DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Cruise Missiles do Recon?

Cruise Missiles do Recon?

cruise_takeoff.jpgYou can’t blame ‘em for trying, I guess. Defense contractors want to sell a bigger pile of their gear to the Pentagon. So, from time to time, they come up with all kinds of, shall we say, sub-optimal explanations why their hardware should be used more often. Like jamming IEDs with supersonic fighters. Or delivering commandos with 14,000-ton destroyers.
Here’s the latest brainstorm, courtesy of Raytheon: Use Tomahawk cruise missiles to handle reconnaissance. That’s right. $750,000-a-shot Tomahawks. Never mind the fact that a Predator drone can handle hundreds of spy missions, for a $4.5 million price tag. (For argument’s sake, let’s say it costs $45,000 per flight, when you throw in maintenance money and pilot pay.) The Pentagon should spend 750 large for a one-time, one-way unmanned flight.
Now, Tomahawks are certainly faster than Predators — 528 miles per hour, as opposed to 135. But we’ve got plenty of fighter jets doing supersonic recon already. And the idea that, somehow, a Tomahawk could be a “cheaper… alternative to unmanned aerial vehicles,” as National Defense magazine tries to argue this month? C’mon, guys. I know you’ve got sales targets to make. But this is taxpayer money here. You need a better explanation than that.

Share |

April 28th, 2006 | Missiles, Money Money Money | 318167 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/04/28/cruise-missiles-do-recon/Cruise+Missiles+do+Recon%3F2006-04-28+15%3A28%3A13david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 04/28/06 | Tongue = Battlefield Probe? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. John says:
    April 28, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    In a non combat or light combat zone the high flying Predators are the one to have, but in a combat zone a low flying hard to hit target missile may be a better choice.
    Not low cost by any means though.
    In Vietnam the Teledyne Ryan AQM-34L “Firebee” was used for low level passes over highly defended targets.

    Reply
  2. Phil Fraering says:
    April 29, 2006 at 12:46 am

    Then again, if you stick a parachute on the cruise missile you might be able to make it reusable. I heard that suggestion somewhere else, but I don’t remember where.

    Reply
  3. chaz says:
    April 29, 2006 at 1:24 am

    Then on the other hand, if you want to do recon in Iran then this works.

    Reply
  4. Murc says:
    April 29, 2006 at 1:35 am

    I agree. This is just a dumb idea.
    I know the tactical Tomahawk is cheaper then the original one, and can do a couple hours worth of recon before heading towards its target…But using them just for recon is just redicluous.
    sounds like Raytheon is grasping for straws.
    They should stick with the predators, they are (reletively) cheap and stealthy.
    I do like the skunkworks concept of the UAV with foldable wings that sits in a subs missile tube…that idea is far better then raytheons.

    Reply
  5. supre says:
    April 29, 2006 at 7:22 am

    So, developing new capabilities for existing systems is a bad thing and not a force multiplier?
    Could they be pressing for their company to make more money, yes. Are they doing it contrary to US interests, no! Such a device could be beneficial to the Navy in particular, especially during a shooting war or for covert missions.
    Use some freaking imagination in your “reporting” instead of using predjudice.

    Reply
  6. Christian says:
    April 29, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    I think that this idea stinks. There are other methods on getting information on targerts. I have done some thinking on what is trying to be done. Like everything else there are good things that are good and then there are bad things.
    The good things are the cruise missle is faster and there are no lives being lost. The bad are many, the cost for launching, and for a one way flight.
    I will go with the idea with putting a parachute but then the enemy will be able to track it and intercept the missle. All information will be stored in there.

    Reply
  7. Byron Skinner says:
    April 30, 2006 at 2:23 pm

    Good Morning Guys,
    Although this on the surface sound like another expensive dumb idea dreamed up by those who see more “Tomahawk” sales as a career move I see one major really major disadvantage to this idea.
    Lets say you are a country, friendly or on Predident Bush axis of evel list(s), it really doesn’t matter much, you see a “Tomahawk” flying towards you, is it there to take your picture or to blow something up?
    In view of the irrational and irresponsible behavior of the Bushes I would say this is a risk better not taken.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  8. John Doe says:
    May 1, 2006 at 11:07 am

    I don’t know. There is a bunch of talk about building some sort of reconn drone for subs. One that is resusable. Maybe reconn on a tommahawk most especially if it doesn’t take away its ability to do its principal job and can be self destructed when its end game isn’t blowing something up might not be entirely a bad idea. It would give ariel reconn to subs which could really use it. It could also potentially add reconn capabilities during its flight to a target. Potentially in the long run even lead to a loitering capability that could allow it to search for targets before actually attacking.
    While it a waste on the surface there are any number of reasons why it might not be such a bad idea.

    Reply
  9. starman2008 says:
    May 12, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    It sounds similar to the trinational Cl-289 drone, isnt it??

    Reply
  10. sa says:
    June 1, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    sa

    Reply
  11. sa says:
    June 1, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    sa

    Reply
  12. rappelz money says:
    August 1, 2008 at 9:05 pm

    The reality life is different from the game life. In the game, you can find warm, when you have different they can come to help you all. I also remembered once my number was stolen, although I find later, but my things were lost all. At that time, they gave me a lot of rappelz money to buy things, I was touched. I love you, Rappelz, the same as I love my husband; I have half a mind you.

    Reply
  13. buy LOTRO Gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:55 pm

    As usual, there are games to task; of course, this is no exception, because this can be upgraded! Thus the results and get more money! Of course, you can also buy LOTRO Gold!

    Reply
  14. Lord Of The Rings says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    And when the players arrived at five times, but also to their stores to buy music to play all kinds of music (on the map that has a place to buy guitar). You can also buy Lord Of The Rings Gold to achieve your strong!

    Reply
  15. Sword of the New World Vis says:
    August 5, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    I want to do then can do without my parents’ chatter. There is my opinion about Sword of the New World Gold.

    Reply
  16. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 4:00 am

    In a non combat or light combat zone the high flying Predators are the one to have, but in a combat zone a low flying hard to hit target missile may be a better choice.
    Not low cost by any means though.

    Reply
  17. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    By allowing players to combine up to three personalized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold delivers a previously unseen level of depth in character development and gameplay strategy.

    Reply
  18. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    By allowing players to combine up to three personalized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold delivers a previously unseen level of depth in character development and gameplay strategy.

    Reply
  19. 2moons gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:58 pm

    they often like to ask something about the players looks like, family, and in the game can earn how much 2moons gold, I do not know these people are playing the game or game play them.

    Reply
  20. kamas says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    I really want to know that do you really can forget me and forget the day s about we together to play and together to upgrade and together to earn the kamas, you really can forget

    Reply
  21. flyff money says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    from fear the beginning of the BB I to the present personal danger of me. I spend not only the flyff money but also my feeling.

    Reply
  22. flyff penya says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:16 pm

    the lingering shadow of shaking in my face, in order to play this game I spend money to buy the flyff penya, the BB again left me at the same time, same situation when I hard to get it, my angry can not use the words describe

    Reply
  23. cheap penya says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    Other players can, I think I can too, many players said that BB can let us get more flyff gold, if you do not have enough flyff gold in the game, and then you can not do many things, in the reality world also like this. But I more like through my effort to get the success, that success can let me memorable forever.

    Reply
  24. last chaos gold says:
    August 25, 2008 at 10:30 pm

    Like this I arrived in this group, the group was so lively, they also like cracking a joke. Maybe because I was a girl, the girl of group was so few, they all liked said I like you, and you get married for me, and I would give you a large of last chaos gold as the betrothal gifts.

    Reply
  25. ??? says:
    March 1, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    ???you love life?????????????100?????????????? -????????-??????????????????????????????????????????class??????????????happy line??????????????????????-007?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????

    Reply
  26. Araba says:
    July 11, 2009 at 10:37 am

    I think that this idea stinks. There are other methods on getting information on targerts. I have done some thinking on what is trying to be done. Like everything else there are good things that are good and then there are bad things.
    The good things are the cruise missle is faster and there are no lives being lost. The bad are many, the cost for launching, and for a one way flight.
    I will go with the idea with putting a parachute but then the enemy will be able to track it and intercept the missle. All information will be stored in there.

    Reply
  27. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 4:32 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.leadsoftstore​.com/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up?
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    Recent Comments
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      Actually, no! Our economies are not interdependent. We...
      rugerblake
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      You can bet the farm that those 150...
      BILL D
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Quote: "China would undeniably...
      Benjamin
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      How about we produce 5 more B2s and have it...
      BILL D
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      China would undeniably destroy all the...
      Alex`
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      I have an even better idea –sell them...
      BILL D
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      I would say that because Taiwan has 146 F16...
      BILL D
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Mainly because the Taiwanese don't...
      andercon05
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Go with the Euro Fighter. Obama will sell...
      Phillip
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Excellent article on strategypage.com called...
      WJS
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage