Home » Ammo and Munitions » Miniature Bomb, Heavyweight Punch

Miniature Bomb, Heavyweight Punch

You hear a lot of big claims in this industry. So when I read about a 31-inch, 64-pound weapon that’s supposed to have more killing power than a 1,000-pound cluster bomb, I was more than a little skeptical.
After all, a typical cluster bomb distributes over two hundred BLU-97 bomblets over a wide area. Together they produce thirty times as many shrapnel fragments as the 64-pound mini-munition, Textron Systems’ Clean Lightweight Area Weapon. It was hard to see how CLAW could compete.

claw combo.JPG

But it turns out that CLAW can be awfully deadly, in its own right. After ejection, CLAW descends by parachute, and a proximity sensor detonates it sixteen feet above the ground. That means its fragments get dispersed far and wide. In contrast, the BLU-97 only goes off on contact with the ground, which sends a lot of fragments into the dirt instead of into targets. (Check out this video to see what CLAW does to a 16 by 12 foot target.)
The design of the warhead casing helps, too. It’s a steel cylinder scored on the inside, so that it forms diamond or arrowhead shaped fragments, over two thousand of them. A special proprietary technique is used to cut the pattern on the warhead casing, creating fragments which are bullet-sized (about 7 grams/114 grains) and effective over a very wide radius. BLU-97 fragments are much smaller (about 30 grains) and less effective.
The explosive filling of CLAW is PAX-21, which is both more powerful and more stable than previous explosives. The combination of explosion and fragments produces thorough coverage of a circular area over 140 yards across, effective against targets including personnel, soft vehicles, parked aircraft and anti-aircraft sites. Textron Systems have precisely quantified this performance with ground tests, and their claim about its effectiveness looks like a strong one.
CLAWs small size means that strike aircraft could carry it in large numbers, but at present its being marketed as the ideal weapon for killer drones. Even something as large as a Predator drone can only carry two Hellfire missiles. For the same weight you could carry several CLAWs, but it also means that even smaller UAVs could be armed for the first time. The development of this type of miniature munition and even smaller weapons are in the pipeline brings the possibility of large numbers of armed UAVs on the battlefield for the first time.
(CLAW is not effective against heavy armor, but the same GPS-guided Universal Aerial Delivery Dispenser which delivers it can also be loaded with a BLU-108 anti-tank weapon with four target-seeking warheads.)
But perhaps the most impressive thing about CLAW is how much work has gone into making sure it only explodes when its meant to. There is a triple-redundant fuzing system the proximity fuze, a ground contact fuze, and a time delay. If all of these fail, then the battery dissipates within seconds and the munition is inert. Its not just unexploded, but unexplodable.
You could hit the CLAW with a hammer, run over it with a tractor or put it in a fire, and it will not detonate. You could take it apart without any personal risk. The insensitive explosive really is insensitive.
The only way you could make it explode would be to take it to a laboratory, says Richard D. Sterchele, Textrons Business Development Manager for Smart Weapons.
This means that unexploded CLAWs cannot be turned into IEDs. Iraq is awash with weaponry, but in other conflicts like Vietnam guerrillas have used unexploded bombs as a major source of explosives.
More importantly, it does not leave hazardous unexploded bomblets scattered around. The failure rate of BLU-97 is widely quoted at around 6%, so each CBU-103 leaves about a dozen potentially lethal bomblets to be cleared up. It is hard to over-emphasize just how dangerous these are; according to the USMCs Multi-Service Procedures for Operations in UXO Environment:

Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity Studies show 40 percent of the duds on the ground are hazardous and for each encounter with an unexploded submunition there is a 13 percent probability of detonationThus, even though an unexploded submunition is run over, kicked, stepped on, or otherwise disturbed, and did not detonate, it is not safe. Handling the unexploded submunition may eventually result in arming and subsequent detonation.

In one incident in 1991, seven members of the 27th Engineer Battalion were killed during operations to clear a runway at As Salam when a pile of dud BLU-97s exploded.
In the Cold War scenario, where the enemy was an invading Soviet horde, unexploded bomblets may not have been seen as a problem. But in scenarios like Iraq and Afghanistan where US engineers are likely to have to deal with them, the argument for a clean weapon like CLAW is a compelling one.
It remains to be seen whether the Pentagon will take up CLAW, which is a private company initiative. Live CLAW munition tests from operational UAVs are being conducted by the U.S. Air Force and Army over the summer 2006. Its a fraction of the cost of a cluster bombs, but the saving in lives could be much more important. But in the world of defense procurement, unfortunately its not always that simple.
David Hambling

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

DavidR June 29, 2006 at 10:03 am

Given that the bomb is dropped with a detonator capable of initiating the explosives, I find the claim that one can’t reuse the explosive from a dud to be pretty thin.

Reply

Nicholas Weaver June 29, 2006 at 10:03 am

Another interesting question: Could this design be used as the basis for better anti-aircraft weapons as well? (Well, against aircraft other than A-10s that is)
And one thing unstated, what is the cost? Should it be more or less than a cluster bomb? (More sophisticated materials and electronics, but fewer parts/detonators/etc?)

Reply

tom June 29, 2006 at 11:58 am

what about the civilians who pick up and handle unexploded ordnance, your article seems to focus entirely on the soldiers who have some measure of armor and protection and says very little to the children who play in war zones littered with cluster bombs.
perhaps CLAW will rememdy this, perhaps not. but the far more compelling argument for this weapon to me is clearly that unexploded ordnance is not a threat to the civilian population, either accidently or retooled as an IED.

Reply

David Hambling June 29, 2006 at 12:42 pm

“Given that the bomb is dropped with a detonator capable of initiating the explosives, I find the claim that one can’t reuse the explosive from a dud to be pretty thin.”
The explosive fill PAX-21 is insensitive munition (IM) rated, which means it cannot be detonated easily and requires special fuzing. The fuzing system of the CLAW becomes inert shortly after the weapon is released. So insurgents would either need a supply of high-tech fuzing devices, or lab equipment capable of ractivating the original fuze. Either way, it’s unlikely to happen.
“And one thing unstated, what is the cost? Should it be more or less than a cluster bomb? (More sophisticated materials and electronics, but fewer parts/detonators/etc?)”
Cost is something like $5k per CLAW. Last time the USAF bought CBU-103 I believe they were around $30k, they’d be more expensive now; buying 200 fuzes, 200 charges, 200 fragmentation cases etc does cost a bit.
“Could this design be used as the basis for better anti-aircraft weapons as well? ”
There may be a better approach to this. Watch out for a future instalment in DefenseTech.

Reply

Mister Kleen June 29, 2006 at 2:35 pm

New – The Triple Action Clean Bomb!
FIRST The explosive blast loosens dirt, grime and insurgents!
SECOND Computer-designed shrapnel scrubs the whole area!
THIRD The Zirconium incendiary sterilizes and leaves everything sparkling clean!
Available in Original, Pine, Lemon Fresh and new Fragrant Napalm.

Reply

rappelz gold August 13, 2008 at 1:18 am

I recognized her is an occasional, When I was just upgrade and earn rappelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my number is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad people, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade.

Reply

goonzu money August 13, 2008 at 1:32 am

So I decided to closed my own heart, I played lonely, I gave up to find, put aside feeling. I upgrade, take account and earn goonzu money a person. I live a little good; I think I have been really put aside.

Reply

GuildWars Gold August 13, 2008 at 1:35 am

Initial contact this game, I did not very like. Since find good reason to release point, I also began to like it. Every day after work, I always go to play this game. Perhaps little girls will like me, in order to give went to all I like it. I dull playing a few weeks, very few speak to people and I have 26 levels and also I earn a little GuildWars Gold.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: