DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » ‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

It’s nice to have a set of robotic eyes in the sky. But sur­veil­lance drones tend to be loud, and rather obvi­ous, as they keep watch above a Middle Eastern city. Many guerilla types know by now to avoid the things.
Phantom-Demo.jpgThat’s why a small com­pany out of Minneapolis, VeraTech Areo, has built a hand-​​held spy drone that it says is prac­ti­cally invis­i­ble. Battery pow­ered and shaped like a boomerang, the “Phantom Sentinel” unmanned aeiral vehi­cle (UAV) “is in con­stant motion and the cen­ter of [its] mass is located out­side of the fuse­lage,” Catherine MacRae Hockmuth tells us in the cur­rent issue of Defense Technology International. “As the air­craft spins, it dis­ap­pears from vision,” an AeroTech fact sheet adds.
Even bet­ter, the com­pany promises, is that the fold­ing, backpack-​​ready drone “has a uniquely min­i­mal cross sec­tion allow­ing it to ‘slice’ through even the most adverse weather con­di­tions that would keep con­ven­tional UAV sys­tems on the ground. The rota­tional iner­tia gen­er­ated in flight allows the UAV to self level and main­tain a very high degree of sta­bil­ity, even while hov­er­ing.“
There don’t seem to be any mil­i­tary orders for the Phantom, yet. But the com­pany does have a patents for its hard-​​to-​​spot flights — and a wacky, techno-​​themed video, too.

Share |

September 29th, 2006 | Drones | 211636 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/29/invisible-boomerang-bot/%27Invisible%27+Boomerang+%27Bot2006-09-29+15%3A34%3A28jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 09/​29/​06 | Chemical Weapons? What Chemical Weapons? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    September 29, 2006 at 11:09 am

    Interesting. It sounds like a low-​​hi mix cost effec­tive UAV.

    Reply
  2. substitute says:
    September 29, 2006 at 12:31 pm

    Typo alert: you spelled “invis­i­ble” wrong in the title.

    Reply
  3. DS says:
    September 29, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    Something else that’s not mentioned…look at the sol­dier beside the ‘launcher-​​dood’. See the gog­gles he’s wear­ing? If you look at the site, another prod­uct the com­pany has devel­oped is an extremely high speed cam­era. If you exam­ine the photo of the drone closely, you will see that one of the three ‘arms’ of the drone has no pro­peller on the end. If you were to pack an extremely high speed cam­era in the end of that arm, fac­ing out, you would have a very use­ful 360 degree live view of the area the drone is fly­ing over. How?
    The whole drone spins very quickly. If the cam­era is fac­ing out­ward, and is set to take very quick snap­shots as it spins, and send them back to the viewer, it would be an easy thing to dis­play those snap­shots in order, and use head-​​tracking to be able to look around in 360 degrees with min­i­mal delay. Pretty neat. If this is for real, the mil­i­tary would be STUPID to not jump on it.
    Add to that the abil­ity to hover AND very sta­ble flight and you have one badass sur­veil­lance drone.

    Reply
  4. Murc says:
    September 29, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    Cool con­cept.
    I would think if the cam­era is in the dead cen­ter, and the have the cam­era spin the oppo­site direc­tion of the craft, then you would have a good sta­ble airiel view of your surroundings.

    Reply
  5. todd says:
    September 29, 2006 at 8:27 pm

    I saw this thing at an unmanned sys­tem sym­po­sium: http://​sta​tic​.flickr​.com/​8​5​/​2​2​9​6​0​6​0​2​0​_​8​3​d​7​3​6​c​c​e​5​_​b​.​jpg

    Reply
  6. Ken says:
    September 30, 2006 at 9:09 am

    I highly pre­dict that they will never, ever get sta­ble video out of this thing.

    Reply
  7. PJ says:
    September 30, 2006 at 10:31 am

    Ken, are you sure? It appears to stay “invis­i­ble” with its off-​​kilter spin. But, what if the cam­era is aimed at a lit­tle mir­ror (posi­tioned dead cen­ter of the spin) that points straight down? I think then you have a steady image that’s sim­ply spin­ning, not jerk­ing. Then all you have to do is sync the rota­tion of the cam­era sen­sor with the rota­tion of “craft” and you’re done. Pretty sim­ple. LOL. PS: I saw this posted at TechMeme​.com

    Reply
  8. george battle says:
    September 30, 2006 at 11:14 am

    you morons.
    if its going to send video, its going to have a sen­sor built in to know the rota­tional speed and only show the appro­pri­ately timed shots (so you can have use­able video. granted the FPS will suck but still.

    Reply
  9. Frank says:
    September 30, 2006 at 11:47 am

    Are you guys even think­ing about that the cam­era may have a gyro or bear­ings that make it from stay­ing still while the boom spins?

    Reply
  10. pedestrian says:
    September 30, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    >Are you guys even think­ing about that the cam­era may have a gyro or bear­ings that make it from
    >stay­ing still while the boom spins?
    That’s my guess. It has to be either a soft­ware approach or hard­ware approach to get sta­bi­lized image.

    Reply
  11. Rocky B says:
    October 1, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    To the naysayers…“whatever can be thought of can be mate­ri­al­ized & done.” This device would be a poten­tially great & cost effec­tive portable tool that could be used by our mil­i­tary & intel ops in the field & maybe save many lives & limbs in the process. I can see a myr­iad of civil­ian appli­ca­tions for this tool also.…

    Reply
  12. arun says:
    October 2, 2006 at 11:44 am

    If it only spies on ene­mies and beams back video, even a tiny cam­era attached on a fly would do… How about using AIR itself as a cam­era? Tiny nanopar­ti­cles float in air, one is a bat­tery one is a lens one is a trans­mit­ter, each fly at dif­fer­ent times and reach the tar­get, when they reach there they form a con­stel­la­tion in the air com­mu­ni­cat­ing with each other tak­ing pic­tures and send­ing it to the trans­mit­ter whose only job is to beam back the pics to base. This will help to spy on unmanned mil­i­tary instal­la­tions that are not vac­uum sealed. If it is manned, then a eye­ball replace­ment implant would do the job, if it is vac­uum sealed, then the par­ti­cles can­not travel, that is another challenge…

    Reply
  13. kobe says:
    October 2, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    This com­pany has been con­tacted for video devices for that fly­ing wing.
    They make fully pro­gram­ma­ble soft­ware dri­ven cam­eras
    Pixim
    http://​www​.pixim​.com/

    Reply
  14. J Glanton says:
    October 2, 2006 at 2:39 pm

    Those boys in the pic­ture look way too soft to be in anyone’s army. At least I hope this is the case.

    Reply
  15. JQP says:
    October 3, 2006 at 4:07 am

    So between us Google & Technorati just how much have we talked up the com­pany stock price? :)

    Reply
  16. Aaron says:
    October 4, 2006 at 7:34 am

    Clearly, this promises a rev­o­lu­tion in war­fare. Hell, we are prob­a­bly already in an arms race with extrater­e­s­tri­als and this is a vital com­po­nent. Its straight out of star trek. or even star wars. Hell its buck rogers tech!
    Seriously, I vote for this being a prac­ti­cal joke.

    Reply
  17. Richard Frazell says:
    October 4, 2006 at 2:05 pm

    This is a very nice gadget!

    Reply
  18. adam says:
    October 5, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Why are these guys wear­ing choco­late chip cami’s. If you want to make a mod­ern adver­tise­ment you should prob­a­bly get the cloth­ing right first just a thought.

    Reply
  19. John says:
    October 6, 2006 at 12:40 am

    My Comment is, can this Boomarang oper­ate with other UAV in the sky and how is it con­troled. and the availability.

    Reply
  20. J. Harper says:
    October 6, 2006 at 6:09 am

    All of these gad­gets are great for fight­ing ter­ror, as long as they aren’t used against the American peo­ple at a later date.

    Reply
  21. Gus Haedo says:
    October 6, 2006 at 7:07 am

    I won­der about the on-​​station time of this gad­get and its range. looks interesting.

    Reply
  22. Les says:
    October 6, 2006 at 8:20 am

    Let’s get down to the nitty gritty. How is this device con­trolled, what is it’s time on sta­tion. How good are the return images. How does the cam­era gear affect the iner­tial stab., etc.

    Reply
  23. Andy says:
    October 6, 2006 at 8:36 am

    Great, some­thing else clog­ging air­space, as if the Raven wasn’t enough for heli­copter pilots to dodge. Why not? Dee Dee Dee

    Reply
  24. pd says:
    October 6, 2006 at 9:33 am

    What is the height, range, and time on sta­tion for the device?

    Reply
  25. J. Huston says:
    October 6, 2006 at 9:53 am

    Possible domes­tic use would be for urban search and res­cue oper­a­tions. I can’t find VeraTech Areo phone or web site. Any help out there?

    Reply
  26. John says:
    October 6, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Not Drones, UAV’s no need to dumb down the name, look it up in Wikipedia. Drones are only loud at low alti­tude. Most fly at an alti­tude that your can’t hear. I am tired of jour­nal­ists pos­ing as experts. Just the facts.

    Reply
  27. Norm says:
    October 6, 2006 at 10:52 am

    By the time the pork bar­rel leg­is­la­tors get done, it’ll have armor and be larger than a foot­ball field..

    Reply
  28. N. R. Glenn says:
    October 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    IF this thing is feasable and oper­a­ble, I also see a poten­tial use in bor­der patrolling. Illegal aliens and ‘coy­otes’ would never know where sen­sors may be to avoid them. Cheaper and more effec­tive than a 700 mile wall.

    Reply
  29. Brandon says:
    October 7, 2006 at 11:03 am

    I’d like to know why the kid on the left is sag­ging his pants in the pic­ture. ANd the per­son on the right has a gut. I’m hop­ing that isn’t active mil­i­tary and just some yahoo actors!

    Reply
  30. ldwalaska says:
    October 7, 2006 at 9:01 pm

    Interesting con­cept.
    How use­ful, don’t know. Interesting con­fig­u­ra­tion and a bit of out there in terms of novelty.

    Reply
  31. Kevin says:
    April 1, 2007 at 7:29 am

    I’d buy it for my kid brother

    Reply
  32. WR says:
    December 5, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    Damn, I built some­thing like this twenty years ago, but it was just a sin­gle rotor RC.
    Would never think it could be used like that, neat ideal!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage