Home » News » More Lebanon Lessons Learned

More Lebanon Lessons Learned

Today Janes takes look at the Israeli Defense Force’s war <a href=“href=“http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw060821_2_n.shtml”>“post-mortem”. It calls the invasion “an indecisive operation, which was conducted ad hoc rather than based on a comprehensive plan, and which revealed a series of flaws within the Israel Defence Force”. These include:

* The reserve army, the IDF’s main ground force, was exposed in the campaign as an insufficiently trained and equipped force. Years of negligence, due to budgetary constraints, brought highly motivated but sometimes poorly equipped units into Lebanon. “We have been warning for years on the deterioration of the reserve army, through its lack of training,” claimed Gen Halutz. There’s a consensus among senior IDF officers that the reserves will have to undergo a significant upgrade effort.
* The anti-tank threat emerged as the most serious challenge to the IDF. Operating Kornet-E and Metis-M anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), Hizbullah successfully destroyed 14 Israeli Merkava Mk 2, 3 and 4 main battle tanks. In response, the Israeli MoD has ordered Rafael Armament Development Authority to accelerate preparations for production of its Trophy active protection system (APS) for future IDF procurement. Israel Military Industries has also been asked to complete development of its APS, dubbed Iron Fist, for IDF evaluation.
* Military intelligence provided information about Hizbullah capabilities, both in artillery rockets and in ATGMs. However, it was not able to provide the IDF with accurate intelligence on the whereabouts of Hizbullah’s political and military leadership, which the IDF wished to target. Also, field commanders claimed, information on Hizbullah’s ground alignment of tunnels and bunkers in southern Lebanon was insufficient.

(Reuters has more on the Reserve’s lack of preparation: “‘The government didn’t take seriously the lives of our troops,’ said Zvi Marek, a reserve infantry soldier at [a recent] demonstration.”)
Janes, like other prominent publications, predicts a resumption of hostilities:

With Israel fearing that the recent conflict with Hizbullah will not be the last and could also mark the prelude for a future confrontation with Iran, calls are growing for a quick rehabilitation of the IDF to prepare it for what could be the “next round”.

That next round could come soon if the U.N. fails to cobble together a worthwhile peacekeeping force, as AFP reports: “Despite intense negotiations since the truce came into effect on August 14 and warnings that it could unravel if more peacekeepers fail to deploy quickly, few European countries have made firm commitments.“
Meanwhile, on its second front, Israel is stepping up Gaza incursions as it continues to search for kidnapped soldiers.
David Axe

Share |

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

ira August 27, 2006 at 8:26 pm

IDF should study the US marine tactics at Iwo Jima. The use of “heavier than air” gasoline fumes (which settle to the lowest level) destroyed many underground fortifications.

Reply

gbruno September 29, 2006 at 1:22 am

[Active defence - anti-missile missiles, thats a 2nd order of difficulty. I'm guessing that most would miss. And could be swamped by batches of cheap,older ATMs fired before new expensive Kornets
In Vietnam the 'tunnels of Cu Chi' were eventually neutralised by saturation bombing from B52s
The VC couldnt build deep because they would get buried as the top layers collapsed. In Gulf War I the Iraq troops in shallow desert bunkers were simply buried alive with bulldozers.
How HA built survivable bunkers in South Lebanon isnt clear. Reports are they were 40m deep. Perhaps the use of reinforced concrete enusured survivability. Or the extensive artillery bombardment form IDF was not equivalent to B52s?
Gas|blast tight doors surely required. The Vietnamese uses water filled sumps (ugh!) The USA is planning nuclear 'bunker busters' but they would emit large plumes of radiation, not desirable 4km from your own border.
Its unclear how long the USA would last if they or their proxy used nukes. Venezuela & Iran would close the taps, and USAnians wouldnt be welcome anywhere outside their borders. China & Russia would move to sequester the world's oil. It would be the end oth the USA. Which is not to say the Cheney regime will forbear.]

Reply

flyff penya August 8, 2008 at 8:24 pm

Like this you will again not want to flyff, in your number’s things and flyff penya should be possible to sell a good price, it is fortunate that oneself also unconsciously!

Reply

buy fiesta Gold August 8, 2008 at 8:25 pm

We discovered that this game need a large of RMB to buy fiesta Gold, or you cannot play a little at all.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: