DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Hezbollah‘s Thermobaric Arsenal (maybe)

Hezbollah‘s Thermobaric Arsenal (maybe)

Hezbollah have deployed a range of new high-​​tech weaponry in Southern Lebanon. Many com­men­ta­tors have noted the effec­tive­ness of their anti-​​tank mis­siles against Israeli armor , with appar­ently reli­able reports of Iranian-​​made copies of the AT-​​5 Spandrel and Russian-​​made Kornet-​​E and Metis-​​M anti-​​tank guided mis­sile which were appar­ently sup­plied by Syria.
smaw-ne sequence.JPG
However, less atten­tion has been paid to the reported use of mis­siles against infantry. In par­tic­u­lar, in one instance

a mis­sile that was fired at a build­ing sol­diers were stay­ing in caused the build­ing to col­lapse, claim­ing the lives of nine reservists. ”

That sort of effect does not sug­gest a HEAT war­head, which would punch a hole through a wall and do lim­ited dam­age beyond. It looks more more like a pow­er­ful ther­mo­baric blast, which pro­duces a sus­tained pulse capa­ble of knock­ing down walls. Both the Metis-​​M and Kornet-​​E mis­siles have ther­mo­baric war­head options. Note that, as the Russians do not make a dis­tinc­tion, the mak­ers describe Kornet war­head as fuel air explo­sive.
According to the Marine Corps Gazette, US Marine devel­oped the tac­tic of using ther­mo­baric SMAW-​​NE rounds in Fallujah: “SMAW gun­ners became expert at deter­min­ing which wall to shoot to cause the roof to col­lapse and crush the insur­gents for­ti­fied inside inte­rior rooms.“
As pre­vi­ously noted with the pro­lif­er­a­tion of ther­mo­baric rounds com­ing from China, Russia, Eastern Europe and pos­si­bly Iran, it was only a mat­ter of time before they turned up in the hands of guer­rilla forces. Thermobaric weapons are likely to cause greatly increased casu­al­ties for three rea­sons.
– As is clear from the above, they turn build­ings from safe cover into death traps. (One US ther­mo­baric test was called ‘Bring Down The House’). Armored vehi­cles, unless but­toned down, also offer lit­tle pro­tec­tion.
– They negate any ben­e­fits given by body armor; some stud­ies (NB — PDF) sug­gest that wear­ing armor may actu­ally worsen the injuries pro­duced by a ther­mo­baric blast enhanc­ing blast effects by increas­ing tar­get sur­face area and chang­ing the effec­tive load­ing func­tion on the tho­rax.“
– The inter­nal injuries pro­duced may be much harder to treat in the field than more nor­mal shrap­nel wounds. Hence the rush for new diag­nos­tic tools: “Early diag­no­sis of inter­nal trauma induced by a pri­mary blast wave via a field-​​deployable, rapid, and non-​​invasive tech­nique will pro­vide an invalu­able tool in the sub­se­quent suc­cess of treat­ing such con­di­tions”.
When Israel was accused of using fuel-​​air weapons ear­lier on in the con­flict there was a wave of objec­tions to this type of muni­tion. It will be inter­est­ing to see whether Hezbollah denies or con­firms using them, and whether any sim­i­lar objec­tions are raised.
– David Hambling

Share |

August 22nd, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions | 323435 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/22/hezbollahs-thermobaric-arsenal-maybe/Hezbollah%60s+Thermobaric+Arsenal+%28maybe%292006-08-22+19%3A28%3A23noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 08/​22/​06 | Futures » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Eric Hundman says:
    August 22, 2006 at 8:20 am

    Excuse my igno­rance, but what does it mean to “but­ton down” an armored vehicle?

    Reply
  2. Jordan says:
    August 22, 2006 at 8:34 am

    close the hatches, so the air dosent get sucked out of the vehicle.

    Reply
  3. Doz says:
    August 22, 2006 at 8:50 am

    There have been a host of pho­tographs of Israeli-​​captured Hezbollah weaponry on the inter­net, and not once has a Kornet-​​E or Metis-​​M been iden­ti­fied among the crop of cap­tured anti-​​tank mis­siles– just old AT-​​4s/​AT-​​5 SPIGOTs/​SPANDRELs and TOWs. This is a myth (sim­i­lar, unsub­stan­ti­ated claims were made by the US dur­ing the Iraq 2003 inva­sion) until actual pho­to­graphic evi­dence of same is released, in my opinion.

    Reply
  4. Robot.Economist says:
    August 22, 2006 at 9:53 am

    Robert Zimmerman’s asser­tion that “a bronze medal in mil­i­tary tech­nol­ogy earns a devel­op­ing mil­i­tary a place at the winner’s podium, while fail­ure to acquire high tech­nol­ogy does not” is as true today as it was in 1994.
    In the end, it doesn’t really mat­ter whether Hezbollah had 10-​​year old Kornets and Metis-​​Ms ver­sus 30 year-​​old Spigots and Spandrels. Either vin­tage of tech­nol­ogy can inflict seri­ous dam­age on a mil­i­tary that is not pre­pared for it. A key mis­take often made by the mil­i­tary plan­ners of devel­oped coun­tries is that they focus too much atten­tion on coun­ter­ing “gold medal” tech­nolo­gies.
    The knowl­edge and com­po­nents needed for tech­nolo­gies, such as SACLOS or chem­i­cal ther­mo­bar­ics, have been read­ily avail­able for years. I wouldn’t sur­prise me if a fairly sophis­ti­cated guerilla group like Hezbollah could get their hands on “bronze-​​medal” weapons with­out the direct sup­port of Syria or Iran.

    Reply
  5. west_rhino says:
    August 22, 2006 at 10:26 am

    Given Hezbolla’s will­ing­ness to stage some atroc­i­ties to blame on the IDF, I can see them using a few teams of Pasdran gun­ners with Kornets et al as man portable physics pack­ages wer reputed to have been deployed by the US, in extremely con­trolled conditions.

    Reply
  6. McKnight says:
    August 22, 2006 at 11:49 am

    I’m no expert but I think it means to have all the hatches closed etc. etc.
    So would it be safe to say that these muni­tions could eas­ily disable/​destroy the Israeli Merkva ?

    Reply
  7. timid observer says:
    August 22, 2006 at 1:50 pm

    From http://​www​.ynet​news​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​0​,​7​3​4​0​,​L​-​3​2​8​8​8​7​0​,​0​0​.​h​tml
    “Shortly after 1 p.m. Hizbullah gun­men fired sev­eral mis­siles at a struc­ture in which the sol­diers were stay­ing. One mis­sile hit the build­ing, caus­ing an arms cache to explode. Several sol­diers were hurt as a result. A short while later, the struc­ture par­tially col­lapsed, and a few other troops were hurt as well.“
    Not a ther­mo­baric arse­nal, just coince­dence of war

    Reply
  8. David Hambling says:
    August 22, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    Good find, Observer — as you say if cor­rect, this would explain the how the inci­dent could have occurred with­out a ther­mo­baric warhead.

    Reply
  9. Herschel Smith says:
    August 23, 2006 at 8:55 am

    Interesting post, and also inter­est­ing fol­lowup com­ments. Either way (ther­mo­baric weapons or not), this points to a need to invest U.S. dol­lars into body armor that can be of use rather than a detri­ment with ther­mo­baric weapons. I post of this at my page.

    Reply
  10. don says:
    August 23, 2006 at 2:39 pm

    Sorry but isn’t it Israel who recently bought Lockheed Hellcat Thermobaric mis­siles from the US? I think these claims are mis­di­rected, it’s Isreal that is guilty of using such weaponary, with many civil­lian casu­al­ties result­ing.
    http://​www​.infor​ma​tion​clear​ing​house​.info/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​1​4​5​3​0​.​htm

    Reply
  11. TrustButVerify says:
    August 25, 2006 at 12:00 am

    McKnight–
    Thermobaric weapons have lit­tle effect on but­toned AFVs, beyond dam­ag­ing “soft” parts on the exte­rior such as anten­nas or ruck­sacks. It takes HEAT (or an EFP) to dent a Merkava.

    Reply
  12. Technologist says:
    September 6, 2006 at 11:27 am

    I think the Telegraph arti­cle is just one more exam­ple of jour­nal­ists accept­ing what­ever their sources say at face value, and with­out any think­ing or check­ing the facts. The state­ments in the arti­cle con­tain too many sus­pi­cious state­ments for the infor­ma­tion to be true.
    1) To begin with, the AT-​​5 Spandrel (Soviet name Konkurs) is usu­ally vehicle-​​mounted, although a portable mount exists. See, for exam­ple, pic­tures of AT-​​5 appli­ca­tions at http://​btvt​.narod​.ru/​4​/​k​o​n​k​u​r​s​.​htm
    2) The tube of AT-​​5 is not 6 feet long, just 4. See for exam­ple, http://​www​.fas​.org/​m​a​n​/​d​o​d​-​1​0​1​/​s​y​s​/​l​a​n​d​/​r​o​w​/​a​t​5​s​p​a​n​d​r​e​l​.​htm
    3) If one both­ers to check the site of hnn​.co​.il for pic­tures of cap­tured Hezbollah weapons, it is easy to see the two main mis­siles appar­ently used: AT-​​3 Sagger, ship­ments of which to Middle East date back to pre-​​1973 times and American-​​made TOW dated 2001! http://​www​.hnn​.co​.il/​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​a​l​b​u​m​s​/​9​6​7​_​1​6​2​4​8​.​jpg
    In other words, there appears to be no traces of Kornets, Metis-​​Ms, or other more or less advanced Russian weaponry. If you have seen any photo that resem­bles Kornet or Metis-​​M tubes, feel free to point me to it. Note that the tubes are dis­posed of after fir­ing, so there should be plenty of these in the moun­tains if the accu­sa­tions are true.
    If I am cor­rect, how­ever, the arti­cles like the one quoted in the post appear to be sim­ply a smoke­screen designed to achieve one or more of the pro­pa­ganda goals:
    a) divert atten­tion from the bad tac­tics used by IDF that resulted in the losses from mostly obso­lete Hezbollah anti­tank arse­nal
    b) put atten­tion onto Syria and divert it from one of the American allies that recently shipped American-​​made TOWs to Hezbollah
    c) blame Russian and Iranian ship­ments of weapons to Syria for Israeli prob­lems. This might be help­ful to cer­tain groups within our (US) polit­i­cal spec­trum that attempt to draw us into an attack on Iran.
    Technologist
    http://​real​-ques​tions​.blogspot​.com/

    Reply
  13. Owen Higgins says:
    September 7, 2006 at 7:39 am

    The IDF went into this with bad lead­er­ship… it was a flip flop approach to war. Try one thing… that doesn’t work… try another.. When you’ve got that approach to a war.. you’re either a)using a badly trained army or b) You just don’t give a sh1t.
    PErsonally I think its a slight mix­ture of both.
    In terms of weapons choice, just cause one per­son is using chem­i­cal weapons it doesn’t mean you have to.
    Israel, have been in a pretty hard place of late, bombs fly­ing in from every direc­tion. lets not for­get Scuds. I can see why they would want to stamp their feet, but in real­ity they’re not doing them­selves any favours in this world by using ordanance that is prven to cause more damge to chil­dren than to guerilla army’s.

    Reply
  14. David USMC Ordnance says:
    September 8, 2006 at 8:37 am

    What is this crap about Israeli guilt? Did Hezbollah not attack them? Plus why are you all blam­ing the jour­nal­ist for report­ing this news. Army’s don’t throw stones any more peo­ple. Weapons are designed to kill your enemy with the least amount of risk to your own troops. Also FAE type weapons are not chem­i­cal weapons, and they have been used since WWII.
    It sucks that civil­ians were killed in the fight­ing, but to call them inno­cent civil­ians is a joke. When the most vio­lent Terrorist orga­ni­za­tion in the world is a part of every aspect of a your civ­i­liza­tion. Then it becomes your respon­si­bil­ity to deal with the con­se­quences of their actions. Just like a par­ent with a hor­ri­ble child, at some point you must pay the price.
    Stop blam­ing oth­ers for the idiots of the world. People need to stand up and say enough is enough. You want to pick a fight with me great. I don’t fight fair, the only fair fight hap­pens in the ring. To quote Sean Connery

    Reply
  15. Darklord says:
    September 8, 2006 at 8:57 am

    hmn,easy to see,that this is a amer­i­can site.All are against Hizbolla.Must be all the amer­i­can jews,who sits on the power.
    Strange,when euro­pean peo­ple fight a under­ground war to get invaders out of their country,then they are heroic free­dom fighters.But when Hizbolla(and other sim­i­lar organ­i­sa­tions) fight a sim­i­lar war,then they are terrorisme.

    Reply
  16. marineeod says:
    September 8, 2006 at 9:06 am

    Yes ther­mo­baric explo­sive weapons are very bad in regards to the amount of dam­age they cause. Yes the sovi­ets are known as the first to deploy these types of weapon sys­tems. However to blame a ther­mo­baric weapon on the col­laspe of a build­ing needs to be looked at more closely. It only takes 6 psi to col­laspe a re enforced con­certe build­ing. Postive peak prea­sure from a det­o­na­tion inside a build­ing from a heat round can achieve this. Most heat rounds are a PIBD (point inatat­ing base det­o­nat­ing) if a heat round hit the out­side of the wall of a house the major amount of the blast energy would not be con­fined in the house. However if a heat round went through a win­dow and hit a inte­rior wall you would have a mas­sive pos­tive pres­sure increase inside the room (well into the 6 psi range). Also you would have reflected pres­sure (3–4 times increase) and mac stem bridg­ing too. The houses they build in that area are not re enforced and drop­ping one would be very easy to do. If the bad guys really under­stood the appli­ca­tion of ther­mo­bar­rics (and had them) they would allow the Iserals to take a house and drop it on top on them. You would not have one case but MANY. Ask the idiots who took on the Marines in Fallugah, the Marines did bring down the house and crushed the idiot bastards.

    Reply
  17. Larry Marchant says:
    September 8, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    The United States has spent bil­lions in aid for many coun­tries. Now our government(Bush and Cheney) have moved us in a dif­fer­ent direc­tion, they are mak­ing sure they get all the money. The mid­dle east has oil so, they went into Iraq. Sadaam was a bad guy and should not have been in power but, he was and he blocked Bush from get­ting oil. His pup­pet­mas­ter Cheney pulled his strings and had him invade Iraq. Now we are fight­ing in a civil war there and Americans are being killed daily. Does Bush care?, evi­dently not, he just sends more over and more die. I praise the troops and thank them for their sac­ri­fices but, why are they there? Bin Laden and Al Queda were respon­si­ble for 9/​11. Isreal is an ally of the US and has always been hated by the Arab nations. They are a closer tar­get than the US and they are caught in the mid­dle. Unless a mir­a­cle hap­pens, the Israelis and the Arab nations will fight until there is only one man stand­ing. Why?

    Reply
  18. Steve says:
    September 8, 2006 at 12:56 pm

    Seems there are alot of agen­das post­ing on here, anti west­ern jihadists, anti Bush/​Cheney anar­chists, and those with legit points on intel­li­gence and tech­nol­ogy.
    What I got out of it is the US mil­i­tary could ben­e­fit from more Thermobaric weapon devel­op­ment. How about that 66mm LAW con­cept only make it reload­able instead of one shot throw away (so the Gs can’t reuse the tube) and make it a HEAT round for light to medium armor with a Thermobaric jacket to increase lethal­ity to per­son­nel in con­fined spaces and imme­di­ate to point of det­o­na­tion. That would be an awe­some dual pur­pose tool!
    (Put a sus­tained motor on it with a heat tracker and maybe we can make it a triple threat to low fly­ing rotor­wing and fixed wing air­craft!!! Now I’m dream­ing.)
    Hezbollah, smezbollah.…as long as the jihadists are not will­ing to accept a 2 nation peace there will be none and once the west­ern world gets over its appetite for oil and devel­ops alter­na­tive energy then the jihadists will be no threat to Israel or the West since the money will dry up to sup­port them and the jihadist enabling nations will be too busy try­ing to fig­ure out how to feed their peo­ple with petro­leum and camel dung.….

    Reply
  19. Tillman says:
    September 8, 2006 at 10:39 pm

    Hey Darklord! Open your eyes and see what is going on. Try read­ing and study­ing a lit­tle his­tory of Europe and you will under­stand that the ‘under­ground’ fight­ers were native coun­try men and women try­ing to retake their home­land from an out­side bru­tal army. The Hezbollahas are invaders (let’s say from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, Egypt) try­ing to take away the coun­try from the Lebononese peo­ple. Something is amiss when in one coun­try the Shittes and Kurds are the U.S. pro­tec­torats, but at the same time these same groups are curs­ing and spit­ting on our name and help. Iran wants nuclear mate­r­ial? Good. Send all the worlds nuclear power plant waste there. Put Tom on the first drum to be burried.

    Reply
  20. The Shadow says:
    September 8, 2006 at 10:40 pm

    No need to invade Iran. Simply pum­mel it from the sky, space, water, and of course, the Iraqi ter­ri­tory. We do not seek to, nor need to under­stand it’s crim­i­nal nature. Just as the for­mer Persian Empire cares not to under­stand the true good­ness of it’s ene­mies. It does not need to sur­ren­der, it’s neu­tral­iza­tion as a threat to world peace and sta­bil­ity will be suf­fi­cient enough.

    Reply
  21. Mr. Dewberry says:
    September 9, 2006 at 6:24 am

    I have to com­ment on the writer that label the US as invaders. First of all in the 5000 mod­ern years of Babylon Iraq has never been peace­ful. Furthermore the state­ment that the US has an his­tory of advanc­ing on depleted Armies. I remem­ber clearly that Saddam and his Cronies promised the ‘Mother of all wars‘. If my Army was so help­less then I would keep my bog mouth shut. Your com­ments are based on no more then igno­rant hate of the US and it

    Reply
  22. marlin says:
    September 9, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    well peep’s you must remem­ber this “the win­ners or vic­tors write the his­tory books”

    Reply
  23. Tillman says:
    September 10, 2006 at 11:30 am

    I like Robin Williams ver­sion ‘that when the “cow­ard self bomber” (that’s my word) arrives at the gates he meets George Washington, who com­mences to beat the crap out of him.’ Alimofoup is scream­ing about ‘the 72 blonde vir­gins that have been promised to him by the Koran’ and some stu­pid clergy if he blows him­self and lots of INNOCENT men, women, and chil­dren up. ‘George Washington replies that it’s 72 Virginians that he is going to meet and set­tle the score with.’

    Reply
  24. biola says:
    September 11, 2006 at 4:55 am

    “Doing what you like is free­dom” America today is doing what they like with the whole world and they claim they are free soci­ety try­ing to free the world. But they denied oth­ers to be free.
    “Liking what you do is hap­pi­ness” They are happy with all the atroc­i­ties the are com­mitte every­where includ­ing in Iraq,Afganistan,(indirectly in Lebanon,west bank, gaza and so on) and all the per­sieved enemy spots in the world.
    Let BUSH not decieve its peo­ple any­longer. the peo­ple of Great Britain are more wisher and they are get­ting reid of BLAIR (the war Monger).
    I have the fol­low­ing advise for the Intelligent peo­ple of America.
    –Make peace with the world so that you will also be at peace as it was dur­ing CLINTON’s Administration.
    –Bear in mind that no Empire last for­ever and so shall it be for the US.
    –Understand more about Islam before you pass com­ments on the reli­gion.
    –Desist from using the tenents of reward in ISLAM the way you like.(virgins)
    –Know that most of the so called ter­ror­ists are tri­aned by the US.
    And finally pray for your nation to enjoy peace as it were in other free places in the world.
    May this day in his­tory ‚5 years ago, never hap­pen to UNITED STATE agian(AMIN)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage