DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Clowns Sabotage Nuke Missile

Clowns Sabotage Nuke Missile

On Tuesday morn­ing, a retired Catholic priest and two vet­er­ans put on clown suits, busted into a nuclear mis­sile launch facil­ity, and began beat­ing the silo cover with ham­mers, in an attempt to take the Minuteman III mis­sile off-​​line. Seriously.
silo-E8-gate.jpgThe trio — mem­bers of the Luck, Wisconsin group Nukewatch — said the break-​​in was part of “a call for national repen­tance” for the Hiroshima and Nagaski A-​​bombings in 1945.
The activists used bolt-​​cutters to get into the E-​​9 Minuteman III facil­ity, located just north­west of the White Shield, North Dakota. “Using a sledge­ham­mer and house­hold ham­mers, they dis­abled the lock on the per­son­nel entry hatch that pro­vides access to the war­head and they ham­mered on the silo lid that cov­ers the 300 kilo­ton nuclear war­head,” the group said in a state­ment. “The activists painted ‘It’s a sin to build a nuclear weapon’ on the face of the 110-​​ton hard­ened silo cover and the peace activists poured their blood on the mis­sile lid.“
This was all done while wear­ing face paint, dunce caps, mis­fit­ting over­alls, and bright yel­low wigs.

We dress as clowns to show that humor and laugh­ter are key ele­ments in the strug­gle to trans­form the struc­tures of destruc­tion and death. Saint Paul said that we are fools for God’s sake, and we say that we are fools for God and human­ity. Clowns as court jesters were some­times the only ones able to sur­vive after speak­ing truth to author­i­ties in power.

Guards responded within min­utes. And when they arrived, the pro­test­ers “ate a lot of gravel,” I’m told.
“The indi­vid­u­als were taken from the area and brought to the McLean County Jail,” the AP notes. “The three are being charged with crim­i­nal tres­pass and crim­i­nal mis­chief, both Class A mis­de­meanors, and bond was set at $500 each.… The FBI is involved in the case and fed­eral charges are pending.”

Share |

June 23rd, 2006 | Bizarro, Nukes | 1970293 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/23/clowns-sabotage-nuke-missile/Clowns+Sabotage+Nuke+Missile2006-06-23+17%3A21%3A26david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 06/​23/​06 | Damn It! ‘24’ Stars Meet Homeland Security Bigs » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Johnboy says:
    June 27, 2006 at 11:48 pm

    The Air Force is get­ting soft. I’ve met Navy offi­cers that per­son­ally had to eat pave­ment just for step­ping over the white line painted on the tar­mac of an Air Force Base. “On the ground NOW, sir.“
    It takes a total idiot to believe we were wrong to ever use atomic bombs against Japan in WW2. There was an arms race, with the oper­a­tive word being “race”.
    German Jewish sci­en­tists were work­ing on it for Hitler. They had to con­vince Einstein to con­vince U.S. lead­er­ship that this was a threat. (We have the let­ter.) It’s arro­gant to think the U.S. did the whole sci­ence in 2 years. These sci­en­tists merely came to the U.S. and con­tin­ued their work. They came here and Germany’s nuclear mate­ri­als were sent to Japan by sub­ma­rine as the Allied forces closed in on Berlin.
    YES. Japan was inves­ti­gat­ing high-​​tech weapons, includ­ing focused microwave trans­mis­sions (prim­i­tive death ray) and nuclear fis­sion.
    We chose to win. If Germany or Japan devel­oped the bomb first, his­tory would read dif­fer­ently.
    Study some his­tor­i­cal facts before repeat­ing what the idiot stand­ing next to you says. It’s like lis­ten­ing to Al Gore or an ex-​​wife. If you don’t know what you are talk­ing about, please STFU and go read a book.

    Reply
  2. Boris says:
    June 27, 2006 at 11:49 pm

    Canadian Beer Sucks!

    Reply
  3. Rev. Dr. Jon Mark Vermilion says:
    June 27, 2006 at 11:57 pm

    Thus saith the Lord who is not a paci­fist lib­eral: “24 When Israel had fin­ished killing all the men of Ai in the fields and in the desert where they had chased them, and when every one of them had been put to the sword, all the Israelites returned to Ai and killed those who were in it. 25 Twelve thou­sand men and women fell that day

    Reply
  4. Torrey says:
    June 28, 2006 at 12:21 am

    If some­body hurts you,you nat­u­raly expect the police to do some­thing about it(right)!Nuclear weapons are the United States of America’s inter­na­tional police force.Unless the clown’s/nuts don’t mind get­ting killed!

    Reply
  5. Brit says:
    June 28, 2006 at 2:41 am

    Quote: It only makes sense: there was no car­pet bomb­ing, urban war­fare, bio­log­i­cal or chem­i­cal war­fare until the 20th cen­tury.
    In addi­tion to the com­ments made ear­lier. You might want to check out the Sack of Magdeburg dur­ing the 30 Years War (in the 17th Century). An esti­mated 20,000 peo­ple were killed and only 400 inhab­i­tants sur­vived.
    Just because the Armies had to do it the old fash­ioned, mus­cle pow­ered way doesn’t mean that they couldn’t wipe out entire cities.
    Alos as these armies tended to “Live of the Land” they might not have killed the oppos­ing coun­tires farmers(unlikely but, you never know). They did make sure that they had no food…

    Reply
  6. Bill Barker says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:03 am

    Talk about phon­ing in your protest. Unmanned Minuteman mis­siles (once total­ing 1000, now like 500–550) have pro­tected the US (since ’60’s) dur­ing the Cold War, pre­vent­ing an in your face Hot War with USSR or China. In a way, pro­tect­ing the rights of these nitwits to comment/​protest things in our soci­ety they don’t like. But, break the law, pay the piper. Hope they get a $1000 fine and a 30 day time­out. I repaired electro-​​mech sys­tems on on sim­i­lar mis­siles in South Dakota ’76–80.

    Reply
  7. Andrew Th says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:37 am

    Where are the clowns…send in the clowns

    Reply
  8. Andrew Th says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:37 am

    Where are the clowns…send in the clowns

    Reply
  9. Defiant Infidel says:
    June 28, 2006 at 8:12 am

    Class A Misdemeanors For break­ing into and dam­ag­ing our NUCLEAR SITE

    Reply
  10. AF SP says:
    June 28, 2006 at 10:19 am

    The title of the arti­cle is rather stu­pid. They did noth­ing to the mis­sile nor the war­heads. This groups has played these assi­nine games over the years per­form­ing the same moronic acts.
    Back in the 80’s Danny Boy Rather was there with his 60 Minutes cam­eras rolling and made every effort to dis­tort and to demean the secu­rity teams.

    Reply
  11. Chris Loomis says:
    June 28, 2006 at 11:45 am

    I chased these jerks around the Oscar flight at MAFB back in 1985. They claimed they were ver­if­ing the location…like we would move them LOL

    Reply
  12. Vel Mori says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:52 pm

    And I thought it was just your pup­pet admnin­is­tra­tion that was nuts.
    Listen to your­selves: hate, anger, inse­cu­rity, bombs, death war. What a sad, fear­ful world you must live in. It must be ter­ri­ble think­ing your neigh­bour is either a ‘com­mie’ a ‘facist’, a ‘ter­ror­ist’ or a ‘homo’.
    Such a blink­ered, igno­rant view of the world.
    Like a petu­lant child.
    So pre­dictable and frankly… bor­ing.
    Like I said — make an effort to actu­ally read some his­tory — not the garbage that is shov­elled down your necks by your own gov­ern­ment and the fundys on the box.
    Revisionist? Umm.… I don’t think so. Read some Euro his­tory… Oh.… and the US gov­ern­ment knew that Japan were about to sur­ren­der fool.
    Finally… Why is it if the US is sooo good — that you always get caught with your pants down? Easy: You are too pre­dictable. Always have been always will be.
    You wouldn’t know good strat­egy if it bit you on the butt.
    I feel sorry for the good peo­ple in your coun­try.
    You don’t even treat your own vets with respect.

    Reply
  13. Noah says:
    June 28, 2006 at 8:21 pm

    In response to a num­ber of com­ments:
    KUWAIT was invaded by Iraq AFTER Hussein was given the green light by US ambas­sador April Gillespie. Old Saddam didn’t do much of any­thing with­out US approval (if you need to know just how quickly the US can turn on its ‘allies’, just ask for­mer CIA stooge Manuel Noreiga). Gulf War I was nec­es­sary to pro­vide the con­gres­sional mil­i­tary indus­trial com­plex with jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for con­tin­ued mil­i­tary build-​​ups, which were threat­ened by the col­lapse of the Soviet Union — the so-​​called ‘peace div­i­dend’.
    Hussein was only able to use CHEMICAL WEAPONS on the Kurds because the US sup­plied him with them. He used them against Iran, too, but you never hear a peep about it because Iran is our mor­tal enemy. Why? Because we installed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Shah of Iran after demo­c­ra­t­i­cally elected Prime Minister Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh and the Iranian par­li­ment voted to nation­al­ize oil.
    Under the Shah, oil money was siphoned off by the elite and the peo­ple suf­fered hor­ri­bly under a bru­tal dicata­tor and the SAVAK, the CIA backed Iranian secret police. The rein of ter­ror was such that the Iranian peo­ple over­threw the gov­ern­ment, with the Ayatollah ris­ing to power as a back­lash against west­ern inter­ven­tion. When the Shah, hid­ing in Egypt, was admit­ted to the US for med­ical treat­ment, Iran demanded his extra­di­tion for trial for crimes against human­ity. When the US refused, Iranian stu­dents fol­low­ing direc­tion from reli­gious lead­ers seized the US embassy and took hostages. The Iran-​​Iraq War was our ‘revenge’ for this act, and we sup­plied Hussein with all kinds of nas­ties in order to per­form these duties (see http://​www​.freace​.de/​p​i​x​/​R​u​m​s​f​e​l​d​-​H​u​s​s​e​i​n​.​jpg).
    MEXICO has lit­tle oil infra­struc­tre and is securely in our sphere of influ­ence. The mid­dle east is up for grabs and the real adver­sary is China. If we con­trol the oil, we can throt­tle China, or so the think­ing goes …
    As for 9/​11, that was sim­ply a response to US actions. Bin Laden was funded, armed and trained by the US to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. We left that coun­try a smok­ing ruin, com­pletely with­out aid or assis­tance after 10 years of a war that we spon­sored. When we repeated the action in Iraq with sanc­tions, weekly bomb­ings and so on for ten years while mil­lions of Iraqis includ­ing an esti­mated 500,000 chil­dren died of dis­ease, malun­tri­tion and con­t­a­m­i­na­tion from depleted ura­nium muni­tions, we gave Bin Laden (and many oth­ers as well) jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for their actions.
    As for TOTAL WAR, it is against the Geneva Conventin and the ideals that we as Americans are sup­posed to hold dear. The con­ven­tion is clear, no tar­get­ing of civil­ians, civil­ian infra­struc­ture, etc. Yet this hasn’t pre­vented the US from specif­i­cally tar­get­ing pop­u­la­tion cen­ters, water treat­ment facil­i­ties, power plants, etc. at any time since 1941. Doolittle’s Tokyo Raid was a clear vio­la­tion of inter­na­tional law. The only rea­son the US hasn’t been held account­able for such actions is that so far, we have been the win­ner in these con­flicts.
    As for NAZI GERMANY, I sug­gest you con­sider Dr. Lawrence Britt’s 14 Characteristics of Fascism at http://​www​.vet​er​ans​for​peace​.org/​T​h​e​_​1​4​_​c​h​a​r​a​c​t​e​r​i​s​t​i​c​s​_​0​3​0​3​0​3​.​htm and decide for your­self how many of them apply to the US today.

    Reply
  14. Capt Scuttle says:
    June 28, 2006 at 9:03 pm

    “The wordl’s super­power is? USA
    The coun­try with the most nuclear weapons? USA
    With the most chem­i­cal weapons? USA
    etc., etc.
    Who poses the great­est threat to human­ity?
    DO THE MATH.
    Go clowns go!“
    I read the above and just about fell over from the total lack of edu­ca­tion from this per­son. (or com­men sense…)
    Yes the U.S.A. is the worlds last remain­ing super­power at this stage of time “God Bless America” We are also the first ones that get called upon for any dis­as­ter that hap­pens in the world. And we do so (and give mil­lions and mil­lions in relief efforts) Without a sec­ond thought.
    Yes cur­rently the U.S.A. has a good sized closet full of WMD’s. GET OVER IT!! The last time we used one? Was back in WW2 for cry­ing in the sink! Granted we could have turned large sec­tions of the mid­dle east into a wal­mart park­ing lot…but we choose to have more restrint, and cur­rently do our best to avoid innocent’s get­ting in the cross­fire. Yes it does and will hap­pen! But we’ve got 2,500 dead soldiers..and we could have had ZERO if we just nucked the area.
    As for Chem Warfare? Give me a break.. While we search for the garbage that our ene­mys could use against us? We pre­pare shots…medical planning..vacinate sol­diers.. All using research we’ve gar­nered from chem weapons. It’s research! Not Weapons! There is not an ounce of chem weapon’s in the US’s bag of tricks…and there will never be. Research Research Research..and not using AirHead America or some com­mie that man­anged to get in print.
    I did the math..The cur­rent world threat? It’s not from the US by a long shot..Unless you are a terrorist…then just stay put..we’ll get to you in good time.
    Currently the biggest threat is the Islamic Terror groups that have a pure lust for death and destruc­tion. Canada just broke up a cell that had tons more mate­r­ial for a ‘home made’ bomb that would have made the Federal build­ing in OK look like a fire cracker.
    These looneys can be anywhere…living in YOUR com­mu­nity! And they can be ordered to set off bombs in a heart­beat.
    So give it a rest with the “Gee look how bad the USA is…” When it’s crunch time? Look at who comes to the res­cue!
    Good lord’n butter.…what I would’ent give to have a mass meet­ing with teach­ers and tell ‘em not to re-​​write his­tory in their own demented fash­ion.
    As Foamy the great would say?
    I’m DONE

    Reply
  15. Capt Scuttle says:
    June 28, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    “As for 9/​11, that was sim­ply a response to US actions. Bin Laden was funded, armed and trained by the US to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. We left that coun­try a smok­ing ruin, com­pletely with­out aid or assis­tance after 10 years of a war that we spon­sored. When we repeated the action in Iraq with sanc­tions, weekly bomb­ings and so on for ten years while mil­lions of Iraqis includ­ing an esti­mated 500,000 chil­dren died of dis­ease, malun­tri­tion and con­t­a­m­i­na­tion from depleted ura­nium muni­tions, we gave Bin Laden (and many oth­ers as well) jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for their actions.“
    Just to cor­rect the MASSIVE pant load..(I’d debunk more of it…but it’s been a long day).
    Let’s see.. The sanc­tions where done by the U.N. Who fig­ured out that Iraq needed food and med­ical sup­plies for it’s peo­ple. So they allowed Saddam to sell some of his oil for food. Remember that scan­dle? He was brib­ing the snot out of quite a few peo­ple in order to ‘get in good’ with the UN..so they would lift the sanc­tions fully. Here’s the neat part that was ommited– Saddam was skim­ming off the top MILLIONS of dol­lars intended for food/​medical/​etc… He built up sev­eral “res­i­dences” with such won­der­ful things as gold plated “Flush” han­dles on his toilets…He lived his life like King Dookey…while his peo­ple starved.
    Why some­one would blame the US for that? I hon­estly do not know? Saddam had the funding…he had the food and med­ical sup­plies… Prehaps some­one should ask that walk­ing pant­load why he let his own peo­ple down? Because as he was steal­ing mil­lions intended for the care of his peo­ple? He seemed to have more inter­est in hav­ing a golden flush knob on his crap­per…
    As for the rest? Such really inter­est­ing ideas and con­cepts? However not much truth to it…In fact I loved the part where you said the US gov­ern­ment gave him the green light for the first war. It must be inter­est­ing liv­ing in such a fan­tasy land.…

    Reply
  16. Jaye Debunked says:
    June 30, 2006 at 8:35 pm

    Hate to bust your bub­ble Jaye, but it’s going to take a lot more than three peo­ple with sledge­ham­mers to pre­vent that blast door from open­ing prop­erly. They could have det­o­nated a truck bomb on the thing and it wouldn’t have pre­vented the door from clear­ing the silo for a launch.

    Reply
  17. Jaye says:
    July 1, 2006 at 8:09 am

    Jaye Debunked; “They could have det­o­nated a truck bomb on the thing and it wouldn’t have pre­vented the door from clear­ing the silo for a launch.” And you would know this, because you are; A) a Fat guy sit­ting at a com­puter. B) a Fat Government Agent or C) a Fat Bad guy? Please pick one of the above. Thank you and please teach us more, I could spend hours lis­ten­ing to you debunk. Do you debunk UFOs too? Thanks and keep on rock­ing in the free world!

    Reply
  18. Noah says:
    July 1, 2006 at 8:06 pm

    Capt Scuttle: Facts are often incon­ve­nient, and may very well serve to sink your ship (which, judg­ing by your screen name, has already foundered).
    As reported in the San Francisco Examiner, 11/​18/​02:
    US ambas­sador April Gillespie to Saddam Hussein, in a meet­ing called by Hussein: “We have no opin­ion on the Arab-​​Arab con­flicts, like your bor­der dis­agree­ment with Kuwait.” She went on to say: “James Baker has directed our offi­cial spokes­men to empha­size this instruc­tion.“
    That such a dis­cus­sion would even come before the US ambas­sador clearly shows how much Hussein was under our con­trol — he wouldn’t act with­out tacit US approval.
    Whether the bor­der dis­agree­ment was ini­ti­ated by the US, encour­ag­ing Kuwait to slant drill Iraqi oil, remains open to inter­pre­ta­tion.
    Those who endorse the con­cept of ‘total war’ (such as Jeff) have no rea­son to be out­raged at the events of 9/​11.

    Reply
  19. Some Guy Who Isn't Fat says:
    July 1, 2006 at 8:06 pm

    Next time try using logic to responed to an argu­ment, eh Jaye?

    Reply
  20. A. Quickle says:
    July 3, 2006 at 9:51 pm

    And Clowns they are… Some folks have noth­ing bet­ter to do with their time. Obviously just a sym­bolic action, any­thing crit­i­cal for the func­tion­ing of that nuclear weapon is safely inside the silo under the blast door. The pre­vi­ous com­ment about the abil­ity of a hard­ened silo to with­stand a “truck bomb” is actu­ally under­stated. These silos were designed to still func­tion even if the area was sub­jected to a first-​​strike nuclear attack. How do I know? Been there, done that, got the T-​​shirt…

    Reply
  21. Jaye says:
    July 4, 2006 at 8:30 am

    Quickie, Gay who is not fat; They used Bio war­fare (Blood), Psychological war­fare (Clown suits), Unconventional war­fare (Vandalism) to accom­plish their mis­sion. Their mis­sion was to dam­age Government prop­erty, dis­credit the secu­rity forces guard­ing Nukes and make a big anti­war state­ment. Unfortunately for us good Americans.
    “Mission accomplished”!

    Reply
  22. Ex_SAC says:
    July 4, 2006 at 4:19 pm

    Stop the dou­ble posts.…. it’s annoying.

    Reply
  23. A Quickle says:
    July 5, 2006 at 11:45 am

    I went back and reread the entire com­ment log…and there appears to be a mis-​​conception as to just what these clowns “entered” and van­dal­ized. Minuteman Missle silos are not located on any mil­i­tary base. They are widely seper­ated (miles and miles apart) & located out in the mid­dle of some North Dakota farmer’s wheat field. All alarms and secu­rity are remotely sit­u­ated and mon­i­tored 24/​7/​365. You could drive past any num­ber of silos and never see them. 99.999% of every­thing on the site is located far under­ground under and enclosed in enough con­crete and steel to build a huge bridge on any multi-​​lane inter­state. The “per­son­nel hatch” that they “dis­abled” the lock on is a seper­ate under­ground build­ing that con­tains no access to the missle silo…just basi­cally the mon­i­tor lights (and absolutely no oper­a­tional con­trols or wiring) for stuff like the A/C…makes it eas­ier for the main­te­nance crews to check­the staus of the basic house­keep­ing stuff with­out hav­ing to open up the actual silo. Opening the silo; even when you have all the Top Secret Codes, the coop­er­a­tion of the oper­a­tional per­son­nel, and the actual cor­rect multi-​​million dol­lar equip­ment; takes almost a full day. If you step inside the fence an alarm goes out in mil­lisec­onds and the armed mil­i­tary response is on-​​site in min­utes. If they run into prob­lems, a full scale mil­i­tary response is there in another hand­ful of min­utes. NO ONE is get­ting unau­tho­rized access to a US Nuclear missle. The secu­rity sys­tem worked just fine. Clowns walked on site, played stu­pid protest games for a cou­ple min­utes and wound up face down in the dirt… Total cost to the overn­ment for repair of their protest actions.…a lit­tle clorox for the blood they poured on the door, a lit­tle graf­fiti remover for the paint, a lit­tle con­crete patch to smooth out the dings, two new pad­locks for the non-​​access outer areas, and a litle lysol for the 3 pud­dles of urine in the gravel.…
    So for all y’all wor­ried about “how close they got”, or “where was the secu­rity” etc… Everything was and is under control.…feel free to relax.

    Reply
  24. Jaye says:
    July 5, 2006 at 4:31 pm

    AQuickie, Geek who is not fat; They used Bio war­fare (Blood), Psychological war­fare (Clown suits), Unconventional war­fare (Vandalism) to accom­plish their mis­sion. Their mis­sion was to dam­age Government prop­erty, dis­credit the secu­rity forces guard­ing Nukes and make a big anti­war state­ment. Unfortunately for us good Americans.
    “Mission accomplished”!

    Reply
  25. Bill says:
    July 5, 2006 at 8:48 pm

    “All alarms and secu­rity are remotely sit­u­ated and mon­i­tored 24/​7/​365.“
    God help us all on February 29th.

    Reply
  26. A Quickle says:
    July 6, 2006 at 8:23 am

    That’s right Bill…you have exposed the fatal flaw in our national security.…every four years, on Feb 29th, no one shows up for work, no one is there walk­ing their post, pro­tect­ing all the sleep­ing cit­i­zens from the truly bad things out there in the dark.…
    “Truth? you can’t han­dle the truth!”

    Reply
  27. NORM says:
    July 8, 2006 at 1:31 pm

    What if they’d had just one shaped charge?

    Reply
  28. Anthony Quickle says:
    July 8, 2006 at 7:02 pm

    Norm, as stated before in this thread (please page back and read…), these missle silos can with­stand every­thing but a DIRECT hit from a nuclear bomb.… A “shaped charge”, of the largest size you could drag in, would not even begin to crack that door or silo. Trust me…you can’t dam­age the missle, the war­head, or the silo it’s in. Not to blame you for your lack of knowl­edge, this is not exactly din­ner con­ver­sa­tion. I do find amus­ing the folks that have asked about these clowns acci­den­tally set­ting off the war­head if they did actu­ally get access to the missle. Nuclear bombs are pre­ci­sion elec­tronic mechanisms…practically del­i­cate, and require a pre­cise series of elec­tronic and mechan­i­cal actions to take place, exactly as designed, and in exactly the proper sequence and tim­ing in order for the nuclear por­tion of the bomb to work. At best, some­one that man­aged to trig­ger the small con­ven­tional explo­sive charge con­tained in a nuclear device would only effect a small non-​​nuclear explo­sion (killing them, but prob­a­bly not any­one else…). One of my favorite Hollywood nail-​​biter moments is found in sev­eral movies…the intre­pid hero is faced with an armed and “count­ing down” nuclear weapon…oh my gosh…what to do…maybe he and his swiss army knife can suc­cess­fully dis­arm the bomb…tick, tick, tick…what to do.… When the actual solu­tion is as sim­ple as shoot­ing as many rifle or pis­tol rounds as you’ve got , or sledge ham­mer blows if thats all you’ve got, to the access pan­els, or the cen­ter of mass of the weapon.….Disrupt the elec­tron­ics, or the nuclear mate­r­ial mass, and you have no nuclear explo­sion.… As above, you prob­a­bly would have a small non-​​nuclear blast, but hey…you don’t get to be a hero with­out some risk.…

    Reply
  29. Blah says:
    July 31, 2006 at 12:01 am

    Repent for the atomic bomb­ings, ha! While tech­no­log­i­cally amaz­ing the bomb­ings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn

    Reply
  30. Anthony Quickle says:
    August 3, 2006 at 11:18 am

    Perhaps we need a primer on the con­cept of War. When at War with a declared or unde­clared enemy, your objec­tive is to elim­i­nate that enemy as a threat. We go to War against nations or iden­ti­fi­able cul­tural /​ eth­nic /​ racial /​ reli­gious /​ eco­nomic groups (CERRE) that bear us ill will, or in some capac­ity have evi­denced that they may be a dan­ger to our obvi­ously supe­rior CEERE. We, of course, out of a sense of com­pas­sion, decency, and a sus­pi­cion that the ene­mies gov­ern­ment may have duped their citizens…they really aren’t as bad as the guys in uni­form shoot­ing at us… we try to limit the vio­lence done to only those sol­diers and men at arms that walk upon the bat­tle­field. If that is not suf­fi­cient to elim­i­nate the threat, then the “civil­ian” pop­u­la­tion is also at risk. Eliminate the threat > esca­la­tion of vio­lence until it is elim­i­natd > supe­rior CERRE wins = War. Not a game for cry­babys.
    Don’t want to have your CERRE pos­si­bly destroyed? Then don’t go to War against a supe­rior cul­ture. Don’t pee in my sand­box and I’ll leave you alone.

    Reply
  31. guinevere says:
    August 4, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    i know i’m a lit­tle behind the times, but i just stum­bled upon this clown story. come on now, it’s hilar­i­ous. the story behind it isn’t hilar­i­ous, but the fact that these clowns dressed up as…well, you know, is so com­pletely fit­ting and won­der­ful. i think that the trea­son com­ment is a lit­tle over the top, but, hey, what­ever. no, peo­ple shouldn’t be able to use a bolt cut­ter to get to where the (yes i know it’s nec­es­sary, but still…) evil nuclear (please stop putting a sec­ond “u” in the word “nuclear” it makes you sound dumb, Mr. President) weapons are. now that these guys have done it, are we going to step up secu­rity now?

    Reply
  32. Anthony Quickle says:
    August 4, 2006 at 2:44 pm

    Guin,
    Please page back and read all he pre­vi­ous com­ments for a bet­ter under­stand­ing of the secu­rity pro­ce­dures at nuclear mis­sile sites. What these “clowns” got access to was basi­cally a large flat con­crete area, very simiar in appear­ance to a park­ing lot. The mis­sile is located under more than 6 feet of rein­forced con­crete and steel that is fully secure and capa­ble of with­stand­ing any­thing short of a direct-​​hit nuclear explo­sion. The secrity sys­tem as designed worked per­fectly. The clowns pres­ence on the site trig­gered an alarm that brought out a secu­rity response team armed with the lat­est in mil­i­tary auto­matic weapons and with the author­ity to shoot (to kill — no warn­ing shots autho­rized) any­one found on the site. (although, the usual out­come is the fool­ish intruder is arrested and winds up fac­ing Fedral charges and a jail sen­tence). An autho­rized mis­sile main­te­nance team with the knowl­edge, required equip­ment, and the com­plic­ity of the con­trol­ling mis­sile crew would take almost a full work­ing day to gain access to the actual mis­sile. A secu­rity team makes it to the site in a mat­ter of min­utes, much less than a half hour. Missile secure. System works well — no need to change any­thing. Thanks for being con­cerned though.

    Reply
  33. Don Shoebridge says:
    November 23, 2006 at 6:45 pm

    Having been in the Air Force myself, I fully under­stand the last line on the warn­ing signs that are plas­tered on all Air Force bases — “Use of deadly force authorized”

    Reply
  34. Joseph F Catlin says:
    December 2, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    I DON’T CARE IF THEY LIKE US
    I DON’T CARE IF THEY REPECT US
    I WANT THEM TO FEAR US

    Reply
  35. The D says:
    December 21, 2006 at 8:28 am

    Meatheads– I dont live far from Luck WI Typical small WI town of like 500 ppl. 6 bars. Meth use is appar­ently abun­dant.…
    was a cool bar there “Denuchis” (sp) got druk there after 9 happy hour. they tore it down..very sad.

    Reply
  36. The D says:
    December 21, 2006 at 8:34 am

    Meatheads– I dont live far from Luck WI Typical small WI town of like 500 ppl. 6 bars. Meth use is appar­ently abun­dant.…
    was a cool bar there “Denuchis” (sp) got druk there after 9 happy hour. they tore it down..very sad.

    Reply
  37. DC Loser says:
    December 22, 2006 at 7:43 am

    Ahhh..I missed this one the first time around. Good ‘ol Echo-​​9 LF. This brings back mem­o­ries from when I was a main­te­nance offi­cer at Minot. Anthony Quickle, a few posts back, is entirely cor­rect about the entry pro­ce­dures for Minutemen LFs. Even when my team had the cor­rect authen­ti­ca­tion codes to gain entry to the site, it takes us min­i­mum of about an hour to make it down to the inside of the silo. All these “clowns” did was to trig­ger both the outer zone and inner zone secu­rity alarms but first get­ting to the top­side of the facil­ity and then bang­ing on the launcher clo­sure door. I hope they have fun in the fed­eral pen, as they’ll prob­a­bly spend the next decade there con­tem­plat­ing their actions. There are much bet­ter ways to get your point across.

    Reply
  38. matt pyers says:
    December 23, 2006 at 4:18 pm

    why can I not send you an email with­out an account — this defeats annonimity.

    Reply
  39. harman says:
    October 21, 2007 at 10:58 pm

    Oh stop it… for a frac­tional exam­ple — the japs com­mit­ted such abho­rant acts against the Chinese at Nangking and the American POW’s from Wake etc… I have no, zero, sym­pa­thy for the jap cul­ture from that time. In fact I truly regret that we only had two bombs ready to go in late sum­mer of ’45. While I think it won­der­ful that we can be allies today I would have been fine back­ing Nimitz words in Dec of 41.. that the only place Japanese would be spo­ken would be hell.

    Reply
  40. ? says:
    April 8, 2008 at 7:37 am

    The title of the arti­cle is rather stu­pid. They did noth­ing to the mis­sile nor the war­heads. This groups has played these assi­nine games over the years per­form­ing the same moronic acts.
    Back in the 80’s Danny Boy Rather was there with his 60 Minutes cam­eras rolling and made every effort to dis­tort and to demean the secu­rity teams.

    Reply
  41. ??????? says:
    April 8, 2008 at 7:37 am

    The title of the arti­cle is rather stu­pid. They did noth­ing to the mis­sile nor the war­heads. This groups has played these assi­nine games over the years per­form­ing the same moronic acts.
    Back in the 80’s Danny Boy Rather was there with his 60 Minutes cam­eras rolling and made every effort to dis­tort and to demean the secu­rity teams.

    Reply
  42. Frank Graham says:
    July 21, 2008 at 5:16 am

    “And to all out there with some sort of knowl­edge of his­tory and an ade­quate IQ would know that the nuke­ing of japan saved lifes on both sides. The Firebombings of Japan killed more!! That would have con­tin­ued if we didnt nuke them, then add an inva­sion, plus the fact that every­one on the Island of Japan was going to fight results in alot more deaths to all.“
    World War Two was a hor­ri­ble night­mare, I can remem­ber it first­hand. Many of the com­ments here are as igno­rant and as full of Jingoisim as those they used to make back then. Even our pres­i­dent says things like “bring it on”.
    Folks, you need to smarten up, or you will suf­fer another actual war. This low level stuff right now is not war. A real war, like WW2 ended up with the allies doing things toward the end of the war that were just as immoral and plain evil as what the axis were doing at the start. When its all over and done, nobody wins. Trotting out glib state­ments like “war is hell” doesnt even begin to encom­pass an under­stand­ing of just how awful it is.
    Oh and the first guys to start bomb­ing cities were the Brits, not the Krauts. So lets not think the allies were pure as dri­ven snow. The Japs attacked us because we block­aded them, which was an act of war.
    Some Idiot here says “one marine is worth 500K japan­ese civil­ians”. Reminds me of the way our ene­mies use to talk. Its the lan­guage of eth­nic cleans­ing. Disgusting and immoral.

    Reply
  43. Afric says:
    March 21, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Good Day. The strongest pos­si­ble piece of advice I would give any young woman is: Don’t screw around, and don’t smoke.
    I am from Jamaica and also now’m speak­ing English, please tell me right I wrote the fol­low­ing sen­tence: “Way to rus­sia guide has part­nered with the lead­ing air­lines and travel agents in usa, uk and rus­sia to bring you the best offers for air­line tick­ets to.“
    Best regards :p, Afric.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      4. The Iraqi Rebels went underground to penetrate OUR and...
      Osher Doctorow
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      Some questions about the Gen. Petraeus Iraqi "Surge"...
      Osher Doctorow
    • The Non-lethal Claymore
      There is a non lethat weapon put out by laser energitics name daser...
      red
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      These guys seem to have had the right idea for a while,...
      TheBoogyMan
    • Airbag Defense
      Hey jack ass (fart) at any time durring that triade did you watch the video?...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This episode is another demonstration that there aren't good...
      Westerner
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage