DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Miniature Bomb, Heavyweight Punch

Miniature Bomb, Heavyweight Punch

You hear a lot of big claims in this indus­try. So when I read about a 31-​​inch, 64-​​pound weapon that’s sup­posed to have more killing power than a 1,000-pound clus­ter bomb, I was more than a lit­tle skep­ti­cal.
After all, a typ­i­cal clus­ter bomb dis­trib­utes over two hun­dred BLU-​​97 bomblets over a wide area. Together they pro­duce thirty times as many shrap­nel frag­ments as the 64-​​pound mini-​​munition, Textron Systems’ Clean Lightweight Area Weapon. It was hard to see how CLAW could com­pete.

claw combo.JPG

But it turns out that CLAW can be awfully deadly, in its own right. After ejec­tion, CLAW descends by para­chute, and a prox­im­ity sen­sor det­o­nates it six­teen feet above the ground. That means its frag­ments get dis­persed far and wide. In con­trast, the BLU-​​97 only goes off on con­tact with the ground, which sends a lot of frag­ments into the dirt instead of into tar­gets. (Check out this video to see what CLAW does to a 16 by 12 foot tar­get.)
The design of the war­head cas­ing helps, too. It’s a steel cylin­der scored on the inside, so that it forms dia­mond or arrow­head shaped frag­ments, over two thou­sand of them. A spe­cial pro­pri­etary tech­nique is used to cut the pat­tern on the war­head cas­ing, cre­at­ing frag­ments which are bullet-​​sized (about 7 grams/​114 grains) and effec­tive over a very wide radius. BLU-​​97 frag­ments are much smaller (about 30 grains) and less effec­tive.
The explo­sive fill­ing of CLAW is PAX-​​21, which is both more pow­er­ful and more sta­ble than pre­vi­ous explo­sives. The com­bi­na­tion of explo­sion and frag­ments pro­duces thor­ough cov­er­age of a cir­cu­lar area over 140 yards across, effec­tive against tar­gets includ­ing per­son­nel, soft vehi­cles, parked air­craft and anti-​​aircraft sites. Textron Systems have pre­cisely quan­ti­fied this per­for­mance with ground tests, and their claim about its effec­tive­ness looks like a strong one.
CLAWs small size means that strike air­craft could carry it in large num­bers, but at present its being mar­keted as the ideal weapon for killer drones. Even some­thing as large as a Predator drone can only carry two Hellfire mis­siles. For the same weight you could carry sev­eral CLAWs, but it also means that even smaller UAVs could be armed for the first time. The devel­op­ment of this type of minia­ture muni­tion and even smaller weapons are in the pipeline brings the pos­si­bil­ity of large num­bers of armed UAVs on the bat­tle­field for the first time.
(CLAW is not effec­tive against heavy armor, but the same GPS-​​guided Universal Aerial Delivery Dispenser which deliv­ers it can also be loaded with a BLU-​​108 anti-​​tank weapon with four target-​​seeking war­heads.)
But per­haps the most impres­sive thing about CLAW is how much work has gone into mak­ing sure it only explodes when its meant to. There is a triple-​​redundant fuz­ing sys­tem the prox­im­ity fuze, a ground con­tact fuze, and a time delay. If all of these fail, then the bat­tery dis­si­pates within sec­onds and the muni­tion is inert. Its not just unex­ploded, but unex­plod­able.
You could hit the CLAW with a ham­mer, run over it with a trac­tor or put it in a fire, and it will not det­o­nate. You could take it apart with­out any per­sonal risk. The insen­si­tive explo­sive really is insen­si­tive.
The only way you could make it explode would be to take it to a lab­o­ra­tory, says Richard D. Sterchele, Textrons Business Development Manager for Smart Weapons.
This means that unex­ploded CLAWs can­not be turned into IEDs. Iraq is awash with weaponry, but in other con­flicts like Vietnam guer­ril­las have used unex­ploded bombs as a major source of explo­sives.
More impor­tantly, it does not leave haz­ardous unex­ploded bomblets scat­tered around. The fail­ure rate of BLU-​​97 is widely quoted at around 6%, so each CBU-​​103 leaves about a dozen poten­tially lethal bomblets to be cleared up. It is hard to over-​​emphasize just how dan­ger­ous these are; accord­ing to the USMCs Multi-​​Service Procedures for Operations in UXO Environment:

Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity Studies show 40 per­cent of the duds on the ground are haz­ardous and for each encounter with an unex­ploded sub­mu­ni­tion there is a 13 per­cent prob­a­bil­ity of det­o­na­tion­Thus, even though an unex­ploded sub­mu­ni­tion is run over, kicked, stepped on, or oth­er­wise dis­turbed, and did not det­o­nate, it is not safe. Handling the unex­ploded sub­mu­ni­tion may even­tu­ally result in arm­ing and sub­se­quent detonation. 

In one inci­dent in 1991, seven mem­bers of the 27th Engineer Battalion were killed dur­ing oper­a­tions to clear a run­way at As Salam when a pile of dud BLU-​​97s exploded.
In the Cold War sce­nario, where the enemy was an invad­ing Soviet horde, unex­ploded bomblets may not have been seen as a prob­lem. But in sce­nar­ios like Iraq and Afghanistan where US engi­neers are likely to have to deal with them, the argu­ment for a clean weapon like CLAW is a com­pelling one.
It remains to be seen whether the Pentagon will take up CLAW, which is a pri­vate com­pany ini­tia­tive. Live CLAW muni­tion tests from oper­a­tional UAVs are being con­ducted by the U.S. Air Force and Army over the sum­mer 2006. Its a frac­tion of the cost of a clus­ter bombs, but the sav­ing in lives could be much more impor­tant. But in the world of defense pro­cure­ment, unfor­tu­nately its not always that sim­ple.
– David Hambling

Share |

June 29th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions | 198541 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/06/29/miniature-bomb-heavyweight-punch/Miniature+Bomb%2C+Heavyweight+Punch2006-06-29+12%3A33%3A32matthew_tompkins You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « White House NYT Bashers: Hypocrites | Rapid Fire 06/​29/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DavidR says:
    June 29, 2006 at 10:03 am

    Given that the bomb is dropped with a det­o­na­tor capa­ble of ini­ti­at­ing the explo­sives, I find the claim that one can’t reuse the explo­sive from a dud to be pretty thin.

    Reply
  2. Nicholas Weaver says:
    June 29, 2006 at 10:03 am

    Another inter­est­ing ques­tion: Could this design be used as the basis for bet­ter anti-​​aircraft weapons as well? (Well, against air­craft other than A-​​10s that is)
    And one thing unstated, what is the cost? Should it be more or less than a clus­ter bomb? (More sophis­ti­cated mate­ri­als and elec­tron­ics, but fewer parts/​detonators/​etc?)

    Reply
  3. tom says:
    June 29, 2006 at 11:58 am

    what about the civil­ians who pick up and han­dle unex­ploded ord­nance, your arti­cle seems to focus entirely on the sol­diers who have some mea­sure of armor and pro­tec­tion and says very lit­tle to the chil­dren who play in war zones lit­tered with clus­ter bombs.
    per­haps CLAW will rememdy this, per­haps not. but the far more com­pelling argu­ment for this weapon to me is clearly that unex­ploded ord­nance is not a threat to the civil­ian pop­u­la­tion, either acci­dently or retooled as an IED.

    Reply
  4. David Hambling says:
    June 29, 2006 at 12:42 pm

    “Given that the bomb is dropped with a det­o­na­tor capa­ble of ini­ti­at­ing the explo­sives, I find the claim that one can’t reuse the explo­sive from a dud to be pretty thin.“
    The explo­sive fill PAX-​​21 is insen­si­tive muni­tion (IM) rated, which means it can­not be det­o­nated eas­ily and requires spe­cial fuz­ing. The fuz­ing sys­tem of the CLAW becomes inert shortly after the weapon is released. So insur­gents would either need a sup­ply of high-​​tech fuz­ing devices, or lab equip­ment capa­ble of rac­ti­vat­ing the orig­i­nal fuze. Either way, it’s unlikely to hap­pen.
    “And one thing unstated, what is the cost? Should it be more or less than a clus­ter bomb? (More sophis­ti­cated mate­ri­als and elec­tron­ics, but fewer parts/​detonators/​etc?)“
    Cost is some­thing like $5k per CLAW. Last time the USAF bought CBU-​​103 I believe they were around $30k, they’d be more expen­sive now; buy­ing 200 fuzes, 200 charges, 200 frag­men­ta­tion cases etc does cost a bit.
    “Could this design be used as the basis for bet­ter anti-​​aircraft weapons as well? “
    There may be a bet­ter approach to this. Watch out for a future instal­ment in DefenseTech.

    Reply
  5. Mister Kleen says:
    June 29, 2006 at 2:35 pm

    New — The Triple Action Clean Bomb!
    FIRST The explo­sive blast loosens dirt, grime and insur­gents!
    SECOND Computer-​​designed shrap­nel scrubs the whole area!
    THIRD The Zirconium incen­di­ary ster­il­izes and leaves every­thing sparkling clean!
    Available in Original, Pine, Lemon Fresh and new Fragrant Napalm.

    Reply
  6. rappelz gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:18 am

    I rec­og­nized her is an occa­sional, When I was just upgrade and earn rap­pelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my num­ber is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad peo­ple, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade.

    Reply
  7. goonzu money says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:32 am

    So I decided to closed my own heart, I played lonely, I gave up to find, put aside feel­ing. I upgrade, take account and earn goonzu money a per­son. I live a lit­tle good; I think I have been really put aside.

    Reply
  8. GuildWars Gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:35 am

    Initial con­tact this game, I did not very like. Since find good rea­son to release point, I also began to like it. Every day after work, I always go to play this game. Perhaps lit­tle girls will like me, in order to give went to all I like it. I dull play­ing a few weeks, very few speak to peo­ple and I have 26 lev­els and also I earn a lit­tle GuildWars Gold.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage