http://defensetech.org/2006/08/23/knock-on-wood/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2006/08/23/knock-on-wood/#comment-51121 joe Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:56:53 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3238#comment-51121 Finally a voice of reason. Look at all the recent bush administration pronouncements regarding terrorism. Change the title of "terrorists" to "wreckers". Then you can understand bush's motivations. Fear and Fear only. Finally a voice of reason.
Look at all the recent bush administration pronouncements regarding terrorism. Change the title of “terrorists” to “wreckers”.
Then you can understand bush’s motivations. Fear and Fear only.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/08/23/knock-on-wood/#comment-141356 campbell Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:22:11 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3238#comment-141356 HALLELUJIA!!! At last I hear someone with some common sense addressing the true nature of the "terrorist threat". Having intent, or wishes, or bluster, or bragidoccio, is NOT the same as being able to actually DELIVER on same. Which is what America should have been aware of regards Saddam Hussein, and all others, prior to the current FUBAR that has been forced down our collective throats in the guise of "bringing democracy to" Iraq, or Afganistan, or Iran. So, having said that....who now willl begin to address the next, more serious, threat? ie: the modern-day equivalent of Germany/Japan Axis......that of Iran/North Korea, who now work hand in hand to develop nuclear weapons, the ability to deliver them, and both use "talks" to delay concrete actions against them as they prepare to USE those capabilities. Delivery of nuclear weapons to U.S. ports via pleasure craft/sailboats (since we are ostensibly searching "containers")...is within reason, and only one example of a the far greater threat than hijacking the odd airliner or taking out some bridge/tunnel,railway. IS ANYONE LISTENING? read history.......half of Europe and U.S. couldn't or wouldn't buy into the dangers readily apparent in 1938 either........ HALLELUJIA!!!
At last I hear someone with some common sense addressing the true nature of the “terrorist threat”.
Having intent, or wishes, or bluster, or bragidoccio, is NOT the same as being able to actually DELIVER on same.
Which is what America should have been aware of regards Saddam Hussein, and all others, prior to the current FUBAR that has been forced down our collective throats in the guise of “bringing democracy to” Iraq, or Afganistan, or Iran.
So, having said that.…who now willl begin to address the next, more serious, threat? ie: the modern-day equivalent of Germany/Japan Axis.…..that of Iran/North Korea, who now work hand in hand to develop nuclear weapons, the ability to deliver them, and both use “talks” to delay concrete actions against them as they prepare to USE those capabilities.
Delivery of nuclear weapons to U.S. ports via pleasure craft/sailboats (since we are ostensibly searching “containers”)…is within reason, and only one example of a the far greater threat than hijacking the odd airliner or taking out some bridge/tunnel,railway.
IS ANYONE LISTENING?
read history.……half of Europe and U.S. couldn’t or wouldn’t buy into the dangers readily apparent in 1938 either.….…

]]>