<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: “Plug-and-Play” Ship Hits the Water</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Kürbissuppe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-212079</link> <dc:creator>Kürbissuppe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-212079</guid> <description>Howdy friend, your post is good but where are the bookmarking buttons? I desired to bookmark and can&#039;t see the buttons. I use yahoo bookmarks. I saved it now per hand, but it would be a awful betterment to go through bookmarks. Regards from Berlin</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy friend, your post is good but where are the bookmarking buttons? I desired to bookmark and can’t see the buttons. I use yahoo bookmarks. I saved it now per hand, but it would be a awful betterment to go through bookmarks. Regards from Berlin</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tibia Gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148784</link> <dc:creator>Tibia Gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:32:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148784</guid> <description>The basic graphics and success of the game have allowed it to offer Tibia Gold on cell phones. The game is nothing mind-blowing, but instead is a solid fantasy MMO with a huge community. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic graphics and success of the game have allowed it to offer Tibia Gold on cell phones. The game is nothing mind-blowing, but instead is a solid fantasy MMO with a huge community.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: buy vis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148781</link> <dc:creator>buy vis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148781</guid> <description>Sword of the New World gives players more options, variety, entertainment and challenges than any other MMORPG can by virtue of its unique cheap snw vis design features. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sword of the New World gives players more options, variety, entertainment and challenges than any other MMORPG can by virtue of its unique cheap snw vis design features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sro gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148780</link> <dc:creator>sro gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:38:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148780</guid> <description>In addition to clothing, characters can also wear accessories such as rings, necklaces, and Silkroad money earrings, these absorb a certain percentage of damage based on the level and statistics of the accessory. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to clothing, characters can also wear accessories such as rings, necklaces, and Silkroad money earrings, these absorb a certain percentage of damage based on the level and statistics of the accessory.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cheap rappelz rupees</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148776</link> <dc:creator>cheap rappelz rupees</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148776</guid> <description>For example, when you have trouble in the work, after work, Rappelz game is a paradise for your happiness. You can use cheap rappelz rupees to but things for abreact. You also can kill people, you can curse, can also talk about the friends you work hard. You can also say to yourself and find a beautiful place to say. In this ay, you will be very happy, so I felt the work is inseparable from the Rappelz, for me, Rappelz is my home, my family, this can find happiness, can be found innocent. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For example, when you have trouble in the work, after work, Rappelz game is a paradise for your happiness. You can use cheap rappelz rupees to but things for abreact. You also can kill people, you can curse, can also talk about the friends you work hard. You can also say to yourself and find a beautiful place to say. In this ay, you will be very happy, so I felt the work is inseparable from the Rappelz, for me, Rappelz is my home, my family, this can find happiness, can be found innocent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter J. Pedersen</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148773</link> <dc:creator>Peter J. Pedersen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148773</guid> <description>The LCS concept - modularizing ships to enable them to fulfill several different roles - seems very similar to what the Danish Navy developed fifteen years ago, as part of the general downsizing that happened everywhere in those days in order to reap the socalled peace dividend. This class was called the Flyvefisken (Flying Fish) class, or Standard Flex 300. More information can be found at http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/Classes/FlyvefiskenClass1989.htm Ironically, the Danish navy has begun selling off this class in order to afford the purchase of larger units (similar to the ones that the SF-300 class superseded). The new class, however, is built up around the same &quot;container&quot; system as SF-300, enabling the continued use of the old containers, together with new ones such as the Long Range Air Defence unit. The modularization idea is great - hopefully it won&#039;t be overloaded with too many far-off demands. Regards, Peter J. Pedersen </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LCS concept — modularizing ships to enable them to fulfill several different roles — seems very similar to what the Danish Navy developed fifteen years ago, as part of the general downsizing that happened everywhere in those days in order to reap the socalled peace dividend. This class was called the Flyvefisken (Flying Fish) class, or Standard Flex 300. More information can be found at<br /> <a href="http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/Classes/FlyvefiskenClass1989.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/Classes/FlyvefiskenClass1989.htm</a><br /> Ironically, the Danish navy has begun selling off this class in order to afford the purchase of larger units (similar to the ones that the SF-300 class superseded). The new class, however, is built up around the same “container” system as SF-300, enabling the continued use of the old containers, together with new ones such as the Long Range Air Defence unit.<br /> The modularization idea is great — hopefully it won’t be overloaded with too many far-off demands.<br /> Regards,<br /> Peter J. Pedersen</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JH</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-21724</link> <dc:creator>JH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:20:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-21724</guid> <description>Actually GD will launch their ship in December. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually GD will launch their ship in December.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148771</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:05:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148771</guid> <description>Ok thanks. They will have 1 oddball duck after that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok thanks. They will have 1 oddball duck after that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noah Shachtman</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148770</link> <dc:creator>Noah Shachtman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148770</guid> <description>The last time I checked, the deal was that they both got to build one -- and then a single design would be picked for the other 53 LCSs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I checked, the deal was that they both got to build one — and then a single design would be picked for the other 53 LCSs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/09/25/plug-and-play-ship-hits-the-water/#comment-148769</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2105#comment-148769</guid> <description>That is the Lockheed version, but I thought General Dynamics was the winner. On a timetable somewhere I saw that they might be building two of each to test out the two designs. So whats the deal, is it Lockheed or Dynamics? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the Lockheed version, but I thought General Dynamics was the winner. On a timetable somewhere I saw that they might be building two of each to test out the two designs. So whats the deal, is it Lockheed or Dynamics?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:58:40 -->
