Home » Air » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Taking on Iran’s air force

Taking on Iran’s air force

The stand-off with Iran over its nuclear ambitions was just beginning while I was embedded with Marine All-Weather Fighter Attack Squadron 332 at Al Asad air base in Iraq. More than once the fliers lamented that they’d probably be back in the States by the time the “inevitable” bombing of Iran got underway. One conversation went something like this:

Me: Oh God. We can’t afford a war with Iran
Aviator #1: Whatever. We’d kick their asses.
Aviator #2: No, they’ve got F-14s!
Aviator #3: Yeah, my wife [deployed to northern Iraq] saw one!
Aviator #1: We’d still kick their asses.
Me: Oh God.

f14_16.jpgIf, God help us, the stand-off does turn violent, U.S. air power will play a critical role. For months pundits have predicted a massive bombing campaign to target Iran’s nuclear facilities, and perhaps even to attempt regime change.
But don’t expect Iran’s air force to roll over like Iraq’s did in 1991 and again in 2003. Unlike the Iraqi air force, the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) appears to be well-armed, well-trained and eager for a fight. Besides the aforementioned F-14 Tomcats, 79 of which the U.S. sold to the country before the Shah was deposed, the air force operates several dozen of each of the following types:

J-7 (Chinese-built MiG-21 derivative)
MiG-29
Su-24
F-5E
F-4E Phantom
Mirage F1

All told, the IRIAF flies as many as 300 fighters. All are older designs, but have been maintained and, in many cases, upgraded by the indigenous aerospace industry, which has become proficient in reverse-engineering weapons and spare parts — and perhaps even engines. And the IRIAF has aerial tankers too — a force multiplier only the most advanced air forces maintain.
Veteran aviation correspondent Tom Cooper and his co-writer Liam Devlin wrote a fascinating feature for a recent issue of Combat Aircraft Magazine, profiling the IRIAF. The authors interviewed IRIAF defectors and U.S. Navy aircrew that have tangled with Iranian fliers over the Arabian Gulf. The feature cautions against the Western habit of underestimating the IRIAF:
In November 2003, a USAF E-3 Sentry flying a patrol over Iraq tracked a formation of no less than 16 IRIAF F-14As … This was the largest group of Iranian F-14s detected in flight by the U.S. military since 1997, when nine IRIAF Tomcats were tracked over the southern Persian Gulf by the U.S. Navy. … During the summer of 2005, several Su-24s were observed operating over the Persian Gulf, armed with Chinese-made C802K-2 anti-ship missiles. … Iranian Phantoms were sighted as well, usually carrying AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-9 Sidewinder [air-to-air missiles].

Now that the 1st Fighter Wing has its first F-22 squadron combat-ready, and with the Navy’s Super Hornets equipped with electronically-scanned radars, we have the capability to beat the IRIAF. But it wouldn’t necessarily be an easy fight. Throw in Iran’s SA-15 surface-to-air missiles and you’ve got a tough air-defense nut to crack. And remember … an air campaign might be just a prelude to a ground invasion. Last year I stood on the Iraq-Iran border and listened to Iranian armored divisions throw down practice artillery barrages. The Tennessee National Guardsmen I was with (the 278th cavalry regiment equipped with M-1 Abrams tanks) admitted that they couldn’t punch through that border if they wanted to.
We must find a diplomatic solution to the problem of Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
David Axe
P.S. — This discussion of Cooper’s article includes some interesting insights.

Share |

{ 140 comments… read them below or add one }

John July 4, 2006 at 9:29 am

Iran has an Air Force, if u call it that. Lets see the USAF has the best Fighter Plane ever built, we have a boat load of F-15s and 16s, not to mention the super hornet. We also have B-2s which are pretty much invisiable to radar, tons of cruise missiles, F-117s which are still pretty good, plus our wild weasal guys, and a ton of other good stuff. The thing is the Iranians prolly dont know how to even spell air force and that marine aviator is right we will kick their ass no matter what they got.

Reply

Andy July 4, 2006 at 11:32 am

Sorry, but you grossly overstate the capabilities of the Iranian Air Force. Even without F-22′s and Super Hornets, we’d still own them.
A complete tactical picture via AWACS + AMRAAM + Best training in the world > Old Aircraft + only SAH missiles + Bad training + interdicted and incomplete tactical picture.
Iran will be a much easier nut to crack from an Air Superiority standpoint than Iraq in 1991 was. Their Air Defense system isn’t as comprehensive or advanced and they have a much larger airspace to defend. The one advantage is that their pilots are somewhat better trained and more able to think for themselves.
The SA-15 is a very capable system, but after the first day of the war, it will pretty much be forced to operated independently. It’s a pretty short-range system and we’ll have plenty of HARMS to take care of them.
Even so, I seriously doubt we’ll attack Iran. There are just too many bad consquences.

Reply

Byron Skinner July 4, 2006 at 1:08 pm

Good Morning Folks,
On the out come of an Air War with Iran I agree with Andy and John it would be more of a non event then an event.
The many have all these legecy platforms but what are they going to fire at us, 1979 vintage AIM-9′s?
As far as the F-22 goes, any war with Iran would be history before they could be deployed. They are way to expensive to risk against a nothing enity like Iran. A few North carolina National Guard pilots should get the job done with their “old” F-16′s.
It’s time to see Iran, like North Korea for what they are, just Bull Sh**ing third rate countries who like to make some noise to get a little press from time to time.
An invasion of Iran might take a little less longer then Iraq did, we wouldn’t have to kiss, out NATO alley Turkey’s a** to let our troops pass through, we own Afghanistan. I guess that puts Iran as the filling of an American sandwitch.
As for Korea’s threat of a nuclear war. Well the little man is as you real Texans would say, “All Hat”.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Reply

Tim July 4, 2006 at 4:35 pm

It should also be noted that Iran has had problems with its commercial and military transport planes crashing due to inability to import parts. So much for that vaunted
reverse engineering.

Reply

Sven Ortmann July 4, 2006 at 4:56 pm

The Iranian Air Force would likely achive little more than the Iraqi one in 1991 – if it fought, it would likely down this or that attacking aircraft in air combat, but not achieve real tactical success.
Most clever would be to deploy this air force on many bases and so spare most of the anti-air capacity too – so that about 40% of the aircraft supported by the U.S. infrastructe (bases, tankers) needs to be focused on MigCAP and SEAD.

Reply

Eddie the foreign observer July 4, 2006 at 5:21 pm

Iran is not much of an aerial threat — it has trouble keeping planes in the sky nevermind making them battle ready. But hasn’t Iran’s government intimated an assymetrical response to any aggression over its skies? Iran’s most dangerous capabilities are in its conventional surface-to-surface arsenal, its regular army — its military and political influence in Iraq and its tactical stranglehold on Persian Gulf shipping routes. None of these capabilities appears particularly vulnerable to threats from the air. The danger to the United States isn’t underestimation of Iranian air power, but overestimation of the effectiveness and utility of bombers/fighters in solving this quarrel.

Reply

Steve Lane July 4, 2006 at 5:41 pm

Come of it guys. The USAF was unable to find or stop four unarmed hijacked passenger jets flown by incompetants on their home turf on 9112001.
What chance will you have against a real airforce.
Think about it.
The US pilots are among the best in the world
but the Commander in Chief is a dangerous treasonous fool and the Pentagon is lead by a donky.

Reply

Bill July 4, 2006 at 6:26 pm

The consequences of an attack on Iran will ignite the Middle East
Americans have little idea of the area and its people
The Brits, despite their superior arms had their tail between their legs and so will America should it decide to attack
Playing video games is a long way removed from the reality of war
Look at your inability to cope with insurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan, to say nothing about the morale of your cannon fodder
“Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind”
Bill

Reply

Punisher1 July 4, 2006 at 6:33 pm

Well,
Noah got a point, they have a decent airforce. But it would have to be in the air to be effective, that’s obvious, I’m sure that it will never make it off the ground or see anything comming until its too late.
Really think about it Iran is not going to see “it” comming. “It” being cruise missiles, Stealth bombers, or a combination of both to clear a path for regular aircraft. By then Iran will have lost a good percentage of combat aircraft.
While not an easy task the Air Force knows how to ploe a road to the objective.

Reply

Iranian Girl July 4, 2006 at 7:25 pm

Sir ,
Please , US has the power to do what ever she wants , bomb us , maim us , blow up the nuclear sites , BUT, Please Don’t play with our heritage , there is no ” Arabian Gulf ” , it is “Persian Gulf”:-)
And to the poster that has his hope on Wimpy Son of the late Puppet , Shah , Don

Reply

Cameron17 - Future Naval Officer July 4, 2006 at 10:30 pm

A war with Iran will certainly be a larger task than one against Iraq, but the United States Armed Forces will prevail.
The IRIAF is nothing to scoff at. 300 aircraft are a sizeable force, and their anti-ship missiles and air defense systems are things to be concerned about.
That said, let us all consider several factors in a totally objective view.
The United States Navy, that’s Navy, not even the branch of our armed services primarily responsible for air defense, operates 4000 tactical aircraft. Four thousand. Even if we assume that 3/4 of those are noncombat roles, that’s still one thousand late-model aircraft, armed with modern avionics and cutting edge weaponry.
Which brings us to our next subject. Weaponry. As has already been discussed, United States aircraft are armed with the very latest in air-to-air weapons (such as the AMRAAM, AIM-9X). This, coupled with a tactical picture of the battlefield, instantly uploadable to all American planes, makes our pilots have supreme Situational Awareness, the most critical aspect of an aerial conflict.
I have no doubt that, should conflict arise, Iran’s air force will make the first line of defense stiff and superior. Their technology is good, and their people are decently trained. However, they lack the numbers, training, technology, and ability of the United States Air Force as well as our Carrier Strike Wings. It is our ability, as the wealthiest coumtry on Earth, to back our pilots with support, intelligence, technology, and a well-funded fighting force. While the first wave will be mean, and we may take losses, the superior ability of our forces will sweep across Iran like a storm, and their defenses will crumble. It is a statistical certainty.
That said, avoiding conflict is always desirable. I plead with all politicians – both American and Iranian – to solve this conflict without bloodshed. How many millions of lives must the desert swallow up before we find a better way?
Thanks for reading
-Cameron
-High School Senior
-Future Naval Officer

Reply

MileHighSailor July 4, 2006 at 10:46 pm

To all of the leftists who think that we cannot win a war with Iran (or anyone else for that matter), I say piss off. We are the worlds finest military, not cannon fodder. We command the seas and rule the skies, and dominate the land. No enemy is to be scoffed at, but those of you who think that we will turn tail and run or loose due to our lack of understanding are absolutely wrong. All we need to understand is this…Locate, Engage, Close With, Destroy. It’s those people who don’t go to war who decry us actually winning one. Let the warriors fight the war, and if you find yourself lacking the courage, convictions, or mindset to join our brotherhood; at least show some respect for those who ensure your right to spew out your mindless, leftist opinions.

Reply

Ian July 4, 2006 at 11:07 pm

Yeah, if you guys can’t win in Afghanistan, can’t win in Iraqi why not start another illegal war against another country that has oil.
Operation Iraqi Freedom ( OIL, subtle… ) is an illegal invasion, ocupation and genocide of the Iraqi people.
Under the definition of war crimes by the then head of the US Supreme court at Neuremburg the illegal invasion of another country is the most serious crime of all.
The real hero’s are the men and women who refuse to obay an illegal order, after all, Neuremberg again made the point that ” I was only following orders ” is no defence in a warcrimes trial.
Wake up people – it isn’t a video game, these are real people that you are murdering.

Reply

Rowan Berkeley July 4, 2006 at 11:47 pm

I love this “world’s wealthiest nation” stuff. What the USA has is the world’s biggest debt. This debt is continually rolled over by the purchase of US Treasury Bonds by such reliable allies as Russian, China, and India. It’s some time since I heard the argument that they won’t stop buying these, because they need the USA as an export market. The reason I no longer hear this, is because they are in fact stopping buying them, and investing in almost anything else instead, being quite rationally sick of your bullying ways.

Reply

Funforall July 5, 2006 at 6:01 am

I agree that the US military could destroy Iran with miminal losses but it can not occuppy Iran with out committing genocide by using totally indescrimnate force against the Iranian population or bringing back the draft. If the draft comes and I am forced to choose between killing Iranians and neo-cons (fake Americans) for me it would be an easy choice to kill neo-cons. You neo-cons who call all of us real conservatives and libertarians leftist because we oppose the war in Iraq and the comming war in Iran as unconstitutional and immoral can not get away with calling us leftists forever. Your day will come. All wars are civil wars.
Long live our Republic, death to our empire.

Reply

Max July 5, 2006 at 7:00 am

Mr. Keller-you can use your real name! You needn’t use “Ian” and “funforall”!
That’s Michael Moore in the role of “Rambo” right?!?

Reply

mabus July 5, 2006 at 1:29 pm

All of you will be surprised in the near future. America is being led to a path of destruction and you are all blind to seeing it. It

Reply

Moose July 5, 2006 at 4:10 pm

So the reason for a diplomatic course is that we’re too afriad of the challenge Iran represents? Um, no F-ing way. By that reasoning anybody that we can take with material ease we should, and we jsut don’t stand up to the real threats. Horse-droppings.
We take the diplomatic course becuase we’re the United States, not the fracking USSR. We have the most powerful military in the history of mankind, enough power to incinerate who nations and declare ourselves overlords of the world. But we negotiate, we make treaties and hold talks, becuase we’re not the Great Satan, our force is our protection, our insureance, not our iron fist. We use diplomacy BACKED by the threat (and sometimes use) of force.
Attacking or not attacking Iran should not be weighed on how badly they can hurt us, becuase THAT devalues the troops’ lives, and the lives of all involved, to a numbers game. The choice has to be whether its the right thing to do, whether if 20 or 2000 men and woman die its for a honorable and just cause.
Secondly, to anyone who thinks the US policy in Iraq is in any way, shape, or form genocide: kiss my ass. Seriously, pucker up. Yes, too many civilians have died in Iraq, and thats a tragedy. But the troops are the ones keeping that country together for a people more interesting in killing each other over 3000-year-old differences rather than working for the common good.

Reply

Max July 5, 2006 at 4:54 pm

Moose, thanks for a little sanity.

Reply

David Axe July 5, 2006 at 7:11 pm

Chris,
You say Turkey is operating air bases in northern Iraq? I’ve been to Kurdistan twice. And I haven’t seen any Turkish bases. Where are they? And where did you get this info from?
Reason I ask is … Kurds don’t like Turks. And an overt Turkish military presence in Iraqi Kurdistan would be a big big deal.
So educate me, please.

Reply

Ian July 5, 2006 at 8:43 pm

Just a couple of points – I don’t hid behind other names – I’m me !!!
What precisly was Falluja if not genocide ?
Shut down the hospitals before moving in to kill everything that was there.
Using chemical weapons & huge amounts of depleted uranium to poison the environment for thousands of years.?
Just on the basis of DU the US is responsible for massive global damage.
The really sick part is that its your own troops that your killing as well – after all your great country doesn’t do head counts of rag heads, if your not am american your not human seems to be your point of view.
What do you think Gulf War syndrome is from the first war, radiation poisoning springs to mind, and already the few troops who have had independant testing are showing very high radiation levels. And it’s not just you guys on the ground, wait till you start having children and see the deformaties and illnesses your going to give to them. Just check out the rates for those in the first war.
So, the deaths of at least 43000 iraqis,(reported, The Lancet reported over 100000 ) the poisoning of the earth for thousands of years ( check the half life of depleted uranium sometime ) and giving every US service person in Iraqi enough radiation poisoning to guarente a leap in cancers is not genocide.
Of course not, if it’s done by the US or a client that just rates as collaterol damage………

Reply

Usahomebase July 5, 2006 at 10:52 pm

Gentlemen,
This is certainly a complex matter of which is best left to those who are entrusted with it.
With current state of affairs prudence seems to be in order. But for sake of Gods green earth and the lives of millions on innocents. Lets give diplomacy and Peace a real chance. Bravado and rushing in to do battle with our enemies is a recipe for disaster. We do not have enough boots on the ground middle east for a fullscale war in the persian gulf . Israel is engaged in it own yard and we sure cant transfer troops from the Korean peninsula or Indonesia etc,But we must deal firmly with them and it is only power and strength that our enemies do respect. So if our leaders do decide to use force lets hope that force is sufficent enough to deal a swift, crushing blow towards the threat they have been making to our country and the menace they are to the world . God Bless Our President Bush and all of our Great leaders who are at the control panel.God Bless The U.S.A and all her true friends. God Bless our good soldiers who stand waiting for the orders to preserve our liberty and our security in very troubled world.
Usahomebase

Reply

Ian July 6, 2006 at 12:12 am

Never used chemical weapons?
- The first account they unearthed in a magazine published by the US army. In the March 2005 edition of Field Artillery, officers from the 2nd Infantry’s fire support element boast about their role in the attack on Falluja in November last year: “White Phosphorous. WP proved to be an effective and versatile munition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with HE [high explosive]. We fired ‘shake and bake’ missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out.”
So by your own admission the US has used chemical weapons.
Falluja
“The cities water, sanitation and electricity supplies were severely disrupted as a result of
these military attacks. Health services have been devastated with medical facilities attacked
and targeted. A huge humanitarian crisis emerged as the siege developed military curfews
were imposed on the cities residents. Food and water was denied to civilians- the military
used this as a weapon during the conflict. These military attacks left the city with hundreds
and thousands of people homeless and displaced. The attacks caused thousands of civilian
casualties mainly women and children.
Doctors for Iraq had medical staff working inside the city during the April and November
2004 sieges. Members witnessed serious breaches of the Geneva Convention and human
rights. These breaches have been embedded in our minds and the minds of civilians
brutalised and traumatise by the illegal acts of aggression carried out by US/ Iraqi forces.”
Well, as the US banned any Western reporting we must rely on people like the Doctors who were there for information inside Falluga.
DU -
“Although many veterans have complained about Gulf War syndrome, the most dramatic claims of DU-related problems come from the area around Basra, Iraq’s second-largest city. Iraqi troops came under heavy fire here as they retreated from neighboring Kuwait in 1991.
Women who lived near the battlefields or whose husbands had fought in the Gulf War began having more babies with birth defects, doctors say. Some survived, usually those with cleft palates or missing limbs. Others were stillborn, including some with two heads, a single Cyclopean eye or such terrible malformities they barely appeared human.”
and..
“Health effects of DU exposure are typically divided into two broad categories, chemical and radiological. Further delineation is also made between internal and external routes of entry. A number of factors will determine the chemical or radiological affects DU may have, including dose, route and magnitude of exposure, and location of embedded fragments. While the most obvious health risk DU poses is to soldiers in tanks that sustain DU hits, there are others that may be affected as well. Survivors of such hits, soldiers investigating the wreckage, and those responsible for transporting or de-contaminating DU-laden tanks are all at risk to receive potentially harmful exposure to DU. With a half life of 4.5 billion years, DU may also cause harm to surrounding air, water, and soil resources and harm civilians returning to DU contaminated areas.
Of the two potential dangers DU poses, chemical affects are generally considered the most dangerous. Like other heavy metals, such as lead, sufficient DU exposure can be toxic to humans.”
And finally, may I remind you that Saddam was a US asset for years, the US got him into power, you had no problem providing him with both conventional and chemical weapons and the US activly supported his internal policing.
Bit rich now claiming that you had to ‘rescue’ the Iraqi people from him…..

Reply

Max July 6, 2006 at 3:28 am

“Never used chemical weapons?
- The first account they unearthed in a magazine published by the US army. In the March 2005 edition of Field Artillery, officers from the 2nd Infantry’s fire support element boast about their role in the attack on Falluja in November last year: “White Phosphorous. WP proved to be an effective and versatile munition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with HE [high explosive]. We fired ‘shake and bake’ missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out.”
Noone but you thinks WP is a chemical weapon-because it isn’t. I stole this from wikipedia-
Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) which went into effect in April of 1997. The Convention is meant to prohibit weapons that are “dependent on the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare”
WP is not so dependent.
“So by your own admission the US has used chemical weapons.”
No-not if you mean WP.
Falluja
“The cities water, sanitation and electricity supplies were severely disrupted as a result of
these military attacks. Health services have been devastated with medical facilities attacked
and targeted. A huge humanitarian crisis emerged as the siege developed military curfews
were imposed on the cities residents. Food and water was denied to civilians- the military
used this as a weapon during the conflict. These military attacks left the city with hundreds
and thousands of people homeless and displaced. The attacks caused thousands of civilian
casualties mainly women and children.
Doctors for Iraq had medical staff working inside the city during the April and November
2004 sieges. Members witnessed serious breaches of the Geneva Convention and human
rights. These breaches have been embedded in our minds and the minds of civilians
brutalised and traumatise by the illegal acts of aggression carried out by US/ Iraqi forces.”
Well, as the US banned any Western reporting we must rely on people like the Doctors who were there for information inside Falluga.”
I’ll just go with the reporting we got from the 3 major networks on this one. I never knew of any ban on reporting-because they reported on the whole action. So was the systematic torture of the residents of Fallujah by the insurgency not enough for you? As for food, water, shelter and medical services-all the residents had to do was head outside the city to a checkpoint-they’d find it there. As for health services, it was available-from the US.
“DU -
“Although many veterans have complained about Gulf War syndrome, the most dramatic claims of DU-related problems come from the area around Basra, Iraq’s second-largest city. Iraqi troops came under heavy fire here as they retreated from neighboring Kuwait in 1991.
Women who lived near the battlefields or whose husbands had fought in the Gulf War began having more babies with birth defects, doctors say. Some survived, usually those with cleft palates or missing limbs. Others were stillborn, including some with two heads, a single Cyclopean eye or such terrible malformities they barely appeared human.”
and..
“Health effects of DU exposure are typically divided into two broad categories, chemical and radiological. Further delineation is also made between internal and external routes of entry. A number of factors will determine the chemical or radiological affects DU may have, including dose, route and magnitude of exposure, and location of embedded fragments. While the most obvious health risk DU poses is to soldiers in tanks that sustain DU hits, there are others that may be affected as well. Survivors of such hits, soldiers investigating the wreckage, and those responsible for transporting or de-contaminating DU-laden tanks are all at risk to receive potentially harmful exposure to DU. With a half life of 4.5 billion years, DU may also cause harm to surrounding air, water, and soil resources and harm civilians returning to DU contaminated areas.
Of the two potential dangers DU poses, chemical affects are generally considered the most dangerous. Like other heavy metals, such as lead, sufficient DU exposure can be toxic to humans.”
Uh-noone has proven that DU is linked to birth defects-there are plenty of reasons a child near Basra would have them. How about the destructive environmental policies of Saddam.
“And finally, may I remind you that Saddam was a US asset for years, the US got him into power, you had no problem providing him with both conventional and chemical weapons and the US activly supported his internal policing.
Bit rich now claiming that you had to ‘rescue’ the Iraqi people from him…..”
The US did tolerate Hussein, but you’re lying (again) about the rest. The US had no role in his rise to power, although Jimmy Carter (who seems to love dictators) never spoke out against his coup. Or if he did I can’t find it, the US never supported his internal policing or gave him chemical weapons. As for our rescue, well we tolerated him over 20 years ago, now with clarity we see that it was a mistake. That’s what Democracy is about.
Posted by: Ian at July 6, 2006 12:12 AM

Reply

Ian July 6, 2006 at 4:41 am

White phosphorus -
White phosphorus is not listed in the schedules of the Chemical Weapons Convention. It can be legally used as a flare to illuminate the battlefield, or to produce smoke to hide troop movements from the enemy. Like other unlisted substances, it may be deployed for “Military purposes… not dependent on the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare”. But it becomes a chemical weapon as soon as it is used directly against people. A chemical weapon can be “any chemical which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm”. White phosphorus is fat-soluble and burns spontaneously on contact with the air. According to globalsecurity.org: “The burns usually are multiple, deep, and variable in size. The solid in the eye produces severe injury. The particles continue to burn unless deprived of atmospheric oxygen… If service members are hit by pieces of white phosphorus, it could burn right down to the bone.” As it oxidises, it produces smoke composed of phosphorus pentoxide. According to the standard US industrial safety sheet, the smoke “releases heat on contact with moisture and will burn mucous surfaces… Contact… can cause severe eye burns and permanent damage.”
The US army knows that its use as a weapon is illegal. In the Battle Book, published by the US Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, you will find the following sentence: “It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP against personnel targets.”
Well, your own literature defines WP as a chemical weapon.
Falluja -

Reply

Max July 6, 2006 at 7:44 am

Dude, Saddam was not an employee of the CIA. His prosecution is being managed by the Iraqi Government-that’s why they prosecute how they do.
Our literature does not define WP as a chemical weapon-you’ve made an interesting leap though.
Uh, the males were given plenty of time to leave Fallujah before the battle.
DU-still not proven to cause these mystery problems.
Neat however-you seem to go to every lunatic website there is!

Reply

Joe July 6, 2006 at 2:07 pm

Max, your comments are really unneeded, you clearly know nothing about these subjects and just sound ignorant when you denounce them with no substance.

Reply

Shepard July 6, 2006 at 2:44 pm

Its so funny how stupid the comments from the actual soldiers and sailors sound.
You are not fighting for your country, you are fighting for your government. And they don’t have your country in mind, only themselves and their personal gain. When the defense budget goes up Cheyney, Rumsfeld, and Bush Sr. (who works for Carlyle Group) gain from it. Cheyney is the biggest traitor of all, he has invested a lot of his money in European currency because he knows the value of the dollar is going to drop (because of the defense spending).
You are all so brain washed by your own government’s propaganda and are now drones and sheep who will die making the rich richer.
So I really hope you soldiers can just step on a landmine next time you are massacring your way through Iraq. The more American deaths, the faster public opinion for this war and the administration will fall.

Reply

Funforall July 6, 2006 at 5:40 pm

Richard O’Donnell, censors should not win. Please repost your comments.

Reply

Max July 7, 2006 at 12:34 am

“Max, your comments are really unneeded, you clearly know nothing about these subjects and just sound ignorant when you denounce them with no substance.
Posted by: Joe at July 6, 2006 02:07 PM”
Thanks no, When people are pushing lunacy like “it’s genocide against the Iraqi people”, I argue, when Saddam becomes a CIA agent-I don’t need to go into details, because it’s all supposition and completely unsupported.
I think it’s ironic how you insisted that I was wrong and shut up, without proving me wrong. While at the same time chiding me for not supporting statements.

Reply

Jaye July 8, 2006 at 10:54 am

Duh, our Air Force will win! It’s the shopping Mall renovations done by the Iranian cells with backpacks on, that bothers me! So lets all get on board the love train and remember we are all Children of Adam and Noah! Peace!

Reply

Kashkouli July 10, 2006 at 5:16 am

Just a follow up to some replies. Iran operates upgraded AIM-54s on its fleet of F-14s contrary to popular belief that all AIM-54 stock piles in Iran were sabotaged. The few that were sabotaged were repaired and returned to service during the Iran-Iraq war.
Also concerning pilot training, Iran received training from the US prior to 1979. This training was then tested in the intense air war with Iraq with success, considering that Iran’s air force was put under embargoes with no spares or technical advisors that Iraq enjoyed. The air war produced several aces for Iran, a couple of them on the F-14.
As far as how effective Iran’s air force would be depends on how it would be used in an all out war. Yes, it has little chance in air-to-air engagements but there is potential for low flying kamikaze like attacks, especially for the air wing of the IRGC

Reply

Jaye July 11, 2006 at 6:51 am

Just a quick follow up! We will win, in the air and they will renovate our malls with their backpacks and take out many innocent women and children just like our and the Israeli planes do in Iraq and Palestine! War is a good and beautiful thing it controls the population, fills hospitals and cemeteries and is good for the economy. like Patton said in the movie “So help me God, I love it, I really do”

Reply

Amir July 12, 2006 at 1:04 am

Hello, Thanks for your nice and interesting piece.
Just wanted to let you know that the Gulf you spoke about is called Persian Gulf.

Reply

Valuethinker July 12, 2006 at 6:45 am

1. The USAF/USN will beat the Iranian Air Force. No it won’t be a cakewalk, but they can put more airframes in the air, with more modern avionics and pilots with more flying hours, more of the time, than the Iranians can. And the losses will be correspondingly lopsided.
AA will be much more of a problem. Undoubtedly the Iranians have liaised with the Serbians.
F14s are an old airframe. I doubt the Iranians have been able to upgrade the EW capability much. They may have been able to buy Russian AAMs.
A more dangerous possibility is that they have modern Israeli stuff (remember Iran Contra?) but relations between the two have cooled a lot over Hizbollah.
2. Iranians will fight to defend their country. This is an Air Force whose pilots were imprisoned for plotting a coup against the government, and petitioned to be let out of prison to go and fight the Iraqis.
They were let out, and many of them died bombing Baghdad.
Arguing that Iranians won’t fight is like arguing that Americans who vote Democrat wouldn’t fight Iran because they don’t like George Bush.
Iran is a nation with a 2600 year history and sense of national identity. This is also a technologically sophisticated society: they have a lot of very well educated people.
The neocon fantasy that ‘the people will rise up against the regime’ is just that, a neocon fantasy.
Destroying the target sites will be (relatively easy). Verifying destruction of all the key nuclear assets will be (relatively) hard.
What comes *after* that, when the Iranians put infiltrators into Iraq and Afghanistan, and attack US civilian and military installations all over the world, Hizbollah attacks Israel, plus all the other blowback across the moslem world, is another matter entirely. Imagine real attacks by nerve gas armed guerillas against civilian targets in the West.
And consider the impact on the West of $100+/bl oil. Or the destruction of key oil infrastructure in the Gulf by Shi’ite sympathisers.
Like Iraq, starting this war will be easy. Winning round 1 will be painful, but it will happen– the US is simply the world’s most powerful military machine by some margin. After a few thousand sorties, anything which isn’t buried deep will be destroyed or shot down.
But, just like Iraq, the aftermath is unforeseeable and could be quite disastrous.

Reply

Jaye July 12, 2006 at 5:45 pm

Does Persia have the deed to the Gulf? Otherwise its just the GULF! Just a quick follow up! We will win, in the air and they will renovate our malls with their backpacks and take out many innocent women and children just like our and the Israeli planes do in Iraq and Palestine! PS I would love to see the F4 Phantom in action no matter where it was! I love that plane!

Reply

Joe July 13, 2006 at 7:35 pm

People like Jaye really need to be exterminated themselves… I pray to God that people like him aren’t actually in charge in the US military or the world will be in big trouble.
I mean, sure we have the best military, but if we don’t use it responsibly, we will regret it in the end. You have to remember that the European Union is economically much more powerful than the United States and if we had an economic collapse, where would our military go?

Reply

Jaye July 14, 2006 at 6:58 am

The Nazis exterminated people Joseph, are you a Nazi?

Reply

Kevin July 19, 2006 at 1:32 am

Jaye- the F-4 is a machine that was designed to kill large numbers of people. I am quite confused regarding your true feelings. You abhor the innocent lives being lost in the Middle East, but at the same time seem to be salivating at the thought of seeing the Phantom in action. If it does go into action, many will die. As well, it is not only the Nazis who strived/or strive for extermination of whole peoples. Simply listen to the oft spoken goals of Islamic extremists and even the average Joe. they are easy to source. Their stated goal is to eliminate all Jews. Sound familiar? Not sure who the Nazi is here.
Kevin

Reply

Jaye July 19, 2006 at 6:06 pm

Kevin; I meant Air to Air like WW1 when pilots were gentlemen not wimps! F as in F4 stands for fighter! But it can also be used for small loads, not large loads of bombs! Israel must first kill all the 25,000 Israelis called Ester’s Children that live in Iran so they can’t be used as hostages when they and the US attack! They will do it too! War is hell! Also remember Henry Ford was a Nazi too and remember the USS Liberty and the Sabra death camp!
Shalom!

Reply

kevin July 22, 2006 at 3:05 am

Jaye- Shalom?? I am of Dutch heritage but would certainly not be ashamed if I had some Jewish blood in my veins just I as I would not be shamed if I was of Arab, Persian, Buddhist or whatever the hell decsent. Are you mocking the Jews at this very difficult time for them as well as the rest of the world? Even the Arab League is expressing their regret for the unprovoked attacks on the Israelis. Your message seems to invoke many images of the Brown Shirts in 1930′s Germany. As well, our fast jet pilots and those of other nations described as wimps? What do you drive to work every morning? Does backing your car out of your driveway even begin to compare to lifting off a runway with a weapon and gas laden high performance fighter mean anything? These pilots are simply doing their jobs as they have been trained and instructed. They are certainly not at peril when compared to WWI fighter pilots… but wimps? Please!! They risk their necks during every flight. As you seem to be an aviation enthusiast, you must know this to be true. When it comes to these noble warriors of all nations, please leave politics and your personal resentments and insecurities out of it.
God bless those of all nations who carry the load politicans heap upon them, Jaye.
Kevin

Reply

Jaye July 22, 2006 at 6:43 am

Kevin; Salam, I think the Israelis have gone a bridge too far! Wake up and Look up the USS Liberty and the Sabra Massacre. Brave, strong, tough US and Israeli pilots kill many innocent women and children but when they are shot down they cry and beg like women and children. You can add to the coward list the IDF snipers who also love to kill innocent women and children! As proved by WW2 the Dutch are great warriors because those wooden shoes really hurt when you kick someone with them! Ouch!

Reply

mh-jahanpanah July 23, 2006 at 8:56 am

hi friends
iran air force has new apility for engage to all enemy 2 su.30 resive to iran and this is 2 of 24 aircraft
and air defence complited by tour missile
iran very stranger as israel(iran and israel war is very funy)
and usa dident attack to iran because this is the hard target and big enemy

Reply

F14-Fan July 30, 2006 at 10:10 pm

Correction:
The water way is called: Persian Gulf
It has always been called Persian Gulf
Hostility in the region does not change
Geographical names.

Reply

mehrdad September 1, 2006 at 8:07 am

hey hello
iranian air force have mig-23&mig-27&mig-31
and Su-22&24&27&30&25
tu-22-h-6
ok
see you air

Reply

Danial September 3, 2006 at 9:55 am

Hi there,
With regards to Iranian air power. They have been steadly increasing their capability interms of firepower and quantity of quality military assets. As mentioned earlier, they have receieved Su-30, a very powerful combat aircraft. The Su-30 may be going through the latest version that includes latest state of the art anti ship and submarine weapons and the much improved AA-12 Addar missiles and possibly a new missile as similar to the F-14 Pheonix. What’s more they also have the latest weapons that goes with some Russian aircrafts.
Pilot training is very well planned. They have revamp their training programs. Years has been spent on developing an effective top gun training program. I was informed that an Iranian pilot gets 180 hours a year.
On top of this, it is rumoured that China might be supplying around 90 FC-1 combat aircraft and 60 F-10 combat aircraft.

Reply

Danial September 3, 2006 at 10:04 am

Hello,
The Iranians have upgraded the following aircraft in terms of weapons systems and avionics with the help of Russia and China; MiG-23 (New weapons systems to include AA-12 missiles, smart bombs and effective RWR and flight refuelling. It also has datalink and much improved radar system); MiG-23/27; The Flogger attack version has seen improvements in avionics area and the ability to use smart munitions. Some of the smart munitions was developed in conjunction with Russian weapons manufacturers. They are also equipped with inflight refuelling system. Su-24 Fencer has been improved. F-7 fighters have also had their weapons and avionics improved. Iran is considering buying additional F-7MG aircraft to equip another 3-4 squadrons. Nearly all US jets such as the F-14, F-4 and F-5E aircraft have been mastered in areas of maintenance especially when support in the fabrication of parts comes from China and weapons system fabrication comes with the help of Russia in exchange for inspecting US equippment for research.

Reply

Danial September 3, 2006 at 10:12 am

I wouldn’t say Iran has 300 aircraft. Most probably, they have between 530-570 operational aircraft and around 110-140 aircraft reserved (especially J-7, F-14, F-4E, F-5E, J-6, Mirage F-1).
FYI, Iran has the latest Russian and Chinese SAM systems. All integrated with communications using fibre optics cable as compared to aerial. Iran has also been granted to use Russia’s spy satelites as art of their defence treaty with Russian and some CIS nations. PS. I don’t think US will attack Iran due to its treaty with Russia in the area of defence protection. (I hope no one missed this out..for all you out there who didn’t even know there was a serious defence treaty between Iran, Russia and some CIS states. Check it out on the web. I guess many governments know this including the US but not the people!)

Reply

ContractorHack September 20, 2006 at 11:38 pm

Too many people over estimate the numbers of aircraft the IRIAF inventories. Although the number of competant combat aircraft is high, they’re mostly of non US origin. Even though the former Bell complex (which I think is at Mehrabad International Airport) is quite capable of producing modern components for F-4s and F-5s, the number of F-14s has been seriously reduced from 79+2 in spares to something like 35-38. There’s been talk of Iran producing new build tomcats and phantoms but this is all conjecture and there is nothing to support this theory at all. Also, there has been talk of the IRIAF acquiring advanced Su-30, 35 models but these are only in the tentative stages. It probably won’t happen anytime soon as the US is increasingly edgy about countries buying the Su-30 and will put considerable pressure on the Russian defence industry to prevent any sales (look at the US acquisition of moldovan Mig-29s)

Reply

Maximilian September 29, 2006 at 12:14 am

I can’t wait for Iran’s Air Force to be destroyed by the US Air force.

Reply

saman November 8, 2006 at 12:44 am

hello guys. Im an iranian engneer ( in air force) . i want say to you that iran bought several new planes , like MIG-31b ( 30) su-30 mk ( ? ) , su-25( 24) and upgrade his ex-iraqi MIG-23 and MIG-27 ( both : 24) therefor see that increase his air force capability . althought we do reverse engeenering on the ” phonix ” aam .its righ that we cant do many thing about the usa air force bout in the region only israeil have experiance as well as us . thanks saman. u can sent your idea to this mail: oburi_62@yahoo.com

Reply

saman November 8, 2006 at 12:49 am

hello guys. Im an iranian engneer ( in air force) . i want say to you that iran bought several new planes , like MIG-31b ( 30) su-30 mk ( ? ) , su-25( 24) and upgrade his ex-iraqi MIG-23 and MIG-27 ( both : 24) therefor see that increase his air force capability . althought we do reverse engeenering on the ” phonix ” aam .its righ that we cant do many thing about the usa air force bout in the region only israeil have experiance as well as us . thanks saman. u can sent your idea to this mail: oburi_62@yahoo.com

Reply

Mehrdad November 12, 2006 at 1:51 am

hey
I really want to c how us destroy iran military power.that would be amazing.
(from iran)

Reply

Ahmad November 17, 2006 at 3:38 am

Dear Sirs:
donot forget that there are a lot of differences between Iranians and Arabs.Most of you donot know that Iranians,Persians,will fight with tooth and nails vice versa of Arabs who are very coward and have a lot of fears.IRAF personnels have a lot of spiritual trainining in which they learn to defend of their countries like a sacred thing.

Reply

Beaston November 29, 2006 at 5:02 am

First off, I don’ think that the military would be spending over $361 million for a plane unless it was the most unbeatable platform ever designed. Over the course of about two-three weeks, 20-25 Raptors could virtually wipe every plane off Irans inventory, and yes even the F-14 wouldnt be able to survive….(and I love the F-14 so dont get me wrong, but it does have some shortcomings) One a side note for the F-14′s…remember that these are A models and there airframes are around 30+ years old, hence why they are being retired now by the US navy. I read somewhere that Iran could only remanufacture about 60% of the components for their fleet anyway, so maitenance shortfalls will further reduce their fleet effectiveness. The number of aircraft that are actually flyable has always been greatly exaggerated. As for their tanker fleet, those wouldnt last a single day, and would be easy air to air targets for about ANY U.S. aircraft. Although the US would prevail easy in an air war with minimanl losses, the main threat would be from surface to air missles, which will be a tougher defense to beat. Once total air dominance is achieved, then ground targets can be hit at will. Now after all this talk about an air war, the real consequences would come from a much larger terrorist threat throughout the world, especailly the radical muslim world as a reaction to US/NATO/ALLIED military action. The best possible action before any military solution is diplomacy or severe UN sanctions (that would actually work).

Reply

Phil December 23, 2006 at 4:27 pm

When Iran deploys numberous Russian ultra high-speed Moskit (Sunburn) cruise missiles and sinks most of the US naval fleet in the Indian ocean and in the gulf, including the sinking of American aircraft carriers by these unstoppable missiles. Then let me hear all of your stupid talk.

Reply

yashar January 12, 2007 at 7:29 am

Level of your first speech have shown the level
of your mind & culture .
We will see what should be done finally .

Reply

Lunakhod January 25, 2007 at 5:26 pm

For the time being US troops are in deep trouble and I don’t see how they will be able to head to another war!
It is interesting to note that some want to “Kick Iranian’s ass” while their own “Bottoms” are being kicked in Iraq and Afghanistan. And also, The Persian Gulf can be a boiling area for American-Arab Allies.

Reply

daniel March 19, 2007 at 7:13 pm

i think iranian air force and the iranian navy has done to much to get ready for such an attack during all these years and they know iraq and afganistan much better than americans and you should know that there is another millitary force in iran named SEPAH that has its own air force,navy and land forces and americans can not control a war the persian gulf or any where ealse in iran.

Reply

Dariush March 29, 2007 at 3:57 pm

Voghan, fek mikonam Iran fateh mishe, age ke Emrica ba havapeyma hamle mikone.

Reply

arab man April 14, 2007 at 2:40 am

Please, wake up brothers of middle east. American military aviation will crush Iranian so called air force. Old SU-24 and F-14a no match for Super Hornet or F-22. God be with you.

Reply

busy June 12, 2007 at 10:52 am

IRAN to me is the finale card game. Any event that takes place there has wordwide repercusions. Even massive Bombings would only generate an end to oil in the region, of this am sure. Compare it to Germany as Iraq is Stalingrad and Iran the promise of oil to the south, a pretty target but a bridge too far.

Reply

the dood June 27, 2007 at 11:39 am

The US could disintegrate the entire Iranian nation with nukes in a very short period of time…..if it really wanted to, i’m sure some of us are forgetting that!!

Reply

Max June 30, 2007 at 12:32 pm

I am looking forward towards an American air/naval campaign against the “Islamic Republic”.

Reply

mick July 27, 2007 at 2:44 pm

I take it that Max of june 30 remark is a member of the armed forces.I wish him all the best and hope he can be in the forefront of any attack.Then he might change his mind about looking forward to it.

Reply

mick July 27, 2007 at 2:45 pm

I take it that Max of june 30 remark is a member of the armed forces.I wish him all the best and hope he can be in the forefront of any attack.Then he might change his mind about looking forward to it.

Reply

Jose July 31, 2007 at 9:24 pm

I believe it should be added that IF we need to kick their trash for legitimated reasons, they will get THE whooping of their lives. This nation when united can achieve amazing things. A Radical terrorist is willing to die for his cause just as much as we are willing to help him get there.

Reply

stacker2005 July 31, 2007 at 10:47 pm

There is so much ignorance on this post. Not all the posts, but many of them are filled with ignorant, blind hatred, which is the root of the problem.
We (The U.S.) need to finish our job in Iraq. We started this, we need to stick around long enough to get the Iraqi forces stable enough to handle it on their own before we pull out.
We need to heed our lessons learned from Iraq before we consider any action against Iran. What we don’t need is to destabilize the Middle East more than it already is.
War is not the solution here. Diplomacy and U.N. Sanctions are the only right way to handle this conflict.

Reply

StompinStu August 12, 2007 at 11:24 am

Everyone is saying use diplomacy and the UN, etc., etc. I guess the pacifists forgot how well all that worked prior to World War II?
Remember Chamberlain proclaiming “Peace in our times?” No, you probably don’t. You don’t take the time to research history and compare current events to similiar times of the past.
You also don’t take the time to understand our enemy. If you were to ask the leadership of Iran if they wanted to destroy the United States, and could do it and get away with it, would they, their answer would be yes. They would also answer yes to the question if posed that they would have to destroy themselves to destroy the United States. Until people realize that, then people won’t comprehend to what lengths these extremist countries want to do us harm.

Reply

mick August 12, 2007 at 3:08 pm

You do not have to be a pacifist to realise that war is futile.Yes if your country is attacked then you respond with whatever force it takes.You do not however go rolling into other countrys just because you dont like there way of conducting business.Have’nt we learned anything from debacles like Vietnam Ask the French about their involvement in that country long before the U.S.A arrived.Or have you even heard of Dien Bien Phu.Most of the people who advocate going to war,are the one sitting at home in office jobs.Nice being an armchair patriot.Just grow up !!!

Reply

Winston August 23, 2007 at 1:31 pm

Bravo Sierra!

Reply

mick August 24, 2007 at 4:44 am

Well Winston, congratulation on posting a most intelligent and constructive comment.

Reply

Novosti86 September 24, 2007 at 5:28 pm

To John
I do not think that Iran air force is stronger but i think that U.S air force is not that strong too.
First lets talk about F-117 ,those planes looks great ,and they are designed to be “undetected” by radar. I think you should question your self about that “undetected” as every modern radar can track them down ,it has been proven in Serbia when 2x F-117 were shot down by Mig-29 (first model) that were not even upgraded (had no more money to keep their air force updated). About F-16 and F/A-18 those were beaten by Mig-29 in Germany 2002 at ease(F-16 lost 20:2 and F/A-18 lost 20:7)(this was friendly air to air combat where they tested planes ,tactics etc ,but if was real war they wouldn’t pass any better) ,F-15 is good (long range fighter),but not that good if you compare it against Mig-31(also long range fighter) who has better radar ,longer range than F-15 and (as i heard longer range of missiles too) ,F-22 is new jet ,pilots need time to get familiar with new aircraft so that means they will not use it 100% as it was made to be used ,not to mention that Su-30 can detect it (or why wouldn’t U.S.A already took challenge of Sukhoi to let F-22 fight against Su-30??) Last but not least is that U.S.A aircrafts have vector trust able only with F-22 ,Russians have vector trusting in service for more than 10 years.If someone think that Russian plane “SUX” they are very wrong ,in fact i think Russians have great fighter jets. I just hope this thing about Iran will be solved with Politics than with war.I hate to see innocent people die ,or someone children to be sent to war for nothing.

Reply

miles October 26, 2007 at 12:47 pm

I like your post SAM, but Amerikkka was not liked in the 50′s, except for white Europeans. First Amerikkka is occupied territory just like Palestine! She has for decades if not centuries wage genocidal wars against people of color.In the near future these crackers will be in a minority status and as soon as they become vulnerable they will come under attack in their own backyard. Many will have to flee to UK and Australia.
Iran should give them 30 days to vacate the Persian Gulf, then launch a preemptive all-out attack on its carrier force and those murderous Amerikkkan terrorist occupying Iraq!

Reply

oscar November 20, 2007 at 12:58 am

Iran compare to U.S. is no match.But don’t underestimate your enemy.Remember Vietnam? America lost that war.It is true U.S. has the military power but the people has no WILL to go to war.Only your leader has the will to conquer the OIL rich countries.

Reply

Old soldier December 21, 2007 at 12:05 pm

As a Canadian, former serviceman (airforce) and friend of the United States I am deeply worried by the “hawkish” views of many Americans. Although there is no doubt that the United States air forces would defeat the Iranian airforce the cost would likely be higher than expected. First, I do not believe that the American public has the stomach to fight another war. Second, the suggestion that other Arab countries would welcome an attack by the United States is naive at best. It is extremely doubtful that these regimes would take part overtly on either side; however, elements of these regimes may covertly support the Iranians or in some instances the Americans. I urge all Americans to remember that in Muslim society, Sunni or Shite, God and faith comes first, tribe (family) second, power third and country fourth. Their belief and adherence to their faith is virtually universal, much more so than our dedication to our own Christian faith. For doubters, simply look at Mecca and the Haj. No matter what we do in either reconstruction or other acts of kindness we will always be crusader infidels. I recently listened to a Canadian Major fighting in Afghanistan say “If we start working with the young now we can achieve some success but it will take at least two generations” (Yes, Canadian soldiers are fighting in Afghanistan and have currently suffered 73 combat related deaths). Therefore, it can reasonably be said that the Taliband and Iranian regime have time on their side. Canadians like Americans do not have the will to remain involved militarily for another 50 years. An air campaign against Iraq could easily result in a ground assault by the Iranians into Afghanistan. This would force an immediate reaction by United States and allied forces to counter the threat. Consequently, an eventual combined operations war in Iran and Afghanistan would result in enormous economic and political consequences for the West and particularly the United States. I have no doubt that United States allies including Canada would take this opportunity to leave Afghanistan citing the unprovoked attach by the United States against Iran as the reason. Needless to say, a ground invasion of Iran, if undertaken, would make Iraq and Afghanistan look like childs play.
Teddy Roosevelt’s famous comment, “Walk softly but carry a big stick” is appropriate, particularly the “Walk softly” portion.

Reply

ramin January 21, 2008 at 4:36 pm

to all you ppl here iranian army is one of the strongest in the world today and america cant do a damn thing to us we are waiting for you americans for passed 28 years and we still see nothing and by the way america is falling really fast we will bring the U.S down
america the great satan your time is over

Reply

Lenard January 30, 2008 at 1:39 pm

Hello there
I am a fan of fast planes and while I was surfing and searching for Su 30- Su 47 and … landed on this site.
Its nice to read peacful messages and I

Reply

Gary February 2, 2008 at 9:48 pm

Hello Lenard,
It was nice to read your point of view and as well it was to see it wasn’t loaded with Anit-Americanism or hatred. One thing though do not apologize for what you consider to be bad English. You do something a vast majority of Americans can’t and that is read/write more than one language.
I think you said it best when you said with our 2 current President’s it will be impossible to build a friendly tone and hopefully their predecessors will do better. On our side if the republicans when the Presidency it may be awhile before relations with the Iranian government thaw and from some research I have been doing it appears as if Ahmadinejad has been manuevering some very strong influences into key positions to enable him to be re-elected a couple of times.
I believe the vast majority of the people of Iran probably feel the same way as you and I. War is not the answer but with our countries respective political leaders at the moment I feel unfortanately that is all we are going to hear.
And yes the events that unfolded after 9/11 are still somewhat clear. I remember the news showing the countries that were happy we were hit and I remember a small blurp about what you said about the Iranian’s not celbrating but mourning the loss of the helpless. I think some of that may be in part due to a large group of the people in your country still remember that at one time the U.S and Iran were friends. Our Governments haven’t always been hostile and hopefully the day will come when they can sit and talk again.
I found your discussion about what you did with your time in the miltary quite fasinating as I just gave a short lecture on the Islamic Republic Iran Air Force. Information on Irans capabilites is tough to come by. For the combat aircraft I found the Lightning (English name) or as its known in Iran the Saeqeh. The one I found virtually no information on though was the Safak. I did find a video that had what I thought may have been the Safak although I couldn’t tell for sure. I would imagine that at about the same time you were arressted was when we started investigating US companies for violating US export control acts.
Next week I am turning in a regional studies research paper on Iran and in 2 weeks I am again doing a small informal lecture primarily covering the history, culture and either the leadership of Iran or the Economics. I would love to do a small and quick email interview with you if I could so I can offer an Iranian national’s point of view. You can email me at gary27530@yahoo.com the paper will not be published it is a school project and the lecture is merely a presentation to my classmates. If you choose not to I understand.
Thanks for being levelheaded in your post.

Reply

nadir February 5, 2008 at 2:15 pm

Well, first of all., it is called Persian Gulf and not Arabia gulf. Second of all, you american do not like to accept the truth, your government can NOT defeat Iran’s government. Iran is not Iraq. Western and Russian military experts have been warning the US for years that moving forces inside Iran’s plateau means opening the gates of hell to US soldiers.

Reply

Dariush February 5, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Americans! A country with such a political, geographic, and economic position as Iran is now more that ever the target of attention of the big powers, especially the US. there is no other way to deter the enemies from attacking us except to increase our defensive capabilities side by side with active diplomacy. And guess what? Iran is now the biggest Military Power in the Region. We want peace and therefore we are always prepared for war.

Reply

shahin March 12, 2008 at 2:04 pm

Unfortunatly, all of you are partialy right and partialy wrong. The Iranian airforce is weak compared to the one of Saudi Arabia, Israel and the mighty US forces in the PERSIAN Gulf. By the way who ever says The ARABIAN Gulf, we the Persians should not get angry since our worldwide ‘prestige’ now dictates for this insult. We simply gave it away. As the late Imam Khomeini used to say:’ Economics if for dunkies’. Well, getting back to the Iranian airforce. We have only 10 operating F-14 tomcats. The USA Airforce grounded its fleets of F-14 for good simply because of the operating costs of more than $1Million for each flight of tomcats. And that is in the US. That cost is even higher in Iran since the maintance is subpar. The Iranian industry is at its infency and lacks high production level and experience. Iran possess no more than 50 ‘quality’ airplanes such as Mig 29s and Sukhoi 25 frog foot which are no match for the US, Saudis or Israel Airforce. Iran airforce is a cakewalk. What the US must be concerned is Iran’s number of ground forces that will play the game of hide and seek and strikes when enemey appeares from the horzone. The Iranian armforces are weak and can be defeated even easier than Sadams forth largest army in the world. Iran can strike the US and other forces with Missiles which lack accuracy. Iranian navy is very weak and they rely on small petrol boats. Iran do posses three Kilo class subs from Russia but the Persian Gulf waters are too shallow to be effective and the Subs are constant repair nightmare. So there you have, talk is cheap but we should all realize that the Iranian old and aging armforces are no match to any in the region and the USA….

Reply

shahin March 12, 2008 at 2:11 pm

Unfortunatly, all of you are partialy right and partialy wrong. The Iranian airforce is weak compared to the one of Saudi Arabia, Israel and the mighty US forces in the PERSIAN Gulf. By the way who ever says The ARABIAN Gulf, we the Persians should not get angry since our worldwide ‘prestige’ now dictates for this insult. We simply gave it away. As the late Imam Khomeini used to say:’ Economics is for dunkies’. Well, getting back to the Iranian airforce. We have only 10 operating F-14 tomcats. The USA Airforce grounded its fleets of F-14 for good simply because of the operating costs of more than $1Million for each flight of tomcats. And that is in the US. That cost is even higher in Iran since the maintance is subpar. The Iranian industry is at its infency and lacks high production level and experience. Iran possess no more than 50 ‘quality’ airplanes such as Mig 29s and Sukhoi 25 frog foot which are no match for the US, Saudis or Israel Airforce. Iran airforce is a cakewalk. What the US must be concerned is Iran’s number of ground forces that will play the game of hide and seek and strikes when enemey appeares from the horzone. The Iranian armforces are weak and can be defeated even easier than Sadams forth largest army in the world. Iran can strike the US and other forces with Missiles which lack accuracy. Iranian navy is very weak and they rely on small petrol boats. Iran do posses three Kilo class subs from Russia but the Persian Gulf waters are too shallow to be effective and the Subs are constant repair nightmare. So there you have, talk is cheap but we should all realize that the Iranian old and aging armforces are no match to any in the region and the USA….

Reply

Jacon Nielson March 12, 2008 at 11:09 pm

“We must find a diplomatic solution to the problem of Iran’s nuclear ambitions.”
Iran’s actions and not its military capability should be the factor in whether we decide on a diplomatic solution or military response. As long as Iran complies with the UN and shows a willingness to work with us, then war is off the table and a diplomatic solution is appropriate. However, if Iran were to initiate an unprovoked hostile action, then we should take the fight to Tehran no matter how difficult the fight will be.

Reply

shahin March 18, 2008 at 9:34 am

To have an effective airfoce you need several thing: Modern planes with advance avionics, speed of the plane and training of the pilot. To win an airwar it takes only seconds. Western planes with their shoot and forget misiles are the best in the world. Adding to this is the western pilot training. Iranian pilots lacks training. Their aging fleet of F-14 planes without the black boxes are no match to an F-15 or the formidable F-22. Iran might produce tanks in masses but they are copies of the Soviet T-72 tanks that are no match to the Western Tanks or the might M1A US battle tanks. It is not the matter of if the US can attack Iran it is the matter of WHEN….

Reply

Iranian April 15, 2008 at 1:16 pm

IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.

Reply

Iranian April 15, 2008 at 1:17 pm

IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.

Reply

Iranians April 15, 2008 at 1:20 pm

IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.
IT IS A “PERSIAN GOULF” NOT, ARABIAN GUOLF.

Reply

Iranians April 16, 2008 at 12:23 pm

DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABSDOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS
DOWN TO ARABS

Reply

GOd BLESS IRANIANS April 30, 2008 at 3:38 pm

Down to all the people who regard Iran as terrorist country and recognise the government of Islamic republic and assuming or maybe (HOPING) that they represent Iranian people!
Iranian are a big nation, they forgive all the damages that has been made to them in past, but they will never forget. It is only a shame that you people cannot hear the voice of the IRANIAN PEOPLE, if you could, then you would hear 75,000,000 million united voice saying

Reply

enzo May 11, 2008 at 8:36 am

Everyone, before you talk about war, go and read “All Quiet on the Western Front”.
Governments want to fight not the people. After all, in the end, the people die. not governments.
I love airplanes, but I prefer to see them on display rather then fighting.
long live piece and harmony.

Reply

ARIYAN June 4, 2008 at 8:59 am

LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF
LONG LAST IRAN & GOD BLESS PERSIAN GULF

Reply

BABAK June 4, 2008 at 9:05 am

It is persian gulf not an Arabian gulf, therfore this article is ball-shit.
*************************************************
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LONG LIFE TO IRANIANS<<<<<<<<<<<<<
*************************************************

Reply

Mehran June 4, 2008 at 9:32 am

Persian gulf is not arabian gulf, whether you like it or not! you can go after the regime of iran, but not its people. your not strong enough.

Reply

Hoshang June 4, 2008 at 9:40 am

Note to all the arabs:
ITS PERSIAN GULF.
you got to be an arab to get that wrong (STUPET KID) because even arabs know that its persian gulf!

Reply

Mitra June 5, 2008 at 11:55 am

Those people who say PERSIAN GULF is an “arabian gulf”, they need to look at their history and see, if their country exist we Iran did? None of the Arabs country can possibly make this claim, because the most historical country among them is

Reply

Soual June 5, 2008 at 12:16 pm

One day Iran will be free and liberated. When that they come no Iranian will stand beside the Arabs country, and make them remember that Iran will always be Iran Persian gulf will always be Persian gulf, Caspian sea, and most importantly 3 three island south of Iran that U.A.E is claiming it, will always be part of the great nation of Iran.

Reply

Shahab June 5, 2008 at 12:32 pm

IF WE, IRANIANS HAD A FLAG TO HOLD IT AGIANST THE ABHORRENCE OF IRAN, THIS DAY WOULD NEVER COME, THAT PERSIAN GULF WOULD BE REFFRED TO AS ARABIAN GULF!
IRAN HAS ONLY ONE FLAG & THAT IS

Reply

Shahab June 9, 2008 at 1:02 pm

First of all, congratulation to all the people in the national team and best of luck in the future games. Secondly, I like to bring up an issue, which our national team is suffering from it very heavily. Who is behind these entire problems that the

Reply

Harry Marsh June 29, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Israel will get their asses kicked if the attack Iran.
They will need to get the US to do their fighting for them.

Reply

ASHKAN July 1, 2008 at 8:58 am

IRAN WILL ALWAYS BE IRAN SO PERSIAN GULF AND CASPAIN SEA WILL ALWAYS REAMAIN THE SAME NAME.
**********************************************
——————LION AND SUN—————-
**********************************************
IRAN WILL NEVER TURN TO PART, NO IRANIAN WILL ALOW THIS TO HAPPEN.

Reply

English geezer July 2, 2008 at 4:19 pm

I say let Iran build their Nuke facilities and let the good old tried and tested (from 1945 to 1989) Mutually Assured Destruction do it’s thing. Wanna wipe Israel off the face of the Earth? The price ain’t gonna be worth it if you do…
No need to do anything but let Iran back itself into it’s own hole…
Who stopped the UK from building a bomb?
or France?
Israel?
Pakistan?
India?
N.Korea…?

Reply

Farshid July 3, 2008 at 7:09 am

First of all, IT IS PERSIAN GULF. Secondly it is the Islamic regime of Iran that wants to build nuke facilities not the Iranian people. Iran is a peaceful nation, and Iranian people were the beginners of the WORLD CIVILISATION. No Iranians have any interest to create violent or instability in the region, it is the Islamic regime that is doing so. Having said that, NO IRANIAN WILL THE THEIR GREAT NATION OF IRAN TO TURN APART OR BE OCCUPIED. Down to the regime of Iran. This regime will be destroyed by the hands of the Iranian people.
PERSIAN GULF WILL REMAIN

Reply

Nikou July 3, 2008 at 5:39 pm

Its Persian Gulf , NOT Arabian Gulf.

Reply

afhsar July 7, 2008 at 12:32 pm

there are around 85 million iranian around the world, as long as there is breath in their boody, the name persian gulf will NEVER CHANGE…

Reply

afhsar July 7, 2008 at 12:33 pm

there are around 85 million iranian around the world, as long as there is breath in their boody, the name persian gulf will NEVER CHANGE…

Reply

Soul July 13, 2008 at 5:36 am

I am half iranian, and half British. I have read 10′s of book regardin 600BC – 100BC History. were did the name Arabian Gulf come from?
The name Persia has always been used to describe the nation of Iran, its people, and its ancient empires since 600 BC. It is derived from the ancient Greek name for Iran’s maritime province, called Fars or Pars in modern Persian, Pars in Middle Persian and P

Reply

armin July 13, 2008 at 5:54 am

Before Islam, all these countries belonged to the Persian empire (IRAN), Therefore, when the Persian Gulf is changed to another name, it doesn

Reply

armin July 13, 2008 at 5:54 am

Before Islam, all these countries belonged to the Persian empire (IRAN), Therefore, when the Persian Gulf is changed to another name, it doesnt matter what ideology you belong to, its insulting.

Reply

sasan July 28, 2008 at 11:57 am

The persoan who has written this article, dont know the first thing abount history. THE NAME IS PERSIAN GULF. THANT IS IT, NOTHING BUT PERSIAN GULF.

Reply

sasan July 28, 2008 at 11:57 am

The persoan who has written this article, dont know the first thing abount history. THE NAME IS PERSIAN GULF. THANT IS IT, NOTHING BUT PERSIAN GULF.

Reply

dofus kamas August 5, 2008 at 3:27 am

I as if could also recall minding initially your appearance because of have no dofus kamas, and then you met misfortune.

Reply

cheap eve isk August 5, 2008 at 3:29 am

They all teach me many skills of defence and how to make cheap eve isk.

Reply

afshin August 11, 2008 at 10:19 am

I DONT GET IT! SOME PEOPLE DONT EVEN READ THIS ARTICLE, AND JUST POST A COMMENT FOR THE POSTING IT! ANYWAY…I AGREE WITH MY ALMOST ALL OF YOU HOW POST A COMMENT HERE. IRANIAN POEPLE ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE REGIM OF IRAN, THERFORE TO CALL THE WATER WAY “ARABIAN GULF”!!!! IS INSULTING, AND MORE IMPORTANLY WRONG. THE CORRECT NAME IS PERSIAN GULF AND WILL ALWAYS REMAIN WITH THIS NAME. SOME PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THAT, THEY CANNOT REWRITE OR RE-TELL THE HISTORY THEY WAY THEY LIKE IT TO BE. PERSIAN GULF HAS BEN WRITTEN IN HISTORY, AND BY “YOU” CALLING IT ARABIAN GULF, WILL NOT CHANGE ANYTHING.
***LONG LIFE TO IRAN AND ALL THE IRANIAN***
***LONG LIFE TO IRAN AND ALL THE IRANIAN***
***LONG LIFE TO IRAN AND ALL THE IRANIAN***
***LONG LIFE TO IRAN AND ALL THE IRANIAN***
***LONG LIFE TO IRAN AND ALL THE IRANIAN***

Reply

cheap Habbo Coins August 13, 2008 at 10:25 pm

As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!

Reply

LOTRO Gold August 13, 2008 at 10:27 pm

Finally, I gained have sufficed the LOTRO Gold, had the family. We were in together finally.

Reply

buy last chaos gold August 13, 2008 at 11:18 pm

If we do not have the good fortune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.

Reply

Metin2 gold August 19, 2008 at 12:17 am

Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

Reply

Buy metin2 gold August 19, 2008 at 12:22 am

If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the company. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

Reply

paul August 19, 2008 at 8:47 am

The might be a greater military powers in world than Iran, but I am sure that no nation in the world are more nationalist than the Iranian people. In this article the world

Reply

ava August 19, 2008 at 8:58 am

NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.
NO ONE WILL EVER BE ABLE TO RULE IRAN LIKE IRAQ…NEVER.

Reply

Sea Dog January 8, 2009 at 9:44 pm

Iran has about 250 combat air craft,, about 50 american fighters plus a AWAC could tke them all out in a pitched battle in about 15 minutes…..
Irans best bet would be to bury them and try to protect them with anti air craft missles.

Reply

daz February 1, 2009 at 12:17 am

Now Iran has purchased 250 Su30 Sukhoi from our Rusky friends. It is more advanced than F16 and F18 Super Hornet. Those advanced planes and Extremely intelligent Iranian fighter pilots makes Iran a VERY powerful air force.

Reply

Iranian April 21, 2009 at 7:15 am

Its PERSIAN GULF,
and will always be.
Iran is the eldest country on earth and the first superpower in history with the longest uninterrupted cultural history in the world.
Its funny to see people from countries whose history does not even reach a millinuem are talking about Iran.
Go get a life.
Iran fought with US navy during 80′s when USA was helping Saddam against Iran and Iran came out victorious. That is a fact.

Reply

The Drummer June 21, 2009 at 12:08 am

Operation Preying Mantis

Reply

John July 25, 2009 at 2:13 pm

The Iranian Air Force couldn’t handle the Iraqi Air Force, they assumed a defensive position for the duration of that long war, which is why they still have so many F-4s and F-14s left. They would be no match for either the U.S. or the Israeli Air Force.

Reply

Jayson August 3, 2009 at 10:44 pm

US won’t attack Iran because they know Iran has nukes unlike Iraq…

Reply

Jayson E August 3, 2009 at 10:44 pm

US won’t attack Iran because they know Iran has nukes unlike Iraq…

Reply

Harry August 8, 2009 at 10:23 am

Iran is going to get their ass kick big time by the Israel Air Force. A war between Israel and Iran will be over faster than the 6-day ware. And Israel will win again.
These dumb ass think they can win against USA and Israel. What the hell are thing thinking.
Yes Iran is 1,000s of year older than the USA. But Iran is still in the past. If it was not for their oil they would have nothing but a horse to ride.

Reply

Man August 30, 2009 at 5:47 am

how izrail cant destroy 2000 young hezbollah militarists and will win agains Iran?

Reply

Iranian Soldier September 9, 2009 at 8:27 pm

It seems you’ve a problem in your ass. Let’s kick it! If you plan to come to Iran, bring another ass for yourself since I don’t think you’d be able to move your own out. Besides, don’t forget new legs, you can’t escape with broken legs.
This was just an advice, you’re free to test or to live in peace. We are peace loving people.

Reply

Iranian Soldier September 10, 2009 at 4:57 am

It seems that your ass is pushin in. Just don’t try Iran if you wanna keep it safe.

Reply

aaa September 11, 2009 at 9:18 pm

if you realy think that USA is so powerful, why it does not atack to Iran ???????? why USA has been waiting for 30 years.
If USA would think that Iran is like Iraq and Afghanistan, why it didn’t do any attack against Iran ?
so it is not easy to attack. If it was, USA would attack 20 years before not now.

Reply

Shalom September 20, 2009 at 3:38 pm

asymmetry (warfare)
is as holy as Trinity
Even from the heavenly skies
(And I don’t even believe in the trinity)
(And I’m not jewish either)

Reply

shahin October 13, 2009 at 8:04 am

I have studied the Iranian arm forces carefully. We must understand one thing. Any war is one by air! That is the most crutial point. The Iranians have 50 operational aircrafts. The F-14s are useless. Its radar is now outdated. The Iranian gave the Russian a copy of the F-14 with 6 pheonix missiles in exchange of military hardwares. The Russian tok the plane apart and incorporated some of its technology into its own. Now you wonder why the US Navy discontinued the F-114? Hummmm But the Iranian fleet has passed its prime and lacks proper maintenance and technology upgrade. Iran can fly only 5 F-14 at any given time but they are not combat capable to due metal fatig and salt water damage to the airframe since the Iranian airforce uses some F-14 in patrol in the Persian Gulf. The second point is that the day of dogfights are over! It will now take seconds for a western Airforce plane to shootdown the enemy. That is due to advance technology and PILOT TRAINING! Iranian planes are not only no match to the western airforces and teh Saudis or the Israelis, also Iranian pilots lack training. Before the revolution we had few topgun pilots but since than they either have fled the country, been executed or have retired many years ago. But today we have to yet find one qualified iranian pilot with one reasonably advanced airplane which has been properly maintained. Iran’s ONLY hope is build the bomb. Once they got it then it can dictate whatever it wants. But for now Iranian armforces, especially its airforce is weak. Iran has no Navy but few small chines patrol boats. Its 3 diesel subs are constantly in the shop due to repair nightmares. Iran only posses large quantities of ground troops. That is all.

Reply

shahin October 13, 2009 at 9:46 am

Iranian nuclear facilities and airforce basis are poorly protected. Iran uses Rapier short range missiles, TOR and AAA to protect. The are vulnarable in many ways. Rapier is a short range misile and has a limited sealing. It can get hit by a missile flying its short range sealing. TOR 1 is a good diffensive system but has a short sealiong coverage also. It can get hit by a hi flying missile. AAA are not a good match against missiles. If Russia would have delivered the S-300 missiles then the game would have been over for the west since the S-300 are the most advance defensive missile that can hit any western planes up to 90,000 feet sealing. That includes F-22, B-1, F117….But the ruskies have not delivered the planes since the are smart businessmen. They got paid for it buy Iran but the play that card well aginst the US and Israel for incentives….Iran in return got screwed out of $1 billion! There you have it.

Reply

shahin October 13, 2009 at 12:28 pm

The only reason that this regime has survived is due to massive repression on those intellectual masses like college sutdents/professors, jounalists, middle class families…and through high subsidies for the majority who are poor in order to keep them quiet. At the same time the regime has stoolen billions of Dollars by hidding them in small islands of far east, china, Russia and some European bank who recently frozen those accounts, thank you very much old chap! If Iran did not have the second reserve of oil by now the regime would have collapsed. This regime is to the benefit of the arm industry since it has caused all teh oil rich states to buy useless western arms at 200% premium and also these oil rich countries have transfered trillions of dollars into western bank. Therefore the Iranian regime has been a blessing to the west AND to the state of Israel in terms of military and financial help! Now if Iran was a democracy, do you think that the west would have made so much profit? I don’t think so! It is all about money!

Reply

shahin October 13, 2009 at 12:57 pm

Dear Mr. David Axe, you findings are way too optmistic about the Iranian airforce. Remember, sadams four largest army of the world got defeated without any contest while sadam himself hide in a rathole! That was an Iraqi army that was battle READY due to 8 years of Iran-Iraq war. What make the Iranian armforces a ‘FORCE’ to be reconned with is out of my understanding! You are putting too many accents over the word F-14,Mig 29….but these are only alphabates followed by numbers! That is the Iranian airforce. When a country who has been under sanction for decades and who passenger planes, military planes fall off the skys due to poor maintenance, do you call teh ‘FORMIDABLE?’ Trust me, the only middle eastern airforce to be reconned with is the one of Israel.

Reply

shahin October 13, 2009 at 1:24 pm

Iran planned to purchase 250 SU 30 (not 300) but after finding out that the export version of SU 30 is far inferior to the domestic version in terms of aviotics and electronics, especially for a country like Iran which would love to take a copy apart and incorporate the technology into its own aircrafts industry. The Iranian found out that the Export version is even more inferior to the aging F-16 and F-15 currently being retired in the Saudi and Israeli airfoce.

Reply

shahin October 20, 2009 at 1:06 pm

Any attack against Iran, if happens, will happen from North and the south simultaniously. From the north, over the Caspian sea, Formatins of dozens of unmaned planes likes the gloabl hawks or the predetors, each carrying antiradiations missiles to hit all the radar instalations. These planes play the role of decoy in order to foul the Iranian airforce personnel. Once these predetors are close to their target they will open fire toward Iranian radar instalation. Once the Iranian airforce is fooled, the Iranian will send airforce fighter planes toward the unmanned planes. Once the Iranian planes are airborned they will get hit by row of F-22s behind the formations of the unammed planes about 100 miles behind. Some US umanned planes will be destroyed but in return all the Iranian radar instalations along with Iranian Airforce planes will be visible to the F-22 radars. The F-22 then hit all the Iranian fighter planes from a distance of 100 miles and all the Iranian radar instalation will be also destroy. Therefore they pave the way for B-1 and B-2 stealth bomber with new buker busting bombs. The will destroy all the military and nuclear facilities before returning to their bases. Iranian airforce will be without defence and the US Navy will send showers of tomohaks missiles to hit other military and economical taget in Iran.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: