DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Money Money Money » Who Ran the Coalition Provisional Authority?

Who Ran the Coalition Provisional Authority?

Another great deci­sion was brought to us this week by T.S. Ellis, the U.S. District Court judge who is mak­ing his own very spe­cial legal mark on the Global War on Terror.
In a sur­prise rul­ing, Ellis decided that defraud­ing the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), though not such a nice thing to do, wasnt the same as defraud­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment (pre­sum­ably thats bad, too).
What? Yes, yes, the word coali­tion is in the name, but we assumed that was just win­dow dress­ing, sort of like the Nicaraguans who were part of the Coalition of the Willing.
I guess some peo­ple took that coali­tion stuff seri­ously.
Lets revisit the case. Custer Battles a Virginia-​​based secu­rity firm with no sub­stan­tive expe­ri­ence in secu­rity, got a lucra­tive secu­rity con­tract from the CPA. In 2006, they were found to have defrauded the U.S. gov­ern­mentsome­thing that didnt come as a sur­prise to those who worked with them (prob­a­bly the worst I’ve seen in my 30 years in the Army” was a mem­o­rable quote). The case was pros­e­cuted on the False Claims Act, which allows cit­i­zens with insider knowl­edge of fraud to make claims against these bad-​​boy com­pa­nies.
The False Claims Act was expected to be used against a num­ber of com­pa­nies oper­at­ing in Iraq, accord­ing to the New York Times. Ellis’ rul­ing throws a wrench in those plans, the arti­cle says:

But an under­ly­ing issue raised by Custer Battles dur­ing its trial and on appeal was whether bills sub­mit­ted to the Coalition Provisional Authority could be regarded as bills pre­sented to the United States gov­ern­ment. The coali­tion author­ity was an entity cre­ated and largely financed by the United States to run Iraq, and largely staffed by American offi­cials, but with an ambigu­ous legal sta­tus.
The Justice Department in an advi­sory opin­ion, and the jury in the Custer Battles case, said that some of the Custer Battles invoices were indeed claims against the American trea­sury and that the False Claims Act applied.
But in an opin­ion issued Wednesday and posted yes­ter­day, Judge T. S. Ellis III, of the Federal District Court in Alexandria, Va., said the plain­tiffs had failed to prove that the claims were pre­sented to the United States. The coali­tion author­ity, the judge ruled, was an inter­na­tional entity, and bills pre­sented to American offi­cials then detailed to the author­ity were not sub­ject to the False Claims Act. 

Did we miss some­thing here? Wasnt Paul Bremer, the CPAs head, report­ing to the U.S. gov­ern­ment? Wasnt the CPA funded and con­trolled by the U.S. gov­ern­ment? Did the United Kingdom really have much of a say (or maybe it was Nicaragua pulling the strings)? The rul­ing, if upheld, sim­ply makes a big­ger mess of U.S. poli­cies in Iraq, par­tic­u­larly as it per­tains to pri­vate con­trac­tors account­abil­ity.
What about Judge Ellis? Lets look at some of his other fas­ci­nat­ing deci­sions:
* Earlier this month, Ellis allowed espi­onage charges to pro­ceed against two for­mer employ­ees of AIPAC, a pro-​​Israel lobby, to con­tinue. The Federation of American Scientists says this prece­dent could have rad­i­cal impli­ca­tions (like for the Federation, which posts a lot of national defense doc­u­ments).
* In May, the same judge dis­missed a law­suit against the CIA and assorted con­trac­tors by German cit­i­zen Khalid El-​​Masri. The judge said the charges of tor­ture, if true, were sad, but national secu­rity is national secu­rity (of course, I thought national secu­rity was about pro­tect­ing the rights of U.S. cit­i­zens and cit­i­zens of our allies).
Of course, now Im sur­prised that Ellis didnt ques­tion whether the CIA was actu­ally con­trolled by the U.S. gov­ern­ment.
–Sharon Weinberger (and cross-​​posted at my new site)

Share |

August 19th, 2006 | Money Money Money | 481243 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/19/who-ran-the-coalition-provisional-authority/Who+Ran+the+Coalition+Provisional+Authority%3F2006-08-19+16%3A55%3A27christian You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Cold Comfort | Will They or Won’t They? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Noah says:
    August 20, 2006 at 9:22 am

    More busi­ness as usual. In May 2003 George II issued Executive Order 13303, “Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq”.
    “Section 1. Unless licensed or oth­er­wise autho­rized pur­suant to this order, any attach­ment, judg­ment, decree, lien, exe­cu­tion, gar­nish­ment, or other judi­cial process is pro­hib­ited, and shall be deemed null and void, with respect to the fol­low­ing:
    (a) the Development Fund for Iraq, and
    (b) all Iraqi petro­leum and petro­leum prod­ucts, and inter­ests therein, and pro­ceeds, oblig­a­tions, or any finan­cial instru­ments of any nature what­so­ever aris­ing from or related to the sale or mar­ket­ing thereof, and inter­ests therein, in which any for­eign coun­try or a national thereof has any inter­est, that are in the United States, that here­after come within the United States, or that are or here­after come within the pos­ses­sion or con­trol of United States per­sons.“
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030522–15.html
    Simply put, it holds The Development Fund for Iraq and US oil cor­po­ra­tions above the law by ren­der­ing any claim or law­suit brought against them to be “null and void.” Whoever con­trols the Fund can do any­thing they want with the money, such as put it in their pocket.

    Reply
  2. David Barrett says:
    August 20, 2006 at 3:42 pm

    While I’m a long fan of DefenseTech, this arti­cle sur­prised me for its lack of bal­ance — it reminds me of the sort of logic employed by Kos.
    Granted, I don’t know the details of the sit­u­a­tion, but the logic pre­sented in the arti­cle seems sound: if the False Claims Act pro­tects the United States gov­ern­ment, of course it wouldn’t apply to invoices for the CPA any more than it apply to invoices for the Iraqi gov­ern­ment (or NATO, or the UN, or any other orga­ni­za­tion in which the US has a dis­pro­por­tion­ate but incom­plete con­trol).
    Now, if we made no pre­tense of hav­ing a coali­tion, and made it clear this were a 100% USA-​​run occu­pa­tion, then the mat­ter would be dif­fer­ent. But it’s not, so the deci­sion seems very sound.
    And the part­ing shot about the CIA not being con­troled by the US gov… wha?
    This is a great site. Please try to keep it rea­son­able and impartial.

    Reply
  3. Andrew Campanelli says:
    August 22, 2006 at 11:37 am

    The Custer Battles case is a hot topic on blogs every­where, espe­cially those crit­i­cal of our judi­cial sys­tem. But for­tu­nately, the bad guys don’t always get away. The aver­age cit­i­zen would be amazed to know two things. First, under a unique fed­eral law, if they know some­one is defraud­ing the fed­eral gov­ern­ment, they can per­son­ally file an action to recover triple the amount of money defrauded, and they may get to keep up to 30% as a reward. Second, most of America’s largest com­pa­nies rang­ing from Shell Oil to Walmart have been sued by pri­vate per­sons, and forced to set­tle for sums as high as $900 Million. To read about every major case in the past 19 years, and to learn about how the law works, peo­ple can go to http://​www​.FederalFraud​.com

    Reply
  4. ankara nakliyat says:
    June 1, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    very nice ankara nakliyat

    Reply
  5. rohan money says:
    August 1, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    I grad­u­ally found that her estranged, I think I can not escape the fate of the for­mer that he, like the tragic. Now I really do not know is that I sym­pa­thize with him, or sym­pa­thy for myself. Sometimes I still can buy some rohan money to send her.

    Reply
  6. mabinogi gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Even this pathetic phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal divi­sion, pro­duced the drug have to give, make a paste of money, I would like to be a sol­dier diverted?As I will get more mabinogi gold and mabinogi money.

    Reply
  7. Knight gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    In response to its rapid growth the com­pany added three new worlds, tripled its Knight gold oper­a­tion and sup­port staff and com­pletely revamped the game with a major upgrade called return of King, exceed­ing cus­tomers expectations.

    Reply
  8. 12sky money says:
    August 5, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    A player ver­sus player based MMORPG, Twelvesky Gold embod­ies ori­en­tal mar­tial arts style of bat­tling tactics.

    Reply
  9. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 4:21 am

    Simply put, it holds The Development Fund for Iraq and US oil cor­po­ra­tions above the law by ren­der­ing any claim or law­suit brought against them to be “null and void.” Whoever con­trols the Fund can do any­thing they want with the money, such as put it in their pocket.

    Reply
  10. Sword of the New World money says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    Sword of the New World money: Granado Espada, boasts a num­ber of inter­est­ing fea­tures I was dying to check out.

    Reply
  11. cheap Tibia coins says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    Also the leg­endary Shattered Isles in the South are def­i­nitely cheap Tibia coins worth a visit.

    Reply
  12. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    then can the game still get the peo­ple happy, so I hope in the game we can become friends, do not because in order to buy 2moons dil then affray, it will affect other play­ers mood

    Reply
  13. cheap kamas says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:08 pm

    I bought many cheap kamas, only hope that I can play together with you, but now my think is wrong, I really do not know what can I do, maybe in your heart I only is a play­ers, but in my heart is not, you are very important

    Reply
  14. buy isk says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    So now there are more and more peo­ple to play this game and the buy isk is more and more popular.

    Reply
  15. flyff gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:12 pm

    Other play­ers can, I think I can too, many play­ers said that BB can let us get more flyff gold, if you do not have enough flyff gold in the game, and then you can not do many things, in the real­ity world also like this. But I more like through my effort to get the suc­cess, that suc­cess can let me mem­o­rable forever.

    Reply
  16. buy cronous gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:17 pm

    In order to advance my magic attacks increased, I spend some money to buy cro­nous gold, after we often meet them we become good friends, we started our Cronous trip.

    Reply
  17. ??? says:
    February 19, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Reply
  18. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 5:03 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 expe­ri­ence with­out nokia mobile learn­ing is bet­ter than learn­ing with­out excperi-​​ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose head­phones is the lamp of expe­ri­ence. I know of no way of judg­ing of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.lead​soft​store​.com/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage