DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Now You See Me…

Now You See Me…

It sounds like some­thing out of a comic book, or Lord of the Rings, I know. But there’s a chance that invis­i­bil­ity real-​​life, honest-​​to-​​God invis­i­bil­ity may actu­ally be pos­si­ble, some day.
The tech­nol­ogy doesnt come from some dubi­ous unknown inven­tor, but from Professor Sir John Pendry, the leg­endary the­o­ret­i­cal physi­cist, I write in this months BBC Focus mag­a­zine the world’s best sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy monthly. Pendry has devel­oped the con­cept of meta­ma­te­ri­als, which have prop­er­ties deter­mined by their struc­ture rather than their com­po­si­tion. This can give them ‘impos­si­ble’ prop­er­ties, such as a neg­a­tive refrac­tive index. Initially, there was some debate about whether this could ever be achieved. But the proof came last year with the demon­stra­tion of a super­lens capa­ble of beat­ing any lens made of nor­mal mate­r­ial. Invis artic.JPG
By uti­liz­ing meta­ma­te­ri­als, it should be pos­si­ble, in the­ory, to cre­ate what Pendry calls an invis­i­bil­ity cloak — although invis­i­bil­ity shell might be more accu­rate as it will need to be rigid. Such a cloak would divert any inci­dent light around its sur­face and release it on the same path on the other side: to any observer the wearer is invis­i­ble.
Interestingly, Pendrys work on meta­ma­te­ri­als started when he was work­ing for Marconi. He was look­ing at the appli­ca­tion of car­bon fiber for a stealth coat­ing when he real­ized that its inter­ac­tion with radar was deter­mined by the length of the fibers it was effec­tively act­ing as an array of tiny aeri­als and that the same effect could have many other appli­ca­tions.
Invisibility in the opti­cal spec­trum will be chal­leng­ing because meta­ma­te­ri­als will need to be con­structed on a scale cor­re­spond­ing to the wave­lengths of vis­i­ble light, which is just a few hun­dred nanome­tres. That tech­nol­ogy will not be around for at least five years.
But radar invis­i­bil­ity is much eas­ier because radar wave­lengths are in the cen­time­ter range. Pendrys col­league, Dr. David R. Smith at Duke University, is already work­ing on a microwave meta­ma­te­r­ial. Results are expected within eigh­teen months.
Unlike exist­ing stealth tech­niques, a meta­ma­te­r­ial should in prin­ci­ple be able to make an air­craft (or mis­sile) lit­er­ally invis­i­ble to any radar from any aspect.
There are likely to be other meta­ma­te­ri­als along later. As Pendry explained, they can have all sorts of mechan­i­cal or acoustic prop­er­ties as well as affect­ing light or other radi­a­tion. But for the mean time, we are likely to have out hands full just think­ing of appli­ca­tions for invis­i­bil­ity.
The biggest ques­tion is likely to be the width of spec­trum that any given mate­r­ial can han­dle. According to Pendry, a suf­fi­ciently deep meta­ma­te­r­ial should be able to cope with a very wide spec­trum. This might include all vis­i­ble wave­lengths plus a chunk of infra-​​red and UV. However, its clear that even very lim­ited invis­i­bil­ity could be a major mil­i­tary asset.
– David Hambling

Share |

September 8th, 2006 | Bizarro | 327917 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/08/now-you-see-me/Now+You+See+Me...2006-09-08+15%3A17%3A32sharon_weinberger You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Sats Hit Snags | Rattlrs Strikes Fast » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Haninah says:
    September 8, 2006 at 10:12 am

    “he real­ized that its inter­ac­tion with radar was deter­mined by the length of the fibers

    Reply
  2. Eric says:
    September 8, 2006 at 11:50 am

    One issue worth men­tion­ing — if you bend all EM radi­a­tion over a cer­tain spec­trum around your­self you can’t see in that spec­trum, either, because no radi­a­tion reaches you to be detected. So if you’re invis­i­ble, you’re also blind. Not say­ing it’s no good, but it’s not quite a sci-​​fi cloak­ing shield.

    Reply
  3. J. Brenner says:
    September 8, 2006 at 12:22 pm

    William Gibson does it again. This sounds like the Polycarbon suits worn by the Panther Moderns in Neuromancer — writ­ten in 1984.

    Reply
  4. Robot.Economist says:
    September 8, 2006 at 12:35 pm

    Eric hit on one of the two com­pli­ca­tions asso­ci­ated with EM refrac­tion: 1) refract­ing light around you effec­tively makes you blind and 2) the cloak­ing lense would have to take the shape of a dome or large lense.
    Provided that a cloak­ing lens only refracted vis­i­ble light, one could get around the blind­ness prob­lem with an infrared scope. Even if the lens wasn’t use­ful for maneu­ver­ing troops, you could prob­a­bly use it to hide CPs, bases, or vehi­cle laagers from high alti­tude pho­tog­ra­phy.
    I thought super­lens arti­cle made a more com­pelling case for the devel­op­ment of hyper-​​sensitive detec­tion equip­ment. A neg­a­tive refrac­tive index on a spy satel­lite could break down res­o­lu­tion bar­ri­ers for all types of snoop­ing cameras.

    Reply
  5. David Hambling says:
    September 8, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    I sus­pect that the ‘invis­i­ble infantry­man’ is a way of putting the idea across and has all sorts of prac­ti­cal issues (how much of your job can you do inside a fiant egg?).
    For vehi­cles it becomes a lot more prac­ti­cal; for sen­sors all you need are some pinhole-​​sized aper­tures which are going to be min­i­mally vis­i­ble.
    —
    “you mean the spac­ing of the fibers, not their lengths“
    No, I believe he said lengths.
    —
    Another semi-​​obvious appli­ca­tion: coat a mis­sile in meta­ma­te­r­ial invis­i­ble to the range of wave­lengths used by the opponent’s anti-​​missile laser, ren­der­ing it useless.

    Reply
  6. Eric says:
    September 8, 2006 at 5:35 pm

    About using the mate­r­ial as an anti-​​laser device — I sus­pect this won’t work any bet­ter than mir­ror­ing the thing.
    Both run into the issue that a high energy pulse may not be com­pletly absorbed, but if enough is the mirror/​invisible mate­r­ial loses its spe­cial prop­er­ties and the follow-​​up pulses burn through.
    This brings up another issue — how durable is this stuff? If the radar-​​invisible mate­r­ial is car­bon fiber, that’s pretty nice. But could you coat a mis­sile or air­craft with all the stuff, or would the stuff that han­dles, say, vis­i­ble light burn off a mis­sile nose cone?

    Reply
  7. DS says:
    September 8, 2006 at 5:49 pm

    ok…that’s just creepy…the idea of a pair of eyes being there with­out a body accom­pa­ny­ing it just freaks me out for some reason…lol.

    Reply
  8. reefdiver says:
    September 9, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    Far more prac­ti­cal meth­ods will prob­a­bly be fab­rics embed­ded with nano cir­cuits acti­vat­ing color chang­ing dyes, or nano OLED’s where small cam­eras view the envi­ron­ment cause a view of the sur­round­ings to be dis­played.
    Even today, you could put some­thing like a color e-​​ink mate­r­ial on a vehi­cle or air­craft and use a sim­ple mag­netic wand type mech­a­nism (some­what like a printer’s print head) to change the camo on it imme­di­ately. Such an approach might be good for armored vehi­cles and the under­side of UAV’s.
    Neither of these two cammo’s won’t be per­fect, but are both near term and could pro­vide con­sid­er­ably improved capa­bil­i­ties over today’s “sta­tic” systems.

    Reply
  9. erewhon says:
    September 9, 2006 at 1:18 pm

    David…a broad­band microwave ver­sion has already been fielded in ‘spe­cial appli­ca­tions’.
    This stuff has been called by var­i­ous names over the past 15 years, it’s a bit con­fus­ing to most as to where and how to find info on it.
    ’Metamaterial’ is the proper name but for a long while we’ve been call­ing them ‘left-​​handed mag­netic mate­ri­als’. If you poke around for it under that nomen­cla­ture you’ll find a bunch of info on the zero-​​to-​​negative per­me­abil­ity meta­ma­te­ri­als. The entire meta­ma­te­r­ial effect is sort of groupable under plas­monic engi­neer­ing — the inten­tional mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the behav­iors of elec­tron clouds around atoms.
    A left-​​handed mag­netic coat­ing can do quite a bit of the things you dis­cussed in your arti­cle, although now they can also achieve neg­a­tive or rad­i­cally enhanced per­mit­tiv­i­ties, which is a totally dif­fer­ent ket­tle of fish.
    Left-​​handed coat­ings can do a lot of freaky things, amongst which are inverse or sta­tic Dopplers. That is, the return from the craft exhibits no Doppler effect or even more unin­tu­itively return a LOWER fre­quency as they increase in veloc­ity rel­a­tive to the radar.
    There are many an appli­ca­tion for these. Some of them you haven’t men­tioned yet.
    Oh, btw, Phantomworks was the first to field.

    Reply
  10. chris antonio perez says:
    April 5, 2007 at 9:40 am

    well let us begin by stat­ing that the jor­dan face mask used by the united states army lets state fur­ther you tardec have in one of your com­ments on the new face armour this face armour could be fit­ted with oleds which will cover the out­ter layer of the face armour which is dis­played on one of your dis­crip­tions on face armour inside the face armour would incor­po­rate a pair of glasses that will fit on the user of this invis­i­ble maqk­ing device which will go along with the invis­i­ble suit which will give the invis­i­ble suit new direc­tions and a change to new heights and so there it is
    christo­pher perez the inven­tor of the new invis­i­ble tank tech­nol­ogy thank you and let me fin­ish these glasses will be con­nected to out­side video cam­eras which will be located . these spe­cial glasses upon voice com­mand will dis­play any radius area which video cam­eras will be view­ing in /​on area of field of vision of the video glasses now lets try to build an anti missle defense in a few words and here it is ok lets have ade­fence mis­sile that will be guided by real time gps which will inco­po­rate ther­mal detect­ing tech­nol­ogy and which will catch an image of the mis­sile from un allied coun­trys we will incor­po­rate fur­ther upon request very soon so.….….…..
    i would also like to say hello to chris­t­ian which is work­ing with me on the invis­i­ble the­ory very soon we will have the prod­uct of the mil­i­tary of the united states of amer­ica and once again thank you chris­t­ian very much for your intrest
    sin­cerely mr christo­pher anto­nio perez

    Reply
  11. chris antonio perez says:
    April 5, 2007 at 10:02 am

    well let us begin by stat­ing that the jor­dan face mask used by the united states army lets state fur­ther you tardec have in one of your com­ments on the new face armour this face armour could be fit­ted with oleds which will cover the out­ter layer of the face armour which will be con­nected to 2 video cam­eras one video cam­era on the back of hel­met armor and one onthe the front of armor hel­met the video cam­era that is located on back of hel­met will dis­play its area of view­ing and will dis­play it on the oleds on the front of hel­met and the video cam­era that is onthe front of hemet will dis­play the area and objects of upon it is view­ing and will dis­play its images on the oled screen on outer layer ofback of armor hel­met armor hel­met which you describe on this web­site which is dis­played on one of your dis­crip­tions on face armour inside the face armour would incor­po­rate a pair of glasses that will fit on the user of this invis­i­ble mak­ing device which will go along with the invis­i­ble suit which will give the invis­i­ble suit new direc­tions and a change to new heights and so there it is
    christo­pher perez the inven­tor of the new invis­i­ble tank tech­nol­ogy thank you and let me fin­ish these glasses will be con­nected to out­side video cam­eras which will be located on either this armour hel­met or on suit we want to be on the same degree of height dis­tance and degree of direc­toral view​ing​.so that we get the invis­i­ble apearence these spe­cial glasses upon voice com­mand will dis­play any radius area which video cam­eras will be view­ing in /​on area of field of vision of the video glasses options will come to rear viwing front view­ing these spe­cial glasses and video cam­eras will be able to see dis­tances as far as miles or feet now lets try to build an anti missle defense in a few words and here it is ok lets have ade­fence mis­sile that will be guided by real time gps which will inco­po­rate ther­mal detect­ing tech­nol­ogy and which will catch an image of a mis­sile and cap­ture its image so that missle and only that mis­sile will be dec­i­mated along with some type of chem­i­cal which will lessen the amount of potency of that mis­siles radi­a­tion we will incor­po­rate fur­ther upon request very soon so.….….…..
    i would also like to say hello to chris­t­ian which is work­ing with me on the invis­i­ble the­ory very soon we will have the prod­uct of the mil­i­tary of the united states of amer­ica and once again thank you chris­t­ian very much for your intrest
    sin­cerely mr christo­pher anto­nio perez

    Reply
  12. CHRISTOPHER A PEREZ says:
    April 12, 2007 at 9:10 am

    DEVICE WHICH WILL INWARDLY INHABIT THE NUCLEAR DEFENCE MISSLE THE MISSLES RADAR MAPPING WILL MEASURE THE PROPERTIES WHICH ARE EVER CHANGING OF THE ON COMING MISSLE THIS ANTI NUCLEAR DEFENSE MISSLE MEASURES THE EVER CHANGING THERMAL SPANS AND LAPSES AFTER A THERMAL IMAGING PICTURE AND NEXT THING IT WOULD DO IS CAPTURE TRACK AFTER PICTURE NEXT WOULD BE SCANNING AND TRACKING THEN LAUNCH THEN LOCK THERMAL PICTURE TAKENTHEN MEASURING AND TRACKINGAND PROCEED LAUNCH APPROACH DESTROY THIS IS A IDEA TO HELP BUILD SPECIAL MISSLE DEFENCES OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY THE U.S. AND FINALLY A CLEANSING AGENT TO DENUCLEARIZE NUCLEAR PROPERTIES TO CREATE CLEAN AIR DURING ITERCEPTION OF UN ALLIED NUCLEAR MISSLE.
    A BODY ARMOR OF HUGE MAGNETIC FIELD PULSES FOR SOLDIERS DURING BATTLE THE MAGNETIC ARMOR SUIT WILL CREATE A FULL MAGNETIC SCAN OF ALL AREAS INVOLVED FULL MAGNETIC ARMOR SUIT WILL BE CREATED OF FULL FIRE RETARDENT MATERIALS.
    DESCRIPTION FINAL–
    THE FULL MAGNETIC ARMOR SUIT WILL TO WHOMEVER IS EQUIPPED WITH FULL ARMOR SUIT WILL CREATE USER OF FULL MAGNETIC ARMOR WILL THENCEFORTH BECOME TRULY INVINCIBLE TO ALL METAL AND LED PROJECTILES.WHILE ANTI LEAD REPELLENT GENERATORS REPEL LEAD WHICH IS CONNECTED TO A LED DETECTING APPARATUS WHICH IS MICROWAVE LED SURVAILLING AND IMAGING SCANNER DETECTOR. THE MAGNETIC ARMOR WILL CREATE AN INVISIBLE SCAN OF ALL AREAS INVOLVED DURRING SPECIAL USE THE SCAN WILL DETECT ALL PROJECTILES METAL AND LEAD THE WAY THE LED SCAN WORKS IS BY ITS QUICK MICROWAVE RESPOSE AND DETECTION OF LED EACH SCAN WILL UPON RECEIVING LED AND METAL DETECTION RESPONSES WILL ACTIVATE MAGNETIC METAL REPEL DETECTION WHICH WILL BECOME ACTIVATED AND WHICH THE FULL MAGNETIC ARMOR SUIT IS ALLIEND IN REPELLING OF METAL AND LED PROJECTILES. …AND ARMOR WILL ALSO CREATE A SCAN WHILE IN ACTIVE COMBAT ON AND INACTIVE COMBAT THAT WILL DETECT WITH A THERMAL SCANNING AND DETECTING SCAN DEVICE WHICH UPON SCANNING HUGE PROPERTIES OF HEAT DURING EXSPLOSION OF ANY SORT WILL CREATE COOL SPOTS TO WHICHEVER AREA OF ARMOR DETECTS HUGE AMOUNTS OF HEAT A SMALL AIR CONDITIONING UNIT WILL BE LOCATED ON BACK OF U.S.SOLDIER AND BODY ARMOR WILL ALSO KEEP HUMAN BODY AT 98.6 DEGREES AT ALL TIMES OF USE OF THIS SPECIAL BODY ARMOR. HI CHRISTIAN TARDEC

    Reply
  13. mr. christopher antonio perez says:
    April 24, 2008 at 8:57 am

    i am very kind i would like to know what­ever hap­pened to my invis­i­ble tank the­ory that i helped you guys with i was work­ing with chris­t­ian jabobowski but she left by the way mabe you could…use another one of my ideas well inven­tions .….……
    i believe that our fos­sil fuels have almost become depleted so lets switch off to nuclear energy its a good resource in which i do not see an end — lets power our auto­mo­biles with it instead of switch­ing off to alter­na­tive fuels–
    ’e85’-which will be a bur­den to our val­u­ble and decreas­ing world food sup­plys. i believe in deter­min­ing ben­e­fits of nuclear energy by using
    small com­part­ments in aircraft-,automobiles which will house small min­eral of nuclear. Well let me say par­ti­cle– this par­ti­cle of nuclear-​​nuclear-​​energy will pro­duce thou­sands of volts through ele­ment and i beleive this ele­ment should be made of phos­pho­rus con­nected to two wires each of metal
    the same way we extract elec­tri­cal energy from nuclear through nuclear power plants i believe
    the same shall be done in the use of nuclear energy being incor­po­rated in auto­mo­biles and air­craft –machinery.

    Reply
  14. William says:
    April 24, 2008 at 9:55 am

    this IS TRUE BUT a kid in my class believes that their is gar­den nobes in the suit that makes this pos­si­ble with an portable printer.

    Reply
  15. Will says:
    April 24, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    My class mate says that the suits are runed by lit­tle gar­den nobes and portable print­ers!
    Is that true

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage