<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: China’s Killer Hovercraft</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: RmH</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-194267</link> <dc:creator>RmH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:42:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-194267</guid> <description>&quot;We are already in WWIII with the Moslem fanatics who intend to take over the entire world and install a Taliban form of government, only most people are too clueless to know it.&quot;
That&#039;s one of the stupidest things I&#039;ve ever read </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We are already in WWIII with the Moslem fanatics who intend to take over the entire world and install a Taliban form of government, only most people are too clueless to know it.”</p><p>That’s one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: salian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147603</link> <dc:creator>salian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147603</guid> <description>hi i am looking forward to assemble  hovercraft in iran beciuse of  the hight amount custom and can,nt sale it and it is,nt afforedable. if you intrest pls contect me..
thanhs
salian </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i am looking forward to assemble  hovercraft in iran beciuse of  the hight amount custom and can,nt sale it and it is,nt afforedable. if you intrest pls contect me..<br
/> thanhs<br
/> salian</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dennis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-56527</link> <dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-56527</guid> <description>i&#039;m trying to find out if the navy is testing a locking nut and bolt system from tinslok.com.my request is for investment purposes only. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i’m trying to find out if the navy is testing a locking nut and bolt system from tinslok.com.my request is for investment purposes only.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147602</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:59:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147602</guid> <description>Major threat any SEAL Ops alone &amp; for aiding Pirates.
Cant US back engineer one of these Hoverships for Use???
If China can, why cant we?
Now imagine Cuba having these?
No Korea.
Major threat to amphib forces.
No More IwoJimas or Normandy style assults. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major threat any SEAL Ops alone &amp; for aiding Pirates.<br
/> Cant US back engineer one of these Hoverships for Use???<br
/> If China can, why cant we?<br
/> Now imagine Cuba having these?<br
/> No Korea.<br
/> Major threat to amphib forces.<br
/> No More IwoJimas or Normandy style assults.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Lim She Weng</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147601</link> <dc:creator>James Lim She Weng</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:30:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147601</guid> <description>The US has the means and power to settle the Taiwan issue. If it favours China it will be considered loss of face. On the other hand helping Taiwan could lead to war which frankly is not in the basic interest of the Bush gang.But you never know.
If Bush were intent on preventing China ever challenging the US in the future,now is a good time for CSB(US agent) to declare independence and let China attack which would galavanise the US to act with its military superiority.
Howewer the US would have to pay a heavy price with at least tow carriers destroyed and possibly ten major US cities reduced to ashes if it were to undertake the surgical dismemberment of China.
Of course China would not tbe around to haunt the US.The price for US victory goes up each day because the Chinese will getting stronger day by day unless the US has a secret weapon that can destroy China with too heavy a price.
But as the saying goes you never know . </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has the means and power to settle the Taiwan issue. If it favours China it will be considered loss of face. On the other hand helping Taiwan could lead to war which frankly is not in the basic interest of the Bush gang.But you never know.<br
/> If Bush were intent on preventing China ever challenging the US in the future,now is a good time for CSB(US agent) to declare independence and let China attack which would galavanise the US to act with its military superiority.<br
/> Howewer the US would have to pay a heavy price with at least tow carriers destroyed and possibly ten major US cities reduced to ashes if it were to undertake the surgical dismemberment of China.<br
/> Of course China would not tbe around to haunt the US.The price for US victory goes up each day because the Chinese will getting stronger day by day unless the US has a secret weapon that can destroy China with too heavy a price.<br
/> But as the saying goes you never know .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil C. Reinhardt</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147600</link> <dc:creator>Neil C. Reinhardt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147600</guid> <description>BT lives in a dream world.
While I hope to hell I am wrong I really believe China WILL invade Taiwan and China WILL use military force to get the raw materials it needs from Sibera.
And the U.S. WILL be in a war in China within the next 20 years, if not within the next 5 to 10 years!
In my view, after China kicks the worlds tail in the next Olympic&#039;s, (like Hiter wanted to do when Germany hosted the Olympics) Taiwan can kiss it&#039;s freedom good by.
China attacks Taiwan and the odds are WWIV is under way.
(We are already in WWIII with the Moslem fanatics who intend to take over the entire world and install a Taliban form of government, only most people are too clueless to know it.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT lives in a dream world.<br
/> While I hope to hell I am wrong I really believe China WILL invade Taiwan and China WILL use military force to get the raw materials it needs from Sibera.<br
/> And the U.S. WILL be in a war in China within the next 20 years, if not within the next 5 to 10 years!<br
/> In my view, after China kicks the worlds tail in the next Olympic’s, (like Hiter wanted to do when Germany hosted the Olympics) Taiwan can kiss it’s freedom good by.<br
/> China attacks Taiwan and the odds are WWIV is under way.<br
/> (We are already in WWIII with the Moslem fanatics who intend to take over the entire world and install a Taliban form of government, only most people are too clueless to know it.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Onizuka-GTO</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147599</link> <dc:creator>Onizuka-GTO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:15:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147599</guid> <description>Well im all for alternative weapon platform,I love those quirky Russian thangs! Mind you, everyone got apoint about China&#039;s copying quality, sur given enough time you can do it right, but the Chinese always seem to leave out the good bits, unlike the Russians stuff, which always have the good points. All well, if it has to take China to make my fatasy of a Armoured Assault Hovercraft Fighting Vehicle, then bring it on. I hope they spit on everyone, when they get going, next up should be the copying of the Ka-52 and the ekranoplanes Wing-In-Ground Effect transporters! GET IN THERE! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well im all for alternative weapon platform,I love those quirky Russian thangs! Mind you, everyone got apoint about China’s copying quality, sur given enough time you can do it right, but the Chinese always seem to leave out the good bits, unlike the Russians stuff, which always have the good points. All well, if it has to take China to make my fatasy of a Armoured Assault Hovercraft Fighting Vehicle, then bring it on. I hope they spit on everyone, when they get going, next up should be the copying of the Ka-52 and the ekranoplanes Wing-In-Ground Effect transporters! GET IN THERE!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: aaron</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-56522</link> <dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-56522</guid> <description>what would it take to sink one of these? an atgm seems to small. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would it take to sink one of these? an atgm seems to small.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BT</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147596</link> <dc:creator>BT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147596</guid> <description>China is not going to take over the world militarily. They are however on the move for resources. Could I call them free-market Communists? Think about Clyde Prestowitz</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is not going to take over the world militarily. They are however on the move for resources. Could I call them free-market Communists? Think about Clyde Prestowitz</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: browch</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/chinas-killer-hovercraft/comment-page-1/#comment-147595</link> <dc:creator>browch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:27:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3290#comment-147595</guid> <description>Yeah BT it IS abig deal..fear of a rising china is a generational thing I guess, for those who do more than worry about israel, jews the second coming, etc etc..the chinese are modernizing their armed forces because they can and should
the key is to look at how..they have budgets and priorties too..it is obvious that they are thinking about the taiwan scenario..they have a buildup in airborne forces and equipment, sealift, airlift, planes that can operate from rough unprepared strips.
thye have hundreds of short range missiles on the coast pointing at taiwan..they are building i believe dozens of new subs a year..some ideally suited for littoral operaations..thye have a long range plan, which taiwan and the US figure in to, as well as korea japan..
Denial of the seas, control of sea lanes, chokepoints to prevent our resupply either of korea japan..subs off guam..mrbms to hit guam pearl,etc..
They are like our military  they gotta wargame something..and taiwan is most likely scenario..
they are securing fueling rights and increasing aid programs all thru micronesia, marshalls etc.
they ultimately want to bust out the taiwan straits, and become more bluewater..primarliy i believe to control key terrain to affect mvtment of us forces to taiwan,japan..
hey all power to them  and us for preventing them
ahh chaps the great game begins again..tallyho </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah BT it IS abig deal..fear of a rising china is a generational thing I guess, for those who do more than worry about israel, jews the second coming, etc etc..the chinese are modernizing their armed forces because they can and should<br
/> the key is to look at how..they have budgets and priorties too..it is obvious that they are thinking about the taiwan scenario..they have a buildup in airborne forces and equipment, sealift, airlift, planes that can operate from rough unprepared strips.<br
/> thye have hundreds of short range missiles on the coast pointing at taiwan..they are building i believe dozens of new subs a year..some ideally suited for littoral operaations..thye have a long range plan, which taiwan and the US figure in to, as well as korea japan..<br
/> Denial of the seas, control of sea lanes, chokepoints to prevent our resupply either of korea japan..subs off guam..mrbms to hit guam pearl,etc..<br
/> They are like our military  they gotta wargame something..and taiwan is most likely scenario..<br
/> they are securing fueling rights and increasing aid programs all thru micronesia, marshalls etc.<br
/> they ultimately want to bust out the taiwan straits, and become more bluewater..primarliy i believe to control key terrain to affect mvtment of us forces to taiwan,japan..<br
/> hey all power to them  and us for preventing them<br
/> ahh chaps the great game begins again..tallyho</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/26 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-22 01:45:22 -->