DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Homeland Security » Coast Guard vs. Small Boats

Coast Guard vs. Small Boats

In an inter­view today with Reuters, new Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen dis­cussed an item that he intends to have at the top of his agenda: coun­ter­ing the threat from explosive-​​bearing small boats. From the story:

The United States must close secu­rity gaps that could let small boats packed with explo­sives slip into ports and stage attacks like the one that killed 17 men on the U.S. war­ship Cole in Yemen, the new Coast Guard chief said on Wednesday.
smallboat.jpg
Adm. Thad Allen, who took over as com­man­dant of the Coast Guard last week, said offi­cials had to do more to help thwart such stealthy strikes, which could cause mas­sive dam­age to ports, oil facil­i­ties, ports, cruise ships or tankers.
“Our own threat analy­sis and vul­ner­a­bil­ity analy­sis tell us there is a sig­nif­i­cant threat by vessel-​​borne impro­vised explo­sive devices,” Allen told Reuters in an inter­view.
“We haven’t put nearly as much think­ing in sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy and (gen­eral) thought into the small-​​vessel threat as we need to, and I think that’s where we need to go next.“
.…As one of his first goals in office, Allen is devis­ing a new secu­rity strat­egy over the next few months which will look at issues such as the small-​​boat threat, as well as the fea­si­bil­ity of licens­ing a broader range of boats or impos­ing exclu­sion zones around some high-​​risk areas.
Current ship­ping reg­u­la­tions, such as the United Nations International Ship and Port Facility Security code and related U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act, focus on large com­mer­cial ships, not the roughly 60 mil­lion U.S. recre­ational ves­sels.
There is no national reg­istry or national sys­tem of oper­a­tor licens­ing for recre­ational boats.

This deci­sion to focus on the small-​​vessel threat rep­re­sents a change of tack for the Coast Guard, which has largely focused, at least by all pub­lic appear­ances, on large ves­sels and sea­port facil­ity secu­rity. Addressing this threat will not be easy, given the large num­ber of recre­ational boats in the nation’s water­ways and their rel­a­tive anonymity, but I’m glad to see that Allen is not deterred by the chal­lenge. And I’m curi­ous to hear what he has in mind in terms of new tech­nolo­gies that might address this threat. The devel­op­ment of the Nationwide Automatic Identification System will cer­tainly play a role. But many of the tech­nolo­gies that have been devel­oped to address this threat are designed to be used in a mil­i­tary con­text and aggres­sively pre­vent a USS Cole-​​type attack — but these tech­nolo­gies are not nec­es­sar­ily appro­pri­ate in a domes­tic con­text. There are a few tech­nolo­gies out there that seem suited for the domes­tic envi­ron­ment, but a lot more R&D is needed to address this threat.
– Christian Beckner (cross-​​posted from Homeland Security Watch)

Share |

June 1st, 2006 | Homeland Security | 190917 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/01/coast-guard-vs-small-boats/Coast+Guard+vs.+Small+Boats2006-06-01+14%3A17%3A49murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Homeland Security Cuts for NYC, DC | Set Cammos to Vibrate » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Byron Skinner says:
    June 2, 2006 at 2:31 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    In prin­ci­ple this seems to be a good idea but, in prac­tice, well it’s sim­ply another case of good inten­tion gone bad it appears. Example.
    I live in San Diego and one of our local attrac­tions is a 5K Acre water park know as Mission Bay. Mission Bay is a rec­re­ta­tional only body of water. The only com­mer­i­cal activ­i­ties are Sea World and about a halh dozen hotels and a few sport fish­ing boats, that’s it.
    Last Feb. while vis­it­ing a friend who lives on Mission Bay on a Wednesday, dur­ing a two hour period, one to three in the after­noon, I counted eleven Law Enforcement boats on the bay.
    There was Fish and Game, Harbor Patrol, Lifeguards, Local Police, State Police, DEA, etc. Even the Coast Guard was there with a Partrol Boat with a mounted M-​​60 machine gun with an ammo can attc­a­hed in the bow.
    They were the only thing hap­pen­ing that after­noon on the bay. A rea­son­able cit­i­zen would assume that Mission Bay on a slow week­day in Winter didn’t require this much pro­tec­tion. There is over kill and then there is overkill.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  2. Scions Of Fate money says:
    August 1, 2008 at 11:22 pm

    The game is the only hobby of him. He would like to give up, in all of us com­fort and encour­age­ment. He decided to join us to play the new moun­tain, he was still play­ing knife, I also play­ing a doc­tor, and we all give him a lit­tle Scions of Fate money.

    Reply
  3. Archlord money says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:56 am

    I could not see my par­ents’ increas­ingly aging appear­ance. In my eyes only have how to earn more Archlord money.

    Reply
  4. eve isk says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    I was play­ing EVE more than a year, but I feel it was already had a long time, the feel­ing seems was many. In this more than one year I already for­got that I spend how much money to buy the eve isk, I already for­got in order to played the game how many things happened.

    Reply
  5. flyff penya says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:42 pm

    slowly my killed the mon­ster had a lit­tle advance, but I do not have the flyff penya to bought the medicines.

    Reply
  6. ronous cro says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    I had happy, sad, although we had falling-​​out but it did not affect our feel­ing, we together to upgrade and earn the cro­nous cro, when we had a small har­vest, we were very happy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage