DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Homeland Security » Could it Happen Again?

Could it Happen Again?

Could 9/11 happen another time? I’m not talking in general about another surprise terrorist attack in the States. Literally, could a group of jihadists “board four airplanes, subdue their passengers, and fly the planes right over the heads of the nation’s leaders, right past the ferocious firepower of the U.S. military, just as they did five years ago?“
221-wtc.jpgThat’s the provacative question Defense Tech contributor Shane Harris asks in the current National Journal. He examines the 9/11 plot, step-by-step, and looks at which ones could — and couldn’t — still be pulled off today. Bottom line: There have been improvements. But it just could happen, all over again.

Then: Months before he piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the north tower of the World Trade Center, Mohamed Atta had come to the attention of U.S. authorities. In January 2001, he persuaded an inspector with the Immigration and Naturalization Service to let him into the country so that he could continue pilot training at a U.S. school, even though he presented no student visa.
Now: …stricter regulations for issuing student visas are in place. Any foreigner entering the United States on a student visa must be registered in a government computer system. However, the schools themselves have generally been responsible for entering the data, and have borne the burden of alerting federal officials when students don’t show up for classes. In that case, federal officials are supposed to track them down. In August, several Egyptian students who were granted visas to attend a summer program in Montana never showed up at their assigned school, and the FBI launched a nationwide manhunt to apprehend them…
Then: Early on the morning of September 11, Mohamed Atta and a fellow hijacker flew from Portland, Maine, to Boston’s Logan Airport, where the two men were to board American Airlines Flight 11 bound for Los Angeles. When Atta checked in at Portland, the government’s Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System flagged him for additional inspection, which consisted of holding Atta’s checked bags off the aircraft until it was confirmed that he was aboard…
Now: CAPPS has undergone at least three iterations. The Transportation Security Administration is trying to launch the Secure Flight System to screen airline passengers. But deployment has been beset by delays, management problems, and unresolved concerns about how the system would protect passenger privacy. The current screening system, which relies on antiquated technologies, has kept some suspicious passengers off planes, officials say, but not all of them. The system has also flagged individuals who were clearly not terrorists, calling into question its efficacy…
Then: All of [the Boston-based hijackers] walked through metal detectors set up to react to items with at least the metallic content of a .22-caliber handgun.
Now: Metal detectors have been recalibrated to react to smaller metal objects.
Then: If any one of them had set off the detector, he would have been screened by hand using a more sensitive, metal-detecting wand.
Now: Passengers who trip the metal detectors are patted down by a TSA screener.
Then: Also, the hijackers’ bags were run through an X-ray machine to examine their contents; nothing suspicious was found.
Now: TSA screeners have color monitors that help them distinguish objects of different density, which can help the screeners find explosives. But the machines do not detect explosives. Screeners can search for trace explosives using separate equipment…
Surely, would-be terrorists could enter the country legally, and presumably they have done so. When actually boarding flights, however, they would face increased scrutiny… Any attempted hijacking would be met with potentially lethal resistance from passengers. This may be the single best insurance that another 9/11 couldn’t happen — at least, not the same way.

Share |

September 7th, 2006 | Homeland Security | 327527 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/07/could-it-happen-again/Could+it+Happen+Again%3F2006-09-07+05%3A08%3A22noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Fake Weapons, Real Jail Time | No Trophy for NBC News » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Dave says:
    September 7, 2006 at 2:59 am

    Missing a troubling point here.
    The July 7th bombers in London and all those alleged terrorists arrested since then in the UK have been ‘home grown’.
    A few have been monitored by our security services, but most have been ‘clean skins’ with no previous connection with fundementalist jihadism. Only by working out from the suspected individuals to identify the other conspirators have these alleged plots been thwarted.
    Although there is still a threat from ‘foreign’ terrorists, radicalisation has meant that the threat from ‘domestic’ terrorism must be underlined.
    Whether or not the concentration by the security services on ‘foreign’ threats has led to this sea-change or not is an interesting thought.
    It’s no slur on the majority of mainstream muslims, but I have to ask how long before we see one of the muslim enclaves in the US throw up a bunch of highly motivated ‘martyrs’?

    Reply
  2. sailfast says:
    September 7, 2006 at 7:50 am

    To address Dave’s point, I don’t think that the London people were “clean” just becuase they were homegrown. You have to keep in mind that connections were made to Pakistan which resulted in arrests related to the London bombings. With the current SWIFT monitoring agreement the U.S. has in place they would catch any outside funding.
    That said, we have no way of knowing for sure if it’s privately funded from the inside by people that are “homegrown” however I think that the limiting factor there is being part of the society you would be destroying. Domestic terrorism can happen, no doubt (OK City) but I think it is limited once you begin doing damage to your own way of life (and to that of your family) by carrying out the acts. If your family is all in the UK, they’re not going to get paid off by Hezbollah if you become a martyr, they’re going to have to emmigrate.

    Reply
  3. Joe Katzman says:
    September 7, 2006 at 12:25 pm

    Davids and Campbell have the right of it. Once the passengers are determined to kill the hijackers at all costs, everything else is irrelevant and an exact replay is impossible.
    This is why all of the “security theater” (except the explosives-related detection efforts) that inconveniences passenger in airports is a total waste of time.
    Now, if you can somehow get access to a cargo aircraft, which only has its crew onboard.…

    Reply
  4. kenyg says:
    September 7, 2006 at 2:45 pm

    I pity the poor SOB’s that try to hijaack a flight that I am on. 5yrs of anger and frustraton along with 15yrs of weightrooms and karate — all given a single focus point. Yikes — even I’m scared of me.

    Reply
  5. Tony says:
    September 7, 2006 at 9:42 pm

    Look what happened to Richard Reid. When the passengers and crew got their hands on him, he was probably glsd to be arrested.

    Reply
  6. Noah (the other one) says:
    September 8, 2006 at 7:59 pm

    While it might be more difficult to do this with public carriers, it would be simplicity itself with private or even chartered jets.
    Using an enemy’s assets aginst them is exactly the training that the CIA gave bin Laden in Afghanistan in the 1980’s (without the suicide part, of course).

    Reply
  7. AB* says:
    September 22, 2006 at 7:01 am

    the bush regime will hit us again. 911 inside job, 7/7 inside job. war games were going on that day . building 7 went down sure wasn’t from the patsies. Bin Laden family been in business with the Bushes.
    it is on record.
    if we get hit again look not at the middle east but to DC.
    wake up please. they need their ocober surprise. be vigilant.
    911blogger​.com
    falseflagnews​.com

    Reply
  8. Adeel Shahid says:
    October 14, 2006 at 6:36 am

    About http://​www​.METAL​-DETECTOR​-REVIEW​.COM
    I want to buy a metal detector but I don’t know which is the best. I found a lot of informations about that on http://​www​.METAL​-DETECTOR​-REVIEW​.COM and I want to know more about which model is ideal for treasure hunting. Any recommendations would be appreciated, make and model, etc)
    Thanks

    Reply
  9. Scions Of Fate money says:
    August 1, 2008 at 11:24 pm

    The game is the only hobby of him. He would like to give up, in all of us comfort and encouragement. He decided to join us to play the new mountain, he was still playing knife, I also playing a doctor, and we all give him a little Scions of Fate money.

    Reply
  10. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 2:53 am

    By allowing players to combine up to three personalized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold delivers a previously unseen level of depth in character development and gameplay strategy. No class need be like another, no two teams will be the same and no MMORPG offers players such a dynamic experience with character classes.

    Reply
  11. cheap Tibia coins says:
    August 8, 2008 at 2:54 am

    As a premium player you can travel to the mysterious islands of Edron and Darama that are looming large to the east of the main continent. Also the legendary Shattered Isles in the South are definitely cheap Tibia coins worth a visit.

    Reply
  12. flyff money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    After a few days, with the classmate help slowly I can earn the flyff money in the game, beginning has a little understand for the game, but I still thought that this game had some boring, so I decided to play the small account

    Reply
  13. cronous gold says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    In the game I can in order to the friends spend all my cronous gold to help them, because in my mind the friends was the most important, in this way in the game I have many friends.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I would like to see any conclusive data showing the...
      @Earlydawn
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      King of Fighters F-22 Gets Killed by Humble T-38 Training...
      gizmodo
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Believe he was referring to its out of control cost increase...
      Thunder350
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      comparison with su-27 and su-50 :...
      sukhoi
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i have a son over in afgh.now he will be in the states...
      logger64
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      King of Fighters F-22 Gets Killed by Humble T-38 Training...
      T-38
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      T38 bags an F22… or does it?...
      T-38
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      bduff509, I believe that's a BAD. Blast Attenuation...
      Gary V
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Couldn't they just buy something...
      WillyPete
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      mbt shoes sale-buy the collection of Mbt...
      mbt shoes
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage