DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cammo Green » No Blood for… Solar Power?

No Blood for… Solar Power?

Last Thursday, the Christian Science Monitor reported on an unusual memo from the staff of Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Richard Zilmer, the highest-​​ranking Marine offi­cer in Iraqs trou­bled Anbar Province. According to the Monitor, and to more com­pre­hen­sive treat­ments in Inside Defense and Defense Industry Daily, Zilmer asked the Pentagon to find a way to get “solar pan­els and wind tur­bines” into the hands of his troops. Without access to renew­able energy solu­tions, Zilmer expects to see “con­tin­ued casu­alty accu­mu­la­tion [which] exhibits poten­tial to jeop­ar­dize mis­sion suc­cess.“
Say what?
Solar.JPGThe arti­cle in the Monitor sug­gests two dif­fer­ent ways in which solar– and wind-​​powered gen­er­a­tors for iso­lated out­posts would reduce U.S. casu­al­ties. The first is that “despite desert tem­per­a­tures, the hot ‘ther­mal sig­na­ture’ of a diesel gen­er­a­tor can call enemy atten­tion to U.S. out­posts.” How, exactly, an array of solar pan­els and wind tur­bines would make U.S. troops less con­spic­u­ous in a coun­try bristling with diesel gen­er­a­tors is left unclear.
The sec­ond argu­ment holds more water. As hard as it is to believe, diesel and other refined petro­leum prod­ucts are actu­ally imported into Iraq by truck, largely from Turkey. And fuel con­voys not to men­tion the U.S. troops rid­ing in them are some of the most tempt­ing tar­gets to insur­gents: in August 2005, for exam­ple, the Army 1st Corps Support Command alone was report­ing 30 IED attacks a week.
All that fuel con­voyin’ costs not only lives, but money, too. Military esti­mates for the cost of one gal­lon of gen­er­a­tor fuel deliv­ered to a unit at a for­ward posi­tion range from $100 to $400. This is a prob­lem.
(If youre curi­ous to know how they get those types of num­bers for a sin­gle gal­lon of fuel, take a gan­der at this LMI pre­sen­ta­tion, from 2004, which cranks out an esti­mate of $3 per kilowatt-frickin’-hour or about $120 per gal­lon of fuel con­sumed on the bat­tle­field, com­pared to $0.40/kWh ($16/​gallon) to run those same gen­er­a­tors state­side. If this state­side num­ber seems high, too, remem­ber that the num­ber rep­re­sents all costs asso­ci­ated with turn­ing that gal­lon of fuel into use­ful energy, includ­ing per­son­nel costs, equip­ment depre­ci­a­tion, and so on.)
So, what can be done?
Right now, theres no easy answer. Arlington, Va.-based SkyBuilt Power offers a con­tainer­ized, deploy­able solar-​​/​wind-​​powered gen­er­at­ing sta­tion which has got­ten a lot of press, but the sys­tem, which pro­duces “0.5 kW to 150 kW or more,” is reported by the Monitor to go for a neat $100,000.
Still, that price tag looks a lot less scary when you keep in mind the absurd cost of run­ning a diesel gen­er­a­tor on the bat­tle­field. According to the Monitor, Zilmers memo esti­mated that a sys­tem like SkyBuilts would pay for itself in three to five years.
That, of course, is prob­a­bly why In-​​Q-​​Tel, the CIAs own venture-​​cap firm, is one of SkyBuilts big back­ers.
Part of the logis­tics crunch which is feed­ing those con­voy casu­alty rates has more to do with inept plan­ning than with a lack of avail­able tech­nol­ogy. In February 2006, the engi­neer­ing jour­nal IEEE Spectrum pub­lished a must-​​read arti­cle describ­ing how diesel fuel is trucked in from Turkey to power Baghdads main power sta­tion, even while the nat­ural gas which could power the same tur­bines, if the appro­pri­ate equip­ment were installed, is flared off as waste at an oil­field across the street.
Obviously, renew­able energy isn’t going to solve prob­lems on the scale of Iraq’s FUBARed power grid, nor will it solve prob­lems that are really about plan­ning, and not tech­nol­ogy. And just as obvi­ously, there’s no mature tech­nol­ogy out there ready to take the place of every diesel gen­er­a­tor and inter­nal com­bus­tion engine in the U.S. armory.
But as I wrote almost a year ago, the Department of Defense can’t afford to sit around and wait for some­one else to mature those tech­nolo­gies: “the mature renewable-​​energy and fuel-​​efficient tech­nol­ogy of the future may never appear in real­ity until it appears among DARPA’s ‘Areas of Interest.’”
Since I wrote those words, I’m glad to say that there’s been all sorts of move­ment on this front. And the pub­lic­ity gar­nered by Zilmers memo can only help mat­ters along.
So next time you hear about a com­pany thats devel­op­ing bet­ter solar cells, or more effi­cient wind tur­bines, pay atten­tion. Theyre not just Mother Natures best friends they may well be a jarhead’s best friend.
– Haninah Levine

Share |

September 12th, 2006 | Cammo Green, Gadgets and Gear, Logistics, Strategery | 328885 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/12/no-blood-for-solar-power/No+Blood+for...+Solar+Power%3F2006-09-12+13%3A06%3A52 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Don’t You Dare Forget | China’s Killer Hovercraft » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Wembley says:
    September 12, 2006 at 7:32 am

    And the take-​​home les­son is: don’t mess up the power grid and the refin­ing capac­ity if you want to occupy the place or rebuild it after­wards.
    “Think ahead”

    Reply
  2. Brian says:
    September 12, 2006 at 11:21 am

    We didn’t mess up the power grid or the refin­ing capa­bil­i­ties. That’s just Iraqi engi­neer­ing.
    The last time we tar­geted their power grid? 1991.

    Reply
  3. Noah (the other one) says:
    September 12, 2006 at 9:08 pm

    Aside from it being against the Geneva Convention to tar­get civil­ian infra­struc­ture, Iraq was inter­mit­tently bombed by the US from 1992 to May 2002 when the pre-​​war cam­paign began in earnest.
    (http://​www​.ccmep​.org/​u​s​b​o​m​b​i​n​g​w​a​t​c​h​/​2​0​0​3​.​htm)
    It should be noted that this bomb­ing cam­paign was ini­ti­ated well before the Oct. 11 2002 con­gres­sional autho­riza­tion, and that a ruse of Iraqi aggres­sion was uti­lized to destroy com­mu­ni­ca­tions, power and other ser­vices con­sid­ered vital to con­duct­ing a defense to the planned inva­sion.
    As for destroy­ing the infra­struc­ture, that was part of the eco­nomic plan whereby American com­pa­nies (like Halliburton) would be paid to rebuild Iraq (to our specs) out of Iraqi oil rev­enue.
    As events in Lebanon have so clearly pointed out (as if it needed point­ing out), the one who destroys your infra­struc­ture is your enemy. When you’ve spent more than a decade doing that I guess it takes you to another level entirely.

    Reply
  4. Carol Rae says:
    July 9, 2007 at 7:12 am

    Wind Turbines like much of mod­ern tech. con­tains
    a device called an inverter/​inverter drive.
    It relaces the nor­mal trans­former to covert AC to DC or DC to AC.. The air­craft indus­try use them as a fule save­ing device a whole string of them can gen­er­ate a lot of power.
    They act as a broad spec­trum low fre­quency transmitter/​generator. Its able to amplfy other fre­quen­cies off scale so these devices don‘t com­ply to EMC elec­tro­mag­netic com­pat­i­bil­ity law.
    Just like Tetra and Mobile phones don‘t com­ply to
    this law for the same rea­son.
    Government pol­icy turns a blind eye.
    Though what was radio­com­mu­ni­ca­tions (OFCOM) warned about the poss. prob­lem in RHS ovens.
    Though the heal and safety aspect was not the orig­i­nal intent of EMC.. There are those impli­ca­tions, but even the inter­fer­ance on other
    elec­tri­cal sys­tems from its use in RADAR to the
    new elec­tronic heal­ing sys­tems able to pro­gramme the bod­ies cells to other sub­stance.. Be they for war or heal­ing…
    This links to the pro­duc­tion of Zero-​​point energy
    These devices can‘t be earthed fil­tered or shield­ing cre­at­ing large scale nuclear as well as microwave radi­tion off scale.
    But one might say they are sold a low level radi­a­tion.. They are not..
    Tesla tech­nol­ogy by just another name.…
    Reverse polar­ity machines is another name in which the power should be read in you gess reverse polar­ity from the South not the north axis. I would like David Hambling to get back to me so we can dis­cuss this further.

    Reply
  5. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:25 pm

    By allow­ing play­ers to com­bine up to three per­son­al­ized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold deliv­ers a pre­vi­ously unseen level of depth in char­ac­ter devel­op­ment and game­play strategy.

    Reply
  6. Sword of the New World Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:25 pm

    By allow­ing play­ers to com­bine up to three per­son­al­ized classes at once, Sword of the New World Gold deliv­ers a pre­vi­ously unseen level of depth in char­ac­ter devel­op­ment and game­play strategy.

    Reply
  7. Tibia coins says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:26 pm

    Tibia is free, and play­ers are wel­come to play free of charge for as long as they like. However, if you enjoy Tibia Gold, you may con­sider buy­ing pre­mium time to take Tibia coins even further.

    Reply
  8. Tibia coins says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    Tibia is free, and play­ers are wel­come to play free of charge for as long as they like. However, if you enjoy Tibia Gold, you may con­sider buy­ing pre­mium time to take Tibia coins even further.

    Reply
  9. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 16, 2008 at 1:11 am

    I used my parents

    Reply
  10. dofus gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 1:30 am

    all things I will asked her, at the begin­ning we were very happy, we together to play and together to buy dofus gold but a long time after

    Reply
  11. delphi says:
    October 18, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Flexible sol­dier solar pan­els
    http://​tac​ti​cal​warfight​ergear​.com/​t​a​c​t​i​c​a​l​g​e​a​r​/​c​a​t​a​l​o​g​/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​_​i​n​f​o​.​p​h​p​?​c​P​a​t​h​=​8​7​_​1​0​2​&​a​m​p​;​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​_​i​d​=​170

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage