DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » Inside Israel, Hez Ground War Strategies

Inside Israel, Hez Ground War Strategies

“The ground war has begun,” says Stratfor. “Several Israeli brigades now appear to be oper­at­ing between the Lebanese bor­der and the Litani River. According to reports, Hezbollah forces are dis­persed in mul­ti­ple bunker com­plexes and are launch­ing rock­ets from these and other loca­tions.“
r3187798417.jpg

Hezbollah’s strat­egy appears to be three­fold. First, force Israel into costly attacks against pre­pared for­ti­fi­ca­tions. Second, draw Israeli troops as deeply into Lebanon as pos­si­ble, forc­ing them to fight on extended sup­ply lines. Third, move into an Iraqi-​​style insur­gency from which Israel — out of fear of a resump­tion of rocket attacks — can­not with­draw, but which the Israelis also can­not endure because of extended long-​​term casu­al­ties. This appears to have been a care­fully planned strat­egy, built around a threat to Israeli cities that Israel can’t afford. The war has begun at Hezbollah’s time and choos­ing…
Hezbollah has imple­mented its strat­egy by turn­ing south­ern Lebanon into a mil­i­tary strong­hold, con­sist­ing of well-​​designed bunkers that serve both as fire bases and launch facil­i­ties for rock­ets. The mil­i­tants appear to be armed with anti-​​tank weapons and prob­a­bly anti-​​aircraft weapons, some of which appear to be of American ori­gin, rais­ing the ques­tion of how they were acquired. Hezbollah wants to draw Israel into pro­tracted fight­ing in this area in order to inflict max­i­mum casu­al­ties and to change the psy­cho­log­i­cal equa­tion for both mil­i­tary and polit­i­cal rea­sons…
Israel is caught between three strate­gic imper­a­tives. First, it must end the threat to Israeli cities, which must involve the destruc­tion of Hezbollah’s launch capa­bil­i­ties south of the Litani River. Second, it must try to destroy Hezbollah’s infra­struc­ture, which means it must move into the Bekaa Valley and as far as the south­ern sub­urbs of Beirut. Third, it must do so in such a way that it is not dragged into a long-​​term, unsus­tain­able occu­pa­tion against a capa­ble insur­gency.…
Simply occu­py­ing the border-​​Litani area will not achieve any of Israel’s strate­gic goals. Hezbollah still would be able to use rock­ets against Israel. And even if, for Hezbollah, this area is lost, its capa­bil­i­ties in the Bekaa Valley and south­ern Beirut will remain intact. Therefore, a bat­tle that focuses solely on the south is not an option for Israel, unless the Israelis feel a defeat here will sap Hezbollah’s will to resist. We doubt this to be the case…
An extended engage­ment in south­ern Lebanon is the least likely path, in our opin­ion. More likely — and this is a guess — is a five-​​part strat­egy:
1. Insert air­mo­bile and air­borne forces north of the Litani to seal the rear of Hezbollah forces in south­ern Lebanon. Apply air power and engi­neer­ing forces to reduce the for­ti­fi­ca­tions, and infantry to attack forces not in for­ti­fied posi­tions. Bottle them up, and sys­tem­at­i­cally reduce the force with lim­ited expo­sure to the attack­ers.
2. Secure roads along the east­ern flank for an armored thrust deep into the Bekaa Valley to engage the main Hezbollah force and infra­struc­ture there. This would involve a move from Qiryat Shimona north into the Bekaa, bypass­ing the Litani to the west, and would prob­a­bly require send­ing air­mo­bile and spe­cial forces to secure the high ground. It also would leave the right flank exposed to Syria.
3. Use air power and spe­cial forces to under­mine Hezbollah capa­bil­i­ties in the south­ern Beirut area. The Israelis would con­sider a move into this area after roads through south­ern Lebanon are cleared and Bekaa rel­a­tively secured, mov­ing into the area, only if absolutely nec­es­sary, on two axes of attack.
4. Having defeated Hezbollah in detail, with­draw under a polit­i­cal set­tle­ment shift­ing defense respon­si­bil­ity to the Lebanese gov­ern­ment.
5. Do all of this while the United States is still able to pro­vide top cover against diplo­matic ini­tia­tives that will cre­ate an increas­ingly dif­fi­cult inter­na­tional environment.

Sounds tough to pull off, even under ideal cir­cum­stances. And what hap­pens if the Sabras have to do all this, while fight­ing the Lebanese army, too?

Share |

July 21st, 2006 | Strategery | 203628 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/07/21/inside-israel-hez-ground-war-strategies/Inside+Israel%2C+Hez+Ground+War+Strategies2006-07-21+17%3A50%3A24david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Senate vs. Darpa | Rapid Fire 07/​24/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. War Buff says:
    July 22, 2006 at 8:52 am

    Hisbollah killed 240 marines in a cow­ardly bomb­ing in Lebanon. A per­fect gift to the Marines mem­ory would be the bod­ies of 2400 Hizbollah ver­min, all miss­ing their right hands.
    Although two decades have passed, hope­fully some of those bod­ies would be of the orig­i­nal crim­i­nals. If not, their sons and grand­sons will do just fine.
    I would hope that President Bush picks up the tab for this action in grat­i­tude to the Israeli peo­ples gift.

    Reply
  2. Lloyd says:
    July 22, 2006 at 2:36 pm

    These arab Nazi’s should get what they give only 10000 times more. I served in the last days of WW2 and never thought that the Nazis would arise again. Since these arab Nazis would never love us let them FEAR and RESPECT us. War is hell so let them and their fam­i­lies fear hell fire!
    Respectfully,
    Lloyd

    Reply
  3. Jaye says:
    July 22, 2006 at 8:03 pm

    Hez strat­egy: “kill Whitey” Israeli strat­egy: “kill Brownie.” Neocon strat­egy: profit from it! God will curse all the mur­der­ers of Innocent women and chil­dren and all who profit from the killing! Praise be to God!

    Reply
  4. Roi says:
    July 23, 2006 at 2:21 am

    All tac­tic issues can be well han­dled by Israel army, I am sure. Like “long sup­ply line”, as pre­vi­ous com­ment has stated, is not a prob­lem at all. The key point is how to end it. Now US’s prob­lem is that they can’t get troops out of Iraq. Similar things hap­pened for Soviet Union to get troops out of Afganistan.
    The uni­ver­sal solu­tion is to find a native agent to help you to clean the mess. You need to pick a potent agent who can do it. I know most of the time, this agent may go wild and out of con­trol, but that’s much bet­ter than suck all your troops in the fight­ing for insur­gency. Now Israel faces the same prob­lem. Strategically, they need to reduce the power of Hizbollah and let Lebanon gov­ern­ment take care of the mess. Currently Lebanon army is too weak to rein Hizbollah.

    Reply
  5. prom expert says:
    July 23, 2006 at 6:40 am

    the israeli will win becausre they are right

    Reply
  6. D C says:
    July 23, 2006 at 7:47 am

    “I just wanted to say that the media, includ­ing this site, are over-​​estimating Hezbollah.“
    Well it seems from 12 days of fight­ing that Israel has greatly under-​​estimated Hezbollah. Israel has been liv­ing in dream land for the past six year (ever since they with­drew and gave Hezzbollah what they wanted), they have no intel­li­gence, they can­not find hezbol­lah lead­ers, they can­not stop the rock­ets and Hezbollah has tech­nol­ogy & rock­ets that Isarael knew noth­ing about.
    “Israel has bunker busters, remem­ber? Though these “for­ti­fi­ca­tions” aren’t the kind of thing you’d need one for any­way. Static tar­gets will NOT sur­vive. “
    Even if Israel has Bunker Busters, one can­not bust bunkers that they can­not find. Hezbollah has had six years to dig in, and from what we have seen they have realy dug in and made every effort to hide and keep these bunkers secret. They have bunkers, tun­nels and sup­plies hid­den deep under­ground. Israel is try­ing to find these bunkers but is hav­ing a very hard time. The well planned and devolped bunker sys­tem along with Israels lack of inteligance, will make win­ning the war with­out mas­sive ground forces, impos­si­ble.
    Israel is fac­ing a hard time, the main cause for the present sit­u­a­tion is lack of deci­sion by Isreali lead­ers. Olmert should decide if he is play­ing at war, then go to war and destroy the enemy. Israel can­not afford a half war effort, it is either all or noth­ing in the Middle East. Olmert and Peretz have to decide where they are tak­ing Israel and stop play­ing games. Once the deci­sion is made Israel can and will achieve victory,simply because they have no other choice. With Israel it is always a suri­val issue.
    If the lead­ers cont. with there half hearted attempts at fight­ing a war and not call­ing it a war, of try­ing not to con­tinue with there present peaces plans and frame of mind, then Israel can expect dark times ahead. Evean Israel can­not win if they really don’t want to.
    The ques­tion that one has to ask is , has Israel lost its nerve? Have 15 years of peace talks and giv­ing in to teror­rist, which reached it peak last sum­mer with the so called dis­en­gag­ment, caused Israel to lose site of its pur­pose and goal.
    Israel can sur­vive and win if it wants to, but do they want to? Or has Israel been com­pletely blinded from its vison of peace and the “New Middle East”.
    To win a war one must fight it!!

    Reply
  7. punisher1 says:
    July 23, 2006 at 6:45 pm

    Hezbollah can only fight at basic lev­els of ground com­bat with no armor and lit­tle artillery or what seems to be a poor excuse for rock­ets.
    The best bet is for the IDF to push every­one out of the buffer zone and search all areas destroy­ing any­thing that has been used by Hezbollah. Leave noth­ing for them to use in the future.
    Hezbollah is not going to stand and fight like an army so there’s no point in hang­ing around for sui­cide and poorly guided rocket attacks. Now that the IDF parades thru the streets Hezbollah is nowhere to be seen. So much for all that bravado and flag burn­ing.
    It just shows how weak and cow­ardly they really are.

    Reply
  8. TheDreamer says:
    July 23, 2006 at 11:08 pm

    “Israel has bunker busters, remem­ber? “
    Interestingly, Israel has run out of pre­ci­sion guided muni­tions and is cur­rently ask­ing for a US resup­ply dur­ing the mid­dle of their air cam­pa­gin. As for bunker bust­ing, it requires the use of troops to at the very least locate the posi­tions, with exact­ing detail. Meanwhile there is cer­tainly moun­tian­sides and path­ways prepped for the assult.
    “Can you really say with a straight face that Israeli logis­tics couldn’t eas­ily han­dle sup­ply­ing forces a mere 30–40 miles dis­tant from the Israeli bor­der?“
    The road from bagh­dad air­port is still not secure. Enough said, how­ever I will point out that it is through hos­tile ter­rian in both pop­u­la­tion and geog­ra­phy, mean­while all of the roads have been bombed by israel. Beyond this there is a lot of evi­dence sug­gest­ing that hez basicly was the research lab for IEDs, so you can bet that they are very pre­pared to use them on the sup­ply lines after forc­ing israel deep into the ter­ri­tory to push back the rocket attacks.
    “No, Israel can with­draw, Israel has already with­drawn before.“
    I am afraid you are wrong in this, it is not pos­si­ble for an israeli with­drawl. Israel with­drew before, after an 18 year occu­pa­tion, which still failed to stop the threat. Politically in israel all rocket attacks must be ceased.
    ” Lebanon already has a gov­ern­ment in place, Israel is NOT nation-​​building.
    Are you refer­ing to the gov­ern­ment was only barely begin­ing of pulling the ter­ri­tory out of a long civil war and has yet even begin to con­trol Hezbollah, which com­poses a sig­nif­i­cant part of said gov­ern­ment? Israel can­not just wall of lebanon like it did to Gaza; it can­not stop the resup­ply, but it must try, and the only way it can do this is the total ani­hi­la­tion of the threat. Israel would rather lebanaon in civil war, though the stray rocket into israel would make with­draw still impos­si­ble. The key fact here is if israel ceases activ­ity on lebanon and one more rocket hits israel olm­berts gov­ern­ment is going to more likely than not col­lapse.
    “The best bet is for the IDF to push every­one out of the buffer zone and search all areas destroy­ing any­thing that has been used by Hezbollah. Leave noth­ing for them to use in the future.“
    That sounds like a per­fect sce­nario for one of the worst human­i­tar­ian dis­as­ters I’ve ever heard of, not only with the refugees but it’ll spark mas­sive ten­sions and pres­sure to return to civil war.
    “Hezbollah is not going to stand and fight like an army so there

    Reply
  9. FooMan says:
    July 24, 2006 at 7:19 am

    I was in the navy when the Israelis warned the PLO about sui­cide bomb­ings and the Lebanese ‘safe zones’ When they ignored the warn­ing the U.S. Marines on peace­keep­ing duties on the Lebanese bor­der got a visit from ‘a scruffy look­ing guy in a beat up jeep.’ He iden­ti­fied him­self as a brigadier gen­eral and informed the marines that needed to move. The marine det. com­man­der replied that they were U.N. peace keep­ers and that thye were stay­ing. The brigadier responded that had four­teen peo­ple with one .50 machine gun and a radio and he had 64 tanks and they wouldn’t stop them, he then ever so politely requested they evaquate to the near­est U.S. posi­tion not is Isreal or Lebanon, which turned out to be our ship. Within min­utes of their evac­u­a­tion the Isreali’s began “Operation Peace in Galili (sp?)“
    which resulted in a con­firmed scores of 75 kills of SAM sites for 0 (that is ZERO!)Isreali air­craft and resulted in the PLO evac­u­at­ing to Cyprus for the next five years. Isreal is an anomoly in the mod­ern world in that when they tell you not to do some­thing there are seri­ous and per­ma­nent con­se­quences when you ignore them. While verg­ing on overkill they do seem to get their point across ask those try­ing to rebuild the high­way bridges to Syria or restore power to the south­ern half of the country.

    Reply
  10. C.A. Bollfrass says:
    July 24, 2006 at 10:26 pm

    We have sleeper cells in the Texas prison sys­tem.
    When the Democrat Senate under George Mitchell took away our pris­ons, they allowed prison gangs to form. Each prison has its Islamic gang, tended to by so called “cler­ics” from the out­side, with funds from unknown sources.

    Reply
  11. Noah says:
    July 25, 2006 at 9:10 pm

    What most are for­get­ting is that ‘insur­gen­cies’ usu­ally win. Vietnam, Afghanistan (the Soviets), Algeria, and so on are sim­ply exam­ples of places where supe­rior forces were forced to capit­u­late. It is only a mat­ter of time before Iraq and Afghanistan are added to that list.
    Israel’s strikes, regard­less of how dam­ag­ing or not they may be to Hezbollah, are far more dam­ag­ing to Israel itself in the same way that the US occu­pa­tion of Iraq is to the US.
    The only mil­i­tary way to defeat an insur­gency is a “final solu­tion” in which the entire pop­u­la­tion is dec­i­mated, thereby elim­i­nat­ing all actual and poten­tial foes. This is “total war”, and no tar­get, tac­tic, weapon or strat­egy is off-​​limits.
    The media is com­plicit in total war. We don’t hear a peep about vio­la­tions of the Geneva Convention (tar­get­ing of civil­ians and civil­ian infra­struc­ture, tor­ture, etc.). The media white­washes such counter-​​information, block­ing news and espe­cially images that would have any sane human being scream­ing in their sleep (http://​www​.fromis​rael​tole​banon​.info/ — be warned).
    Israel is as respon­si­ble for cre­at­ing these ene­mies as the US has been in cre­at­ing Al Qaeda (http://​msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​3​3​4​0​1​01/). The Mossaud, tak­ing a page from the CIA, has funded groups that later turn out to be even worse ene­mies that those they were try­ing to desta­bi­lize. By pro­vid­ing sup­port for Muslim fun­da­men­tal­ists in an attempt to desta­bi­lize Arab regimes, Israel has not only fur­ther alien­ated those neigh­bor­ing Arab coun­tries, it has empow­ered it’s most dan­ger­ous enemy, which has now been elected to office in Palestine (Hamas) and Lebanon (Hezbollah).

    Reply
  12. John B says:
    July 26, 2006 at 6:21 pm

    Re: “What most are for­get­ting is that ‘insur­gen­cies’ usu­ally win.“
    Tell that to the British about the Malaya campaign.

    Reply
  13. Daren says:
    July 29, 2006 at 12:03 pm

    Noah, I think John B was refer­ring to the con­flict known as the ‘Malaya Emergency’ fought between 1948–60 by the British against Communist gueril­las (drawn mostly from the eth­nic Chinese pop­u­la­tion).
    The cam­paign was hard fought and cost around 600 British lives, but the ‘insur­gents’ were ulti­mately defeated and the cam­paign is often regarded as a text­book exam­ple of an anti-​​insurgency cam­paign.
    Furthermore the British army has more expe­ri­ence in this field than any other in his­tory.
    And with regard to your com­ment we’ve only lost one major war against ANYBODY since the 15th cen­tury.
    Perhaps you’d like to learn a bit more his­tory and engage your brain before mak­ing such statements.

    Reply
  14. abbey says:
    August 11, 2006 at 6:43 am

    I really pray this whole thing can come to an end. God loves that we live as one, moti­vated by the desire to help one another, liv­ing through our dif­fer­ences and mak­ing a bet­ter world avail­able for gen­er­a­tions to come. I beseech both empires & all nations of the world to embrace the path of peace.

    Reply
  15. 1/7 Twist says:
    August 11, 2006 at 6:42 pm

    Oohrah! War Buff you are a good man.

    Reply
  16. bruce says:
    March 11, 2007 at 11:12 pm

    Pres Bush will pick up the Israeli tab all right budd!!!$125 MILLION in avi­a­tion fuel bill for the Israeli air cam­paign was sent to the American taxpayer…Who the hell knows how much for a rush ship­ment of pre­ci­sion guided muni­tions to replace expended Israeli stocks!!
    This over and above the $15 MILLION A DAY in US tax­payer aid Israel receives.
    This ofcourse does not include the Lebanese tab of infra­sruc­ture destruc­tion caused by Israel.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage