By: Lula

Lula — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:20:28 +0000

Sorry. You know what’s interesting about Washington? It’s the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature.
I am from Fiji and learning to speak English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “Get cheep flight and quality travel.“
Thanks for the help :p, Lula.

By: Xs Andree

Xs Andree — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:07:37 +0000

There is no law against mercy.

By: joe

joe — Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:01:36 +0000

Opium for the masses.

By: jeremy

jeremy — Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:14:28 +0000

i have enjoyed the religous comments on both sides, although i agree that jesus and the father are one. i am curious though, as to why there is this type of discussion on a “defensetech” web site…that is very humorous i think.
i will pray for the salvation of the guy who thinks that jesus is not the same as the father, my friend, if you do not have your faith in jesus to save you, then it appears that you might be in some trouble, i hope you will come to find true peace through jesus christ.
jeremy

By: Jonathan Repka

Jonathan Repka — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:39:14 +0000

This goes to Noah, You used John chap.10, "Jesus said" Philip I have been with you this long and you still don't know me?, (I'm paraphrasing) if you have seen me, you have seen the Father, the Father is in me, and I am in the Father, Noah, get this, the Father is in him, not with him, there is a difference you know!! Read John chapter 10 again, it does not say with him, "Jesus said the Father is in him, Jesus is the Father, the eternal Father, you need to quit saying he's with the Father, or the father is with him, no!, "Jesus is the everlasting Father" according to Isaiah, Jesus is God!!!, he was the invisible God of the Old Testament, becoming visible in the New Testament, drop me a line Noah.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:58:36 +0000

Response to SALAAM, SHALOM, PEACE that was posted July 15, 06
It would seem that our Muslim friend is the one who has trouble with elementary math, plus lack of plain english reading skills, when it comes to reading the Bible.
He correctly asserts that “If the prophet Abraham was tested to sacrifice Ismael(Ishmael) and not Issaac then both Judaism and Christianity are destroyed and vice-versa for Islam. I couldn’t agree with him more on this point. (Psalms 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?)
He comments two grave errors in his ascertion that Ishmael was 17 years old in Gen. 21:14–21:
1. He adds 3 years to the age of Ishmael for weaning, why does weaning make one 3 years older?
The Bible clearly states that the age difference between Abramhams sons was 14 years.
2. He adds to the word of God by calling Ishmael and “infant”, and claiming that Hagar put Ishmael on her shoulder, that Ishmael was crying like a baby.
Genesis 21:14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.
In the above verse, we see that Abraham put the bread and the bottle of water on her shoulder, and also gave her the child. It seems to me that there would not been enough room left on Hagar’s shoulders for even and “infant”.
Genesis 21:16 And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bowshot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept.
Genesis 21:17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is.
The scripture does not call Ishmael and infant, but a child and a lad. While it is true that a child can be an infant, I don’t think you can get infant from lad. The only crying that seems to be going on is from Hagar’s weeping, it does not say “the child lifted up his voice and wept” as our muslim friend claims. The scripture only records “the voice of the lad”.
See Deu. 4:2, Rev. 22:18–19 about adding to God’s word.
Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Revelation 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
If the above argument for Ishmael to be the heir to the covenant, instead of Isaac, is because Ishmael was to old to fit the description given in Gen. 21:14–21, then I submit that the only way to arrive at that conclusion, is to ignor the plain truth of the Bible.
I would like to also point out that our muslim friend neglected to tell us something very important about Ishmael that certainly “HAS IMPLICATIONS ON THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM/ISLAM“
scince the Arabs are descendants of Ishmael. Genesis 16:11 is a prophetic verse pertaining to Ishmael and his descendants:
Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Just think about that for a moment. Just because Abram and Sarai decided that God was going to need there help in getting the heir that God had promised him! Is mankind not still paying for that?
But, let’s get back to Isaac vs Ishmael, what’s done is done. The apostle Paul will help us clear up the issue on who is the real heir to God’s covenant with Abraham:
Galatians 4:19 My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,
Galatians 4:20 I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you.
Galatians 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Galatians 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
Galatians 4:23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Galatians 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
Galatians 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Galatians 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Galatians 4:27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
Galatians 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
Galatians 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Galatians 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Galatians 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
As for the Muslim position on who Jesus is, they seem to want to cherry pick some verses out of our bible to their liking.
They are happy to allow that He was a prophet, but not the Son of God as he claimed to be:
John 4:25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
John 4:26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.
Allow me to include some other
relevant verses about who Jesus is:
Acts 3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
Acts 3:23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
Acts 3:24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
Acts 3:25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
Acts 3:26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

By: Petr

Petr — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:17:28 +0000

Jihadbabes.com supports any attempt to date. Perhaps some cross-cultural dating is good for the soul. Visit Jihadbabes.com to find out more.

By: Billy

Billy — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:01:56 +0000

Please read John 1, In the beginning was the word{plan] and the word [plan} was with God, and the Word [plan] was God. If you understand this , maybe everything else will be clarified. i d w , ,

By: John

John — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:08:04 +0000

Repent you miserable sinner!
Ok now that that’s out the way, a question for you: I’m sure this has been taken into consideration already, but if a modified Phalanx is used to defend a city what about the rounds which miss and come raining down? Thanks.

By: sauron

sauron — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:20:38 +0000

As is was said during Viet Nam: “Kill’em all… Let God sort’em out…”

Comments on: Lasers: Israel’s Rocket Defense?