch from amphibious ships stationed over the horizon, it will be capable of carrying a reinforced Marine rifle squad. The EFV will travel at speeds in excess of 20 nautical miles per hour in a wave height of three feet. This capability will reduce the vulnerability of our naval forces to enemy threats at sea and ashore. Our surface assault forces mounted in EFVs will have the mobility to react and exploit gaps in enemy defenses ashore. Once ashore, EFV will provide Marines with an armored personnel carrier designed to meet the threats of the future. The EFV has high-speed land and water maneuverability, highly lethal day/night fighting ability, and enhanced communications capability. It has advanced armor and nuclear, biological, and chemical collective protection. These attributes will significantly enhance the lethality and survivability of Marine maneuver units.

Share |

April 25th, 2006 | Ships and Subs | 3173444 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/25/f-o-b-s-afloat/F.O.B.s+Afloat2006-04-26+01%3A33%3A40hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Parthenon in a Pouch | NBC Reconnaissance Vehicles — Coming Soon » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Big D says:
    April 25, 2006 at 10:03 pm

    Nobody seems to know about it?
    The Navy has been trumpeting it for years! Seabasing and CEC are the Navy’s two big warfighting concepts!
    Heck, even the Voltron-ships (which have always somewhat intrigued me) have popped up in a couple of studies in recent years.
    Also, note that “Seabasing” is not immobile, since it consists of multiple platforms each capable of 20kts. A Voltron-style “Seabase” would be relatively immobile while operating, but almost unsinkable short of a nuke (which ISTR was a show-stopper for previous iterations of the concept).

    Reply
  2. Raymond says:
    April 25, 2006 at 11:57 pm

    Newport Papers #26 covered Sea Basing. Chapter 5 for those interested.

    Reply
  3. Tex says:
    April 26, 2006 at 6:30 pm

    Good systems concept, and I reckon it’ll find use.
    But between you and me, I’m not so concerned about countries like Turkey “denying access” for ground operations anymore. Unless that country has a nuclear arsenal and is ready to use it in defense of its girlish honor, I say we let the 4th ID go in paws & claws, up front, and then “clarify” access permissions, once the 4th has found a cozy spot to call home-away-from-home.
    Nations that “deny access” are the ones that deserve the 4th ID’s most special attention. Ya know what I mean?
    Total victory. Nothing less.

    Reply
  4. Harry Toor says:
    April 26, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    http://​www​.hscproject​.net/
    That site details a USMC connector. Doing a google image search by the term seabasing, the above site surfaced. Most of the links though seem to go into password protected and portal sites.

    Reply
  5. Byron Skinner says:
    April 27, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    First off I recomend to all to catch the new paint scheme of the U.S.S. Tarawa. It’s cool. I’m not sure of any practical value it has but it’s a change from the Navy’s traditional “peace time” “Fog Gray”. I guess this change finally means we are now offically at war.
    Seabasing and forward deployments are not new. This concept has two major problems though. First the Navy is telegraphing where any future conflict is expected, even al Qaeda can figure this out, strike in someother place.
    Secondly it is hard on ships and equipment. In the past when seabased ships have tried to play a roll in rapid deployments much of the equipment had deteriorated to the point where it was of no use and spplies had spoiled or were out of date.
    Condisder the above though, seabasing might be a way to use aging vessels at the end of there service lives. The Tarawa is schedualed to be decomissioned in 2011 after being denied a service life extension overhall in 2004.
    Regardless of what Adm. Mullen is saying the USN is contracting, his current count of 280 is just so much, well all you know the phraise.
    When the Kartina factor is considered even a Navy in the short run of 240 vissles is just a dream. Keeping these old ducks deployed as much as possable, with some new lipstick before they go to the boneyard might be the best way to keep up a Naval presence form an era of a hallow fleet.
    ALLONS,
    Byron

    Reply
  6. FooMan says:
    June 4, 2006 at 8:58 am

    for those you into some pretty accurate techno-fiction grab a copy of “Sea Fighter” by James H. Cobb. Also author of several other books including “Choosers of the Slain” and “Sea Strike” which involve curent naval topics including; piracy, mobile sea-basing platforms, and litoral war fare and platfroms involved in these. The somewhat intersting thing is that these books were all written at leat three year ago but are topical and factual to go with them good stories involved.

    Reply
  7. ?????????? says:
    July 19, 2007 at 6:54 am

    sdfsdfdsf

    Reply
  8. ?? says:
    July 19, 2007 at 6:58 am

    sdwew

    Reply
  9. ?? says:
    July 19, 2007 at 6:59 am

    dsfsdfewwew

    Reply
  10. ????? says:
    July 19, 2007 at 7:01 am

    sdfawerwrew

    Reply
  11. gwgold.eu says:
    August 8, 2007 at 5:19 am

    Guild Wars is being developed by ArenaNet, a subsidiary of NCsoft. Rather than have a continuous beta ArenaNet hold Beta weekends, where pre-ordered players and invited friends are allowed to test the game. This weekend was one such event and I was lucky enough to be invited along.
    I hope the site can help u
    http://​www​.gwgold​.eu
    http://​www​.gwgold​.eu/​g​o​l​d​.​h​tml

    Reply
  12. xuanlu says:
    October 10, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    2moons money
    buy lineage 1 adena
    sword of the new world vis
    lineage 1 gold
    tales of pirates money
    ge vis
    tales of pirates gold
    granado espada vis
    lineage 1 adena 2moons gold
    buy 2moons gold

    Reply
  13. lotro gold says:
    October 17, 2007 at 11:25 pm

    http://​www​.buy​-gil​.com
    http://​www​.ffxigilshop​.com
    http://​www​.lotrogold​.us
    http://​www​.lotro​-gold​.eu

    Reply
  14. fff says:
    November 12, 2007 at 1:33 am

    ??? ???,????? ????? ??? ????? ??? ????? ??? ?????

    Reply
  15. Pullers says:
    May 9, 2008 at 3:59 am

    I have some Gold secrets regarding Chinese farmer if anybody interested. It

    Reply
  16. ????? says:
    September 2, 2008 at 3:50 am

    ?????????????????????????????????????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? web????????? ????? ??

    Reply
  17. ???? ????? says:
    November 22, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    nero vista
    nero vista
    nero free
    nero 6
    nero express
    ???????
    ??????? ?????????
    ??????? xp
    ??????? ??????
    ??????? ????
    ??? ???????
    ??????? ?????
    ??????? ???????
    ??????? ?????
    Windows Live
    Messenger
    ????? ?????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ????
    ????? ??
    ????? ????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ???
    ????? ??
    ????? ???
    ????? ???
    ????? ???
    ????? ????
    ????? ????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ???
    ????? ???
    ????? ?????
    ????? ????
    ????? ????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ???
    ????? ???????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ????
    ????? ???
    ????? ????????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ???
    ????? ???
    ????? ????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ??????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ???????
    ????? ????
    ????? ????? ????
    ????? ???? ????
    ???? ?????
    ?????? ???? ?????
    ??? ???
    ??? ??????
    ??? ???? ?????
    ??? ?????
    ??? ??????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ?????
    ??? ????
    ??? ?????
    ??? ?????
    ??? ?????
    ??? ???
    ?????
    ??? ???? ????

    Reply
  18. chi1 says:
    September 10, 2009 at 5:09 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  19. chi says:
    September 10, 2009 at 5:13 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  20. binh says:
    September 28, 2009 at 12:40 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply
  21. binh says:
    September 28, 2009 at 12:42 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    Recent Comments
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Legalize it, with heavy regulation. There's a program in...
      Flapjack
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I have sadi from the start that the LCS is and always had...
      Dale
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Time to bring the hydrofoils,"Pegasus" out of...
      9190835
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Helicopters for reach, yes, but you can't...
      Brian Mulholland
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      "In urban areas, tracked vehicles have the...
      Ken
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Helicopters for reach, yes, but you can't...
      Brian Mulholland
    • D.I.Y. GUN TRUCK
      Looks formidable, I'd like to see a larger, more detailed photograph....
      K-Bar
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Toad – Precision rounds are not meant to and...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The flare at the end of the cannon is to reduce...
      dragon6actual
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      "The Infantry Company seldom engages target...
      dragon6actual
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage