<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSA Whistle-blower: Intel Chair’s Source?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/07/10/nsa-whistle-blower-intel-chairs-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/10/nsa-whistle-blower-intel-chairs-source/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:54:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Shachtman</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/10/nsa-whistle-blower-intel-chairs-source/#comment-133413</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Shachtman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2009#comment-133413</guid>
		<description>Reader JS says:
Ummmm....Maybe have your defensetechites get to work on why Hoekstra is so pissed off in his letter. Would there be any surprise to learn
that the SAP--with Rumsfeld&#039;s hand on it--might be one that listens in on the communications of members of the US Congress and staff, or
opponents in other branches of government? It&#039;s be classic Rumsfeld &amp; Cheney.
What else might cause a congressman to use a line like ..&quot;a direct affront to me...strongly encourage...&quot; if his turf hadn&#039;t been
violated directly?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader JS says:<br />
Ummmm.…Maybe have your defensetechites get to work on why Hoekstra is so pissed off in his letter. Would there be any surprise to learn<br />
that the SAP–with Rumsfeld’s hand on it–might be one that listens in on the communications of members of the US Congress and staff, or<br />
opponents in other branches of government? It’s be classic Rumsfeld &amp; Cheney.<br />
What else might cause a congressman to use a line like ..“a direct affront to me…strongly encourage…” if his turf hadn’t been<br />
violated directly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

