<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: China Top Card in Pentagon Shuffle</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-55995</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:34:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-55995</guid> <description>only jokeing stay where you are.. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only jokeing stay where you are..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-55994</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:29:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-55994</guid> <description>Bring It On Man..and we will see who wins) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring It On Man..and we will see who wins)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-55993</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:26:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-55993</guid> <description>The only freat china posses is nukclaer warheads. but then russa has more of them than any one. WEST Rules man... and thats the FACT </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only freat china posses is nukclaer warheads. but then russa has more of them than any one. WEST Rules man… and thats the FACT</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-55992</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:24:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-55992</guid> <description>The only freat china posses is nukclaer warheads. but then russa has more of them than any one. WEST Rules man..Down with china!!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only freat china posses is nukclaer warheads. but then russa has more of them than any one. WEST Rules man..Down with china!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaye</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147088</link> <dc:creator>Jaye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147088</guid> <description>Tell em, Kaltes; Real_chinese has been hitting the opium again. However recently in the news, Taiwan has been pulling away from the PRC, so hard that very soon the PRC has no choice but to attack and invade to save face and to get women for their men because the &quot;One Child Policy&quot; has turned China into Homoland and good Commies are not Homos. Maybe,when we attack Iran they will attack Taiwan, then their would be nothing we could do to stop them! God only knows! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell em, Kaltes; Real_chinese has been hitting the opium again. However recently in the news, Taiwan has been pulling away from the PRC, so hard that very soon the PRC has no choice but to attack and invade to save face and to get women for their men because the “One Child Policy” has turned China into Homoland and good Commies are not Homos. Maybe,when we attack Iran they will attack Taiwan, then their would be nothing we could do to stop them! God only knows!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kaltes</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147087</link> <dc:creator>Kaltes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147087</guid> <description>I LOVE THIS: &quot;In fact,99.9% of the Chinese don&#039;t want to fight to anyone in the world,&quot; &quot;we hardly concern the international affair,we only want to live better...&quot; AND THEN HE SAYS IN THE SAME POST &quot;who wants to separate the Taiwan from China,we will destroy whom ,if we can&#039;t beat it ,we even destroy the earth with nuclear warhead,that means if we can&#039;t live in the earth, we won&#039;t let other&#039;s live in going on.&quot; So yeah, we are all peaceful and dont want to fight anyone, but interfere with us from waging a war of aggression against a free democracy and we will destroy the entire world to spite you? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I would think this post was a joke, but the sad truth is Ive heard sooo many ignorant typical chinese guys talk like this, it is one of the reasons that I know we will end up in a war with them. China is the next great threat to world peace. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE THIS:<br /> “In fact,99.9% of the Chinese don’t want to fight to anyone in the world,“<br /> “we hardly concern the international affair,we only want to live better…“<br /> AND THEN HE SAYS IN THE SAME POST<br /> “who wants to separate the Taiwan from China,we will destroy whom ‚if we can’t beat it ‚we even destroy the earth with nuclear warhead,that means if we can’t live in the earth, we won’t let other’s live in going on.“<br /> So yeah, we are all peaceful and dont want to fight anyone, but interfere with us from waging a war of aggression against a free democracy and we will destroy the entire world to spite you? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br /> I would think this post was a joke, but the sad truth is Ive heard sooo many ignorant typical chinese guys talk like this, it is one of the reasons that I know we will end up in a war with them. China is the next great threat to world peace.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaye</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147086</link> <dc:creator>Jaye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147086</guid> <description>Real Chin; Taiwan is pushing the PRC very hard, so soon, very soon the PRC will attack and invade Taiwan and the the Chinese Union will be born with North Korea joining also. So cheer up, drink some Sake and do not destroy the world, thanks. Sincerely, Jaye </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real Chin; Taiwan is pushing the PRC very hard, so soon, very soon the PRC will attack and invade Taiwan and the the Chinese Union will be born with North Korea joining also. So cheer up, drink some Sake and do not destroy the world, thanks.<br /> Sincerely,<br /> Jaye</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147083</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:46:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147083</guid> <description>China&#039;s economy is growing rapidly.  That&#039;s because it&#039;s easy to grow from nothing.  You could teach a caveman how to make fire and you&#039;ve just given him 10 thousand years of technological development in like half an hour. China cannot sustain its current economic growth.  They&#039;ve got loads more problems than we ever thought about having.  Ever hear of the 4-2-1 problem?  That &quot;one child&quot; policy did them a world of hurt. We&#039;ve sustained higher economic growth for longer periods than any other country in history.  Oh sure, China&#039;s economy is growing at 10%, but it still lags far behind ours.  Depending on which sources you use, China&#039;s economy is smaller than California&#039;s. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China’s economy is growing rapidly.  That’s because it’s easy to grow from nothing.  You could teach a caveman how to make fire and you’ve just given him 10 thousand years of technological development in like half an hour.<br /> China cannot sustain its current economic growth.  They’ve got loads more problems than we ever thought about having.  Ever hear of the 4–2-1 problem?  That “one child” policy did them a world of hurt.<br /> We’ve sustained higher economic growth for longer periods than any other country in history.  Oh sure, China’s economy is growing at 10%, but it still lags far behind ours.  Depending on which sources you use, China’s economy is smaller than California’s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WarNerd</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147082</link> <dc:creator>WarNerd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147082</guid> <description>You people really need to get out and visit the world, instead of listening to selfish politicians in the US. I suggest you go to Macau, China, the Asian Las Vegas. They are not going to be the next Soviet Union. They are Chinese. China is Communist in name only. They are however a single party state, one that has an identity crisis. It takes decades of institution building to create a democracy. Interaction with the outside world is more important than a democracy at this time. It will be the last to be implemented in China, but all the trends point in that direction, despite the government</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people really need to get out and visit the world, instead of listening to selfish politicians in the US. I suggest you go to Macau, China, the Asian Las Vegas. They are not going to be the next Soviet Union. They are Chinese.<br /> China is Communist in name only. They are however a single party state, one that has an identity crisis. It takes decades of institution building to create a democracy. Interaction with the outside world is more important than a democracy at this time. It will be the last to be implemented in China, but all the trends point in that direction, despite the government</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Haninah</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/china-top-card-in-pentagon-shuffle/#comment-147081</link> <dc:creator>Haninah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3263#comment-147081</guid> <description>Now, I&#039;m no fan of dictatorships, which is clearly what we have in China, and was troubled already under Clinton when we decided to let the Chinese government get away with whatever it wanted to domestically, but I have to ask one thing: I&#039;ve seen Kaltes talk in this thread about China &quot;embark[ing] on further wars of aggression,&quot; and refering to China&#039;s &quot;inherent aggressiveness.&quot; Would he care to give an example of a past war of aggression that they&#039;ve embarked on, aside from their invasion of Tibet, and explain whether the second comment was anything more than some bizarre and rather ill-fitting essentialist description of how he sees their culture? There are a lot of things wrong with China today, but a tendency to launch wars of aggression abroad has not generally been one of them (again, aside from Tibet.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I’m no fan of dictatorships, which is clearly what we have in China, and was troubled already under Clinton when we decided to let the Chinese government get away with whatever it wanted to domestically, but I have to ask one thing: I’ve seen Kaltes talk in this thread about China “embark[ing] on further wars of aggression,” and refering to China’s “inherent aggressiveness.” Would he care to give an example of a past war of aggression that they’ve embarked on, aside from their invasion of Tibet, and explain whether the second comment was anything more than some bizarre and rather ill-fitting essentialist description of how he sees their culture?<br /> There are a lot of things wrong with China today, but a tendency to launch wars of aggression abroad has not generally been one of them (again, aside from Tibet.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 06:06:45 -->
