* Drone video = Haditha key?
* Air-charter’s rocket stockpile
* Darpa goal: bionic arm by ’09
* Fewer secrets in ’05
* Nanotech means smaller ships?
* Lasers enrich uranium?
* Kiwi crystals of death
* Ft. Hood turns out the lights
* Wings could let paratroopers fly 200 km
* Owen West: Get over 2003, already
* Michel: Haditha “shows the warning signs of infamy… [But] we will not be party to generalizations and nave oversimplifications about… conduct in battle.“
* Pantano: don’t rush to judge Haditha
(Big ups: CC, RC, DS, Winds, AT)
UPDATE 4:19 PM: Haninah is calling BS on the laser enrichment story.
The Australian story about laser enrichment was a bit inaccurate (as often happens when journalists recycle press releases as “news”). Laser enrichment was proved technically a long time ago, it just hasn’t been proved economically (just a few years ago many people thought the US was about to start using laser enrichment on an industrial scale — see the two links below). The press release from Australia seems to describe some technical breakthrough, but it doesn’t seem to prove that laser enrichment will now be economical, so it’s not clear to what extent it’s really news.
Not you guys’ fault, it’s the Aussie journos’ fault.
http://www.uic.com.au/nip33.htm
http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=ma05boureston