Home » Air » Drones » ‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

It’s nice to have a set of robotic eyes in the sky. But surveillance drones tend to be loud, and rather obvious, as they keep watch above a Middle Eastern city. Many guerilla types know by now to avoid the things.
Phantom-Demo.jpgThat’s why a small company out of Minneapolis, VeraTech Areo, has built a hand-held spy drone that it says is practically invisible. Battery powered and shaped like a boomerang, the “Phantom Sentinel” unmanned aeiral vehicle (UAV) “is in constant motion and the center of [its] mass is located outside of the fuselage,” Catherine MacRae Hockmuth tells us in the current issue of Defense Technology International. “As the aircraft spins, it disappears from vision,” an AeroTech fact sheet adds.
Even better, the company promises, is that the folding, backpack-ready drone “has a uniquely minimal cross section allowing it to ‘slice’ through even the most adverse weather conditions that would keep conventional UAV systems on the ground. The rotational inertia generated in flight allows the UAV to self level and maintain a very high degree of stability, even while hovering.“
There don’t seem to be any military orders for the Phantom, yet. But the company does have a patents for its hard-to-spot flights — and a wacky, techno-themed video, too.

Share |

{ 32 comments… read them below or add one }

pedestrian September 29, 2006 at 11:09 am

Interesting. It sounds like a low-hi mix cost effective UAV.

Reply

substitute September 29, 2006 at 12:31 pm

Typo alert: you spelled “invisible” wrong in the title.

Reply

DS September 29, 2006 at 1:20 pm

Something else that’s not mentioned…look at the soldier beside the ‘launcher-dood’. See the goggles he’s wearing? If you look at the site, another product the company has developed is an extremely high speed camera. If you examine the photo of the drone closely, you will see that one of the three ‘arms’ of the drone has no propeller on the end. If you were to pack an extremely high speed camera in the end of that arm, facing out, you would have a very useful 360 degree live view of the area the drone is flying over. How?
The whole drone spins very quickly. If the camera is facing outward, and is set to take very quick snapshots as it spins, and send them back to the viewer, it would be an easy thing to display those snapshots in order, and use head-tracking to be able to look around in 360 degrees with minimal delay. Pretty neat. If this is for real, the military would be STUPID to not jump on it.
Add to that the ability to hover AND very stable flight and you have one badass surveillance drone.

Reply

Murc September 29, 2006 at 7:15 pm

Cool concept.
I would think if the camera is in the dead center, and the have the camera spin the opposite direction of the craft, then you would have a good stable airiel view of your surroundings.

Reply

todd September 29, 2006 at 8:27 pm

I saw this thing at an unmanned system symposium: http://static.flickr.com/85/229606020_83d736cce5_b.jpg

Reply

Ken September 30, 2006 at 9:09 am

I highly predict that they will never, ever get stable video out of this thing.

Reply

PJ September 30, 2006 at 10:31 am

Ken, are you sure? It appears to stay “invisible” with its off-kilter spin. But, what if the camera is aimed at a little mirror (positioned dead center of the spin) that points straight down? I think then you have a steady image that’s simply spinning, not jerking. Then all you have to do is sync the rotation of the camera sensor with the rotation of “craft” and you’re done. Pretty simple. LOL. PS: I saw this posted at TechMeme.com

Reply

george battle September 30, 2006 at 11:14 am

you morons.
if its going to send video, its going to have a sensor built in to know the rotational speed and only show the appropriately timed shots (so you can have useable video. granted the FPS will suck but still.

Reply

Frank September 30, 2006 at 11:47 am

Are you guys even thinking about that the camera may have a gyro or bearings that make it from staying still while the boom spins?

Reply

pedestrian September 30, 2006 at 5:45 pm

>Are you guys even thinking about that the camera may have a gyro or bearings that make it from
>staying still while the boom spins?
That’s my guess. It has to be either a software approach or hardware approach to get stabilized image.

Reply

Rocky B October 1, 2006 at 3:08 pm

To the naysayers…”whatever can be thought of can be materialized & done.” This device would be a potentially great & cost effective portable tool that could be used by our military & intel ops in the field & maybe save many lives & limbs in the process. I can see a myriad of civilian applications for this tool also….

Reply

arun October 2, 2006 at 11:44 am

If it only spies on enemies and beams back video, even a tiny camera attached on a fly would do… How about using AIR itself as a camera? Tiny nanoparticles float in air, one is a battery one is a lens one is a transmitter, each fly at different times and reach the target, when they reach there they form a constellation in the air communicating with each other taking pictures and sending it to the transmitter whose only job is to beam back the pics to base. This will help to spy on unmanned military installations that are not vacuum sealed. If it is manned, then a eyeball replacement implant would do the job, if it is vacuum sealed, then the particles cannot travel, that is another challenge…

Reply

kobe October 2, 2006 at 1:42 pm

This company has been contacted for video devices for that flying wing.
They make fully programmable software driven cameras
Pixim
http://www.pixim.com/

Reply

J Glanton October 2, 2006 at 2:39 pm

Those boys in the picture look way too soft to be in anyone’s army. At least I hope this is the case.

Reply

JQP October 3, 2006 at 4:07 am

So between us Google & Technorati just how much have we talked up the company stock price? :)

Reply

Aaron October 4, 2006 at 7:34 am

Clearly, this promises a revolution in warfare. Hell, we are probably already in an arms race with extraterestrials and this is a vital component. Its straight out of star trek. or even star wars. Hell its buck rogers tech!
Seriously, I vote for this being a practical joke.

Reply

Richard Frazell October 4, 2006 at 2:05 pm

This is a very nice gadget!

Reply

adam October 5, 2006 at 11:51 pm

Why are these guys wearing chocolate chip cami’s. If you want to make a modern advertisement you should probably get the clothing right first just a thought.

Reply

John October 6, 2006 at 12:40 am

My Comment is, can this Boomarang operate with other UAV in the sky and how is it controled. and the availability.

Reply

J. Harper October 6, 2006 at 6:09 am

All of these gadgets are great for fighting terror, as long as they aren’t used against the American people at a later date.

Reply

Gus Haedo October 6, 2006 at 7:07 am

I wonder about the on-station time of this gadget and its range. looks interesting.

Reply

Les October 6, 2006 at 8:20 am

Let’s get down to the nitty gritty. How is this device controlled, what is it’s time on station. How good are the return images. How does the camera gear affect the inertial stab., etc.

Reply

Andy October 6, 2006 at 8:36 am

Great, something else clogging airspace, as if the Raven wasn’t enough for helicopter pilots to dodge. Why not? Dee Dee Dee

Reply

pd October 6, 2006 at 9:33 am

What is the height, range, and time on station for the device?

Reply

J. Huston October 6, 2006 at 9:53 am

Possible domestic use would be for urban search and rescue operations. I can’t find VeraTech Areo phone or web site. Any help out there?

Reply

John October 6, 2006 at 10:17 am

Not Drones, UAV’s no need to dumb down the name, look it up in Wikipedia. Drones are only loud at low altitude. Most fly at an altitude that your can’t hear. I am tired of journalists posing as experts. Just the facts.

Reply

Norm October 6, 2006 at 10:52 am

By the time the pork barrel legislators get done, it’ll have armor and be larger than a football field..

Reply

N. R. Glenn October 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm

IF this thing is feasable and operable, I also see a potential use in border patrolling. Illegal aliens and ‘coyotes’ would never know where sensors may be to avoid them. Cheaper and more effective than a 700 mile wall.

Reply

Brandon October 7, 2006 at 11:03 am

I’d like to know why the kid on the left is sagging his pants in the picture. ANd the person on the right has a gut. I’m hoping that isn’t active military and just some yahoo actors!

Reply

ldwalaska October 7, 2006 at 9:01 pm

Interesting concept.
How useful, don’t know. Interesting configuration and a bit of out there in terms of novelty.

Reply

Kevin April 1, 2007 at 7:29 am

I’d buy it for my kid brother

Reply

WR December 5, 2007 at 7:29 pm

Damn, I built something like this twenty years ago, but it was just a single rotor RC.
Would never think it could be used like that, neat ideal!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: