DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Sabra Tech » Hez Surprises Israeli Military

Hez Surprises Israeli Military

“Terrorists are cow­ards,” one Army sergeant told me in Iraq last year. “And they can’t shoot worth @$%#!,” he added.
Through all the trou­bles in Iraq, the U.S. mil­i­tary has taken some com­fort in its absolute tac­ti­cal supe­ri­or­ity to insur­gent forces. In a stand-​​up fight, U.S. troops always win.
But what if that changed?
Indications are that Hezbollah has achieved the unthink­able. It has com­bined the elu­sive­ness and agility of a ter­ror­ist group with the fight­ing prowess of a mod­ern army, accord­ing to The New York Times:

Hezbollah is a mili­tia trained like an army and equipped like a state, and its fight­ers are noth­ing like Hamas or the Palestinians, said a sol­dier who just returned from Lebanon. They are trained and highly qual­i­fied, he said, equipped with flak jack­ets, night-​​vision gog­gles, good com­mu­ni­ca­tions and some­times Israeli uni­forms and ammu­ni­tion. All of us were kind of surprised. 

This is bad. Real bad.
On the other hand, as fel­low blog­ger and Iraq vet Geoff Edwards has pointed out: the bolder and more tac­ti­cally pro­fi­cient a group like Hezbollah gets, the more it looks and acts like an army and the eas­ier it is to find, fix and destroy using pre­cisely those weapons that, against an insur­gent force, are nearly use­less.
–David Axe
UPDATE, 4:37 EST: Now Reuters is report­ing that Israel has shot down a Hezbollah drone:

Israeli air­craft shot down a sus­pected Hizbollah drone as it flew over Israeli ter­ri­tory on Aug. 7, the Israeli army said. “I can con­firm that the air force destroyed a Hizbollah drone,” an army spokesman said, but would not pro­vide any other details, includ­ing where the drone was fly­ing. Israels Channel One tele­vi­sion reported that the drone was believed to be armed, but the army had no comment.

Is this another bit of igno­rant report­ing like the “drone hits ship” sit­u­a­tion a cou­ple weeks back? Or is this the lat­est exam­ple of Hezbollah’s remark­able mil­i­tary sophis­ti­ca­tion?
If it’s true, I won­der … was this drone on a sur­veil­lance mis­sion, or doing some­thing more nefarious?

Share |

August 7th, 2006 | Sabra Tech | 208431 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/07/hez-surprises-israeli-military/Hez+Surprises+Israeli+Military2006-08-07+16%3A06%3A25hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 8/​7/​06 | Killer Swarms: The New Generation » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chris Wo says:
    August 7, 2006 at 12:11 pm

    Except that so far the IAF and IDF have had sig­nif­i­cant prob­lems in tar­get­ing and destroy­ing hezbol­lah fight­ing abil­ity. In fact, hezbol­lah has man­aged to dou­ble its aver­age rocket bar­rage per day for the last week, and is suf­fer­ing very few casul­ties against a sup­pos­edly sup­pe­rior foe.
    Solid train­ing with good opsec, well entrenched and hid­den posi­tions, with heav­ily ATGM equipped light infantry. Thats what caus­ing the IDF trouble.

    Reply
  2. Dimitar Vesselinov says:
    August 7, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    1. Any other coun­try would act the same way if ter­ror­ists crossed over an inter­na­tion­ally rec­og­nized bor­der and killed peo­ple unpro­voked.
    2. On the whole, Israel has con­sis­tently made efforts to retract from con­flict for the sake of nor­malcy and peace; from Sinai, from Yamit, from Lebanon, from Gaza, and even­tu­ally from the West Bank. (Charles Krauthammer wrote about this in a recent col­umn in the Washington Post)
    3. Israelis do not parade in the streets when oth­ers die.
    4. Jewish public/​governmental fig­ures do not advo­cate the destruc­tion of any other coun­tries or eth­nic groups, yet other eth­nic groups decry the destruc­tion of Israel on a daily basis.
    5. Before you call Israel an apartheid state, or a state pur­su­ing eth­nic cleans­ing, or any other ridicu­lous claim like that, remem­ber your his­tory, and how the Armenian, Kurdish, and Tajik pop­u­la­tions of the Middle East were (are) treated by Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Turkey. Remember how Sunni/​Shiite/​Alawite/​Wahabi rul­ing elites have treated their pop­u­la­tions and each other (like the inci­dent at Hama). Israel has screwed up in the past, but that does not mean the rest of the region is golden in com­par­i­son.
    http://​www​.newzion​ist​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​8​/​o​n​-​i​s​r​a​e​l​i​-​pr/

    Reply
  3. Byron Skinner says:
    August 7, 2006 at 1:19 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    All good posts here but I find some­thing miss­ing. No body has men­tioned the infu­lence that the insur­gency in Iraq has had on devel­op­ing the mil­i­tary soph­i­ca­tion of not only Hezabollah but Hamas and The Teliban in Afghanistan.
    The leg­ecy of al-​​Zarqawi and his seem­ing genus in orga­ni­za­tion and mil­i­tary tac­tics along with his mas­ter of the asymer­ti­caly bat­tle­field seems to be spread­ing.
    Hind sight is that before 2003 al Zarqawi was a nobody look­ing for some role in bin-​​Ladens al-​​Qaeda orga­ni­za­tion, but all that changed with the Americans inva­sion of Iraq and its blotched occu­pa­tion. Opportunity knocked and al-​​Zarqawi answered, the rest as they say is his­tory.
    Who say’s that Bush hasn’t accom­plished any­thing in Iraq.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  4. Marshall says:
    August 7, 2006 at 3:22 pm

    I think Hezbollah is one of the first mil­i­tar­ily active “late phase 4GW” forces. It seems obvi­ous that in the later phases of 4GW (or early phases of 5GW) we would see forces that have the resources and train­ing of a state spon­sored mil­i­tary using the proven tac­tics of 4GW or suc­cess­ful guer­rilla forces.
    Expect to see Iran use a mod­i­fied ver­sion (they’d start out by rely­ing on their air defense net­work and their long range missle capa­bil­i­ties) of this kind of strat­egy if attacked by the U.S or other major powers.

    Reply
  5. Lord Talbot says:
    August 7, 2006 at 6:03 pm

    It is doubt­ful that Hezbollah will be defin­i­tively defeated by the IDF. Seeing as they are entrenched within a pop­u­la­tion, and the IDF is oper­at­ing with a nec­es­sar­ily short amount of time. It is com­par­a­tive to the Iraqi insur­gency in that way and that way only, and the one did not influ­ence the other. Oh, and Bush hasn’t accom­plished any­thing in Iraq. In less you count stag­na­tion as an accom­plish­ment. Israel has made attempts to back off of cap­tured ter­ri­tory for peace, but never will­ingly, only after great inter­na­tional pres­sure. Whats with that com­ment about the Hezbollah wel­fare sys­tem? I would say if there is such a thing in Lebanon, it would be pro­vided by the gov­ern­ment. Although Israel isn’t entirely in the right for this police action, they should still be able to counter ter­ror­ism how ever pos­si­ble. For Israel’s present sit­u­a­tion in the world, sur­rounded by hos­tiles, an inabil­ity to react would mean destruction.

    Reply
  6. peace says:
    August 7, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    i saw on tv a “free­dom figther/​terrorist” {depend­ing on which tv sta­tion you are watching}.in afgan­istan and than a week later an other one in iraq say­ing this same words.
    (patience amer­ica our revenge will be bru­tal).
    if you want war pre­pare for war.……

    Reply
  7. Robot Economist says:
    August 7, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    First, J. Brenner has an inter­est­ing point. Since the IDF has started to scale up ground force incur­sions into Lebanon, have they lost armor to ATGMs? Since the body count for Israeli sol­diers has been rel­a­tively low until recently, I won­der whether Hezbollah has some AT-​​4 Spigots or AT-​​5 Spandrels squir­reled away some­where.
    As for Mr. Skinner’s post, I think report­ing on Zarqawi’s exploits in Iraq were overblown. Was he part of the insur­gency? Yes. Where his attacks high pro­file? Relatively so. But my impres­sion is that his plan­ning and oper­a­tions were only an incre­men­tal improve­ment on stuff typ­i­cal of al Qaeda. Also, as the eth­nic vio­lence in Iraq blooms, his unfor­tu­nate vic­tims are prov­ing to be merely a down pay­ment on a much large con­flict.
    As for this lat­est bit of drone spec­u­la­tion, I am skep­ti­cal. Without details, for all we know this drone could have been a remote con­trol prop plane kit. I don’t see where a drone fits into Hezbollah’s tac­tics or C4ISR scheme. With IAF planes dom­i­nat­ing the sky, you’d think it would be eas­ier to recon on foot and in civil­ian cloth­ing. I am inter­ested to see if this turns out to be another cruise missile.

    Reply
  8. Kaltes says:
    August 7, 2006 at 8:17 pm

    The media is exag­ger­at­ing Hezbollah’s bat­tle­field prowess, and has been con­sis­tently doing so, since the begin­ning of this fight. It goes with­out say­ing that Hezbollah is going to be bet­ter trained and equipped than the pales­tini­ans, they are, after all, a proxy force for Iran, trained by prob­a­bly the best Iran has to offer and armed by Iran/​Syria.
    That said, Hezbollah has NOT man­aged to defeat or even seri­ously stall the Israelis any­where. If Hezbollah was such a pow­er­ful force, with all the myr­iad advan­tages this site was pro­claim­ing, then how can it be that Hezbollah can’t even put up the level of resis­tance that the oft-​​denigrated Poles put up against the Nazis. Even the Poles had solid mil­i­tary units that the Nazis could not take down in a straight fight, and the Nazis were forced to encir­cle and bypass them.
    Even if Hezbollah was able to beat back mul­ti­ple seri­ous Israeli attempts to take an area, that doesn’t mean Hezbollah is win­ning. In war, the losers, even when they lose over­whelm­ingly, can at least count SOME suc­cesses within the broader war. Can Hezbollah do that? NO.
    How do I know for sure that Hezbollah isn’t hav­ing mil­i­tary vic­to­ries? Because if Hezbollah did have one, the inter­na­tional media would ocne again make a moun­tain out of a mole­hill, and mer­rily pro­pa­gan­dize for Hezbollah, as the media has know­ingly been doing in the con­text of civil­ian casu­al­ties thus far.

    Reply
  9. Noah says:
    August 7, 2006 at 8:19 pm

    “For Israel’s present sit­u­a­tion in the world, sur­rounded by hos­tiles, an inabil­ity to react would mean destruc­tion.“
    React is the wrong word. I’d use “secure vic­tory”, because in this instance, any­thing less is a defeat, espe­cially since it appears that Israel has staked its exis­tence on this cam­paign.
    Pretty soon, a cease-​​fire will look like a time-​​out for Israel rather than the other way around.

    Reply
  10. FooMan says:
    August 7, 2006 at 10:48 pm

    Anyone who has been exposed to Isreali mil­i­tary prowess via either defense exer­cise, or wit­ness. (i.e. Operation Peace in Galilli in the 80’s, which may have trig­gered our involve­ment in the fiasco in Berirut a cou­ple of years later.) Knows the stan­dard Israeli stat­egy, Identify, Isolate them from their resup­ply, fix them with air and artillery, and force them to stand and fight. Israeli reconai­sance is as usual state of the art. They shut down the high­ways the first day of the war, (espe­cially those to Syria and their sup­plies), make sure they kept the pres­sure on to fix them, then hit them as they please with either infantry.
    The Lebanese gov­ern­ment seems to have ceeded power to the var­i­ous oppo­si­tion groups against Israel for bet­ter than 20 years and now peo­ple are sur­prised at the Isreali response? Note, that the Israeli’s are respond­ing with artillery and pre­ci­sion weapons not the damned unguided 122mm rock­ets of hezbol­lah. If Hezbollah decided to stand and fight then so much the bet­ter for the Israeli cause, in a stand up fight very few can stand with them. I ernestly believe if the Labanese would just gov­ern their coun­try most of this could be avoided. The irony of this is that Hezbollah is the duly elected rul­ing power in gaza, why go to war now for this?

    Reply
  11. Lord Talbot says:
    August 8, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    A weak gov­ern­ment, such as the one in Lebanon, would be all but unable to pre­vent “var­i­ous oppo­si­tion groups” from gain­ing power. The Israeli “pre­ci­sion weapons” have killed far more civil­ians than the “damned unguided rock­ets of Hezbollah.” And Hamas is the power in Gaza, not Hezbollah. The media is exag­ger­at­ing Hezbollah’s prowess, but that is how it has always been with such orga­ni­za­tions, and they will be exceed­ingly dif­fi­cult to irrad­i­cate in any case.

    Reply
  12. flyff penya says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:05 am

    the lin­ger­ing shadow of shak­ing in my face, in order to play this game I spend money to buy the flyff penya, the BB again left me at the same time, same sit­u­a­tion when I hard to get it, my angry can not use the words describe

    Reply
  13. flyff money says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:09 am

    I to the present per­sonal dan­ger of me. I spend not only the flyff money but also my feeling.

    Reply
  14. flyff gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:10 am

    Other play­ers can, I think I can too, many play­ers said that BB can let us get more flyff gold, if you do not have enough flyff gold in the game, and then you can not do many things, in the real­ity world also like this. But I more like through my effort to get the suc­cess, that suc­cess can let me mem­o­rable forever.

    Reply
  15. buy flyff penya says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:12 am

    I can spend many money to buy flyff penya, I can do not have lunch and sleep. Play the game can look the peo­ple diathe­sis, but I only know that we will not attack unless we are attacked; if we are attacked, we will cer­tainly coun­ter­at­tack. This is my principles.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage