DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Hoax Watch, Day 10: No Nork Launch, After All

Hoax Watch, Day 10: No Nork Launch, After All

Ten days ago, the New York Times and its sis­ter paper, the International Herald Tribune, ran a pair of breath­less sto­ries, warn­ing us that North Korea’s long-​​range Taepodong-​​2 mis­sile was being fueled for “take off.” Worse, the weapon could have the abil­ity to “deliver chem­i­cal, bio­log­i­cal or per­haps nuclear war­heads to tar­gets as far away as the con­ti­nen­tal United States.“
taepodong.jpgWorldwide hys­te­ria fol­lowed. Condi Rice called it a “provoca­tive act.” The Japanese prime min­is­ter said they would “respond harshly” to a launch. The Pentagon shouted that its mis­sile defense sys­tem was ready to go. A for­mer SecDef and a for­mer VP called for pre­emp­tive strikes on North Korea.
But cracks in the story appeared almost imme­di­ately. No one could really say what this Taepodong-​​2 really looked like, or what it could do. Responsible reporters recalled North Korea’s his­tory of saber-​​rattling stunts — and its ane­mic track record for test­ing mis­siles.
And then there was the fuel and oxi­dizer sup­pos­edly being loaded into the mis­sile. Corrosive stuff, it could eat through a missile’s metal cas­ing in two or three days. Which meant that the Norks had to launch quickly, or not at all. With every day this mis­sile “cri­sis” dragged on, the less likely it became.
By the begin­ning of this week, it became clear that a world-​​class hoax had gone down. Either Pyongyang had hood­winked the globe into think­ing it was about to launch — or the Times was once again hyp­ing up a national secu­rity threat.
Today, finally, the Times admit­ted the obvi­ous. Well, kinda sorta. And on page A9 — not the font page, where the Taepodong “scoop” had been orig­i­nally published.

On Monday and Tuesday, two offi­cials said the intel­li­gence could, at best, be inter­preted as offer­ing only a pru­dent assump­tion that the mis­sile was fueled, and that intel­li­gence ana­lysts had described an already fueled mis­sile as a worst-​​case sce­nario.
“It is impos­si­ble to know for cer­tain whether or how much fuel is mov­ing between a closed con­tainer through a closed line to another closed con­tainer,” one offi­cial said.
Citing intel­li­gence gath­ered by “over­head sys­tems” pho­tograph­ing the mis­sile, Senator Warner said, “We are not cer­tain if it’s fueled.”

(Big ups: TP)

UPDATE 07/​06/​06 12:11 PM
: Well, so much for hoaxes! See here for cov­er­age of the Nork’s actual launch.

Share |

June 28th, 2006 | Missiles, Those Nutty Norks | 19814 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/28/hoax-watch-day-10-no-nork-launch-after-all/Hoax+Watch%2C+Day+10%3A+No+Nork+Launch%2C+After+All2006-06-28+16%3A16%3A21david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « JSF Delays Vex Marines | Robo-Doggie’s New Pal » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Byron Skinner says:
    June 28, 2006 at 12:46 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Dah, the only ones fooled by the North Koreans and their “Teapot Missile” were our intel­li­gence experts and of course the NYT who does the bid­ding for the Bush admin­is­tra­tion.
    Next Hoax busted, Iran. Thirty years of a nuclear pro­gram and all the have to show is one vile of “enriched mate­r­ial”, it looks more like a urin sam­ple to me. Did any of our spooks bother to ver­ify what was in that con­tainer.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  2. Leo Belldaere says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    Kim Il-​​sung has got to be laugh­ing his ass off over this! All these idiots bought his lit­tle shadow-​​play, and the U.S. Mainstream Media con­tin­ues to be the worth­less suck-​​ups to the Bush Junta they have been for the last five and a half years.

    Reply
  3. Leo Belldaere says:
    June 28, 2006 at 7:43 pm

    oops! Fingers got ahead of the brain. Though I am sure Kim Il-​​sung is laugh­ing at his son Kim Jong-il’s lit­tle joke from his grave.

    Reply
  4. Brian says:
    July 5, 2006 at 4:36 pm

    Boy, funny joke. Hah hah hah. They sure showed us with their “hoax”, didn’t they?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage