DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Armor » More Body Armor. Ugh.

More Body Armor. Ugh.

bodyarmor200a.jpgThe seem­ingly end­less drive to encase sol­diers and marines in more and more armor con­tin­ues — whether the troops want it or not. The lastest, Inside Defense tells us, is “QuadGuard,” a full body suit that’s been shipped out to about 5,000 marines in Iraq. There’s no men­tion of how many of ‘em are actu­ally using the things.
QuadGuard is made out of “Dyneema,” sup­pos­edly “15 times stronger than steel.” Worn with the stan­dard Interceptor body armor, it comes in two mod­els: QuadGuard IV is a one-​​piece. QuadGuard V is more mod­u­lar, “allow­ing marines to remove some parts of the equip­ment if they are not nec­es­sary.” Total weight: about nine and a half pounds. That’s on top of the approx­i­mately 42 pounds taken up by fully-​​loaded Interceptor gear, and the 5–6 pounds for the newly-​​required, side and shoul­der guards. (Let’s not even get into that crazy facial armor or the moon suit.)
Designed by researchers at Oklahoma State University, with some Naval Research Lab cash, QuadGuard has the poten­tial to “reduce fatal­i­ties by 10% and seri­ous injuries by 30–40%,” its back­ers claim. Of course, there’s men­tion of how many of those ben­e­fits will be given back, with the addi­tional heat, weight, and loss of mobil­ity that comes with all that extra gear. Could this help some ultra-​​exposed troops? Sure. Let’s just hope the higher-​​ups don’t start forc­ing every­one on patrol to stop wear­ing ‘em. Especially not when the Iraqi sum­mer is start­ing to kick in, and tem­per­a­tures start climb­ing into the high 130’s. As Sgt. Eric Daniel noted a few months back:

Something folks don’t take into con­sid­er­a­tion is the trade­offs asso­ci­ated with wear­ing addi­tional armor. Just before I rotated out, we were get­ting issued the DAPS (del­toid aux­il­iary something-​​or-​​other…) and the “space marine” shoul­der pads. While these offered addi­tional pro­tec­tion to the side of the chest and shoul­ders (from small arms fire and small frag­ments) they were so cum­ber­some to wear that you were effec­tively immo­bile while wear­ing them. In fact, it was so bulky that I could not put it on and then climb through the tur­rets on the LMTVs and HUMVEES; I had to put the armor on top of the vehi­cle, get in the tur­ret, and then suit up. Furthermore, while my small arms pro­tec­tion may have gone up, I was a dead man when it came to vehi­cle roll overs or sur­viv­ing an IED/​VBIED blast. This is just with the DAPS/​ shoul­der armor, mind you. Now they’re talk­ing about equip­ping gun­ners with entire ensem­bles of kevlar armor (com­plete with portable AC sys­tems). That’s just insane.

UPDATE 7:42 AM: Inside Defense also passes along another inter­est­ing tid­bit. Just six weeks ago, the Army said that any sol­dier caught wear­ing Dragon Skin body armor “would have to turn it in and have it replaced with autho­rized gear.” Now, ser­vice offi­cials are going to put the bal­ly­hooed pro­tec­tive equip­ment through a week­long series of tests, “to help the Army deter­mine if the body armor meets the Armys stan­dards.“
UPDATE 9:36 AM: Murdoc has more on the moon suit.

Share |

May 11th, 2006 | Armor | 321223 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/05/11/more-body-armor-ugh/More+Body+Armor.++Ugh.2006-05-11+11%3A57%3A08david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 05/​10/​06 | “Every Call Ever Made” in NSA Database » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JSAllison says:
    May 11, 2006 at 9:07 am

    Next step, pow­ered exoskeletons…or the ter­ror­ists will have won.

    Reply
  2. steve says:
    May 11, 2006 at 4:40 pm

    The facial armor is NOT stu­pid, only it’s use can be. If you’re a gun­ner in a Humvee tur­ret, you’d best be wear­ing all the armor you can. Listening to the troops com­plaints can be detri­men­tal, bitch­ing amongst troops is an insti­tu­tional tra­di­tion.
    Personally, I’ve always wanted to see body armor designed more like hockey gear. Since it’s already designed to allow great free­dom of move­ment, the only change would be the mate­ri­als. Our only imped­i­ment to this is get­ting the pow­ers that be to fund it.

    Reply
  3. Sloane says:
    May 11, 2006 at 6:59 pm

    I stumped at the fact that the boys back at the labs have not thought of some­thing a bit more durable than this tack­ling dummy out­fit.
    Who in their right mind would think you can strap on 40+ pounds of armor and not get hot? Possibly become a heat casu­alty in a short amount of time.
    The U.S. can build bil­lion dol­lar “stealth” bombers, multi-​​billion dol­lar Aircraft car­ri­ers, put peo­ple in space, and send them a mile and half to the ocean floor but can­not get the typ­i­cal Infantry guy a decent vehi­cle, high power assault rifle, or a well thought out suit of armor.
    As silly as it may sound take the fol­low­ing peo­ple and put them in a room. A guy who designs cos­tumes for movies, A guy who makes full suit of old style steel armor, a guy who designs small refrig­er­a­tion sys­tems and some­one that is knowl­edge­able in mate­ri­als that stop bul­lets.
    So heres what ya got, The movie guy fig­ures out how the suit best looks and func­tions, the armor guy fig­ures out the proper fit and best way to cover the body, The refrig­er­a­tion guy makes a small unit that cools the suit keep­ing the sol­dier cool in com­bat, and the mate­r­ial guy fig­ures out how to make it all bul­let a frag­men­ta­tion proof, along with being light weight.

    Reply
  4. EmporerMing says:
    May 11, 2006 at 10:14 pm

    Actually exoskele­tons with “assisted” mobil­ity would work. Provide just the added lift to com­pen­sate for one to carry 75lbs of armor/​gear. Making it strong enough to carry any extra gear but need­ing the sol­dier to lift any­thing above that 75lbs.
    I would Consider that a more log­i­cal step in tech­nol­ogy than any “mule”.
    What the indi­vid­ual has is the cen­ter­piece of what­ever sys­tem of sys­tems your going to fight your fight with.

    Reply
  5. Kevin says:
    May 12, 2006 at 12:43 am

    Be inter­est­ing to see if Pinnacle’s Murray Neal fig­ures out a way to scut­tle the test, like his para­noid threats a few weeks ago. It sure sounds good, but I’m sort of sus­pi­cious of any body armor that claims to stop AP rifle bul­lets that some­how is only NIJ cer­ti­fied at IIIA. Pinnacle has lots of flashy mar­ket­ing videos avail­able but a strik­ing absence of test results.
    We shall see.

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    May 12, 2006 at 4:20 pm

    Sloan says:
    “As silly as it may sound take the fol­low­ing peo­ple and put them in a room. A guy who designs cos­tumes for movies, A guy who makes full suit of old style steel armor, a guy who designs small refrig­er­a­tion sys­tems and some­one that is knowl­edge­able in mate­ri­als that stop bul­lets.
    So heres what ya got, The movie guy fig­ures out how the suit best looks and func­tions, the armor guy fig­ures out the proper fit and best way to cover the body, The refrig­er­a­tion guy makes a small unit that cools the suit keep­ing the sol­dier cool in com­bat, and the mate­r­ial guy fig­ures out how to make it all bul­let a frag­men­ta­tion proof, along with being light weight.“
    Refrigeration means you have a heat exchanger with a water cir­cu­la­tion unit. A heat exchanger must trans­fer heat from user to out­side, so under low-​​light con­di­tions you might stick out on infra-​​red.
    Another prob­lem is bulk and vul­ner­a­bil­ity of the sys­tem to dam­age (we are on the bat­tle­field, remem­ber!) Most likely this cool­ing sys­tem is just a jacket placed between the body and the armor lay­ers. It’ll inhibit move­ment quite nicely. Imagine get­ting rolls of blan­kets and wrap­ping them around your arms, legs and torso. Now prac­tice climb­ing fences, duck­ing from ran­dom mor­tar attacks and crawl­ing around. Then try com­pet­ing with some­one while doing those tasks.
    Next off is weight. Water is heavy, at 1 gram per liter and one kilo­gram per liter. How many liters of water will this sys­tem be, dis­trib­uted on the shoul­ders and back, or worse, legs? Army sol­diers today are fairly slow as light infantry…the num­ber given is around 1 mph or less.
    “mate­r­ial guy fig­ures out how to make it all bul­let a frag­men­ta­tion proof, along with being light weight“
    Bullet proof is /​not/​ a real­ity with­out using ceram­ics, which in turn are pretty much sin­gle use and shat­ter on a sin­gle hit. Fragmentation proof and low-​​vel bul­let proof is what the vest really is for.
    The real prob­lem with this armor is weight and weight dis­tri­b­u­tion. It’s heavy and you can’t just say “mate­r­ial guy make thing light weight”, which bor­ders on just wish­ing the prob­lem away.

    Reply
  7. Punisher1 says:
    June 1, 2006 at 9:23 pm

    Seems you got this all wrapped up buddy.….(not really)
    The prob­lem with Chuck here is that he’s a bit behind the times, but thats ok. For one cov­er­ing your­self in ceramic armor is not very smart. For obvi­ous rea­sons, there have been many improve­ments in mate­ri­als that stop bul­lets all of them are lighter than the 1/​2 inch chunk of plate(s) they place in a vest. Most of this infor­ma­tion is hard to find, how­ever its out there, ya just got to look around­Chuck.
    You need to reg­u­late the tem­per­a­ture to the human body, thats a sim­ple fact. So lets break it down so Chuck here, gets it. Compare a two mile run on a cool day say 72–74 degrees ver­sus a hot day of say, 96 degrees and high humid­ity. For most of us that have actu­ally been in the mil­i­tary we know what this is like. We would pre­fer the run in the 70 degree range ver­sus the later. The cool­ing sys­tem can use var­i­ous types of fluid who said any­thing about water? Let alone using sev­eral liters of it. Using some com­mon knowl­edge of your anatomy you should know what gets hot. Also where you blood flows and where cool­ing cer­tain areas would cool the rest of your body. No need for gal­lons of water here Chuck.
    Now we go into other issues like weight, ya, as an Infantry sol­dier at one time, my gear weighted over 80 pounds. But now things are dif­fer­ent doc­trine is chang­ing and the days of hump­ing all over the place are going to be over. Soldiers will ride to com­bat areas and deploy over a short time and then return after the mis­sion is over. Even with­out the vehi­cles being some what bul­let and bomb proof is bet­ter than being dead. Better yet if the suit is envi­ron­men­tally sealed (NBC proof would be a plus) there no need for a tent.
    With the push for the Future Warrior system(s) the sol­dier is going to be car­ry­ing plenty of elec­tron­ics and bat­ter­ies and less non essen­tial gear. Years ago we packed more food and water than ammo, today with lessons learned the hard way things have changed. Our troops are fight­ing a dif­fer­ent war than our Father and Grandfathers.Chuck.

    Reply
  8. not important says:
    June 6, 2006 at 4:14 am

    i think its obvi­ous that effec­tive plate armor that extends blow the elbows is at least a decade away. this armored leg crap is even worse. it might sound silly but i think that we will even­tu­ally go the same rought that medevil armor­ers went and move towards a armadil­loed skirt for pro­tec­tion of the legs. any­one seen any­thing like this?

    Reply
  9. Jon Flynn says:
    September 2, 2006 at 11:15 am

    Instead of dis­count­ing the opin­ions of the troops in the field as bitch­ing, why not use them to help deve­l­ope new armor sys­tems. A team of engi­neer types to build the pro­to­types, and a team of recent vet­er­ans to test. I volu­teer. I’m less than a year out of the desert and if you haven’t spent the bet­ter part of a year liv­ing in armor day in and day out, in the heat, try­ing to oper­ate, you don’t really get it.

    Reply
  10. Allimar says:
    October 29, 2006 at 11:36 pm

    With all these attempts on body armor, why don

    Reply
  11. Cameron says:
    November 16, 2006 at 11:28 am

    where can one get leg pro­tec­tion? From the knees and up to bot­tom of vest? Please point me in the right direc­tion. I am in iraq right now.
    Thanks cameron
    cameron.​roberts@​us.​army.​mil

    Reply
  12. Matthew A. Sonner says:
    December 10, 2006 at 3:29 pm

    Cameron,
    Please visit my site at http://​www​.tacarm​.com were you can order Shrapnel Shield Ballistic Inserts that fit into the elbow and knee pock­ets of your Army Combat Uniform (ACU).
    They will stop frag­ments with bal­lis­tic char­ac­ter­is­tics sim­i­lar to a .44 Magnum pis­tol round and weigh only 7.3 ounces each.
    They are flex­i­ble and com­fort­able and will replace the need for you to wear non-​​ballistic strap-​​on pads.
    I will send them Priority Mail and you should receive them in around 2 weeks
    I can cus­tom make the upper leg Shrapnel Shield Ballistic Inserts for you that will give you pro­tec­tion from frag­ments sim­i­lar to bul­lets fired from a .38 pis­tol.
    I will also pro­vide the ACU fab­ric and Velcro so you can have a tai­lor on your FOB con­vert your ACUs so you can eas­ily insert or remove the upper leg inserts from your trousers.
    I am the inven­tor of the Patent Pending Ballistic Combat Uniform which also offers bal­lis­tic pro­tec­tion for your lower back, hips upper legs and shins.
    I wore the BCU in Iraq dur­ing 2004 while serv­ing with the First Infantry Division.
    Retired after 23 years to include ser­vice in the Ranger Regiment and Special Forces, I believe you will be impressed.
    I can also pro­vide BCU upgrade kits for Marines and Airmen to con­vert their uni­forms.
    Send me an email at tacarm@​aol.​com and let me know what you need.
    Sincerely,
    Matt Sonner
    President
    Tacarm, LLC

    Reply
  13. Tybie Eidson says:
    January 17, 2007 at 11:09 am

    I under­stand your anx­i­ety about more armor. It does add weight and heat and it may limit your mobil­ity to some extent, but it is not meant for every­one in every sit­u­a­tion. I sug­gest that you try it out though before you get to upset about it and tell every­one that it isn’t good.

    Reply
  14. Allan Bain says:
    May 12, 2007 at 12:45 am

    Hey Matt,
    I was look­ing at your suit, pretty cool, hey, how would you like to try mak­ing it with Evo-​​Flex 500 denier and or 840 denier Twaron.
    Allan Bain

    Reply
  15. Edward says:
    May 16, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    Hey Matt don’t lis­ten to Mr.Bain. Keep char­gin’ for­ward on your idea because it sounds very good. As to Allan Bain, don’t try to polute other peo­ples ideas just because you want to make some bucks with cheaper/​lesser qual­ity materials.

    Reply
  16. Jeremiah says:
    October 16, 2007 at 5:13 pm

    thought tha mil­i­tary couldnt get cheaper or dumber. Wheres tha actual armor. I guess spendin alil money to save a sol­diers life aint worth it for’em. they already get crap when they leave so why do any­thing when they in there too.

    Reply
  17. Chris says:
    November 4, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    think Dragon scale is good but is quite heavy and does not take inceri­ble amout of hits maybe 10 at best. A newer amour from Defend-​​X is much bet­ter it is like hard plates in shape and size but thats were the sim­i­lar­ies end. I saw a video on you tube of it tak­ing 63 5.56 nato green tip rounds before even dint­ing on the back. The armour has two plates with some for of rino lin­ing on them and sand­wiched in bete­ween them is a bal­sitic foam. any way it looks like the best amour out there right now.

    Reply
  18. Bill Burley says:
    June 19, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    Guys, all the armor out there is inad­e­quate. As a for­mer oper­a­tor I know develop body armor speci­ficly for the Air Force Research Lab at Tyndall. I know it has been to you guys in the field yet, but we just made a full Level 4 vest that weighs 14 lbs. IT WILL BE OUT THERE SOON!!! I promise.. If any­one has ques­tions feel free to con­tact me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage