DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Norks Launch Missile Barrage; ICBM Fails

Norks Launch Missile Barrage; ICBM Fails

“North Korea test-fired at least six missiles over the Sea of Japan on Wednesday morning, including an intercontinental ballistic missile that apparently failed or was aborted 42 seconds after it was launched,” the Times is reporting.

Of the launchings, intelligence officials focused most of their attention on the intercontinental missile, called the Taepodong 2, which American spy satellites have been watching on a remote launching pad for more than a month.
It is designed to be capable of reaching Alaska, and perhaps the West Coast of the United States, but American officials who tracked its launching said it fell into the Sea of Japan before its first stage burned out.
“The Taepodong obviously was a failure that tells you something about capabilities,” Stephen Hadley, President Bush’s national security adviser, told reporters in a phone call on Tuesday evening in Washington…
The other missiles that the North fired appeared to be a mix of short-range Scud-C missiles and intermediate-range Rodong missiles, of the kind that the North has sold to Iran, Pakistan and other nations. Those missiles also landed in the Sea of Japan…
Intelligence from American satellite photographs indicated in mid-June that the North was proceeding with the test-firing of the Taepodong 2 at a launching pad on North Korea’s remote east coast. Satellite photographs showed that the North Koreans had taken steps to put fuel into the missile, but the missile sat there until Wednesday morning, leading to speculation
[especially on this site — ed.] that the North was simply staging the event in order to gain attention from the United States…
But the North contradicted expert opinion by launching its long-range missile in predawn darkness today.

The surprise launch is bad news for Pyongyang, Joe Cirincione says over at Arms Control Wonk HQ.

The North Koreans have now blown it by actually testing a system that was always worth much more as a bargaining chip than as a military capability. Continued attempts to hype the threat (by either the DPRK or the Missile Defense Agency) will now be much harder to make with a straight face… [And] all those reporters and analysts who have been talking about both the North Korean missiles and the US anti-missiles as if both were proven capabilities should slap themselves in the face and snap out of it.

UPDATE 07/05/06 12:26 AM: David here. Missile defense expert Philip Coyle from the Center for Defense Information just emailed me with this:

I’m sure you noticed that the press has been confused about how many missiles North Korea actually fired. At first it was three, then four or five, then six. But the Yonhap news agency in South Korea says North Korea fired 10 missiles, not six. At the time of Tony Snow’s press briefing with National Security Advisor Steve Hadley, the White House thought only three had been fired.
And at this writing Northern Command will only confirm six. So maybe our military has been confused too.
This displays one of the vulnerabilities of missile defense. If you don’t see all of the missiles an enemy fires, or if they fire too many, even the most futuristic missile defenses we can imagine will be overwhelmed.
And by coordinating its missile launches with the U.S. shuttle launch, North Korea showed that any country can aspire to have the capability to conduct peaceful space launches.

David again. Just to clarify on Phil’s behalf, that last comment about “peaceful space launches” was intended as sarcasm.
UPDATE 08:03 AM: The Norks just fired off another one.
UPDATE 09:12 AM: For a completely different view, check out what Stratfor has to say: “A failed launch may ultimately offer North Korea greater choices than other scenarios might have.”

Had Pyongyang succeeded, even Seoul might have thought twice about continued economic contacts with the North. And had the United States or Japan shot the missile down, Pyongyang would very quickly have been forced to decide whether to consider the move an act of war and launch a counterstrike, or just complain loudly and demonstrate its own impotence. A failed test, if a test was to be carried out, provides renewed avenues for negotiation.
China will be the first to offer its services in figuring out what next for North Korea. Pyongyang will be more beholden to Beijing following the test, as North Korea tries to gauge its options and how best to play down the failure. It has lost its missile leverage now, and will need its northern neighbor even more. For its part, China will take this added leverage with the North for its own negotiations with the United States.
The failed launch may bring Washington back into the six-party talks or to the informal six-party talks Beijing recently suggested as U.S. officials breathe a collective sigh of relief at not having been forced to decide whether to try to shoot down the North Korean missile. Thus, Washington can say it was ready for the launch without having had to prove its anti-missile system in a real-life situation. And the United States also enjoys the advantage of a North Korea weakened for now by the failed test.
The question now is what happens inside Pyongyang. A failure of a major economic, political and military expenditure could quickly lead to infighting as blame is assigned and passed and next steps are debated. While North Korean leader Kim Jong Il has shown himself quite adept at managing his place in power, the loss of a key political lever is sure to create at least a brief internal political crisis. While the North may have already thought through the implications of failure, thinking and facing reality are rather different. If Pyongyang makes quick, clear steps in the coming days, it will suggest it was either well-prepared for failure or aborted the launch itself. If not, expect to see the North close in on itself, and perhaps turn to neighbor China for advice and protection.
Either way, a major shift in North Korean behavior can be expected in the coming months.

Share |

July 4th, 2006 | Missiles, Those Nutty Norks | 199427 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/07/04/norks-launch-missile-barrage-icbm-fails/Norks+Launch+Missile+Barrage%3B+ICBM+Fails2006-07-05+03%3A52%3A04david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Still the Best Weapon | Ballistic Missiles: Not Just For Norks » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kolin Koehl says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:04 pm

    i honestly think that north korea is just trying to scare many americans by pulling this stunt on July 4th. they need to be put away now!!! the longer we wait the bigger the war will be!
    kolin Koehl

    Reply
  2. Evan says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:27 pm

    I bet you feel silly about those posts claiming hoax now :>

    Reply
  3. Murc says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:32 pm

    lol…yeah they should of just let it keep collecting dust on the pad…Now everyone knows how far behind there missile tech really is.
    Clearly they launched it at an hour that they hoped no one would be watching, if it was a success…they would no doubt be bragging that they shot there first missile capable of hitting the US, On our nations birthday.
    BTW, defensetech…I did notice how you managed to still bash the US ABM program, even when these test had nothing to do with it. “rolls eyes”

    Reply
  4. michael says:
    July 4, 2006 at 11:55 pm

    I’m at a loss trying to understand the “peaceful space program” spin I’m seeing on this site. The NORKs are threatening to “annihilate” us and yet you’re trying to put a “peaceful purposes” cast to their activities.
    Who is paying your bills these days that you’re trying to twist reality so hard?

    Reply
  5. David says:
    July 5, 2006 at 7:42 am

    There’s always the possibility that the taepodong was self-destructed…it doesn’t seem to be in NK’s current persona, but perhaps they were attempting to mask their true capabilities.
    The taepodong’s initial stage oxidizes a gasoline/kerosene mix, which seems to typically be a more stable platform than other fuels, as that mix is in liquid state at room temperature. Liquid oxygen (or the standard russian ak-27I, in this case), is of course quite corrosive, and highly volatile.
    If globalsec is accurate, this thing does seem to have more than enough thrust to send a payload to US shores: http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​w​m​d​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​d​p​r​k​/​t​d​-​2​-​s​p​e​c​s​.​htm

    Reply
  6. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 5, 2006 at 8:08 am

    Evan:
    Sure do!
    nms

    Reply
  7. mike says:
    July 5, 2006 at 9:02 am

    I think Noah’s being ironic about the “peaceful space program,” bro. Remember these clowns were claiming they were trying to launch a satellite back in 1998 instead of failing to have a ballistic missile test.
    I mean, yeah, they’d probably love to put a satellite up but that would be even further out of their league…

    Reply
  8. Brian says:
    July 5, 2006 at 9:33 am

    Washington DC–Yesterday, a large number of Korean missiles were fired into the air. Reports indicate most of them exploded above US population centers.
    John Smith, of New York City, said “My God, I couldn’t believe it. There were these huge explosions, and fire rained down from the sky. My dog hid under the couch, and my 2 year old son began crying. I just didn’t know what to do.“
    Some casualties have been reported. Lee Roy Johnson, of Jackson Hole, Mississippi, was critically injured by one of the missiles. “He saw one of them miss-iles come down to the ground. It hadn’t blown up, and he said ‘I’ll be derned if I let good money go to waste,’” said his wife, Jolene. “He walked over to it, kicked it, and said it was a dud. Then he bent down with his cigarette lighter and tried to get it goin’. The blame thing blowed up right in his face. He was a screamin’ and a hootin’ and hollerin’. I looked at my boy Jethro and said ‘Look at yer pappy. Them Koreans did this to him.’”
    Fortunately, injuries appear to be light. Most of the missiles appear to have exploded in mid-air, sparing the country from any serious damage, though grassfires were reported over drier states.
    “We thought the Russians were dangerous,” said General “Thunderbolt” Ross. “Yeah, they had nukes, but we never imagined how many missiles those funny little people in Korea could manufacture. They’ve made millions of them. MILLIONS. And, they’ve demonstrated the capabilities to get these weapons to American soil.“
    Known defense blogger Noah Schactman notes “This is another indication of wasted defense dollars. We’ve spent billions on an anti-ballistic missile program, and yet Korea was able to get literally millions of these rockets into our airspace. These things never showed up on radar, and our waste of money program never got to fire even a single shot. We are defenseless, and this “Star Wars” program has been a failure from the start. Obviously, they were just toying with us yesterday. I’m told some of the missiles even exploded into the shape of a giant American flag. They’re mocking our 4th of July holiday, showing that our so-called ‘free’ nation is defenseless before their military might.”

    Reply
  9. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 10:25 am

    I think the Norks blinked and hit the self-destruct button. If they had gone with the missile and BMD took it down it would have instantly ended their missile threat and at the same time sent Japan, S. Korea, the world begging full tilt boogie to get under the US BMD umbrella. A live enemy fired missile intercept would have cemented BMD and if we could hit the long range the mid-ranges would have been proven useless as-well.
    This way they save face by not backing down, don

    Reply
  10. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 10:47 am

    Ohh and by the way on the # of missiles launched confusion. I wouldn

    Reply
  11. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    C-Low:
    I’m assuming Phil Coyle’s “peaceful” comment is pure sarcasm… I’ll ask Axe, who did the interview.
    Re: shoe. It’s yummy. I love it. And I’ve saved a slice for those people who were wailing that the Norks were about to be able to hit us with an ICBM.
    Also, maybe I’m being thick, but I don’t get how this is a “win” for BMD.
    nms

    Reply
  12. Cernig says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    I watched the various reports as they came in and I have a problem with the narrative.
    http://​cernigsnewshog​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​7​/​4​t​h​-​o​f​-​j​u​l​y​-​d​a​m​b​-​s​q​u​i​b​.​h​tml
    Look. Every single other missile was a shorter range Rodong-1 (a Scud copy). The Pentagon and the Japanese at first seemed confident the failed launch wasn’t a Taepongdo-2. Then some faceless guy from State pops up and says it was — and everyone else scurries to get “on message”. Color me sceptical.
    Where’s the proof the only missile that failed is the one that all the fearmongering has been about? Without that hard proof, I will take the Occam’s Razor explanation — it was another Scud copy that just happened to fail on takeoff. The administration then decided to make political hay while the sun shines and the Pentagon and Japanese for a while got caught behind the story curve. It fits not only the events of yesterday but also this administration’s history.
    It amazes me that the invertebrate press corps, having been lied to over Iraqi WMD intelligence and so much more, goes on blithely presenting this administration as being trustable when it says anything at all. They should be picking at the gaps in the administration’s storyline and demanding explanations. Instead they will take the administration at its belated word.
    Regards, Cernig

    Reply
  13. Byron Skinner says:
    July 5, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Oh goody the North Koreans did it, still are according to an AP wire story the A.M., and the world didn’t come to an end.
    I guess the story that is trying to bury itself here is, how many missiles were launched, 3,6, 7,10 still launching? and how long did Taepongdo-2 stay up, 35, 40, 42 sec. how long?
    Since this event was anything but a surprise and every spy in the sky was watching how come we don’t know many were launched and from where?
    I guess it’s time for SSN Jimmy Carter to start doing some bottom scratching in the Sea of Japan.
    Meanwhile this show just how much respect Sec. of State Mzzz… Condoleezza has around the world. I assume Noah that whie this was happening she was out “Shoe Shopping” over on 5th. Ave.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  14. C-Low says:
    July 5, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    I would call it a win because they didn

    Reply
  15. Moose says:
    July 5, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    All word on the Typeofdong-2 is that it failed, not that it was aborted. I’m pretty sure if it were and abort the NORK’s would be screaming that it were so quite loudly, becuase their foreign policy relies on people thinking they have an ICBM, not a pipe-dream.
    As for not being able to track all the launches, we detected and tracked a missile launch that lasted under a minute on no warning hundreds of miles away? Sounds like a good job to me.

    Reply
  16. Bob says:
    July 5, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    I’m wonderfully amused that just a few days ago this site claimed that the administration’s claims that N.Korea was preparing to perform missile tests was a world-class hoax. Now that the missile tests have been performed comments focus on the administrations presumed failure to know with certainty how many missiles were fired. I liked the comment from one poster saying that nobody was surprised by the tests — given that you claimed the warnings were a world-class hoax and that the tests weren’t actually going to happen I imagine that this site’s contributors were actually very surprised.

    Reply
  17. Noah Shachtman says:
    July 6, 2006 at 11:11 am

    Hey Bob:
    I’m more than willing to eat crow (or shoe or whatever) about the “hoax” series of comments. Check out the mea culpas below.
    But, just so we’re clear, I never wrote that “the administration’s claims that N.Korea was preparing to perform missile tests was a world-class hoax,” as you say. Instead, I suggested that the hoax was *Pyongyang’s*, not Washington’s. A big difference, no?
    Anyway, here are my exact words:
    “By the beginning of this week, it became clear that a world-class hoax had gone down. Either Pyongyang had hoodwinked the globe into thinking it was about to launch — or the Times was once again hyping up a national security threat.“
    I’m not saying they were spot-on — they weren’t. But they also weren’t the accusations that you imply.
    Best,
    nms

    Reply
  18. Requiem gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:33 pm

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply
  19. cronous gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    Because there were many people asked me that borrow some cronous gold to buy medicine.

    Reply
  20. Metin2 yang says:
    August 20, 2008 at 1:06 am

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  21. Cheap metin2 gold says:
    August 20, 2008 at 1:13 am

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the company. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Guys this platform is about CAS but not in the...
      ANGRYTACP
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Blaming the contractors for a development system created...
      G Lof
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage