DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » War Update » More Lebanon Lessons Learned

More Lebanon Lessons Learned

Today Janes takes look at the Israeli Defense Force’s war <a href=“href=“http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw060821_2_n.shtml”>“post-mortem”. It calls the inva­sion “an inde­ci­sive oper­a­tion, which was con­ducted ad hoc rather than based on a com­pre­hen­sive plan, and which revealed a series of flaws within the Israel Defence Force”. These include:

* The reserve army, the IDF’s main ground force, was exposed in the cam­paign as an insuf­fi­ciently trained and equipped force. Years of neg­li­gence, due to bud­getary con­straints, brought highly moti­vated but some­times poorly equipped units into Lebanon. “We have been warn­ing for years on the dete­ri­o­ra­tion of the reserve army, through its lack of train­ing,” claimed Gen Halutz. There’s a con­sen­sus among senior IDF offi­cers that the reserves will have to undergo a sig­nif­i­cant upgrade effort.
* The anti-​​tank threat emerged as the most seri­ous chal­lenge to the IDF. Operating Kornet-​​E and Metis-​​M anti-​​tank guided mis­siles (ATGMs), Hizbullah suc­cess­fully destroyed 14 Israeli Merkava Mk 2, 3 and 4 main bat­tle tanks. In response, the Israeli MoD has ordered Rafael Armament Development Authority to accel­er­ate prepa­ra­tions for pro­duc­tion of its Trophy active pro­tec­tion sys­tem (APS) for future IDF pro­cure­ment. Israel Military Industries has also been asked to com­plete devel­op­ment of its APS, dubbed Iron Fist, for IDF eval­u­a­tion.
* Military intel­li­gence pro­vided infor­ma­tion about Hizbullah capa­bil­i­ties, both in artillery rock­ets and in ATGMs. However, it was not able to pro­vide the IDF with accu­rate intel­li­gence on the where­abouts of Hizbullah’s polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary lead­er­ship, which the IDF wished to tar­get. Also, field com­man­ders claimed, infor­ma­tion on Hizbullah’s ground align­ment of tun­nels and bunkers in south­ern Lebanon was insufficient.

(Reuters has more on the Reserve’s lack of prepa­ra­tion: “‘The gov­ern­ment didn’t take seri­ously the lives of our troops,’ said Zvi Marek, a reserve infantry sol­dier at [a recent] demon­stra­tion.”)
Janes, like other promi­nent pub­li­ca­tions, pre­dicts a resump­tion of hostilities:

With Israel fear­ing that the recent con­flict with Hizbullah will not be the last and could also mark the pre­lude for a future con­fronta­tion with Iran, calls are grow­ing for a quick reha­bil­i­ta­tion of the IDF to pre­pare it for what could be the “next round”.

That next round could come soon if the U.N. fails to cob­ble together a worth­while peace­keep­ing force, as AFP reports: “Despite intense nego­ti­a­tions since the truce came into effect on August 14 and warn­ings that it could unravel if more peace­keep­ers fail to deploy quickly, few European coun­tries have made firm com­mit­ments.“
Meanwhile, on its sec­ond front, Israel is step­ping up Gaza incur­sions as it con­tin­ues to search for kid­napped sol­diers.
–David Axe

Share |

August 22nd, 2006 | War Update | 323233 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/22/more-lebanon-lessons-learned/More+Lebanon+Lessons+Learned2006-08-22+15%3A11%3A40hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Keeping (More) Secrets | Rapid Fire 08/​22/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ira says:
    August 27, 2006 at 8:26 pm

    IDF should study the US marine tac­tics at Iwo Jima. The use of “heav­ier than air” gaso­line fumes (which set­tle to the low­est level) destroyed many under­ground fortifications.

    Reply
  2. gbruno says:
    September 29, 2006 at 1:22 am

    [Active defence — anti-​​missile mis­siles, thats a 2nd order of dif­fi­culty. I’m guess­ing that most would miss. And could be swamped by batches of cheap,older ATMs fired before new expen­sive Kornets
    In Vietnam the ‘tun­nels of Cu Chi’ were even­tu­ally neu­tralised by sat­u­ra­tion bomb­ing from B52s
    The VC couldnt build deep because they would get buried as the top lay­ers col­lapsed. In Gulf War I the Iraq troops in shal­low desert bunkers were sim­ply buried alive with bull­doz­ers.
    How HA built sur­viv­able bunkers in South Lebanon isnt clear. Reports are they were 40m deep. Perhaps the use of rein­forced con­crete enusured sur­viv­abil­ity. Or the exten­sive artillery bom­bard­ment form IDF was not equiv­a­lent to B52s?
    Gas|blast tight doors surely required. The Vietnamese uses water filled sumps (ugh!) The USA is plan­ning nuclear ‘bunker busters’ but they would emit large plumes of radi­a­tion, not desir­able 4km from your own bor­der.
    Its unclear how long the USA would last if they or their proxy used nukes. Venezuela & Iran would close the taps, and USAnians wouldnt be wel­come any­where out­side their bor­ders. China & Russia would move to sequester the world’s oil. It would be the end oth the USA. Which is not to say the Cheney regime will forbear.]

    Reply
  3. flyff penya says:
    August 8, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    Like this you will again not want to flyff, in your number’s things and flyff penya should be pos­si­ble to sell a good price, it is for­tu­nate that one­self also unconsciously!

    Reply
  4. buy fiesta Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    We dis­cov­ered that this game need a large of RMB to buy fiesta Gold, or you can­not play a lit­tle at all.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage