DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Norks Launch Missile Barrage; ICBM Fails

Norks Launch Missile Barrage; ICBM Fails

“North Korea test-​​fired at least six mis­siles over the Sea of Japan on Wednesday morn­ing, includ­ing an inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­sile that appar­ently failed or was aborted 42 sec­onds after it was launched,” the Times is reporting.

Of the launch­ings, intel­li­gence offi­cials focused most of their atten­tion on the inter­con­ti­nen­tal mis­sile, called the Taepodong 2, which American spy satel­lites have been watch­ing on a remote launch­ing pad for more than a month.
It is designed to be capa­ble of reach­ing Alaska, and per­haps the West Coast of the United States, but American offi­cials who tracked its launch­ing said it fell into the Sea of Japan before its first stage burned out.
“The Taepodong obvi­ously was a fail­ure that tells you some­thing about capa­bil­i­ties,” Stephen Hadley, President Bush’s national secu­rity adviser, told reporters in a phone call on Tuesday evening in Washington…
The other mis­siles that the North fired appeared to be a mix of short-​​range Scud-​​C mis­siles and intermediate-​​range Rodong mis­siles, of the kind that the North has sold to Iran, Pakistan and other nations. Those mis­siles also landed in the Sea of Japan…
Intelligence from American satel­lite pho­tographs indi­cated in mid-​​June that the North was pro­ceed­ing with the test-​​firing of the Taepodong 2 at a launch­ing pad on North Korea’s remote east coast. Satellite pho­tographs showed that the North Koreans had taken steps to put fuel into the mis­sile, but the mis­sile sat there until Wednesday morn­ing, lead­ing to spec­u­la­tion
[espe­cially on this site — ed.] that the North was sim­ply stag­ing the event in order to gain atten­tion from the United States…
But the North con­tra­dicted expert opin­ion by launch­ing its long-​​range mis­sile in predawn dark­ness today.

The sur­prise launch is bad news for Pyongyang, Joe Cirincione says over at Arms Control Wonk HQ.

The North Koreans have now blown it by actu­ally test­ing a sys­tem that was always worth much more as a bar­gain­ing chip than as a mil­i­tary capa­bil­ity. Continued attempts to hype the threat (by either the DPRK or the Missile Defense Agency) will now be much harder to make with a straight face… [And] all those reporters and ana­lysts who have been talk­ing about both the North Korean mis­siles and the US anti-​​missiles as if both were proven capa­bil­i­ties should slap them­selves in the face and snap out of it.

UPDATE 07/​05/​06 12:26 AM: David here. Missile defense expert Philip Coyle from the Center for Defense Information just emailed me with this:

I’m sure you noticed that the press has been con­fused about how many mis­siles North Korea actu­ally fired. At first it was three, then four or five, then six. But the Yonhap news agency in South Korea says North Korea fired 10 mis­siles, not six. At the time of Tony Snow’s press brief­ing with National Security Advisor Steve Hadley, the White House thought only three had been fired.
And at this writ­ing Northern Command will only con­firm six. So maybe our mil­i­tary has been con­fused too.
This dis­plays one of the vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties of mis­sile defense. If you don’t see all of the mis­siles an enemy fires, or if they fire too many, even the most futur­is­tic mis­sile defenses we can imag­ine will be over­whelmed.
And by coor­di­nat­ing its mis­sile launches with the U.S. shut­tle launch, North Korea showed that any coun­try can aspire to have the capa­bil­ity to con­duct peace­ful space launches.

David again. Just to clar­ify on Phil’s behalf, that last com­ment about “peace­ful space launches” was intended as sar­casm.
UPDATE 08:03 AM: The Norks just fired off another one.
UPDATE 09:12 AM: For a com­pletely dif­fer­ent view, check out what Stratfor has to say: “A failed launch may ulti­mately offer North Korea greater choices than other sce­nar­ios might have.”

Had Pyongyang suc­ceeded, even Seoul might have thought twice about con­tin­ued eco­nomic con­tacts with the North. And had the United States or Japan shot the mis­sile down, Pyongyang would very quickly have been forced to decide whether to con­sider the move an act of war and launch a coun­ter­strike, or just com­plain loudly and demon­strate its own impo­tence. A failed test, if a test was to be car­ried out, pro­vides renewed avenues for nego­ti­a­tion.
China will be the first to offer its ser­vices in fig­ur­ing out what next for North Korea. Pyongyang will be more beholden to Beijing fol­low­ing the test, as North Korea tries to gauge its options and how best to play down the fail­ure. It has lost its mis­sile lever­age now, and will need its north­ern neigh­bor even more. For its part, China will take this added lever­age with the North for its own nego­ti­a­tions with the United States.
The failed launch may bring Washington back into the six-​​party talks or to the infor­mal six-​​party talks Beijing recently sug­gested as U.S. offi­cials breathe a col­lec­tive sigh of relief at not hav­ing been forced to decide whether to try to shoot down the North Korean mis­sile. Thus, Washington can say it was ready for the launch with­out hav­ing had to prove its anti-​​missile sys­tem in a real-​​life sit­u­a­tion. And the United States also enjoys the advan­tage of a North Korea weak­ened for now by the failed test.
The ques­tion now is what hap­pens inside Pyongyang. A fail­ure of a major eco­nomic, polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary expen­di­ture could quickly lead to infight­ing as blame is assigned and passed and next steps are debated. While North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has shown him­self quite adept at man­ag­ing his place in power, the loss of a key polit­i­cal lever is sure to cre­ate at least a brief inter­nal polit­i­cal cri­sis. While the North may have already thought through the impli­ca­tions of fail­ure, think­ing and fac­ing real­ity are rather dif­fer­ent. If Pyongyang makes quick, clear steps in the com­ing days, it will sug­gest it was either well-​​prepared for fail­ure or aborted the launch itself. If not, expect to see the North close in on itself, and per­haps turn to neigh­bor China for advice and pro­tec­tion.
Either way, a major shift in North Korean behav­ior can be expected in the com­ing months.

Share |

July 4th, 2006 | Missiles, Those Nutty Norks | 199427 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/07/04/norks-launch-missile-barrage-icbm-fails/Norks+Launch+Missile+Barrage%3B+ICBM+Fails2006-07-05+03%3A52%3A04david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Still the Best Weapon | Ballistic Missiles: Not Just For Norks » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kolin Koehl says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:04 pm

    i hon­estly think that north korea is just try­ing to scare many amer­i­cans by pulling this stunt on July 4th. they need to be put away now!!! the longer we wait the big­ger the war will be!
    kolin Koehl

    Reply
  2. Evan says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:27 pm

    I bet you feel silly about those posts claim­ing hoax now :>

    Reply
  3. Murc says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:32 pm

    lol…yeah they should of just let it keep col­lect­ing dust on the pad…Now every­one knows how far behind there mis­sile tech really is.
    Clearly they launched it at an hour that they hoped no one would be watch­ing, if it was a success…they would no doubt be brag­ging that they shot there first mis­sile capa­ble of hit­ting the US, On our nations birth­day.
    BTW, defensetech…I did notice how you man­aged to still bash the US ABM pro­gram, even when these test had noth­ing to do with it. “rolls eyes”

    Reply
  4. michael says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:55 pm

    I’m at a loss try­ing to under­stand the “peace­ful space pro­gram” spin I’m see­ing on this site. The NORKs are threat­en­ing to “anni­hi­late” us and yet you’re try­ing to put a “peace­ful pur­poses” cast to their activ­i­ties.
    Who is pay­ing your bills these days that you’re try­ing to twist real­ity so hard?

    Reply
  5. David says:
    July 5, 2006 at 7:42 am

    There’s always the pos­si­bil­ity that the tae­podong was self-destructed…it doesn’t seem to be in NK’s cur­rent per­sona, but per­haps they were attempt­ing to mask their true capa­bil­i­ties.
    The taepodong’s ini­tial stage oxi­dizes a gasoline/​kerosene mix, which seems to typ­i­cally be a more sta­ble plat­form than other fuels, as that mix is in liq­uid state at room tem­per­a­ture. Liquid oxy­gen (or the stan­dard russ­ian ak-​​27I, in this case), is of course quite cor­ro­sive, and highly volatile.
    If glob­alsec is accu­rate, this thing does seem to have more than enough thrust to send a pay­load to US shores: http://​www​.glob​alse​cu​rity​.org/​w​m​d​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​d​p​r​k​/​t​d​-​2​-​s​p​e​c​s​.​htm

    Reply
  6. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 5, 2006 at 8:08 am

    Evan:
    Sure do!
    nms

    Reply
  7. mike says:
    July 5, 2006 at 9:02 am

    I think Noah’s being ironic about the “peace­ful space pro­gram,” bro. Remember these clowns were claim­ing they were try­ing to launch a satel­lite back in 1998 instead of fail­ing to have a bal­lis­tic mis­sile test.
    I mean, yeah, they’d prob­a­bly love to put a satel­lite up but that would be even fur­ther out of their league…

    Reply
  8. Brian says:
    July 5, 2006 at 9:33 am

    Washington DC–Yesterday, a large num­ber of Korean mis­siles were fired into the air. Reports indi­cate most of them exploded above US pop­u­la­tion cen­ters.
    John Smith, of New York City, said “My God, I couldn’t believe it. There were these huge explo­sions, and fire rained down from the sky. My dog hid under the couch, and my 2 year old son began cry­ing. I just didn’t know what to do.“
    Some casu­al­ties have been reported. Lee Roy Johnson, of Jackson Hole, Mississippi, was crit­i­cally injured by one of the mis­siles. “He saw one of them miss-​​iles come down to the ground. It hadn’t blown up, and he said ‘I’ll be derned if I let good money go to waste,’” said his wife, Jolene. “He walked over to it, kicked it, and said it was a dud. Then he bent down with his cig­a­rette lighter and tried to get it goin’. The blame thing blowed up right in his face. He was a screamin’ and a hootin’ and hol­lerin’. I looked at my boy Jethro and said ‘Look at yer pappy. Them Koreans did this to him.’”
    Fortunately, injuries appear to be light. Most of the mis­siles appear to have exploded in mid-​​air, spar­ing the coun­try from any seri­ous dam­age, though grass­fires were reported over drier states.
    “We thought the Russians were dan­ger­ous,” said General “Thunderbolt” Ross. “Yeah, they had nukes, but we never imag­ined how many mis­siles those funny lit­tle peo­ple in Korea could man­u­fac­ture. They’ve made mil­lions of them. MILLIONS. And, they’ve demon­strated the capa­bil­i­ties to get these weapons to American soil.“
    Known defense blog­ger Noah Schactman notes “This is another indi­ca­tion of wasted defense dol­lars. We’ve spent bil­lions on an anti-​​ballistic mis­sile pro­gram, and yet Korea was able to get lit­er­ally mil­lions of these rock­ets into our air­space. These things never showed up on radar, and our waste of money pro­gram never got to fire even a sin­gle shot. We are defense­less, and this “Star Wars” pro­gram has been a fail­ure from the start. Obviously, they were just toy­ing with us yes­ter­day. I’m told some of the mis­siles even exploded into the shape of a giant American flag. They’re mock­ing our 4th of July hol­i­day, show­ing that our so-​​called ‘free’ nation is defense­less before their mil­i­tary might.”

    Reply
  9. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 10:25 am

    I think the Norks blinked and hit the self-​​destruct but­ton. If they had gone with the mis­sile and BMD took it down it would have instantly ended their mis­sile threat and at the same time sent Japan, S. Korea, the world beg­ging full tilt boo­gie to get under the US BMD umbrella. A live enemy fired mis­sile inter­cept would have cemented BMD and if we could hit the long range the mid-​​ranges would have been proven use­less as-​​well.
    This way they save face by not back­ing down, don

    Reply
  10. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 10:47 am

    Ohh and by the way on the # of mis­siles launched con­fu­sion. I wouldn

    Reply
  11. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    C-​​Low:
    I’m assum­ing Phil Coyle’s “peace­ful” com­ment is pure sar­casm… I’ll ask Axe, who did the inter­view.
    Re: shoe. It’s yummy. I love it. And I’ve saved a slice for those peo­ple who were wail­ing that the Norks were about to be able to hit us with an ICBM.
    Also, maybe I’m being thick, but I don’t get how this is a “win” for BMD.
    nms

    Reply
  12. Cernig says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    I watched the var­i­ous reports as they came in and I have a prob­lem with the nar­ra­tive.
    http://​cernigsnew​shog​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​7​/​4​t​h​-​o​f​-​j​u​l​y​-​d​a​m​b​-​s​q​u​i​b​.​h​tml
    Look. Every sin­gle other mis­sile was a shorter range Rodong-​​1 (a Scud copy). The Pentagon and the Japanese at first seemed con­fi­dent the failed launch wasn’t a Taepongdo-​​2. Then some face­less guy from State pops up and says it was — and every­one else scur­ries to get “on mes­sage”. Color me scep­ti­cal.
    Where’s the proof the only mis­sile that failed is the one that all the fear­mon­ger­ing has been about? Without that hard proof, I will take the Occam’s Razor expla­na­tion — it was another Scud copy that just hap­pened to fail on take­off. The admin­is­tra­tion then decided to make polit­i­cal hay while the sun shines and the Pentagon and Japanese for a while got caught behind the story curve. It fits not only the events of yes­ter­day but also this administration’s his­tory.
    It amazes me that the inver­te­brate press corps, hav­ing been lied to over Iraqi WMD intel­li­gence and so much more, goes on blithely pre­sent­ing this admin­is­tra­tion as being trustable when it says any­thing at all. They should be pick­ing at the gaps in the administration’s sto­ry­line and demand­ing expla­na­tions. Instead they will take the admin­is­tra­tion at its belated word.
    Regards, Cernig

    Reply
  13. Byron Skinner says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Oh goody the North Koreans did it, still are accord­ing to an AP wire story the A.M., and the world didn’t come to an end.
    I guess the story that is try­ing to bury itself here is, how many mis­siles were launched, 3,6, 7,10 still launch­ing? and how long did Taepongdo-​​2 stay up, 35, 40, 42 sec. how long?
    Since this event was any­thing but a sur­prise and every spy in the sky was watch­ing how come we don’t know many were launched and from where?
    I guess it’s time for SSN Jimmy Carter to start doing some bot­tom scratch­ing in the Sea of Japan.
    Meanwhile this show just how much respect Sec. of State Mzzz… Condoleezza has around the world. I assume Noah that whie this was hap­pen­ing she was out “Shoe Shopping” over on 5th. Ave.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  14. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    I would call it a win because they didn

    Reply
  15. Moose says:
    July 5, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    All word on the Typeofdong-​​2 is that it failed, not that it was aborted. I’m pretty sure if it were and abort the NORK’s would be scream­ing that it were so quite loudly, becuase their for­eign pol­icy relies on peo­ple think­ing they have an ICBM, not a pipe-​​dream.
    As for not being able to track all the launches, we detected and tracked a mis­sile launch that lasted under a minute on no warn­ing hun­dreds of miles away? Sounds like a good job to me.

    Reply
  16. Bob says:
    July 5, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    I’m won­der­fully amused that just a few days ago this site claimed that the administration’s claims that N.Korea was prepar­ing to per­form mis­sile tests was a world-​​class hoax. Now that the mis­sile tests have been per­formed com­ments focus on the admin­is­tra­tions pre­sumed fail­ure to know with cer­tainty how many mis­siles were fired. I liked the com­ment from one poster say­ing that nobody was sur­prised by the tests — given that you claimed the warn­ings were a world-​​class hoax and that the tests weren’t actu­ally going to hap­pen I imag­ine that this site’s con­trib­u­tors were actu­ally very surprised.

    Reply
  17. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 6, 2006 at 11:11 am

    Hey Bob:
    I’m more than will­ing to eat crow (or shoe or what­ever) about the “hoax” series of com­ments. Check out the mea cul­pas below.
    But, just so we’re clear, I never wrote that “the administration’s claims that N.Korea was prepar­ing to per­form mis­sile tests was a world-​​class hoax,” as you say. Instead, I sug­gested that the hoax was *Pyongyang’s*, not Washington’s. A big dif­fer­ence, no?
    Anyway, here are my exact words:
    “By the begin­ning of this week, it became clear that a world-​​class hoax had gone down. Either Pyongyang had hood­winked the globe into think­ing it was about to launch — or the Times was once again hyp­ing up a national secu­rity threat.“
    I’m not say­ing they were spot-​​on — they weren’t. But they also weren’t the accu­sa­tions that you imply.
    Best,
    nms

    Reply
  18. Requiem gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:33 pm

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply
  19. cronous gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    Because there were many peo­ple asked me that bor­row some cro­nous gold to buy medicine.

    Reply
  20. Metin2 yang says:
    August 20, 2008 at 1:06 am

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  21. Cheap metin2 gold says:
    August 20, 2008 at 1:13 am

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the com­pany. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage