DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » Pentagon’s Space Spies

Pentagon’s Space Spies

You can’t pro­tect what you can’t see. And, right now, America’s mil­i­tary has a really, really hard time see­ing into space. Which means U.S. satel­lites could be at risk.
space_fence.JPGSo it makes sense that the Air Force is spend­ing a whole lot of money on “space sit­u­a­tional aware­ness” — get­ting a bet­ter pic­ture of what’s in orbit — before the ser­vice starts invest­ing big in the more out­landish tools of space war. Air Force mag­a­zine breaks down the programs:

The Space Fence is an array of dis­persed radars that track satel­lites as they pass over the United States. The Air Force is plan­ning a $275 mil­lion upgrade over the next five years that will con­vert the sys­tem to S-​​band radar, allow­ing greater search capa­bil­ity and faster revisit times. It also will sharpen the res­o­lu­tion of the radar, so that it can see objects from a cur­rent min­i­mum of 12 inches in size down to two inches in size. The radars them­selves will be dis­trib­uted over a wider geo­graph­i­cal area, giv­ing a bet­ter view of the hori­zon. They will be able to see beyond low earth orbit (LEO) to medium Earth orbit (MEO). [Col. Ronald] Grundman said the old hard­ware likely will be retired around 2011, because its reach­ing some sus­tain­abil­ity lim­its.
Space-​​Based Surveillance System: Planned to be a con­stel­la­tion of five satel­lites, the SBSS would oper­ate in in LEO to look at satel­lites and other objects in geo­syn­chro­nous Earth orbit (GEO), at about 26,000 miles from the Earths sur­face. SBSS builds on a mis­sile defense exper­i­ment launched in 1996 that looked for bal­lis­tic mis­siles using a vis­i­ble and an infrared sen­sor. The IR sen­sor quit after 18 months, but the vis­i­ble sen­sor has con­tin­ued to func­tion, now for almost 10 years, as proof of con­cept for a space-​​based sen­sor. However, Grundman said, We think its prob­a­bly going to run out of life at any time. A Block 10 ver­sion of the SBSS is to be ready to fly in 2009. It will be a risk reducer for the objec­tive sys­temthe remain­ing four satel­liteswhich should be launched between 2013 and 2014. The SBSS will be a visible-​​spectrum tele­scope. It will help us find things at GEO and MEO that we dont already know about, Grundman noted, as well as keep track of things up there that we do know about, and to get more fre­quent revisit on them. The SBSS will be able to sur­vey an area of inter­est a few times a day as opposed to every few days.
RAIDRS: The Rapid Attack Identification Detection and Reporting System is not a satel­lite, but a hybrid archi­tec­ture of sen­sors, comm links, and data pro­cess­ing sys­tems intended to ana­lyze the data from satel­lites and deter­mine if they are being affected by some exter­nal force, Grundman explained. Its a data sit­u­a­tional aware­ness sys­tem that ana­lyzes the data received at satel­lite down­links. RAIDRS detects elec­tro­mag­netic inter­fer­ence on satel­lites; in other words, its look­ing to see if our comm­sats are being jammed by oth­ers. Spiral 1 also will be able to pin­point the source of the jam­ming. By 2010, full oper­a­tional capa­bil­ity will be 32 ground-​​based, deploy­able RAIDRS with broad capa­bil­ity to ana­lyze radio fre­quency energy across many bands.Grundman noted that inter­fer­ence or jam­ming may not always be a hos­tile act. Its not that uncom­mon that we end up inter­fer­ing with our own com­mu­ni­ca­tions, some­times, he noted. However, its impor­tant to find a jam­ming sig­nal and stop it, no mat­ter the source. Spiral 2 will have more data fusion and more auto­mated con­nec­tions with space com­mand and con­trol sys­tems.
On the offen­sive coun­ter­space [knock­ing out enemy satel­lite] front is the Counter Communications System. Known as CounterComm for short, this project funds a series of ground-​​deployable jam­ming units, each with two anten­nas, set up in the vicin­ity of an area where the Air Force wants to inter­fere with an adver­sarys satel­lites. Operational since 2004, the Air Force now has three Block 10 sys­tems and, in the Fiscal 2007 bud­get, asked for three more. There are plans to upgrade the units to a Block 20 con­fig­u­ra­tion. Further details are clas­si­fied…
Grundman said he has noth­ing in his port­fo­lio involv­ing a kinetic [phys­i­cally destruc­tive] ASAT [anti-​​satellite] capa­bil­ity. Asked about ASATs that dis­able a tar­get satel­lite by spray­ing their optics or solar pan­els with paint, Grundman said, There have been some stud­ies look­ing at poten­tial con­cepts in that regard. Theyre some­times called coaters. And I think thats about as much as I can say about that.

(Big ups: NOSI)

Share |

June 7th, 2006 | Space | 19274 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/07/pentagons-space-spies/Pentagon%27s+Space+Spies2006-06-07+14%3A52%3A52david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Chertoff ♥s NY | Amish Gone Wild! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DS says:
    June 7, 2006 at 1:54 pm

    heh…yeah, good luck get­ting more info on ASAT’s. that’s ‘no man’s’ zone. i do remem­ber see­ing a cool video a while back of an ASAT sys­tem being tested out in New Mexico. it basi­cally hov­ered in the air using small micro­jets. really cool stuff. basi­cally just a test of space maneu­ver­abil­ity. i went back to find the video a few years later and it had been taken down, and doing a Google search for the video came up with zilch. :(

    Reply
  2. Maplestyle says:
    June 9, 2006 at 1:22 pm

    I thought the US had ASAT caba­bil­ity in the form of a mis­sile launched from an F-​​15. Because of the thrust to weight ratio of an F-​​15 it was able to act as a first stage. The mis­sile would frag­ment as it approached the tar­get SAT bathing it in a spray of BB’s.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Zandor, You're obviously and expert on religion and religious...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Cannon, please stop bringing relevant facts and arguments into this. The...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage