DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » DARPA’s Secret Space Slingshot?

DARPA’s Secret Space Slingshot?

A Trident missile is not the only way of putting a warhead anywhere in the world on target at short notice. A couple of weeks back I mentioned the Slingatron, which appeared in a US Army report on possible low-cost routes to space. The idea of a giant spiral Hula Hoop, somewhat bigger than a football stadium and oscillating at about nine revolutions a second, may seem a bit radical to some people. But if you didnt know already no idea is too radical for DARPA. Budget documents reveal that they are not just doing studies. They have their very own Slingatron program , budgeted at at $3 million for 2006 rising to $4 million in 2007. Here’s how it’s described:
slingatron2.JPG

The Slingatron program will use modern engineering and physics concepts to accelerate masses to extremely high velocities. This mechanical mass acceleration concept, based on using centripetal body forces, is fundamentally different from electro-magnetic accelerators and hence avoids the limitations of those machines. Initial studies have demonstrated the fundamental feasibility of the Slingatron concept. This program will explore the concepts bounding limits and seek to develop uses for the technology within those limits. Included in this program will be studies of the key technologies that will allow the accelerator to achieve very high projectile energies.

The program plans are nothing if not ambitious, aiming to:

- Fabricate experimental launchers.
– Demonstrate mass launchers that range in capabilities over three to four orders of magnitude.
– Demonstrate mass velocities on the order of several km/s and perhaps higher than 10km/s.

However, a perusal of DARPAs latest plans showed no sign of the Slingatron. I checked with the Agency itself, and spokeswoman Jan Walker advised me:

“We did some preliminary investigation and results were not promising, so we decided not to proceed further.”

This could mean one of two things. Either the idea is too crazy even for DARPA, and it really cannot be made to work. Or else it does work, and the whole thing has gone underground, with a giant black program somewhere to construct one of these things. If a huge rotating structure appears in your neck of the woods, accompanied by occasional whooshing sounds and shooting starsId advise you to stay quiet about it.
THERE’S MORE The U.S. Air Force has its own ideas about ground-based space launchers according to this piece in New Scientist magazine. The work is being carried out by LaunchPoint Technologies who are working on an innovative magnetic space launch system. Its based on a sled which works like a maglev train running on a circular track. When it reaches a high enough speed — which might take a large number of revolutions — it is diverted off the track and off into space. LaunchPoint suggest that they will be able to put payloads into orbit for as little as $750/lb for their first system, perhaps later dropping to $100/lb, against current costs of $4,000/lb or more. Such a device could also be used to launch projectiles. The initial capital cost would be expensive but then Trident submarines are not cheap either, and they’re not so useful for putting up satellites.
– David Hambling

Share |

June 5th, 2006 | Space | 191814 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/05/darpas-secret-space-slingshot/DARPA%27s+Secret+Space+Slingshot%3F2006-06-05+12%3A25%3A12matthew_tompkins You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Al-Qaeda Attack Omaha? Fat Chance! | Rapid Fire 06/05/06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Vigilis says:
    June 5, 2006 at 12:04 pm

    Mr. Hambling, an interesting article. Let’s try to be more accurate with regard to ballistic missile submarine satellite launches, however. Russia has been doing this with some success for quite a while. Here are only two, recent links: http://​www​.nasaspaceflight​.com/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​?​i​d​=​4​513>nasaspaceflight​.com
    and
    Bellona

    Reply
  2. David hambling says:
    June 5, 2006 at 3:38 pm

    Thanks for the comment Vigilis — I’m glad you brought up the Russian subs converted to satellite launch, this very example is discussed in my book Weapons Grade. However, such a system will never be able to match the launch rate or low cost-per-launch of a ground-based launcher — IF one can ever be successfully built.
    That’s a big IF — but the rewards would be tremendous in terms of being able to put payloads into orbit cheaply. Personally I would say that the military are more likely than NASA to build the system that will be the stepping stone to space.

    Reply
  3. James L. Young says:
    June 5, 2006 at 5:02 pm

    General Atomics of San Diego, Ca. (www​.ga​.com) has developed electrically driven linear linear motors to launch U.S.Naval aircraft from their newest aircraft carrier that is in construction today. These launchers can be scaled to launch any mass desired. Power generation and storage needs to be scaled to match the launch energy requirements as well.
    Place such a system on the side of a very tall mountain peak, at the desired azimuth and elevation angle and you probably will have replaced the first stage of a mass launcher. The inital high altitude of the launcher reduces air drag as well.
    If the mountain is near a sea port and rail access developed, the launch rate could be significant.
    G forces would probably exceed what humans could endure unless the launcher were long enough to allow lower acceleration forces.

    Reply
  4. Tim says:
    June 5, 2006 at 7:24 pm

    Why do you act like it is a surprise that DARPA canceled this? As was pointed out last time you posted about the project, it defies basic physics. Even DARPA notices such glaring errors sooner or later.

    Reply
  5. Dyson says:
    June 6, 2006 at 2:44 am

    It doesn’t violate basic physics, but the risks are way too big even for DARPA. They’re not stupid and that’s what they will have been studying. The folks at http://​www​.slingatron​.com/ still reckon it works though.

    Reply
  6. David hambling says:
    June 6, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    I don’t think any laws of physics are being threatened here — DARPA and the US Army are not as stupid as you seem to imply — check out the papers listed
    here and The Spiral Slingatron Mass Launcher in particular.
    Then again, there were people saying the Wright Brothers had it all wrong too :)

    Reply
  7. David Hambling says:
    June 6, 2006 at 3:51 pm

    Sorry, scientific papers are here:
    http://​www​.slingatron​.com/​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​.​htm
    Especially this:
    http://www.slingatron.com/Publications/Linked/The%20Spiral%20Slingatron%20Mass%20Launcher.pdf
    On the physcis of using a slingatron for space launch

    Reply
  8. john of sparta says:
    September 16, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    closer to the Tropic of Cancer would be the most
    efficient. electronics would endure centripetal
    forces. bottom line: a private concern based
    outside the USA could win the X-prize by
    test launching in this manner.

    Reply
  9. abcefg says:
    September 7, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    We are saling different sorts of UGG products.We supplied the best sevrice and cheap price. Welcome to http://​www​.lastestugg​.com/.

    Reply
  10. nba2you says:
    September 10, 2009 at 7:28 am

    Basketball is my favourite,and I am interested in collecting baskeball
    shoes.Recently,I find a good website http://​www​.nba2you​.com, if you are interested in Basketball shoes,This is the best choice for you.

    Reply
  11. nba2you says:
    September 13, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Basketball is my favourite,and I am interested in collecting baskeball
    shoes.Recently,I find a good website http://​www​.nba2you​.com ‚it supplier many NBA Star’s
    Basketball shoes, such as Lebron James,Kobe Bryant,Vince Carter and so on. If you are interested in Basketball shoes,This is the best choice for you.

    Reply
  12. mbt shoes says:
    October 27, 2009 at 3:16 am

    mbt shoes

    Reply
  13. rockbily says:
    October 27, 2009 at 6:19 am

    Ugg boot
    ugg nightfall
    UGG Classic Crochet
    Cheap UGG
    UGG Sundance

    Reply
  14. rockbily says:
    October 27, 2009 at 6:20 am

    http://​www​.myugleahy​.com Ugg boot

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage