DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » JSF Delays Vex Marines

JSF Delays Vex Marines

The Marines put all their tacair eggs in one bas­ket when they decided, in the early 1990s, to pass up the F/​A-​​18E/​F Super Hornet and wait for a ver­ti­cal take-​​off plane instead. That plane turned out to be the F-​​35B Joint Strike Fighter, and the Marines have com­mit­ted to buy­ing as many as 500 to replace around the same num­ber of sin­gle– and two-​​seat F/​A-​​18 legacy Hornets, AV-​​8B Harriers and EA-​​6B Prowlers — neck­ing down to one tac­ti­cal air­frame and sav­ing loads of cash in the process.
Sounds great, right?
The prob­lem is that the F-​​35 ini­tial oper­a­tional capa­bil­ity keeps slid­ing right thanks to weight, soft­ware and engine prob­lems. It’s unlikely the Marines will be able to field a squadron before 2012, sev­eral years later than orig­i­nally planned. Meanwhile, in Iraq, the Marines are fly­ing the life out of all their air­planes, putting as many hours on a deployed jet in just seven months as they would in two years back in the States.
usmc jet.jpgBy the time the JSF enters Marine Corps ser­vice in large num­bers, the service’s jets will be around 25 years old on aver­age. That’s old for a naval jet. But when you talk about air­craft age, there’s cal­en­dar age and then there’s fatigue age. What with all the hard use in hot, sandy Iraq and on the Navy’s car­ri­ers (to alle­vi­ate Navy force cuts, the Marines con­tribute sev­eral Hornet squadrons to car­rier air wings), the Marines jets “feel” a lot older than they actu­ally are.
The result is pre­ma­ture retire­ment for dozens of tired jets, mostly Hornets. As the fleet shrinks with­out a hot pro­duc­tion line to replace losses, the only way the Marines can keep its squadrons fully equipped is to decom­mis­sion a few squadrons and redis­trib­ute their jets. Which is exactly what will hap­pen in March 2007, when the Corps shut­ters VMFA(AW)-332 and VMFA-​​134 fly­ing the F/​A-​​18D and F/​A-​​18A+, respec­tively.
I embed­ded with 332 in Iraq this year, report­ing on the great work they were doing sup­port­ing the ground troops in restive Al Anbar province. 332 is a fine unit with one of the best safety records in the entire Marine Corps, hav­ing last crashed a jet around 30 years ago. It’ll be a shame to see them go.
On the other hand, these force struc­ture cuts them­selves don’t actu­ally reduce the num­ber of jets in Corps ser­vice. They just con­sol­i­date the exist­ing jets into fewer, larger units that can fly and main­tain the planes more effi­ciently. This is mak­ing lemon­ade out of lemons from trees planted a decade ago when the Corps pinned all its tacair hopes on a paper air­plane that is only now tak­ing shape, years late.
Here’s to hop­ing the F-​​35 pans out. If it doesn’t, the Air Force can buy new F-​​16s and F-​​15s from pro­duc­tion lines sus­tained by for­eign sales and the Navy can boost its Super Hornet order (as has already been rumored), but the Marines are screwed. As long as nobody at HQMC is inter­ested in the Super Hornet, there’s no con­tin­gency plan.
Pay 332 a trib­ute by check­ing out some of their Iraq snap­shots at Flickr.
–David Axe

Share |

June 27th, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 19803 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/27/jsf-delays-vex-marines/JSF+Delays+Vex+Marines2006-06-27+23%3A00%3A00hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « All-​​Seeing Blimp on the Rise | Hoax Watch, Day 10: No Nork Launch, After All » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. tim says:
    June 28, 2006 at 11:44 am

    I’m old enough to remem­ber when multi-​​role fight­ers were sup­posed to save money by con­sol­i­dat­ing the force.
    This has not proven to be the case.

    Reply
  2. Moose says:
    June 28, 2006 at 3:29 pm

    Its still less costly than 3 inde­pen­dant 5th-​​gen fighter pro­grams would be. But it was never going to be cheaper than pre-​​existing pro­grams, nor as cheap as adver­tised. No major new pro­gram ever is.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage