DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eye on China » Beijing Feeds the Hype

Beijing Feeds the Hype

In the last few days, China has voiced its dis­ap­proval of the new Pentagon report eval­u­at­ing Chinas mil­i­tary. The com­ments have been about what youd expect, along the lines of the Foreign Ministry spokesman that accused the Pentagon of a “Cold War men­tal­ity.“
But that didn’t stop Beijing from feed­ing the hype by unveil­ing an ambi­tious new pro­gram to enhance its capa­bil­ity to inno­vate, develop and rapidly sup­ply new-​​generation weaponry on the same day it was crit­i­ciz­ing the US for “con­tin­u­ing to ped­dle the so-​​called ‘China threat.’”
Sino Tech army.jpg The 15-​​year endeavor will include new and high-​​technologies for the space indus­try, avi­a­tion, ship and marine engi­neer­ing, nuclear energy and fuel, and infor­ma­tion tech­nol­ogy for both mil­i­tary and civil­ian pur­poses, with a focus on devel­op­ment of new and high-​​tech weaponry.
The effort to develop new tech­nolo­gies may run up against Chinas con­tin­u­ing dif­fi­cul­ties with fraud in its sci­en­tific and R&D com­mu­ni­ties, although the gov­ern­ment is also intro­duc­ing ini­tia­tives to con­front these prob­lems.
In truth, the new mil­i­tary tech­nol­ogy plan doesnt appear to mark any actual depar­ture from the trends the Pentagon report already noted this is new PR and pack­ag­ing, not new pol­icy. But youd think some­one would real­ize that its dif­fi­cult to pro­tect your inter­na­tional image as a peace­ful, sta­bi­liz­ing pres­ence the same day youre try­ing to instill national pride in your new, pow­er­ful, high-​​tech mil­i­tary. Maybe they should divert a few yuan to mod­ern­iz­ing their media oper­a­tion.
Its actu­ally been a rough cou­ple of weeks for Chinese spokes­men address­ing secu­rity rela­tions with the US. Last week, they had to deal with a Taiwanese sales rep for Lockheed who pled guilty to spy­ing for China and attempt­ing to pur­chase US mil­i­tary tech­nol­ogy for ship­ment to China. A few days later, they were crit­i­ciz­ing a State Dept announce­ment that none of the Departments thou­sands of new Lenovo com­put­ers would be used on clas­si­fied net­works, out of secu­rity con­cerns with the Chinese com­pa­nys sys­tems. The FBIs Chinese spy is still in the news as well.
So it looks to be a trend of hawks and pes­simists steer­ing the technology/​security poli­cies of both coun­tries lately. Not to worry our China pol­icy remains as mud­dled as ever: In devel­op­ments that are appar­ently com­pletely unre­lated, this month China (and the American Chamber of Commerce in China) asked the US to relax export con­trols of high-​​tech goods, and appar­ently that wont be a prob­lem.
– Matthew Tompkins

Share |

May 29th, 2006 | Eye on China | 19016 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/05/29/beijing-feeds-the-hype/Beijing+Feeds+the+Hype2006-05-29+12%3A37%3A27jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « What do you do? | Rapid Fire 05/​29/​06 (UPDATED) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Will says:
    May 30, 2006 at 11:51 am

    Why aren’t sto­ries like these on the front of every news­pa­per? China is posi­tion­ing itself as a mil­i­tary, and eco­nomic threat to the US. The only rea­son that they are not more overt about their ambi­tions is they still need the West’s money and tech­nol­ogy to advance their posi­tion in the world. Everyone should read The Art of War. It reads like a play­book for China’s present and future actions.
    The sad part is, us west­ern­ers are too used to the cheap goods that they pro­duce, so I’m sure that is the rea­son we are not stand­ing up to this omi­nous threat.

    Reply
  2. Al says:
    May 30, 2006 at 1:33 pm

    Well, not just the west Will, but China also has to worry about India, Pakistan, and Taiwan.
    Well, er, being an American-​​Taiwanese lets me know that China is attempt­ing to force a sur­ren­der from the increas­ingly crappy Taiwanese mil­i­tary. Glad to know that China still’s exe­cis­ing undue restraint for some jerk off politi­cians across the straight.
    I also agree The Art of War exactly the play­book the Chinese are using, but I bet that Chinese politi­cians mainly want to intim­i­date coun­tries rather than to actu­ally wage war. A lot of mem­bers of the CCP have been get­ting rich lately, and I think they want to stay that way.
    But if you are para­noid though, here’s a nice web­site to feed your fears:
    http://​www​.sin​ode​fence​.com/
    Of inter­ests are Chinese stud­ies that address how to both fight ter­ror­ists and Westerners by study­ing US counter-​​insurgency oper­a­tions via mul­ti­ple sources (prob­a­bly even through mil-​​blogs. A lot of Chinese elite speak excel­lent english).

    Reply
  3. Will says:
    May 30, 2006 at 2:11 pm

    I don’t think that China is iter­ested in war either, since they can acheive all of their goals much quicker with­out wag­ing war. That is one of the basic pric­i­pals in The Art of War. They may be build­ing up their mil­i­tary, so we will con­cen­trate on that, while at the same time they are secur­ing agree­ments with oil-​​rich coun­tries to sup­ply them with oil.

    Reply
  4. Wembley says:
    May 31, 2006 at 8:53 am

    Now look at it from the other point of view: how threat­en­ing does the US mil­i­tary build-​​up look if you are Chinese? Would you take it lying down, of try and build up a cred­i­ble military?

    Reply
  5. youbet says:
    May 31, 2006 at 7:10 pm

    Nobody wants a war — just the pos­si­bil­ity of a war is all we (the weapons deal­ers) need. Hey another cool mil­lion in my pocket is fine with me — I gotta have a planet to spend all my money — hahahahahaha.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage