DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » FALCON Flies Falls Again

FALCON Flies Falls Again

Falcon a word that evokes power, speed, lethal­ity. Then why did the Air Forces lat­est FALCON fall out the back of a C-​​17 at 32,000 feet?
The answer: drop tests. The drop from the C-​​17, which pro­ceeded accord­ing to plan, was part of DARPAs efforts to develop a Small Launch Vehicle (SLV) as part of its FALCON pro­gram. This par­tic­u­lar FALCON is the Force Appli­ca­tion and Launch from the CONtinen­tal United States pro­gram — and shouldnt be con­fused with the rocket, the satel­lite, the fighter jet, the super­com­puter, or any of the other pieces of hard­ware which undoubt­edly bear the same name in the defense tech com­mu­nity.
The SLV is a small rocket (still over 60 feet in length) that, if suc­cess­ful, will be able to quickly place a light­weight mil­i­tary satel­lite into orbit. I guess drop­ping a 72,000 pound rocket out the back of a plane is eas­ier than wait­ing for a launch pad at Vandenberg.
The SLV would allow for the rapid replace­ment of failed assets, pro­vide sup­ple­men­tal recon­nais­sance for a hot zone, etc. Rapid launch could also be applied to space weapons, pro­vid­ing the Air Force with the abil­ity to quickly deploy either pas­sive or active weapons sys­tems with­out pro­vid­ing the pub­lic and inter­na­tional com­mu­nity the oppor­tu­nity to protest.
The SLV also has another objec­tive — to boost a scramjet-​​powered hyper­sonic bomber to its tar­get halfway around the world. This is part of FALCONs other aim, to pro­vide Prompt Global Strike capa­bil­ity to any loca­tion in the world in under two hours. Prompt Global Strike is basi­cally the always-​​ready, rapid response sys­tem behind our bal­lis­tic mis­siles. Except in this case, you cant use mis­siles, and you cant use nukes.
The hope is to drop con­ven­tional bombs on far-​​flung tar­gets quickly with­out the show­stop­per issues asso­ci­ated with using a Trident II. The prob­lem with the Trident is, you dont want to place the worlds nuclear second-​​strike forces on alert as you send a conventionally-​​tipped Trident II toward Osama bin Laden.
FALCON has lofty goals by attempt­ing a truly global reach and a 12,000 pound pay­load. You could send more than just bombs deploy­ing Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVS) are cer­tainly pos­si­ble. It can, in fact, carry so much that some peo­ple want to use it to rapidly deploy a Marine squad. However, it is unlikely that even hard­ened Space Marines (OOO-​​RAH!) could sus­tain the nec­es­sary G forces in their poten­tial drop ship.
FALCON is cen­tered on the Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV), a reusable unmanned bomber. Traveling at over Mach 5, the HCV will use a scram­jet engine, a sig­nif­i­cant depar­ture from the rock­ets tra­di­tion­ally used in long-​​range weapons sys­tems. Since a scram­jets tra­jec­tory is markedly dis­tinct from an ICBM it will also be read­ily iden­ti­fi­able.
What is not clear is, given the HCVs pro­posed range and pay­load, is whether the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity would con­sider it any less of a threat than a Trident. It doesnt even have to be nuclear-​​tipped to scare the heck out of you 12,000 pounds of muni­tions in the right place can be dev­as­tat­ing. In fact, FALCON could be a big­ger threat than the nuclear arse­nal since there is a much greater chance of its use in non-​​apocalyptic sce­nar­ios.
But then, thats the point.
Learn more about FALCON at CDIs Fact Sheet.
– Ryan Caron

Share |

August 2nd, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps, Space | 20694 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/02/falcon-flies-falls-again/FALCON+%3Cstrike%3EFlies%3C%2Fstrike%3E+Falls+Again2006-08-02+18%3A58%3A57sharon_weinberger You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Not So Divine After All? | Rapid Fire 08/​02/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Murc says:
    August 2, 2006 at 6:58 pm

    I know this was just a test rocket…but did it place any­thing into orbit… like a cheap test satel­lite or some­thing?
    I’m glad FALCON is pro­gress­ing for­ward. I really want the AF to start build­ing a scram­jet bomber…since it seams like all the cool scram­jet and PDE stuff we heard about years ago…has fallen into the dark side (aka: black).

    Reply
  2. Ryan Caron says:
    August 3, 2006 at 10:58 am

    This was a drop test of a “dummy” rocket. It has the same dimen­sions, and weight, of what they plan to be using, but it was inert. Future drop tests will drop the test arti­cle out at higher alti­tudes and faster ground speeds.
    This rocket is an inte­gral part of any scram­jet bomber since such engines can’t reach hyper­sonic speeds all on their own.

    Reply
  3. Allen Thomson says:
    August 3, 2006 at 7:13 pm

    Another aspect of this pro­gram that has been men­tioned in press releases but not much picked up on is that it demon­strates the abil­ity of vanilla C-​​17s to drop very heavy (36 tons most recently) cylin­dri­cal objects with pointy noses. In the case of Falcon, the nose is intended to end up point­ing upward. In other cases, one could imag­ine that it would be pointed in the oppo­site direc­tion.
    Speculative, of course.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage