<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Israeli Missile Defense: Not Katyusha-Ready</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: cheap silkroad gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133930</link> <dc:creator>cheap silkroad gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:44:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133930</guid> <description>Shop where one buys cheap silkroad gold and sells trader goods. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shop where one buys cheap silkroad gold and sells trader goods.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tibia money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-20141</link> <dc:creator>Tibia money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-20141</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t hesitate to think more time and try playing at once. Now I love the Tibia money Game very much. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn’t hesitate to think more time and try playing at once. Now I love the Tibia money Game very much.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: gw gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133928</link> <dc:creator>gw gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133928</guid> <description>My negative, as my boss</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My negative, as my boss</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rohan crone</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133924</link> <dc:creator>rohan crone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:05:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133924</guid> <description>Yesterday, because I miss you, I go back the game and I want to watch to see. The rohan crone that you give me is also in here. I unexpectedly met you; I think I should stay here because I still think around you. This afternoon, I let you played together me this night, you promised. In the evening I thought you would not have come, but I saw you really come, I really very happy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, because I miss you, I go back the game and I want to watch to see. The rohan crone that you give me is also in here. I unexpectedly met you; I think I should stay here because I still think around you. This afternoon, I let you played together me this night, you promised. In the evening I thought you would not have come, but I saw you really come, I really very happy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rappelz rupees</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133923</link> <dc:creator>rappelz rupees</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:03:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133923</guid> <description>Three years ago, after friends introduced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and confused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rappelz rupees, but I became the most evil villains in the game. Until I encountered her, I found the meaning of survival. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years ago, after friends introduced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and confused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rappelz rupees, but I became the most evil villains in the game. Until I encountered her, I found the meaning of survival.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ro zeny</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133922</link> <dc:creator>ro zeny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:02:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133922</guid> <description>The friend took me to the game, but she own was leaving the game. A person to game is boring, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feelings and moving. Once, the two boys for me quarreled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to married, I think perhaps all this to change, and I pray to become a reality, a few days after he disappeared. A person was playing a marriage number, what would it have taken place. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The friend took me to the game, but she own was leaving the game. A person to game is boring, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feelings and moving. Once, the two boys for me quarreled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to married, I think perhaps all this to change, and I pray to become a reality, a few days after he disappeared. A person was playing a marriage number, what would it have taken place.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mehdi</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133912</link> <dc:creator>Mehdi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:21:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133912</guid> <description>How a $1 to $3 million, patriot and similarily Arrow is ever supposed to be usefull against $1000 Katyushas? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How a $1 to $3 million, patriot and similarily Arrow is ever supposed to be usefull against $1000 Katyushas?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaye</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133911</link> <dc:creator>Jaye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:56:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133911</guid> <description>Israel; ABMs do not work! Please listen to me the only thing that will save you and your people from the missiles is &quot;The Patriot Act&quot; please try it and live, I beg you, please! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel; ABMs do not work! Please listen to me the only thing that will save you and your people from the missiles is “The Patriot Act” please try it and live, I beg you, please!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kaltes</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133910</link> <dc:creator>Kaltes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:59:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133910</guid> <description>I have to admit I have never been very impressed by Metal Storm. I think the hype is unjustified and the concept, while interesting, is overrated. Metal Storm would be inferior to conventional, proven systems like the phalanx because the metal storm system lacks endurance, and lacks the ability to correct its aim and fire subsequent shots if it attempts to expend its ammunition making a &quot;cloud&quot; of rounds. As far as I know there is no high-caliber metal storm system. The phalanx uses more powerful rounds than would otherwise be necessary to disable a missile because range is very important for an anti-missile system. More range means more time to engage the missile and means more area protected by the system. If a &quot;cloud&quot; was good at stopping missiles, it would be much more effective, and cheaper, to use large flechette/shotgun type rounds or air-bursting rounds instead of a metal storm system. The air-burst type systems are probably the future of missile defense and they are being worked on now. Such systems can operate at much longer ranges than something like a phalanx, and with new computers/software/sensors handling complex calculations to ensure the round explodes close to the high-speed missile, you don&#039;t need to flood the sky with rounds to get a hit. I do not think metal storm type weapons will replace conventional weapons because the systems get much heavier as you add more ammunition to them. More ammunition means more barrels. If you want 10 more rounds, you have to add another barrel. That is the whole point, the barrels are serving as magazines. This seems like it is really efficient until you have to reload, then you see how absurd it can be. Would you rather carry 10 more clips for your rifle, or 10 more much heavier barrels to get the same amount of ammunition? This is not to say that the metal storm concept is entirely useless. I would love to be able to have aircraft paradrop robotic, remote controlled mortar systems that could support special forces in afghanistan, for example. With remote controlled systems, reloading isnt really an option anyway so the biggest disadvantage of metal storm disappears. If you can make the systems cheap enough, they can be considered used up and left behind after they fire their rounds. It would add a great capability to small light units operating in remote areas, who now have to rely solely on air support. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I have never been very impressed by Metal Storm. I think the hype is unjustified and the concept, while interesting, is overrated.<br /> Metal Storm would be inferior to conventional, proven systems like the phalanx because the metal storm system lacks endurance, and lacks the ability to correct its aim and fire subsequent shots if it attempts to expend its ammunition making a “cloud” of rounds.<br /> As far as I know there is no high-caliber metal storm system. The phalanx uses more powerful rounds than would otherwise be necessary to disable a missile because range is very important for an anti-missile system. More range means more time to engage the missile and means more area protected by the system.<br /> If a “cloud” was good at stopping missiles, it would be much more effective, and cheaper, to use large flechette/shotgun type rounds or air-bursting rounds instead of a metal storm system. The air-burst type systems are probably the future of missile defense and they are being worked on now. Such systems can operate at much longer ranges than something like a phalanx, and with new computers/software/sensors handling complex calculations to ensure the round explodes close to the high-speed missile, you don’t need to flood the sky with rounds to get a hit.<br /> I do not think metal storm type weapons will replace conventional weapons because the systems get much heavier as you add more ammunition to them. More ammunition means more barrels. If you want 10 more rounds, you have to add another barrel. That is the whole point, the barrels are serving as magazines. This seems like it is really efficient until you have to reload, then you see how absurd it can be. Would you rather carry 10 more clips for your rifle, or 10 more much heavier barrels to get the same amount of ammunition?<br /> This is not to say that the metal storm concept is entirely useless. I would love to be able to have aircraft paradrop robotic, remote controlled mortar systems that could support special forces in afghanistan, for example. With remote controlled systems, reloading isnt really an option anyway so the biggest disadvantage of metal storm disappears. If you can make the systems cheap enough, they can be considered used up and left behind after they fire their rounds. It would add a great capability to small light units operating in remote areas, who now have to rely solely on air support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Hambling</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/07/20/israeli-missile-defense-not-katyusha-ready/#comment-133908</link> <dc:creator>David Hambling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2031#comment-133908</guid> <description>Actually the US is now putting guidance systems on mortar bombs, as a way of providing precision indirect fire at a small unit level. It&#039;s unlikely this sort of technology would be use by guerillas, just as they don&#039;t use many guided missiles. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the US is now putting guidance systems on mortar bombs, as a way of providing precision indirect fire at a small unit level.<br /> It’s unlikely this sort of technology would be use by guerillas, just as they don’t use many guided missiles.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:23:19 -->
