DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Comms » Hez Hacked Israeli Radios

Hez Hacked Israeli Radios

This is down­right shock­ing, if true. “Hezbollah guer­ril­las were able to hack into Israeli radio com­mu­ni­ca­tions dur­ing last month’s bat­tles in south Lebanon, an intel­li­gence break­through that helped them thwart Israeli tank assaults,” Newsday reports.
gaza147.jpg

Using tech­nol­ogy most likely sup­plied by Iran, spe­cial Hezbollah teams mon­i­tored the con­stantly chang­ing radio fre­quen­cies of Israeli troops on the ground. That gave guer­ril­las a pic­ture of Israeli move­ments, casu­alty reports and sup­ply routes. It also allowed Hezbollah anti-​​tank units to more effec­tively tar­get advanc­ing Israeli armor, accord­ing to the offi­cials…
The Israeli mil­i­tary refused to com­ment on whether its radio com­mu­ni­ca­tions were com­pro­mised, cit­ing secu­rity con­cerns. But a for­mer Israeli gen­eral, who spoke on the con­di­tion of anonymity, said Hezbollah’s abil­ity to secretly hack into mil­i­tary trans­mis­sions had “dis­as­trous” con­se­quences for the Israeli offen­sive…
Like most mod­ern mil­i­taries, Israeli forces use a prac­tice known as “frequency-​​hopping” — rapidly switch­ing among dozens of fre­quen­cies per sec­ond — to pre­vent radio mes­sages from being jammed or inter­cepted. It also uses encryp­tion devices to make it dif­fi­cult for enemy forces to deci­pher trans­mis­sions even if they are inter­cepted. The Israelis mostly rely on a U.S.-designed com­mu­ni­ca­tion sys­tem called the Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System…
With frequency-​​hopping and encryp­tion, most radio com­mu­ni­ca­tions become very dif­fi­cult to hack. But troops in the bat­tle­field some­times make mis­takes in fol­low­ing secure radio pro­ce­dures and can give an enemy a way to break into the frequency-​​hopping pat­terns. That might have hap­pened dur­ing some bat­tles between Israel and Hezbollah, accord­ing to the Lebanese offi­cial. Hezbollah teams likely also had sophis­ti­cated recon­nais­sance devices that could inter­cept radio sig­nals even while they were frequency-​​hopping.
During one raid in south­ern Lebanon, Israeli spe­cial forces said they found a Hezbollah office equipped with jam­ming and eaves­drop­ping devices. 

It was my impres­sion that this kind of sig­nal inter­cep­tion was really, really hard to do — espe­cially for an irreg­u­lar force like Hezbollah. I know there are some radio and comm­sec gurus who read the site reg­u­larly. Weigh in here, guys.
Or maybe the arti­cle itself con­tains the seed of what actu­ally hap­pened. “Besides radio trans­mis­sions, the offi­cial said Hezbollah also mon­i­tored cell phone calls among Israeli troops,” Newsday notes. A raided Hezbollah base had list of “cell phone num­bers for Israeli com­man­ders.“
Cells are, of course, way eas­ier to inter­cept. “Israeli forces were under strict orders not to divulge sen­si­tive infor­ma­tion over the phone.” But maybe they talked any­way. Maybe they thought Hezbollah would never be sophis­ti­cated enough to grab their calls.
UPDATE 3:25 PM: Weeks ago, the Times of London and Asia Times had hints of this.

Apparently using tech­niques learnt from their pay­mas­ters in Iran, they were even able to crack the codes and fol­low the fast-​​changing fre­quen­cies of Israeli radio com­mu­ni­ca­tions, inter­cept­ing reports of the casu­al­ties they had inflicted again and again. This enabled them to dom­i­nate the media war by announc­ing Israeli fatal­i­ties first.
They mon­i­tored our secure radio com­mu­ni­ca­tions in the most pro­fes­sional way, one Israeli offi­cer admit­ted. When we lose a man, the fight­ing unit imme­di­ately gives the loca­tion and the num­ber back to head­quar­ters. What Hezbollah did was to mon­i­tor our radio and imme­di­ately send it to their Al-​​Manar TV, which broad­cast it almost live, long before the offi­cial Israeli radio.

(Big ups: JQP, /​.)

Share |

September 19th, 2006 | Comms, Terror Tech | 331192 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/19/hez-hacked-israeli-radios/Hez+Hacked+Israeli+Radios2006-09-19+18%3A56%3A33noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Lasers Speak to Subs | Final Word on YouTube Whistleblower » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. reload223 says:
    September 24, 2006 at 5:10 am

    Pssiitttttttt —– you missed some­thing, what Hez boys were doing were lis­ten­ing to cell phones ———————-

    Reply
  2. Recon 30248 says:
    September 24, 2006 at 6:23 am

    i am from Iran and i am a net­work secu­rity expert. this is like a joke that IRAN and Hezbollah have such abil­ity. These hack­ing tech­niques require advance knowl­edge and experts. as i know in my coun­try what is not impor­tant , is knowl­edge !! so who want to hack these com­pli­cated sys­tems ? The Hezbollah (who r unfa­mil­iar with basic war­fare) or REVELOTIPN BRIGARDS (same as Hezbollah) i rec­om­mend u to allow mil­i­tary intel­li­gence search for some­thing else like mil­i­tary per­sonal abuse or spying.

    Reply
  3. Golani51 says:
    September 24, 2006 at 6:50 am

    Point 1.
    They rabs have been able to jack into com­mu­ni­ca­tions for at least the last sev­eral years since I served. One doesn;t have to be a genius, espe­cially when it comes to mobiles.
    Point 2.
    As for it being sa vic­tory against Israel, what a crock of your moth­ers crappy hum­mus. For rea­sons bey­ong under­stand­ing, Israel pulled back when we should have gone on and cleared the waste that is Lebanon. Unfortunately, injuries were suf­fered because unlike those sheep-​​dipping blood­thirdty mur­der­ers, Israel does care about the life of inno­cents, even if it adds to the fatal­i­ties of its own sol­diers. As an ex-​​IDF sniper, I can ver­ify many times I wasn’t allowed to com­plete a job because of infor­ma­tion that could not be 100% ver­i­fied. If Israel said screw them all, it wouldn’t have taken much to clear the whole bloody lot of them. Case closed!!

    Reply
  4. erewhon says:
    September 24, 2006 at 10:15 am

    SAVILLE is a rel­a­tive biatch to encode and decode, unless you’re vonNeumann’s rein­car­na­tion you’re not likely to be decrypt­ing it in any use­ful period of time.
    The most straight­for­ward way to inter­cept a SINCGARS net would be to have some­one give you the keys.
    In terms of fre­quency hops, SINCGARS’ direct chip LFSR algo­rithm has a long dwell time (com­par­a­tively) and very well defined bins. You could use a multi-​​blade SDR setup to first bin out the entire SINCGARS hop spec­trum, if you got some­what close to an oper­at­ing sys­tem.
    The hopset for a SINCGARS net is vari­able but usu­ally not that many slots, less than 2000 bins and usu­ally more like 1000. Once you have the hopset elu­ci­dated, you can nar­row your SDR’s atten­tion to the 1000 or so bins that the net is oper­at­ing in, a small enough sub­set that your SDR could eas­ily munch it in real time.
    You could use that data to eas­ily tri­an­gu­late on units close by. Given idio­syn­crasies in each unit’s cen­ter fre­quency, chip tim­ing and ampli­tude, you can even­tu­ally iden­tify and sep­a­rate out trans­mis­sions from units at a dis­tance.
    Decoding would be a lot tougher. But if you had the keys at one loca­tion and no way to eas­ily dis­trib­ute them to the other “free­dom fight­ers”, I would assume one might be able to fake being a net con­troller and send well-​​known keys to the net with ERFs, every­one would think they were prop­erly set up to trans­mit with code keys but would be using ‘blanks’.
    Short of that, there are some other ways to attack encrypted trans­mis­sions that don’t involve directly decrypt­ing the traffic’s data stream by care­fully exam­in­ing some aspects of the sig­nal char­ac­ter­is­tics once you have the hopset. Some sets will “give away” more of this info than oth­ers, it would be a crap­shoot if you could locate a SINCGARS unit doing it that was also send­ing really use­ful comm traf­fic. Maybe that’s why HB couldn’t do it daily.
    At any rate, a spe­cial pur­pose SDR receiver with some com­pu­ta­tional horse­power and a com­pe­tent oper­a­tor is needed, most likely HB is get­ting help from a tech­ni­cally advanced coun­try, it’s not the sort of thing you toss together over the weekend.

    Reply
  5. Warren says:
    September 25, 2006 at 9:06 am

    It is kinda funny most of you jok­ers act like these arabs are back­ward and you pysdo tough guy have no respect for our cur­rent foes in the mid­dle east, I am a sig­nal offi­cer and when I attended col­lege most of the EE, and math­matic majors were either arab or per­sian. Freq are based on wave­lengths hmmmmm.…maybe the are smat enough to fig­ure this out…and maybe we are to dumb to see it. In a nut­shell never under­es­ti­mate you enemy.

    Reply
  6. 41mils says:
    September 25, 2006 at 1:07 pm

    Interesting debate. Most telling is that you never under­es­ti­mate your enemy, tech­nol­ogy is not fool proof, and the good guy doesn’t always win.

    Reply
  7. djb1017 says:
    September 26, 2006 at 8:11 am

    To erewhon & his ilk; There is an old saw about engi­neers: “Never use a straight line where a recurve is pos­si­ble, the short­est dis­tance between any two points is never a straight line, & never, EVER, use clar­ity when obfus­ca­tion will suf­fice”. I don’t know who the orig­i­nal author was, but he sure nailed it when one reads com­ments like the ones erewhon (amoungst oth­ers) wrote. Why is it so hard for engi­neers to stop & think before they open their mouths to mas­sage their own ego’s with sup­posed insider info? These guys make me crazy!! Hey moron — any­one with a high end scan­ner, a decent lap­top & 10 cents worth of brains can fig­ure out the 5 or 6 per­cent of trans­mit­ted info nec­es­sary to sus out com­mon repeated intel. The more you engi­neers com­pli­cate things, the eas­ier they are to break. Evidently, this is a les­son which will never find accep­tance in the engi­neer­ing community.

    Reply
  8. Liz says:
    September 26, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    It can be a tricky thing to keep track of who got what weapon, not to men­tion when and how they are used, when the tech­nol­ogy and intel­li­gence of weapons is just like any other commodity-​​regulated by avail­abil­ity and demand.
    National bor­ders and national loy­alty is only true in the vocab­u­lary of those at the state vs state level. Below relations-​​whether in infor­ma­tion, per­sonal con­nec­tions, mon­e­tary trans­ac­tions, resources etc — are flow­ing with lit­tle regard to arti­fi­cial lines.

    Reply
  9. erewhon says:
    September 26, 2006 at 9:24 pm

    djb:
    Do you seri­ously think a Radio Shack scan­ner is going to be able to fol­low a direct-​​chip sequence spread spec­trum net­work? Even one as slow as SINCGARS?
    Get a grip, dude. It’s only been in the last cou­ple of years that soft­ware defined radio sys­tems have been able to pull it off.
    You can’t spot traf­fic pat­terns until you can catch the traf­fic. You…DO…know that you can’t just turn on a short­wave and actu­ally HEAR any­thing on a spread-​​spectrum net like SINCGARS?
    Back under your rock, troll boy. Come back when you can describe an FFT ker­nel with­out a cut-​​and-​​paste off Wikipedia.

    Reply
  10. Begruss says:
    September 26, 2006 at 9:50 pm

    One more time:
    Where did it say specif­i­cally that the HZ decoded fre­quency hop­ping sig­nals. The use of the expres­sion “hack into” sounds to me like the author of the orig­i­nal arti­cle did not really under­stand the total sit­u­a­tion. As usual, we American high tech guys jumped in and said it can­not be done. There were indi­ca­tions that the HZ did mon­i­tor some RDF cell phones and prob­a­ble some sig­nal chan­nel comms that may or may not have been encrypted. Bottom line, every­one should have learned some­thing about OPSEC plan­ning and tac­ti­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tions in the field.

    Reply
  11. erewhon says:
    September 27, 2006 at 11:04 am

    Begruss:
    Both the London Times and Newsday arti­cles seemed pretty explicit that they had com­pro­mised either SINCGARS or other unnamed Israeli comms that used fre­quency hop­ping. Grant you, as you say the authors may have mis­un­der­stood, but it was explic­itly stated that HB had got­ten their intel from encrypted or fre­quency hop­ping comms.
    If they were using dig­i­tal cell phones, the data is encrypted there as well but you can snag the key if you catch a call dur­ing setup. Or you can do it pretty eas­ily at the cell tower, if you get access to the equip­ment. You can’t trust cell phones in enemy territory.

    Reply
  12. SaigonJohn says:
    September 27, 2006 at 12:47 pm

    Just a thought, What has been Syria’s fee for tor­tur­ing sus­pected Al Quaeda mem­bers. Access to pos­si­ble sig­nal hop­ping fre­quences related to our old, out­dated bat­tle­com system??

    Reply
  13. Bucky says:
    September 27, 2006 at 11:58 pm

    Been a ham and inven­tor in more then one way for over 50 years. I beleive I have a way to catch whomever/​whereever at any­time. I need a con­tact with the proper agent and or per­son. Can be done with what we already have availi­ble to us.

    Reply
  14. erewhon says:
    September 29, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    “Ps, It’s not pos­si­ble to inter­cept and decrypt Israeli Military Radio Communications within a rea­son­able para­me­ter for effec­tive uti­liza­tion. So, for the the peo­ple here declar­ing it can be done … quit smok­ing crack and get back to real­ity“
    Once upon a time there was a per­son of Arabic descent. He thought he had a secure line of com­mu­ni­ca­tion. He spoke of many inter­est­ing things upon his encrypted radio link.
    The encryp­tion was indeed for­mi­da­ble. Not decod­able in uni­verse time…one of those com­bi­na­to­r­ial explo­sions you get with prime fac­tors.
    Yet, the intre­pid crew got the audio any­way.
    And they didn’t decrypt the data flow.
    How do you get down off an ele­phant? You don’t. You get down off a duck.
    How do you decrypt spec­tac­u­larly good encryp­tion?
    You don’t.
    In this case, the audio amps were draw­ing a vari­able amount of cur­rent when our Islamic friend spoke on the invul­ner­a­ble encryp­tion. That caused a tiny fre­quency devi­a­tion in the FM mod­u­la­tor, and a tiny AM mod­u­la­tion of the sig­nal ampli­tude. And when you used a math­e­matic trans­form on the two that ampli­fies sim­i­lar­i­ties between the two effects and removes the other noise, voila! there was the voice data.
    The moral of the story is, you don’t always have to decrypt the unbreak­able encryp­tion to retrieve the data.

    Reply
  15. xshipdriver says:
    October 1, 2006 at 10:46 pm

    Sometimes, the obvi­ous is over­looked. It is not impos­si­ble that the Hezbollah had the use of the fruits of Iranian or Syrian espi­onage. Since the sys­tem is a US one, it is pos­si­ble it was com­pro­mised in the US. Remember what the trai­tor Walker did to the US Navy?

    Reply
  16. Lizardman says:
    October 6, 2006 at 10:27 am

    Having worked for the maker of SINCGARS, I am not aware of any sale of the sys­tem to the IDF. Israel has it’s own comms com­pany and they pre­fer to use it instead of a for­eign sys­tem. The IDF radios although Freq Hopping are not based on the SINCGARS model in anyway.

    Reply
  17. Sean Osborne says:
    October 18, 2006 at 12:33 pm

    I have 4 .jpg images of the equip­ment the IDF SoF recov­ered as ref­er­eced in the arti­cle.
    All I can say is that your eyes will pop like mine did.

    Reply
  18. J.P. Patterson RM2 says:
    October 31, 2006 at 12:32 am

    Do you guys remem­ber a guy named John Walker a US Navy RMC who stole our Jason and Creon codes for the Russians? All dur­ing Nam the Soviets sup­plied codes and then radio equip cloned from the hijacked USS Pueblo. They read our mail every day for years while we sweated our secure pro­ce­dures. Even chan­nel hop­ping can be tapped into with the right com­puter chip.

    Reply
  19. Alvin King says:
    November 4, 2006 at 1:25 am

    Rule # 1, regard­less of your com­mu­ni­ca­tion and trans­mis­sion secu­rity, even the most advanced, always assume that all your com­mu­ni­ca­tions have been inter­cepted by the enemy and that it will be used against you. Hence, only a fool would believe that his com­mu­ni­ca­tion sys­tem can­not be inter­cept, decode and use against you

    Reply
  20. Ray says:
    July 27, 2008 at 12:12 am

    I had heard that Israel DOES NOT use SINCGARS. If their fre­quency hop­ping net was hacked then they were not using encryp­tion. It is pos­si­ble to fol­low a FHSS net by using highly spe­cial­ized receivers such as some made by WJ (Microceptor)+ AOR (SR1050). If they were just freq hop­ping in the clear then yes, any­one with $5500 and some good tech­ni­cal knowl­edge could fol­low the hop­ping. If they had used AES or even DES then their info would not have been bro­ken in real time. As far as mon­i­tor­ing dig­i­tal cell phones all they needed was a ser­vice mon­i­tor. On a fur­ther note, Israel is a ter­ror­ist nation just like Iran and Iraq. I wish the U.S would cut off that blood suck­ing leach Israel now!
    Remember the U.S.S Liberty

    Reply
  21. Reva says:
    August 11, 2009 at 5:18 pm

    Hey. Don’t be afraid to take a big step if one is indi­cated. You can’t cross a chasm in two small jumps. Help me! Help to find sites on the: Modern framed bath­room mir­rors. I found only this — finan­cial free­dom debt relief. Pink acid washed jeans is prob­a­bly the clos­est descrip­tion. A home gar­den fun for the whole fam­ily. Thank you very much :o . Reva from Chile.

    Reply
  22. Kita says:
    August 16, 2009 at 7:35 pm

    Greeting. Keep cool and you com­mand every­body. Help me! Please help find sites for: Home depot bath­room mir­rors. I found only this — debt relief form let­ters. Old sit­ting in the chair with his mouth hang­ing open. Now, as you put in the frames, together with the help of the handy­man, you also have to note that it also has to be fixed by nail­ing. Thank :-( Kita from Nauru.

    Reply
  23. Rosalyn says:
    September 6, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    Excuse me. Deeds, not words shall speak me.
    I am from Zambia and also now teach English, please tell me right I wrote the fol­low­ing sen­tence: “How to apply provil­lus: the front hair is a regen­er­a­tive hour indus­try that does at the effect of the head con­di­tion.“
    Thank :p Rosalyn.

    Reply
  24. Katina says:
    October 1, 2009 at 12:34 pm

    Good evening. There is a tragic flaw in our pre­cious Constitution, and I don’t know what can be done to fix it. This is it: Only nut cases want to be pres­i­dent.
    I am from France and too poorly know English, tell me right I wrote the fol­low­ing sen­tence: “Tisdale’s surgery jumped her to improve fab­u­lous attempts on the melan­cho­lia.“
    Thank :o Katina.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Zandor, You're obviously and expert on religion and religious...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Cannon, please stop bringing relevant facts and arguments into this. The...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage