DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Hezbollah’s Surprise Weapons

Hezbollah’s Surprise Weapons

Wonder why the Israelis thought their ship had been hit by a drone last week — when it turned out to be a radar-​​guided mis­sile instead? Or why the crew of the Hanit corvette didn’t use their coun­ter­mea­sures to pro­tect them­selves? Simple: the Sabras knew that Hezbollah had been play­ing with drones; they had no idea that the ter­ror­ist group had such a sophis­ti­cated mis­sile in their arse­nal. It’s one of a num­ber of ways that the “power and sophis­ti­ca­tion” of Hezbollah’s arms “has caught the United States and Israel off guard,” the Times reports. “Officials in both coun­tries are just now learn­ing the extent to which the mil­i­tant group has suc­ceeded in get­ting weapons from Iran and Syria.“
c-802_3.jpgThe mis­sile that hit the Hanit was a C-​​802, an Iranian-​​made vari­ant of a stealthy, turbojet-​​powered, Chinese weapon. It’s “con­sid­ered along with the US ‘Harpoon’ as among the best anti-​​ship mis­siles” in the world, GlobalSecurity​.org says.
“Iran began buy­ing dozens of those sophis­ti­cated anti­ship mis­siles from the Chinese dur­ing the 1990s,” the Times notes. “Until Friday, how­ever, Western intel­li­gence ser­vices did not know that Iran had man­aged to ship C-​​802 mis­siles to Hezbollah.“
Now that the Israelis know, it’s influ­enc­ing their choice of tar­gets to hit. The C-​​802 was most likely “fired it from a truck-​​mounted launcher cued by a coastal radar instal­la­tion,” Situational Awareness says. So “Israel has stepped up its attacks against coastal radar sites, as any sort of surface-​​search set would be able to pro­vide data for the ini­tial launch.”

After launch, the mis­sile takes care of itself with its own iner­tial guid­ance sys­tem and onboard radar seeker. Since the launch­ers are mobile, the trucks car­ry­ing them could scoot after fir­ing. And we all know how noto­ri­ously dif­fi­cult it can be to locate mobile units, even when you have lots of recon­nais­sance assets.

The ter­ror­ists’ more tra­di­tional weapons, like Katyusha rock­ets and Fajr-​​3 mis­siles, have con­tained sur­prises, too. “In the past, wed see three, four, maybe eight launches at any given time if Hezbollah was feel­ing feisty,” one unnammed offi­cial told the paper. “Now we see them arriv­ing in large clus­ters, and with a range and even cer­tain accu­racy we have not seen in the past.“
70 Katyushas were fired at Israel “within the space of an hour” on Wednesday after­noon, Ha’Aretz writes. Israel is respond­ing by send­ing small group of ground troops into Lebanon, and by strik­ing tar­gets in Beruit — includ­ing ones in the Christian part of town.
The Times says that “while Iranian mis­sile sup­plies to Hezbollah, either by sea or over­land via Syria, were well known, offi­cials said the cur­rent con­flict also indi­cated that some of the rock­ets in Hezbollahs arse­nal includ­ing a 220-​​millimeter rocket used in a deadly attack on a rail­way site in Haifa on Sunday were built in Syria.”

Officials have since con­firmed that the war­head on the Syrian rocket was filled with ball bear­ings a method of destruc­tion used fre­quently in sui­cide bomb­ings but not in war­head tech­nol­ogy.
“Weve never seen any­thing like this,” said one Western intel­li­gence offi­cial, speak­ing about the warhead. 

Conflicts Forum’s Mark Perry, on the other hand, isn’t as alarmed as most about Hezbollah’s weaponry. {Joe Katzman says that’s because the guy is a ter­ror­ist shill.} Perry declares that the mili­tia only has a hand­ful of sophis­ti­cated and long-​​range mis­siles. Check out his All Things Considered inter­view here.

UPDATE 1:43 PM
: “Israeli mil­i­tary offi­cials have warned that the next Palestinian upris­ing could be ‘a bal­lis­tic intifada,’” the Washington Post reports.
(Big ups: Umansky)
UPDATE 7:13 PM: The Jerusalem Post is report­ing that “IAF fighter jets dropped over 20 tons in bombs late Wednesday night on a Hizbullah bunker, pos­si­bly the hid­ing place of the group’s leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, in the Bourj al-​​Barajneh refugee camp in south­east Beirut. It was still unclear who was in the bunker at the time and what their fate was, but IDF sources said the bunker was totally destroyed and that all that was left was a crater.”

Share |

July 19th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions, Missiles, Terror Tech | 202728 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/07/19/hezbollahs-surprise-weapons/Hezbollah%27s+Surprise+Weapons2006-07-19+16%3A06%3A10david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Tech Undermining Israeli Army? | “DOOD KATYUSHAZ R COMIN 2 U” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Joe Katzman says:
    July 19, 2006 at 11:46 am

    Mark Perry would be expected to say that — his orga­ni­za­tion shills for Hezbollah, and before that he ser­viced Yasser Arafat whom he describes as his per­sonal friend. He isn’t a reli­able source for any­thing except the Hezbollah line.
    See:
    http://​www​.wind​sofchange​.net/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​8​8​0​5​.​php

    Reply
  2. Robot.Economist says:
    July 19, 2006 at 3:19 pm

    C-​​802 mis­siles are pretty sophis­ti­cated for a group like Hezbollah con­sid­er­ing their tra­di­tional weapons of choice have been unguided rock­ets.
    I’m not com­pletely sur­prised by the vol­ume of rock­ets they have man­aged to light off though. The Soviets used to mount Katyushas on double-​​sided racks, 8 deep on the backs of trucks. With all the rub­ble and debris in Southern Lebanon, its has be easy to fire Katyushas in quick order.
    I am sur­prised by the poten­tial large arse­nal they have been able to amass. 100 122mm rock­ets just don’t grow on trees, which makes you won­der how much the Israelis knew about stock­piles of that size.

    Reply
  3. Eric says:
    July 19, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    Haninah, your com­ment rein­forces my nag­ging feel­ing that this par­tic­u­lar con­flict has been build­ing for a long time. I’m not at all sur­prised to hear that Israelis have been expect­ing some sort of bar­rage. It does stretch credulity to believe Hezbollah wants this many rock­ets sim­ply for deter­rence (or pride, or some such).
    I’m inter­ested, though, in the many other rea­sons Israel chose now for such a strong response. Israel has faced mis­sile attacks and kid­nap­pings before; if the coun­try has been watch­ing the mis­sile buildup for so long, the pres­sure to act should have cer­tainly been mount­ing com­men­su­rately. However, the mil­i­tary waited and seems to have taken the kid­nap­pings as an excuse to bom­bard the entire coun­try. I don’t know a ton about Middle East pol­i­tics, but, in ret­ro­spect, some­thing along these lines seems inevitable since Hezbollah was elected into Lebanon’s gov­ern­ment.
    Hezbollah’s place in the Lebanese gov­ern­ment gives some jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for act­ing against the entire country–state sov­er­eignty and respon­si­bil­ity and all that–since by elect­ing Hezbollah, the coun­try on some level endorsed their actions. Combine that rel­a­tively new sit­u­a­tion with a new prime min­ster (and defense min­is­ter, I think?), increas­ing aggres­sion from Hamas, and jit­ters over the new Iranian lead­er­ship and nuclear pro­gram, and the kid­nap­pings pro­vided a per­fect oppor­tu­nity to attempt a reshap­ing of the sta­tus quo–hopefully in Israel’s favor.
    Such a strong Israeli mil­i­tary response also jives with what you said about Israelis being dis­ap­pointed that their mil­i­tary hasn’t done more to pre­vent mis­sile launch­ings. While geopo­lit­i­cal for­eign pol­icy con­cerns are almost cer­tainly pri­mary, domes­tic Israeli pol­i­tics have to play some role in this as well.
    I guess I have a cou­ple ques­tions: First, do you think the sta­tus quo was unten­able in the short term? Second, would there have been a more advan­ta­geous time for Israel to act, given the con­ver­gence of all these fac­tors so recently?

    Reply
  4. Jaye says:
    July 19, 2006 at 5:13 pm

    Hi Tech, Low Tech, US and Israeli pilots are a bunch of Baby Killers! Who, when they are fly­ing are tough guys but when they are shot down become Homos! Add to the list the Coward Hezbollah Missile and Rocket boys too.

    Reply
  5. Brian says:
    July 19, 2006 at 6:34 pm

    “Took it out with a heat-​​seeker, Dylan. That’s pretty sophis­to­cated tech for a bunch of half-​​assed moun­tain boys.“
    “Guess they’re get­ting bet­ter equipped all the time.“
    Suprisingly sophis­to­cated tech­nol­ogy? Missing sol­diers? Very hot sum­mer? Obviously, the Israelis need to watch out for the Predator.

    Reply
  6. Pearse says:
    July 19, 2006 at 9:30 pm

    “I don’t know a ton about Middle East pol­i­tics“
    You made this clear by say­ing:
    “Hezbollah was elected into Lebanon’s gov­ern­ment.“
    Hezbollah was not elected to Lebanon’s govt, and there is no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the scale of Israeli attacks on civil­ian, eco­nomic and infas­truc­tural tar­gets.
    You may be think­ing about Hamas’ polit­i­cal wing get­ting elected to head the Palestinian author­ity which is entirely sep­a­rate and in no way jus­ti­fies the ongo­ing slaugh­ter in Lebanon.
    For up to date infor­ma­tion untainted by pro­pa­ganda please see http://​www​.gnn​.tv.

    Reply
  7. anon says:
    July 19, 2006 at 9:43 pm

    Pearse: Hezbollah has two min­is­ters in the lebanese
    gov­ern­ment … where do you get off post­ing pro­pa­ganda ref­er­ences?
    –gh

    Reply
  8. pedestrian says:
    July 19, 2006 at 11:33 pm

    From the next arti­cle (“DOOD KATYUSHAZ R COMIN 2 U”):
    >FEMA is work­ing on a sim­i­lar sys­tem here in the U.S., with a twist. FEMA’s text mes­sages
    >will “tell you to get to a tele­vi­sion or radio because some­thing unfor­tu­nate has hap­pened that
    >you need to know about.” Sounds like Cellact’s straight­for­ward alerts make a lit­tle more sense.
    What the… Why does US gets slammed when Israel is given a stand­ing ova­tion for sim­i­lar tech­niques and tech­nol­ogy? I can’t believe FEMA’s text mes­sage sys­tem only gives lim­ited infor­ma­tion, but I believe FEMA has some­thing SUPERIOR than Israel. FEMA also plans to use the Internet to access and cut into (in other terms, hack) PCs giv­ing emer­gency stress calls. I would guess there would be peo­ple slam­ming FEMA for cut­ting into everyone’s PC that looks like hack­ing, but would give a stand­ing ova­tion if it was Israel doing the same. There is some­thing wrong here.

    Reply
  9. Eric says:
    July 20, 2006 at 9:18 am

    Pearce, not only are there two Hezbollah min­is­ters in the Lebanese gov­ern­ment, there are also 23 Hezbollah MPs.

    Reply
  10. Azrael says:
    August 1, 2006 at 4:12 am

    Geez, lets do this one by the num­bers.
    It is obvi­ous that the anti-​​ship mis­sile that struck the sa’ar 5 corvette Hanit was not a parafin fueled tur­bo­jet pow­ered c-​​802 with a 165 kilo­gram HE war­head. The c-​​802 is an oth mis­sile that requires more infra­struc­ture to fire and tar­get suc­cess­fully than the Hizb-​​e-​​allah armed wing have at their dis­posal. Furthermore the war­head of the c-​​802 is capa­ble of sink­ing a ves­sel of 10 kilo­tons, the sa’ar 5 masses only ~1.3 kilo­tons and though crit­i­cally dam­aged was not sunk.
    From the dis­tance of the Hanit from the lebanese shore and the level of dam­age suf­fered by the Hanit it is more likely that the anti­ship mis­sile that crip­pled the israeli corvette was an iran­ian kosar mis­sile. This mis­sile is a mod­i­fied c-​​701, the range is enhanced slightly the war­head remains the same but the electro-​​opitical tracker is replaced with a mil­lime­ter search radar. The kosar can be launched off the back of an toy­ota truck at a tar­get within vis­i­ble range. The kosar comes in a sealed air­tight con­tainer and can be stored for long peri­ods of time until needed. The dam­age suf­fered by the Hanit most closely matches the size of the war­head fielded by the kosar.
    Also i’ve read var­i­ous odd reports about a high-​​low attack against the hanit by mul­ti­ple mis­siles and that the hanit’s defense sys­tems were turned off to pre­vent frat­ri­cide; both are false.
    Firing a mis­sile into a high arc above a ves­sel will not in any­way degrade the abil­ity of the pas­sive ecm pack­age from doing it’s job against sea-​​skimmers. Likewise the anti-​​missile defense sys­tems will not in any­way splash friendly air­craft, the range of the pha­lanx gun cou­pled with the oper­at­ing alti­tude of jets armed with pgms makes this an impos­si­bil­ity as evi­denced by the fact that a nearby idf ves­sel had it’s ecm pak­age and anti-​​missile pha­lanx gun oper­a­tional. The cam­bo­dian ves­sel that was destroyed was too far at sea for a lucky lock on by an errant shore launched mis­sile, it was most likely destroyed by acci­dent by the idf who may have mis­taken it for a threat source, a la the uss lib­erty :)
    At the end of the day, it looks as if the ira­ni­ans have mod­i­fied the c-​​701 enough to be able to defeat the anti-​​missile sys­tems of the the idf, which are heav­ily reliant on begged, bor­rowed and stolen u.s. tech­nol­ogy; i, and every u.s. ship cap­tain who’ll have to tran­sit the straits of hor­muz or even come close to the per­sian gulf, won­der to what degreee the ira­ni­ans have mod­i­fied other weapons in their arse­nal, namely the c-​​802.

    Reply
  11. michael says:
    August 2, 2006 at 10:36 am

    Pearse says “Hezbollah was not elected to Lebanon’s govt” And then offers as his impec­ca­ble author­ity some­thing called the Guerrilla News Network.
    That’s odd. The rest of the world remem­bers very clearly that Hezbollah has mem­bers elected into the cur­rent Lebanese gov­ern­ment. Here’s the Council on Foreign Relations report, for instance:
    http://​www​.cfr​.org/​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​/​8​1​9​5​/​l​e​b​a​n​o​n​.​h​tml

    Reply
  12. tmoan says:
    June 3, 2008 at 4:33 am

    first of all
    for all of you who said his­bal­lah was elected to the lebanese gov­ern­ment.
    we do not elect cab­i­net members.the pres­i­dent and the prime min­is­ter appoint them.of course after mp dis­cus­sions and debates but in no way their view is manda­tory.
    sec­ond: after all the war that hap­pened you still look down to the mil­i­tary tech­niques and tech­nol­ogy of iran and his­bal­lah and think that this is all they got,simply because that’s all you saw.who told you that it’s all they got.
    third: ter­ror­ism is by all laws and con­ven­tions defined as vio­lence against inno­cent civil­ians.
    his­bal­lah attacked israeli troops and out posts on the day of the kid­nap­ping and any news about fir­ing rock­ets at the neigh­bor­ing north towns of israel is sim­ple pro­pa­ganda because i was in marwa7in which is vis­i­ble from zarit that day​.it was said to be bombed but noth­ing like that appears to be the case.
    they kid­napped SOLDIERS not only this time but all the times after 1990 because they were aware of the con­ven­tions of war after the civil war in lebanon.They only kid­nap to exchange with Kidnapped lebanese CIVILIANS by israel who’s major­ity didn’t do any­thing against israel.
    after israel bombed some i think 11 bridges and killed 26 civil­ians on the first day and after nasrallah’s speech at 8pm did the rocket launch­ing and towns begin
    this is noth­ing but self defence.
    israel kills no mas­sacres peo­ple day after day civil­ians and is not rec­og­nized once as ter­ror­ist.
    i tell you some­thing any ratio­nal per­son with enough polit­i­cal knowl­edge can say his­bal­lah is less a ter­ror­ist than any other of their ene­mies.
    Israel killed 1200+ civil­ians most are women and chil­dren and old peo­ple.
    why because the oth­ers were fight­ing them and i dare any news agency or intel­li­gence reports to con­tra­dict this by pure fact.
    i dare you to bring me a fig­ure less than 70% of men who were killed at fight­ing age if they were not killed in combat.which in any coun­try is honor.
    his­bol­lah pro­tected us and still does from israel because you wish to be on the offen­sive and backed by the US to be super power in the region.
    don’t just call them ter­ror­ists sim­ply because of self defense.this is very degrad­ing to the lebanese peo­ple as a whole being called moun­tain boys and peas­ants.
    by all israel itself declared its defeat on the moun­tain boys’ hands who are by the way the most edu­cated with uni­ver­sity degrees and well man­nered peo­ple in this coun­try and i tell you that by experience

    Reply
  13. jdowjsd says:
    October 19, 2009 at 2:32 am

    dfwoewjf­spo­duw­p­poweruje

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage