DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Chem-Bio » Iraq’s Biowar Labs: Mystery Solved?

Iraq’s Biowar Labs: Mystery Solved?

mobile lab.jpgOkay, just when you thought that the whole Curveball-​​Iraqi bio­log­i­cal weapons story couldn’t get any weirder, it does. Milton Leitenberg of the Center for International Security Studies has pro­vided me with the exclu­sive third (and last) part of the story behind the story of the alleged Iraqi mobile bio­log­i­cal war­fare labs. In Part 1, he revealed that in 2001 the U.S. gov­ern­ment had fab­ri­cated a “mobile BW lab” for the pur­poses of train­ing SOCOM oper­a­tives on how to iden­tify and exploit an adversary’s BW pro­duc­tion facil­ity. In Part 2, Leitenberg dis­cusses how a U.S. con­trac­tor devel­oped the now infa­mous graph­ics of an Iraqi mobile BW lab — not based on any exist­ing mobile BW lab or any hard intel from Curveball, but rather based on “the processes he [Curveball] described,” which were “assessed by an inde­pen­dent lab­o­ra­tory as work­able engi­neer­ing designs.“
In Part 3, Leitenberg com­pletes the full rid­dle inside the enigma within a mys­tery. It may be that we can trace back the idea of a mobile BW lab­o­ra­tory to Scott Ritter dur­ing his tour of duty in Iraq in 1998 with UNSCOM. Ritter was try­ing to obtain infor­ma­tion from the Iraqi National Congress, specif­i­cally on Iraq’s intel­li­gence agen­cies and WMD pro­gram. In 1998, he talked to Ahmed Chalabi about his sus­pi­cion that Saddam may have had mobile chem­i­cal or bio­log­i­cal weapons labs, which would explain the UNSCOM’s lack of suc­cess in find­ing any evi­dence. In late 1999–2000, Curveball — the brother of a top lieu­tenant to Ahmed Chalabi — starts talk­ing to the German intel­li­gence about mobile Iraqi BW labs, who for­wards this infor­ma­tion to the CIA. At the same time, Chalabi is talk­ing to Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Feith about the dan­ger of Iraq’s “WMD pro­gram.“
So here we have a rumor started by a for­mer U.S. marine sup­port­ing a UN inspec­tion team, where he passes the idea to Chalabi, who passes it to German intel and U.S. defense offi­cials, both of whom pass the story to the CIA. The agency devel­ops graph­ics drawn by a U.S. con­trac­tor based on Curveball’s story and might have known of the mock-​​up BW lab built for SOCOM, both of which “con­firms” the con­cept that Iraqi mobile BW labs exist, which leads to SecState Powell’s speech at the UN in February 2003 and the media’s echo cham­ber agree­ing with the pres­i­dent that there’s enough evi­dence to go to war against Iraq.
And as a bonus at the end of this short paper, Leitenberg reveals that Scott Ritter was pulled into a British intel­li­gence op called “Operation Mass Appeal” run by MI6 in 1997. The pur­pose of “Operation Mass Appeal” was to leak weak and not “action­able” data about Iraq’s WMD pro­gram to the media, who would fall upon it like hun­gry wolves and keep alive the pub­lic impres­sion that Saddam had an active WMD pro­gram, despite the lack of offi­cial gov­ern­ment endorse­ment. Leitenberg notes that the dis­in­for­ma­tion oper­a­tion func­tioned sim­i­lar to the DOD Office of Special Plans, but didn’t involve dis­in­for­ma­tion regard­ing the Iraqi mobile BW pro­duc­tion vehi­cles.
Call George Clooney. I’ve got his next movie plot all ready.
– Jason Sigger, cross­posted at Armchair Generalist

Share |

August 31st, 2006 | Chem-Bio | 325989 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/08/31/iraqs-biowar-labs-mystery-solved/Iraq%27s+Biowar+Labs%3A+Mystery+Solved%3F2006-08-31+10%3A40%3A34jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Israel Wants to Jam Sats | “Future Combat” Needs Info Chief » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Luc says:
    August 31, 2006 at 9:38 pm

    This would a plau­si­ble expla­na­tion were it not for the cou­ple of mobile labs already found in Iraq.

    Reply
  2. Noah (the other one) says:
    September 1, 2006 at 10:01 am

    “US Team Concluded Trailers in Iraq Not Mobile Weapons Labs Despite Bush Claim“
    http://​www​.glob​alse​cu​rity​.org/​i​n​t​e​l​l​/​l​i​b​r​a​r​y​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​6​/​i​n​t​e​l​l​-​0​6​0​4​1​2​-​v​o​a​0​1​.​htm
    “Administration Pushed Notion of Banned Iraqi Weapons Despite Evidence to Contrary“
    http://​www​.wash​ing​ton​post​.com/​w​p​-​d​y​n​/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​2​0​0​6​/​0​4​/​1​1​/​A​R​2​0​0​6​0​4​1​1​0​1​8​8​8​.​h​tml

    Reply
  3. Carl Sumner says:
    September 1, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    Well, there must have been some labs some­where, because there is not any doubt about the Kurds towns killed by poi­son gas, earlier.

    Reply
  4. Siconik says:
    September 1, 2006 at 8:58 pm

    »> “Well, there must have been some labs some­where, because there is not any doubt about the Kurds towns killed by poi­son gas, ear­lier.“
    That was before sanc­tions and inspec­tors destroyed the WMD pro­gram.
    BTW, I am stunned by the num­ber of peo­ple who still believe that any WMD of note was found in Iraq. Most of them heard that on some right-​​wing radio show/​website which never both­ered with a retrac­tion or correction.

    Reply
  5. Luc says:
    September 1, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    Siconik,The mobile weapons labs found in Iraq were cer­tainly not con­t­a­m­i­nated with traces of bio­log­i­cal weapons. However, it is very unlikely also that they were Hydrogen Generators as claimed and they could cer­tainly be used for bio­log­i­cal weapon man­u­fac­tur­ing. It appears to me that this arti­cle does not pro­vide def­i­nite proof of what the mobile labs were used for, so there is no need to lis­ten to a right-​​wing radio/​website to reach a dif­fer­ent con­clu­sion than yours. I may be wrong, but I seem to recall some rel­a­tively recent Pentagon claim that to date about 500

    Reply
  6. Siconik says:
    September 2, 2006 at 1:48 am

    Luc,
    It is news to me that what was found in Iraq has after fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion been clas­si­fied as “mobile weapons labs”. There has been review after review by var­i­ous gov­ern­men­tal actors that con­cluded that Iraq had no active WMD pro­gram. I believe that the only weapons that have been found were dete­ri­o­rated to the point of use­less­ness Iran/​Iraq war-​​era artillery shells.
    BTW, the arti­cles sighted above give quite a detailed chain of events re. the ori­gins and prop­a­ga­tion of the “Mobile Labs” theory.

    Reply
  7. Siconik says:
    September 2, 2006 at 2:00 am

    But, don’t take my word for it. Here is what the Mr. Mobile Labs him­self had to say in ret­ro­spect:
    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​4​9​9​7​7​66/
    “Interviewed Sunday on NBC

    Reply
  8. J. says:
    September 2, 2006 at 12:31 pm

    Luc — Saddam had labs and sig­nif­i­cant pro­duc­tion facil­i­ties in the 1980s. Then we beat the snot out of him and the UN pretty well watched him get rid of nearly all of it. What was miss­ing was most prob­a­bly lost due to account­ing errors, such as the 500 chem­i­cal shells buried near the Iraq-​​Iran war. Mustard rounds aren’t all that impres­sive and the nerve agent degraded to near zero effec­tive­ness.
    The “labs” dis­cov­ered by US forces in 2003 were indeed hydro­gen gen­er­a­tors. The US Army has a hydro­gen gen­er­a­tor set on a HMMWV and it looks just like the Iraqi ver­sion (but smaller). Iraq had no effec­tive CB war­fare capa­bil­ity after 1995. For more read­ing, see “Where Are the WMDs?“
    http://​www​.ama​zon​.com/​e​x​e​c​/​o​b​i​d​o​s​/​A​S​I​N​/​1​5​9​1​1​4​4​8​6​8​/​1​n​9​8​6​7​a​-20

    Reply
  9. Noah (the other one) says:
    September 2, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    “Well, there must have been some labs some­where, because there is not any doubt about the Kurds towns killed by poi­son gas, ear­lier.“
    Iraq chem­i­cal weapons used against the Iranians and the Kurds were ini­tially sup­plied by the US (Sarin) and oth­ers. (See ttp://www.kentimmerman.com/krt/PoisonGas.pdf) It has also been revealed that nearly all of these weapons were destroyed in GW I (expo­sure to which appar­ently caused Gulf War Syndrome) and that the remain­der were destroyed by Iraq itself to pre­vent them from being found by inspec­tors.
    One of the prin­ci­ple rea­sons for the sup­ply of these agents was the Iraq-​​Iran war, in which the US used Iraq to extract revenge against Iran for the hostage cri­sis, which was insti­gated by the US fail­ure to extra­dite Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (the dic­ta­tor installed in a 1953 CIA coup to pre­vent the nation­al­iza­tion of Iraq

    Reply
  10. E. Smith says:
    September 2, 2006 at 11:40 pm

    Possibly illu­mi­nat­ing:
    http://​alib​er​al​dose​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​6​/​0​2​/​h​o​w​-​w​e​-​c​a​m​e​-​t​o​-​o​w​n​-​i​r​a​q​-​r​e​p​o​s​t​.​h​tml

    Reply
  11. Frances says:
    September 2, 2006 at 11:50 pm

    Iran gassed the Kurds in 1988
    A report pre­pared by the top CIA offi­cial han­dling the mat­ter says Saddam Hussein was not respon­si­ble for the mas­sacre, and indi­cates that it was the work of Iranians. Further, the Scott inquiry on the role of the British gov­ern­ment has gath­ered evi­dence that fol­low­ing the mas­sacre the United States in fact armed Saddam Hussein to counter the Iranians chem­i­cals for chem­i­cals.
    http://​www​.​u​-​r​-next​.com/​I​r​a​n​K​u​r​d​s​.​htm

    Reply
  12. 5th of November says:
    September 3, 2006 at 12:16 am

    Powell will never be able to run for office after pre­sent­ing those ‘facts’. Iraq is a dis­trac­tion while the US gov’t erodes your rights by steal­ing pri­vate lands, con­duct­ing ille­gal wire-​​taps, ban­ning books like “America Deceived” from Amazon, and start­ing 2 wars based on lies. Lies, lies and more lies.
    Final link (before Google Books caves to pres­sure and drops the title):
    http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0–595-38523–0

    Reply
  13. Ed Hands says:
    November 1, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Regarding “America Deceived” It was NEVER avail­able via Amazon or B&N. It was pub­lished via “Fast Track” at iUni​verse​.com (a sub­sidiary of B&N, btw)
    The author choose not to have it released via B&N or Amazon per iUni­verse. Political moti­va­tion or just a cheap­skate? You decide.
    If you would like, you can call them your­self and ask. The phone num­ber for iUni­verse is 1–800-AUTHORS.
    BTW, all pol­i­tics aside, the book sucks. Mr. 5th of November has posted the same basic post on at least a dozen web­sites. One has to won­der if he/​she isn’t the author pitch­ing a crappy book.

    Reply
  14. Anonymous says:
    July 22, 2008 at 8:13 am

    thank you please keep it improve ;)
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/vb
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​pic
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​v​i​deo
    http://​www​.5aa5​.com
    http://​forum​.5aa5​.com
    http://​youtube​.5aa5​.com
    http://​sms​.5aa5​.com
    http://​islam​.5aa5​.com
    http://​www​.9l9l​.com/
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​8/8
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​9/9
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​1​0​/10
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​1​1​/11
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​5​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​9​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​6​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​0​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​7​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​5​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​8​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​ws/
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​7​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​8​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​9​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​0​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​5​.​h​tml

    Reply
  15. ??? says:
    July 22, 2008 at 8:13 am

    thank you please keep it improve ;)
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/vb
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​pic
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​v​i​deo
    http://​www​.5aa5​.com
    http://​forum​.5aa5​.com
    http://​youtube​.5aa5​.com
    http://​sms​.5aa5​.com
    http://​islam​.5aa5​.com
    http://​www​.9l9l​.com/
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​8/8
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​9/9
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​1​0​/10
    http://​games​.9l9l​.com/​c​a​t​e​g​o​r​y​/​1​1​/11
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​5​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​9​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​6​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​0​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​7​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​5​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​8​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​ws/
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​7​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​8​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​1​9​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​0​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​1​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​2​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​3​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​4​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.0ff0​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​-​2​5​.​h​tml

    Reply
  16. dfdsgsdgf says:
    January 2, 2009 at 10:59 pm

    Tomica Minichamps
    Mini-​​Z Kyosho Futaba RCtank Choro-​​Q Ebbro Tiger I Silyerlit Radiocontrol
    Tamiya Tomy Cars Model Tamiya Ebbro Kyosho Mini-​​Z Tomica .
    . .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Tomica
    Tomica
    Tomica
    Tomica
    Minichamps
    Minichamps
    Minichamps
    Minichamps
    Minichamps
    Mini-​​Z
    Mini-​​Z
    Mini-​​Z
    Mini-​​Z
    Kyosho
    Kyosho
    Kyosho
    Kyosho
    Kyosho
    Futaba
    Futaba
    Futaba
    Futaba
    Choro-​​Q
    Choro-​​Q
    Choro-​​Q
    Choro-​​Q
    Ebbro
    Ebbro
    Ebbro
    Ebbro
    Ebbro
    Ebbro
    Tomica
    MIni-​​Z
    Minichamps
    Choro-​​Q
    Kyosho
    Tiger I
    RC tank
    RC bear­ing
    car model
    Futaba
    Tomica
    Minichamps
    Tiger I
    Tomica
    Minichamps
    Choro-​​Q
    Mini-​​Z
    Kyosho
    Futaba
    RC tank
    Minichamps
    Mini-​​Z
    Tomica
    Kyosho
    Minichamps
    Futaba
    Choro-​​Q
    Tomica
    Mini-​​Z
    Tomica
    Minichamps
    Tomica
    Mini-​​Z
    Kyosho
    Minichamps
    RC Tank
    RC Tank
    Mini-​​Z
    Tomica
    Mini-​​Z
    Minichamps
    Futaba
    Futaba
    Tomica
    Minichamps
    Mini-​​Z
    Futaba
    Mini-​​Z
    Futaba
    Tomica
    Kyosho
    Mini-​​Z
    Tomica
    MIni-​​Z
    Futaba
    Mini-​​Z
    RC Tank
    Futaba
    Minichamps
    Mini-​​Z
    Mini-​​Z
    Futaba
    Futaba
    RC Tank
    RC Tank

    Reply
  17. baby says:
    August 29, 2009 at 1:40 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement
    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage