DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Bunker Busters Bulk Up

Bunker Busters Bulk Up

None of them are anywhere near as cool as Deep Digger, the bunker-busting bomb that drills its way underground. But various arms of the Defense Department are working on a number of next-generation munitions, designed to take out deeply buried targets, Aviation Week writes.
mop-image57.gif

Pentagon will be testing the theory next year of whether bigger and heavier is… better for penetrators. The Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is a behemoth of a bomb, weighing almost 30,000 lb. It is designed to “overwhelm target characterization uncertainties,” according to program officials.
With 5,300 lb. of explosive material, MOP will pack more than 10 times the explosive punch of its BLU-109 [today’s bunker-busting workhorse] predecessor… Optimum penetrating distance is classified, but some analysts say it is as much as 200 ft. through reinforced concrete and soil or sand…
MOP will have a blunter nose than its predecessors to keep the weapon intact during penetration… The majority of MOP’s weight is actually carried in the heavy steel casing, according to AFRL [Air Force Research Lab] officials. Once the tests are finished next year, the Pentagon will decide whether to produce the MOP and begin a small stockpile…
About six years ago, AFRL officials developed the Advanced Unitary Penetrator (AUP), which can burrow twice the depth of the BLU-109. The weapon uses denser materials “to pack more mass into a smaller cross-section,” Sands says. It is essentially a massive explosive bullet encased in a shroud that is dimensionally the same as the BLU-109. During penetration, the outer casing peals off, leaving the core to dig and detonate. The technology has been proven but has not been purchased by the Air Force, quite possibly because they need to go deeper still.
Thus, engineers have been experimenting with various steel formulations to improve the likelihood that a penetrator will survive on its path to a target without breaking up midcourse.
Through years of work, AAC and Ellwood National Forge in Irvine, Pa., have developed a very strong steel that is being used on the BLU-122, the Air Force’s newest penetrator, weighing in at 5,000 lb. The team has applied for a patent for the chemical composition and manufacturing process that has produced “Eglin Steel,” a strong blend estimated at one-eighth the cost of experimental metals with similar strength. Prior attempts to formulate similar steel have proved cost prohibitive. The patent for Eglin Steel — a blend of carbon, chromium and tungsten for hardness, and of silicon and nickel for durability — is under final review.

Share |

September 15th, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions | 330371 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/15/bunker-busters-bulk-up/Bunker+Busters+Bulk+Up2006-09-15+14%3A51%3A25noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Predators to the Rescue | Attack Of The Genius Robot Cockroach Swarm » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Allen Thomson says:
    September 15, 2006 at 8:57 am

    These weapons are cool and it probably doesn’t hurt to have them on the shelf, but there’s another big problem with underground facilities in denied areas: where are their vulnerable parts? Even if the entrances can be spotted, where do the tunnels go from there? A clever, if evil, opponent will presumably include at least a few zigs and zags to increase targeting uncertainties.

    Reply
  2. George Crawford says:
    September 15, 2006 at 10:24 am

    I wonder where these MOPs are destined to be used. If my information is correct (and I doubt that it is), Iran and Syria have developed large tunnel networks and bunkers at depths of greater than 70 foot underground and for the purposes of shielding their nuclear projects or WMD.
    I suppose a weapon that could penetrate these type of bunkers is needed in the event the US attacks Iran.
    G.C.

    Reply
  3. David Hambling says:
    September 15, 2006 at 10:42 am

    “The technology has been proven but has not been purchased by the Air Force, “
    I think they’re confused, as the AUP/BLU-116 is most definitely in the inventory -
    “One of the newest weapons in the Air Force’s arsenal of hard target penetrating bombs is the AFRL Munitions Directorate-developed Advanced Unitary Penetrator (AUP) shrouded aerial bomb, equipped with the Hard Target Smart Fuze (HTSF). The bomb and its smart fuze were a big hit during Operation Allied Force.…“
    http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​/​s​y​s​t​e​m​s​/​m​u​n​i​t​i​o​n​s​/​b​l​u​-​1​1​6​.​htm
    This is approach of just using bigger bombs is very limited and can’t go much further. new technology is needed…

    Reply
  4. CR says:
    September 15, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    Why not a smaller penetrator accelerated by a rocket motor prior to impact? Not as big a bang, certainly, but you would be able to put it on more platforms. Why continue to build bombs that can only be deployed from C-130s?

    Reply
  5. Siconik says:
    September 15, 2006 at 3:13 pm

    200 ft penetration? I recall reading a paper that concluded a bomb will not pentrate armor more then ~5 projectile lenghts, regardless of shape, weight and velocity.

    Reply
  6. Siconik says:
    September 15, 2006 at 4:07 pm

    Regarding the pentration depth/length ratio — I got the number from an exelent penetration technology overview right here…
    http://​www​.defensetech​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​2​1​7​7​.​h​tml
    BTW, the magic number is 4 lengths, not 5..

    Reply
  7. garmr says:
    September 15, 2006 at 6:11 pm

    Question: if engineers can make a bomb hit a very small, precise location (say an exhaust vent), is there any reason you couldn’t make bombs that play “follow-the-leader”? Acting like the teeth of a saw, could a large group of smaller munitions, striking a target in paced succession, dig deeper than one larger bomb?
    Just curious; I’m in no way qualified to have an opinion one way or another, and I’d be glad to know why this wouldn’t work.

    Reply
  8. bespoke says:
    September 15, 2006 at 7:52 pm

    Quote:
    These weapons are cool and it probably doesn’t hurt to have them on the shelf, but there’s another big problem with underground facilities in denied areas: where are their vulnerable parts? Even if the entrances can be spotted, where do the tunnels go from there? A clever, if evil, opponent will presumably include at least a few zigs and zags to increase targeting uncertainties.
    EndQuote
    Some of the targets these bunker busters are intended for are tunnels deep into mountains, they are bunkers that were built in a huge hole and have been covered up by dirt/concrete/etc. So we know exactly where they are.
    Iran has been using this method for large facilities that are presumed to be used for centrifuges. And when we talk about bunker busters, I would assume the sudden increased interest in them is due to Iran’s activities.

    Reply
  9. Brian says:
    September 18, 2006 at 9:34 am

    True, but if you can seal off all the exits, who cares if they stay down there? If communication is cut off, let them suffocate down there.

    Reply
  10. Just me... says:
    July 28, 2007 at 11:57 am

    During GW I we fired two GPS Tomahawks at a Commond bunker– the first one only blew a hole in the side of the bunker, with minimal damage inside. The second Tommy, with the same GPS flight path, flew through the hole, into the creamy nougat center and destroyed most of Saddams top echelon. Now, imagine replacing the cute lil’ Tomahawk with GPS Bunker-Busters.… the second one would go so deep it would open a hole under Beijing (not a bad idea!).

    Reply
  11. http://www.herogold.net says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:16 pm

    I would establish a strongest gang! I decide to buy hero coins on line.

    Reply
  12. cheap mesos says:
    August 4, 2008 at 9:02 pm

    From novice to play is not too difficult, mainly Liandao a bit high, we should sell what ah, we should start to buy what the point, of course, has often been Qiangguai?Then we have no choice but to buy mesos, can also buy cheap mesos.

    Reply
  13. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 3:59 am

    I wonder where these MOPs are destined to be used. If my information is correct (and I doubt that it is), Iran and Syria have developed large tunnel networks and bunkers at depths of greater than 70 foot underground and for the purposes of shielding their nuclear projects or WMD.
    I suppose a weapon that could penetrate these type of bunkers is needed in the event the US attacks Iran.

    Reply
  14. Shaiya gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:32 pm

    I believe that if you look the text you will want to try playing Shaiya at once and to buy Shaiya gold.

    Reply
  15. 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    sometimes before when the sleeping I often think of the previous screen, together with friends upgrade, earn the 2moons dil and together play with friends, playing now I also feeling some tired

    Reply
  16. dofus kamas says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:44 pm

    I earn many dofus kamas, I think we will together play forever, but I was wrong, until one day you tell me that you will left and said goodbye to me, when I heard I was very sad, then you said that your home happed many things

    Reply
  17. flyff penya says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:46 pm

    the lingering shadow of shaking in my face, in order to play this game I spend money to buy the flyff penya, the BB again left me at the same time, same situation when I hard to get it, my angry can not use the words describe, if I was not operated for a full and the lack of time, then I do not have any words to say, but last time also like this.

    Reply
  18. ronous cro says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    When we earn the ronous cro, we will very happy then give the need of friends.

    Reply
  19. cheap 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:48 pm

    I only want to say that, we are playing the game is not the game playing us, game only used for the entertainment, do not let ourselves feel so tried, do not because some cheap 2moons dil then affect the feeling. Sincere treatment of others, you will get many of my friends.

    Reply
  20. buy cabal alz says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    Now when boy heard his colleagues buy cabal alz or discuss which place can buy the cheap cabal alz, he often thinks of the girl, but he knows that all things already finished.

    Reply
  21. forex says:
    August 26, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    Forex market — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The foreign exchange (currency or forex or FX) forex market exists wherever one currency is … The average daily trade in the global forex and related markets is

    Reply
  22. buy imvu credits says:
    August 29, 2008 at 3:31 am

    About six years ago, AFRL officials developed the Advanced Unitary Penetrator (AUP), which can burrow twice the depth of the BLU-109. The weapon uses denser materials “to pack more mass into a smaller cross-section,” Sands says. It is essentially a massive explosive bullet encased in a shroud that is dimensionally the same as the BLU-109. During penetration, the outer casing peals off, leaving the core to dig and detonate. The technology has been proven but has not been purchased by the Air Force, quite possibly because they need to go deeper still.

    Reply
  23. FFXI Gil says:
    September 1, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    They let me next time to play the game together with them, when the next time to play the game I together to play with them, they found that my level was high, they asked me why, I told them because the FFXI Gil.

    Reply
  24. FFXI Gil says:
    September 1, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    They let me next time to play the game together with them, when the next time to play the game I together to play with them, they found that my level was high, they asked me why, I told them because the FFXI Gil.

    Reply
  25. daddd says:
    January 3, 2009 at 8:55 am
    Reply
  26. Anonymous says:
    February 19, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    you love life ?100 — — class happy line ?-007 ?

    Reply
  27. ??? says:
    February 19, 2009 at 10:02 pm

    ???you love life?????????????100?????????????? -????????-??????????????????????????????????????????class??????????????happy line??????????????????????-007?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      You are senile. The...
      jaythehistorian
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      F-35 has not been canceled…The F-22 has. Alternate engine...
      Robert
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Is General Dynamics LCS still in the...
      Wildcard
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      NLOS-PAM is important to the LCS for some...
      Will
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Well, that's a lot more stable than any AV-8B...
      Cranky Observer
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Isn't this the reason why the Navy went with a...
      @Earlydawn
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      It's a reduction in spending compared with...
      gmanaz
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Perfect, just in time for the program's cancellation.
      John
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I don't doubt that...
      Wildcard
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      It looked like a Transformer at the end!
      Wes
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage