DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Israeli Missile Defense: Not Katyusha-​​Ready

Israeli Missile Defense: Not Katyusha-​​Ready

Israelis are used to mis­sile attacks; they’ve spent tons of cash on mis­sile defense sys­tems. So why have their inter­cep­tors been silent, as a thou­sand Katyushas have slammed into their soil? Victoria Samson, the Center for Defense Information’s res­i­dent mis­sile defense sage, has the answer: the Israeli sys­tems are built to stop longer-​​range mis­siles — ones that fly for hun­dreds of miles, like those Iraqi Scuds that fell on Tel Aviv dur­ing the first Gulf War, or the mis­siles Iran might one day nuke-​​equip.) The shorter-​​range pro­jec­tiles that Hezbollah is fir­ing are are too quick, and too mobile, for these inter­cep­tors to catch.
arrow_y.jpg

Israel has a two-​​tiered mis­sile defense sys­tem. The first, the Arrow Weapon System, is to inter­cept bal­lis­tic mis­siles in their final phase of flight. It would do so by shoot­ing the U.S.-developed Arrow II inter­cep­tor at a threat. Once the Israel-​​developed Green Pine Fire Control Radar, Citron Tree Fire Control Center, and Hazel Nut Tree Launcher Center have sent the inter­cep­tor near the tar­get, the Arrow II would blow up, with the hope that the frag­ments from the blast would either destroy the tar­get or knock it suf­fi­ciently off course so that it would no longer remain a threat. There are two Arrow bat­ter­ies deployed. One cov­ers the cen­ter of Israel from its posi­tion in Palmahim, while the other in Ein Shemer is sup­posed to defend Israels north­ern ter­ri­tory…
Israel also has an early ver­sion of the U.S. Patriot mis­sile defense sys­tem. The Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC)-2 is designed to defend against bal­lis­tic mis­sile tar­gets in their ter­mi­nal phase as well; also, it would pro­vide defense via a blast-​​fragmentation war­head… The Patriot dif­fers from the Arrow in that it aims at tar­gets which are at lower alti­tudes.
[But] nei­ther mis­sile defense sys­tem has been used is because they are not designed to inter­cept short-​​range rock­ets. It is esti­mated that of the 13,000 or so rock­ets and mis­siles in Hezbollahs arse­nal, 11,000 of them are of the Katyusha type. These rock­ets have a short range maybe up to nine miles or so and a small war­head of roughly 40 pounds. Based on vin­tage Soviet tech­nol­ogy, these rock­ets can be rolled out of a hid­ing place, shot, and rolled back in before any detec­tion can be made. Their flight is over in sec­onds, mak­ing track­ing dif­fi­cult, much less shoot­ing any­thing down. A sys­tem would have to be in exactly the right place to detect the mis­sile once it is launched, then the defen­sive sys­tem would have to make a nearly instan­ta­neous deci­sion to respond, after which the inter­cep­tor would have to get to the tar­get quickly enough to destroy it. It is an exceed­ingly dif­fi­cult propo­si­tion when the flight times are as short as those launched by Hezbollah. 

That’s one of the rea­sons why Israel spent year pur­su­ing a speed-​​of-​​light rocket defense, the Tactical High Energy Laser — and why some folks are try­ing to re-​​introduce an updated ver­sion of the sys­tem to the Sabras.
But even an updated THEL will take years to get ready. In the short term, Israel’s plan seems to be to clear out as much of south­ern Lebanon as pos­si­ble, the Times notes.

Homes in south­ern Lebanon received taped phone calls in Arabic warn­ing that they needed to evac­u­ate because strikes would hit house by house. The record­ing ended by say­ing it came from the Israeli Army. The Israelis also used a radio sta­tion near the bor­der to broad­cast warn­ings into south­ern Lebanon for res­i­dents to leave.
The radio warn­ing also stressed that any truck, includ­ing pick­ups, trav­el­ing south of the Litani River would be sus­pected of trans­port­ing weapons or rock­ets, and could there­fore be a target.

(Big ups: TP)

Share |

July 20th, 2006 | Missiles, Sabra Tech | 203137 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/Israeli+Missile+Defense%3A+Not+Katyusha-Ready2006-07-20+15%3A28%3A03david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Specter Hearts NSA Spying | Axe at Comicon » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kaltes says:
    July 20, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    “The shorter-​​range pro­jec­tiles that Hezbollah is fir­ing are are too quick, and too mobile, for these inter­cep­tors to catch.“
    NONSENSE. The real­ity is that a Katyusha is too small and cheap to be worth shoot­ing at. Katyushas were built to be fired in massed bar­rages as a form of artillery.
    But instead of the exceed­ingly obvi­ous answer of “not worth it” to the ques­tion of why Israel isnt using Arrows on Katyushas, you try to make it seem as if Katyushas are out­side of the Arrow’s and Patriot’s capa­bil­i­ties. This is igno­rance, bias, or both.

    Reply
  2. CR says:
    July 20, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    I don’t under­stand why Israel isn’t rolling some of the trailer-​​mounted Phalanx sys­tems in? The have met with some suc­cess, it seems in Iraq. From here, they look like just the thing, and they’re (rel­a­tively) quickly avail­able, unlike HELs.

    Reply
  3. David Hambling says:
    July 21, 2006 at 9:44 am

    Actually the US is now putting guid­ance sys­tems on mor­tar bombs, as a way of pro­vid­ing pre­ci­sion indi­rect fire at a small unit level.
    It’s unlikely this sort of tech­nol­ogy would be use by gueril­las, just as they don’t use many guided missiles.

    Reply
  4. Kaltes says:
    July 22, 2006 at 5:59 pm

    I have to admit I have never been very impressed by Metal Storm. I think the hype is unjus­ti­fied and the con­cept, while inter­est­ing, is over­rated.
    Metal Storm would be infe­rior to con­ven­tional, proven sys­tems like the pha­lanx because the metal storm sys­tem lacks endurance, and lacks the abil­ity to cor­rect its aim and fire sub­se­quent shots if it attempts to expend its ammu­ni­tion mak­ing a “cloud” of rounds.
    As far as I know there is no high-​​caliber metal storm sys­tem. The pha­lanx uses more pow­er­ful rounds than would oth­er­wise be nec­es­sary to dis­able a mis­sile because range is very impor­tant for an anti-​​missile sys­tem. More range means more time to engage the mis­sile and means more area pro­tected by the sys­tem.
    If a “cloud” was good at stop­ping mis­siles, it would be much more effec­tive, and cheaper, to use large flechette/​shotgun type rounds or air-​​bursting rounds instead of a metal storm sys­tem. The air-​​burst type sys­tems are prob­a­bly the future of mis­sile defense and they are being worked on now. Such sys­tems can oper­ate at much longer ranges than some­thing like a pha­lanx, and with new computers/​software/​sensors han­dling com­plex cal­cu­la­tions to ensure the round explodes close to the high-​​speed mis­sile, you don’t need to flood the sky with rounds to get a hit.
    I do not think metal storm type weapons will replace con­ven­tional weapons because the sys­tems get much heav­ier as you add more ammu­ni­tion to them. More ammu­ni­tion means more bar­rels. If you want 10 more rounds, you have to add another bar­rel. That is the whole point, the bar­rels are serv­ing as mag­a­zines. This seems like it is really effi­cient until you have to reload, then you see how absurd it can be. Would you rather carry 10 more clips for your rifle, or 10 more much heav­ier bar­rels to get the same amount of ammu­ni­tion?
    This is not to say that the metal storm con­cept is entirely use­less. I would love to be able to have air­craft paradrop robotic, remote con­trolled mor­tar sys­tems that could sup­port spe­cial forces in afghanistan, for exam­ple. With remote con­trolled sys­tems, reload­ing isnt really an option any­way so the biggest dis­ad­van­tage of metal storm dis­ap­pears. If you can make the sys­tems cheap enough, they can be con­sid­ered used up and left behind after they fire their rounds. It would add a great capa­bil­ity to small light units oper­at­ing in remote areas, who now have to rely solely on air support.

    Reply
  5. Jaye says:
    July 22, 2006 at 6:56 pm

    Israel; ABMs do not work! Please lis­ten to me the only thing that will save you and your peo­ple from the mis­siles is “The Patriot Act” please try it and live, I beg you, please!

    Reply
  6. Mehdi says:
    August 17, 2006 at 5:21 am

    How a $1 to $3 mil­lion, patriot and sim­i­lar­ily Arrow is ever sup­posed to be use­full against $1000 Katyushas?

    Reply
  7. ro zeny says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    The friend took me to the game, but she own was leav­ing the game. A per­son to game is bor­ing, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feel­ings and mov­ing. Once, the two boys for me quar­reled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to mar­ried, I think per­haps all this to change, and I pray to become a real­ity, a few days after he dis­ap­peared. A per­son was play­ing a mar­riage num­ber, what would it have taken place.

    Reply
  8. rappelz rupees says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    Three years ago, after friends intro­duced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and con­fused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rap­pelz rupees, but I became the most evil vil­lains in the game. Until I encoun­tered her, I found the mean­ing of survival.

    Reply
  9. rohan crone says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Yesterday, because I miss you, I go back the game and I want to watch to see. The rohan crone that you give me is also in here. I unex­pect­edly met you; I think I should stay here because I still think around you. This after­noon, I let you played together me this night, you promised. In the evening I thought you would not have come, but I saw you really come, I really very happy.

    Reply
  10. gw gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    My neg­a­tive, as my boss

    Reply
  11. Tibia money says:
    August 14, 2008 at 3:42 am

    I didn’t hes­i­tate to think more time and try play­ing at once. Now I love the Tibia money Game very much.

    Reply
  12. cheap silkroad gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 3:44 am

    Shop where one buys cheap silkroad gold and sells trader goods.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Valid observation, Charles. This is all so new that it's hard...
      Will
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : But, as I said in a previous comment, I...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : The Bushmaster's machine-cannon...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : Why doesn't this article, or even...
      freefallingbomb
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I guess camouflaging exposed skin has gone out of...
      Eric daniel
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage