DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bomb Squad » Enter the BomBot

Enter the BomBot

One of the nice things about being editor of Defense Tech is that people occasionally show up at your apartment with military robots. Take last Friday, for example, when Bradley DeRoos and Alex Gizis dragged one of their brand-new BomBots into my dining room.
bombot_home.JPG600 of the machines have already shipped to troops in Iraq. Another 1800 are being built. And if the BomBots look more like toy trucks than military-grade hardware well, there’s a reason for that. That’s exactly what the things are.
Gizis spent several years designing bad-ass digital controllers for RC cars — the fastest of their kind, working in the 2.4 GHz band. They transmit drivers’ orders in a hurry. And the controllers send all kinds of telemetry data back, like engine temperature and battery strength.
It all worked so well, Gizis figured the military might be interested in some cheap, remote-controlled bomb-spotters. The current crop of ordinance-disposal robots cost $100,000 or more, he knew. Even the smaller, dumbed-down Marcbots, used on route patrol, can run about $15,000 each. Maybe, Gizis thought, he could come up with something cheaper.
So Gizis started playing around with Traxxas E-maxx RC trucks, to see if they could do the job. At the same time, some Air Force Research Laboratory engineers (working with the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division) were also fiddling with E-maxxes, to handle the same duties. But they couldn’t get the radios to work.
Eventually, everyone was brought together by the National Center for Defense Robotics. And within a couple of months, the first BomBots were being sent off to Iraq for testing.
At 15 pounds, 22 inches high, the miniature truck isn’t exactly bomb-proof. It doesn’t have to be be. At $5,000 a pop — dirt cheap, by military standards — the bot becomes a sound investment even if it’s blown sky-high after the fourth or fifth use. You could even imagine the BomBots keeping up with Humvees on route patrol, since the machines have a top speed of 35 miles per hour and a range of 1500 feet.
Now, Gizis claims the trucks are also going to be used for bomb disposal, as well as bomb spotting. And that’s a little harder to imagine — despite the nifty, six-inch loading bay, big enough to dump off a C4 brick. EOD techs tend to be pretty particular about where they place their bang. The BomBots don’t have the dexterity to pull off much precision. But for a souped-up RC truck, the machines are pretty cool.
Who’s that at the door now, I wonder?

Share |

June 13th, 2006 | Bomb Squad, Drones | 194227 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/13/enter-the-bombot/Enter+the+BomBot2006-06-13+16%3A01%3A46david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Superbomb — or Crapshoot? | Carter and the Killer » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. chicago dyke says:
    June 13, 2006 at 3:49 pm

    cute photo! i picked that up for our place.

    Reply
  2. kzemach says:
    June 13, 2006 at 8:00 pm

    Uh, MARCbots cost $7k each, not $15k. And they run on standard military radio batteries for over six continuous hours of runtime, not proprietary hobby batteries. And they don’t have the plastic bombot drivetrain that breaks in temps above 115F… like all of the first ones that are currently sitting broken in Baghdad. While I’m certainly a bit biased, I’m not as biased as this article.

    Reply
  3. thorn_stevens says:
    June 13, 2006 at 10:20 pm

    Actually, the new upgraded MarcBots cost $45,000
    You can see the contract listing at the bottom of this post on my blog:
    http://​robotstocknews​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​5​/​i​r​o​b​o​t​-​w​i​n​s​-​6​4​-​m​i​l​l​i​o​n​-​n​a​v​y​-​c​o​n​t​r​a​c​t​.​h​tml

    Reply
  4. Harry Moore says:
    June 17, 2006 at 9:49 am

    I am a retired AF EOD tech, retiring in 1978. We didn’t have robots back then, we used an airman as a remote bomb detector (just joking). It is great seeing all these improvements on equipment over the years. So many EOD techs from all branches are being maimed and killed in Iraq and Afganistan. You guys are my hereos.

    Reply
  5. smith says:
    June 17, 2006 at 11:37 am

    Not surprising that a heat tolerance problem never crossed the minds of these geeks. Since they spend their entire lives in air conditioned comfort.

    Reply
  6. Luanne says:
    June 17, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    The bots are an answer to grandmas’ prayers. Hoorah!

    Reply
  7. kaden says:
    June 17, 2006 at 2:24 pm

    this thing rocks!!!!!!!!i cant wait to be in the air force!!!! thank you military​.com

    Reply
  8. kaden says:
    June 17, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    air force guys are my heros!!!!!!!!!!!the air force rocks and so do the tecks!ty foryour souport in iraq,my dad is there so plz pray for him.he works in the department of def. thank you.

    Reply
  9. K9 says:
    June 17, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    So aside from retrofitting the plas drivetrain to exceed 130F temp this works! Wonder how it holds-up to 45mph crosswinds on station? Better still at 1500′ in the dark a sound emitter with cone might Play a Recorded 5ton truck racing along (especially with own battery pack). Telemetry controls for volume output. Hey,what if Go– Karts were better muffled to serve as stealth launch-mobiles? Why sound? Diversity of bot use to attract IED Triggerman.

    Reply
  10. Paul Reamer says:
    June 17, 2006 at 11:24 pm

    I have been wandering when someone would apply all of this video game experience and technology to something that is worth something. At $5000 a pop it is cheaper than some of the other units now in use, but I am sure they could be much cheaper than that and be truely a desposable unit. What ever happened to mass production. These things should be ubiquitous in the war zones, anywhere our young men and women are serving. This is the United States for God sakes we should have the newest and the best cutting edge gadets and tecnology for our fighting men and women.

    Reply
  11. Bryan says:
    June 18, 2006 at 9:56 pm

    Now lets program these bots to actively scan and map and follow a hummer convoy to record and track down the enemy for us. The video would be used to learn the enemy’s tactics for the next run. The software to run these 4x4’s would be little more than sophisticated vacuum bots available at WalMart. There are plenty of smart Marines who could program it, that is if Microsoft isnt interested in the contract.
    Bryan D. Moszer

    Reply
  12. EOD3MC says:
    June 19, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    In Response to Mr? Smith’s comments regarding the air conditioned comfort of “us” geeks. If the shade of a plywood building in Iraq constitutes air conditioned comfort, then I would have to agree with your comment.

    Reply
  13. Mike Ferrante says:
    June 20, 2006 at 3:18 am

    Actually we are not the first to come accross this idea. Early last year I was in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I was working as a contractor to the US Army for REF (Rapid Equipping Force). This is a small division that is responsible for engineering solutions, and introducing new technology to the battle field. One day a couple of gentlemen came in with these trucks. They introduced themselves as EOD (US, Canadian, and one other of our coalition forces Ukrainian — I think). They were really excited about these trucks. One of the vehicles the Canadians brought forth was even capable of firing a 308 catridge powered water cannon.
    At the time this was still very experimental technology, and it was passed off as such (boys with toys). The REF was focused more on body armor antennas, FOB camera systems, personnel born IED full body X-Ray scanners (for which was my purpose in life) and other projects of the time. This did stick with me however; and I began testing/toyig with the idea more upon my return back to home last November. I have attained a lot of knowledge about these RC’s since then. Does anyone know who is now leading this project from the US side? I would like to get more involved as there is a lot of very serious potential with this technology.
    My hat comes off to those who have continued to push this type of project forward since the end of 2005. Anything to assist in saving lives is a really good thing!!!

    Reply
  14. Jon says:
    July 14, 2006 at 12:46 am

    these are not “little rc trucks”. The proper term is Traxxas E-maxx. These truck are amazingly durable and will work wonders for the Army.

    Reply
  15. K. Hudgens says:
    September 14, 2006 at 1:56 pm

    All great ideas…problem is if you have ever personally encountered an IED; the explosive blast is a threat EVEN to the operator of these RC vehicles. did you see the picture posted for the “BomBot” and the guy holding the remote control? Well IED will make all those disappear depending on the amount of explosives used in the device. Frequency jammers…might be more effective to explode the devices.

    Reply
  16. Bryan says:
    September 16, 2006 at 12:11 pm

    Forget about having someone remotely control it from the internet, program the buggers to drive themselves! They can do it much faster that way using software recognition functions and multiple cameras and sensors, a remote operator could never see or react like a properly programed drone. Nor would they work like a hive to map the area around the hummer/transport convoy. If you think the military is going to pay you to log in to xbox live and command a bot in Afganistan for an hour your on the wrong path. Last thing we need is for the military to recruit thousands of joystick jockys to secure the highways and byways of backwater jerkoffistan. To keep the military lean they need to automate it and record the data for later review. Humans would mess it up.

    Reply
  17. alex says:
    October 27, 2006 at 12:52 am

    seems pretty cool. defiantly worth the investment.
    weird thing is that right as i read the line “Who’s that at the door now, I wonder?” Someone knocked at my door.

    Reply
  18. Les Akre says:
    November 4, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    The Bombot sounds like a great opportunity to bring technology to the battlefield. As in past conflicts the US soldier is creative and innovative. The Bombot and its roll will evolve as our troops work with it. Despite any shortcomings it needs to go out and work so that it can evolve to meet the challenges. Bombot: $5,000 Iraq Expedition: $Billions Soldiers coming home alive and well: PRICELESS!!!

    Reply
  19. Thom Rutherford says:
    November 5, 2006 at 10:17 pm

    i wondered when you guys would catch up!!, want more precision? email me backand I’ll send pics of some of my hardware, also you missed the point on the loading bay, why not put an eject mech in it and drop off some C-4 with a remote triger on it, pop the bombs BEFORE they pop YOU!! sounds like you need an old bot builder like me to help out. please, give me a chance, I’m ex-mil (US Army) and the less body bags we send home the better, they are my friends too,
    ncc1776@comcast.net Thom Rutherford
    besides, Dell is boring me to death at their company…

    Reply
  20. Jim Breeding says:
    November 15, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    I do not know alot about these bombots,but what I could find out came from one of the partners
    on this project, as my company manufactured the springs for this project.If anyone has a little more information about these that they could share without breeching any security I would appreciate it.

    Reply
  21. JKK says:
    January 19, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    http://​angela​-grande​-fratello​.syigvz​.info
    http://​matura​-succhia​-cazzo​.qtrntu​.info
    http://​rivincita​-bionda​-colonna​-sonora​.syegvz​.info
    cristina-bella
    http://​grattugia​-per​-spatzle​.syigvz​.info
    http://​cerco​-contatto​-email​-ragazza​-asiatica​-napoli​.qtrntu​.info
    http://​giovane​-studentessa​-scopata​.syegvz​.info
    confessioni-erotiche
    http://​mini​-bus​-renault​-master​.syigvz​.info
    http://​film​-culo​-sfondati​-free​.qtrntu​.info
    http://​foto​-da​-guardoni​.syegvz​.info
    ficha-pelosa

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I will concede timeliness will never be satisfied;...
      TMB
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      RE: Mac, has the Air Force ever asked the Army...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Question…with modern equipment like laser...
      gmanaz
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      why don't we go to the boneyards and museums and...
      Jim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Why take American when the foreign one is better? Enough of...
      american1776
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Invade Mexico?
      kim
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Why is that the angriest...
      kim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Buy American!!!!
      kim
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      One approach to spotting road mines is an old...
      Max Friedman
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Gentlemen,from a...
      Roy M Brown
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage