DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cammo Green » Hybrid reality check

Hybrid reality check

Despite 15 years development that has produced more than 30 different demonstrators and despite a lot of hype lately, military diesel-electric hybrids are no closer to mass production than they were five years ago. “Right now we don’t have a hybrid-electric vehicle targeting fielding,” says Gus Khalil, director of the Army’s hybrid research.
ShadowRSTV_5.jpgThe reasons are many. Despite advantages including modest fuel savings, power export capability, design scalability and flexible internal layout, hybrids are simply too expensive, too heavy and too fragile for military service. Batteries — or, alternately, capacitors — are particularly problematic: they’re unstable, finnicky in extreme weather and present enormous safety and logistical challenges.
In recent weeks, I’ve talked to hybrid programs managers at all the major U.S. military vehicle manufacturers. They all maintain the same line: hybrids are very promising, they say, but more work is needed.
Khalil says that the first mass-produced military hybrids will most likely be vehicles in the Future Combat Systems family, which should enter production around 2010. In the meantime, expect demonstrators like the HEMTT A3, RST-V (pictured) and hybrid Humvee to remain just that — demonstrators.
–David Axe
P.S. Publishers Weekly just reviewed my graphic novel War Fix!
UPDATE 8:58 AM: Noah here. I’ve been told by a high-level Army general who worked the hybrid problem for years that the problems which Axe details above can be overcome. But there’s an even bigger barrier to the new vehicles: Detroit. American auto– and truck-makers still aren’t committed to mass-producing hybrids on the level that the Army needs, the General said. (Look at their reluctance to make commercial hybrids.) Without their buy-in, the Army won’t have hybrids for a long, long time.

Share |

May 4th, 2006 | Cammo Green, Ground Vehicles | 319623 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/05/04/hybrid-reality-check/Hybrid+reality+check2006-05-04+13%3A47%3A20hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 05/03/06 | Watch List Snags Fellow Feds » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Ben says:
    May 4, 2006 at 10:11 am

    Hummer, Schmummer—
    The Germans already have two no! three hydrogen powered submarines and are working on another one.
    http://​www​.fuelcellsworks​.com/​S​u​p​p​p​a​g​e​5​0​3​3​.​h​tml

    Reply
  2. Moose says:
    May 4, 2006 at 1:17 pm

    The German subs don’t have to worry (as much) about compactness. Even on smaller European SSKs there’s more than enough room for the industrial-size Fuel Cells they use.
    I have to agree with the good General, GM and DCX especially are dragging their feet on Hybrids. DCX has been experimenting with FCVs for years, but they’ve somewhat neglected Hybrids. GM had that skate-board chassis concpet car that everyone talked about a couple years ago, but they still aren’t fielding any commercial hybrids. Of the Big Three, only Ford is seriously fielding Hybrids and working to expand their offerings. And while they’re well ahead of the others, Ford is still far behind where they could be.

    Reply
  3. Charles says:
    May 4, 2006 at 6:46 pm

    Sounds like comments mirrored in the last hybrid entry:
    http://​www​.defensetech​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​2​3​3​8​.​h​t​m​l​#​c​o​m​m​e​nts
    Besides, the only thing that keeps Detroit from jumping into hybrids for the USGov is funding for R&D and perceived lack of necessity. Tanks remained stagnant between WW1 and WW2, and within a few years of the war’s commencement the Germans began producing sixty ton tanks with a 75 or a 88, previously towed weapons now mobile and heavily armored.
    Going further back, the industrial principle of standardized parts can be applied to weapons. Eli Whitney was told to develop techniques for standardized weapons production by the government.
    Nobody in any other industry had ever thought of the idea, apparently. Muskets were custom made one at a time, each part fitted with every other part differentially. Whitney developed the mechanisms for standardized parts, which made mass production possible in the future. Without the government behind him, it’s unlikely anyone else would have made a try at it.

    Reply
  4. Dennis says:
    May 5, 2006 at 1:45 pm

    Just apply pressure! What do you think Detroit would do if we ordered 150 Hybrid RST-V’s from Toyota. Congress would probably never let it happen, using national security as their excuse. Toyota could make it happen in a timely manner with very little R&D seed money. I’m sure they could evolve their technology using their own R&D funding to come up with a solution that would meet our defense requirements and give them a healthy ROI. US contractors are too short-sighted. We have created a culture where we are focused on short-term payoffs, and our contracts incentivise this behavior.

    Reply
  5. Gab says:
    May 5, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    Aren’t the FCS line of manned vehicles Hybrid powered (whether turbine or otherwise)?

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    May 9, 2006 at 9:25 am

    Or maybe production of batteries is short, just like American refining capacity’s been short for so many years..

    Reply
  7. Art says:
    May 9, 2006 at 10:29 pm

    The FCS ground vehicles development is a total mess. The whole program is stuck in a requirements nightmare which has been going on for 4 years and there is no end in sight. The recent Government Accounting Office report also shows the program is a technilogical disaster with very few of the technologies needed actually being mature enough to used in the system design. Boeing is really making some terrible decisions here, and GD is dragging its feet as they really don’t want the program to suceed (GD bid on the program and lost). GD has their fingers in every vehicles, every computer, and every FCS radios — great eh? I’ve also heard the price tag on an FCS ground vehicle is insanely high, so high that the Army will never be able to afford to buy that many. This program will be cancelled — just a matter of time.

    Reply
  8. rappelz money says:
    August 2, 2008 at 2:27 am

    The reality life is different from the game life. In the game, you can find warm, when you have different they can come to help you all. I also remembered once my number was stolen, although I find later, but my things were lost all. At that time, they gave me a lot of rappelz money to buy things, I was touched. I love you, Rappelz, the same as I love my husband; I have half a mind you.

    Reply
  9. shaiya money says:
    August 9, 2008 at 3:35 am

    Your increased stat and skill points here will make your character the most powerful possible: 9 Stat points and 5 Skill points per level. You can use Shaiya money all items in the game, including the devastating Goddess weapons. However, this power comes at a cost: if your character dies, you have only 3 minutes to be resurrected or your character is deleted and you must start all over.

    Reply
  10. Birkita says:
    July 11, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Hi guys. Cheese — milk’s leap toward immortality.
    I am from Bahrain and know bad English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: “Dermal fillers take care of excessive sweating.“
    Thanks for the help :-) , Birkita.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Good Morning Folks, LM to DoD: ” Stick...
      Byron Skinner
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage