DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » ‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

‘Invisible’ Boomerang ‘Bot

It’s nice to have a set of robotic eyes in the sky. But surveillance drones tend to be loud, and rather obvious, as they keep watch above a Middle Eastern city. Many guerilla types know by now to avoid the things.
Phantom-Demo.jpgThat’s why a small company out of Minneapolis, VeraTech Areo, has built a hand-held spy drone that it says is practically invisible. Battery powered and shaped like a boomerang, the “Phantom Sentinel” unmanned aeiral vehicle (UAV) “is in constant motion and the center of [its] mass is located outside of the fuselage,” Catherine MacRae Hockmuth tells us in the current issue of Defense Technology International. “As the aircraft spins, it disappears from vision,” an AeroTech fact sheet adds.
Even better, the company promises, is that the folding, backpack-ready drone “has a uniquely minimal cross section allowing it to ‘slice’ through even the most adverse weather conditions that would keep conventional UAV systems on the ground. The rotational inertia generated in flight allows the UAV to self level and maintain a very high degree of stability, even while hovering.“
There don’t seem to be any military orders for the Phantom, yet. But the company does have a patents for its hard-to-spot flights — and a wacky, techno-themed video, too.

Share |

September 29th, 2006 | Drones | 211636 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/09/29/invisible-boomerang-bot/%27Invisible%27+Boomerang+%27Bot2006-09-29+15%3A34%3A28jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 09/29/06 | Chemical Weapons? What Chemical Weapons? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    September 29, 2006 at 11:09 am

    Interesting. It sounds like a low-hi mix cost effective UAV.

    Reply
  2. substitute says:
    September 29, 2006 at 12:31 pm

    Typo alert: you spelled “invisible” wrong in the title.

    Reply
  3. DS says:
    September 29, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    Something else that’s not mentioned…look at the soldier beside the ‘launcher-dood’. See the goggles he’s wearing? If you look at the site, another product the company has developed is an extremely high speed camera. If you examine the photo of the drone closely, you will see that one of the three ‘arms’ of the drone has no propeller on the end. If you were to pack an extremely high speed camera in the end of that arm, facing out, you would have a very useful 360 degree live view of the area the drone is flying over. How?
    The whole drone spins very quickly. If the camera is facing outward, and is set to take very quick snapshots as it spins, and send them back to the viewer, it would be an easy thing to display those snapshots in order, and use head-tracking to be able to look around in 360 degrees with minimal delay. Pretty neat. If this is for real, the military would be STUPID to not jump on it.
    Add to that the ability to hover AND very stable flight and you have one badass surveillance drone.

    Reply
  4. Murc says:
    September 29, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    Cool concept.
    I would think if the camera is in the dead center, and the have the camera spin the opposite direction of the craft, then you would have a good stable airiel view of your surroundings.

    Reply
  5. todd says:
    September 29, 2006 at 8:27 pm

    I saw this thing at an unmanned system symposium: http://​static​.flickr​.com/​8​5​/​2​2​9​6​0​6​0​2​0​_​8​3​d​7​3​6​c​c​e​5​_​b​.​jpg

    Reply
  6. Ken says:
    September 30, 2006 at 9:09 am

    I highly predict that they will never, ever get stable video out of this thing.

    Reply
  7. PJ says:
    September 30, 2006 at 10:31 am

    Ken, are you sure? It appears to stay “invisible” with its off-kilter spin. But, what if the camera is aimed at a little mirror (positioned dead center of the spin) that points straight down? I think then you have a steady image that’s simply spinning, not jerking. Then all you have to do is sync the rotation of the camera sensor with the rotation of “craft” and you’re done. Pretty simple. LOL. PS: I saw this posted at TechMeme​.com

    Reply
  8. george battle says:
    September 30, 2006 at 11:14 am

    you morons.
    if its going to send video, its going to have a sensor built in to know the rotational speed and only show the appropriately timed shots (so you can have useable video. granted the FPS will suck but still.

    Reply
  9. Frank says:
    September 30, 2006 at 11:47 am

    Are you guys even thinking about that the camera may have a gyro or bearings that make it from staying still while the boom spins?

    Reply
  10. pedestrian says:
    September 30, 2006 at 5:45 pm

    >Are you guys even thinking about that the camera may have a gyro or bearings that make it from
    >staying still while the boom spins?
    That’s my guess. It has to be either a software approach or hardware approach to get stabilized image.

    Reply
  11. Rocky B says:
    October 1, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    To the naysayers…“whatever can be thought of can be materialized & done.” This device would be a potentially great & cost effective portable tool that could be used by our military & intel ops in the field & maybe save many lives & limbs in the process. I can see a myriad of civilian applications for this tool also.…

    Reply
  12. arun says:
    October 2, 2006 at 11:44 am

    If it only spies on enemies and beams back video, even a tiny camera attached on a fly would do… How about using AIR itself as a camera? Tiny nanoparticles float in air, one is a battery one is a lens one is a transmitter, each fly at different times and reach the target, when they reach there they form a constellation in the air communicating with each other taking pictures and sending it to the transmitter whose only job is to beam back the pics to base. This will help to spy on unmanned military installations that are not vacuum sealed. If it is manned, then a eyeball replacement implant would do the job, if it is vacuum sealed, then the particles cannot travel, that is another challenge…

    Reply
  13. kobe says:
    October 2, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    This company has been contacted for video devices for that flying wing.
    They make fully programmable software driven cameras
    Pixim
    http://​www​.pixim​.com/

    Reply
  14. J Glanton says:
    October 2, 2006 at 2:39 pm

    Those boys in the picture look way too soft to be in anyone’s army. At least I hope this is the case.

    Reply
  15. JQP says:
    October 3, 2006 at 4:07 am

    So between us Google & Technorati just how much have we talked up the company stock price? :)

    Reply
  16. Aaron says:
    October 4, 2006 at 7:34 am

    Clearly, this promises a revolution in warfare. Hell, we are probably already in an arms race with extraterestrials and this is a vital component. Its straight out of star trek. or even star wars. Hell its buck rogers tech!
    Seriously, I vote for this being a practical joke.

    Reply
  17. Richard Frazell says:
    October 4, 2006 at 2:05 pm

    This is a very nice gadget!

    Reply
  18. adam says:
    October 5, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Why are these guys wearing chocolate chip cami’s. If you want to make a modern advertisement you should probably get the clothing right first just a thought.

    Reply
  19. John says:
    October 6, 2006 at 12:40 am

    My Comment is, can this Boomarang operate with other UAV in the sky and how is it controled. and the availability.

    Reply
  20. J. Harper says:
    October 6, 2006 at 6:09 am

    All of these gadgets are great for fighting terror, as long as they aren’t used against the American people at a later date.

    Reply
  21. Gus Haedo says:
    October 6, 2006 at 7:07 am

    I wonder about the on-station time of this gadget and its range. looks interesting.

    Reply
  22. Les says:
    October 6, 2006 at 8:20 am

    Let’s get down to the nitty gritty. How is this device controlled, what is it’s time on station. How good are the return images. How does the camera gear affect the inertial stab., etc.

    Reply
  23. Andy says:
    October 6, 2006 at 8:36 am

    Great, something else clogging airspace, as if the Raven wasn’t enough for helicopter pilots to dodge. Why not? Dee Dee Dee

    Reply
  24. pd says:
    October 6, 2006 at 9:33 am

    What is the height, range, and time on station for the device?

    Reply
  25. J. Huston says:
    October 6, 2006 at 9:53 am

    Possible domestic use would be for urban search and rescue operations. I can’t find VeraTech Areo phone or web site. Any help out there?

    Reply
  26. John says:
    October 6, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Not Drones, UAV’s no need to dumb down the name, look it up in Wikipedia. Drones are only loud at low altitude. Most fly at an altitude that your can’t hear. I am tired of journalists posing as experts. Just the facts.

    Reply
  27. Norm says:
    October 6, 2006 at 10:52 am

    By the time the pork barrel legislators get done, it’ll have armor and be larger than a football field..

    Reply
  28. N. R. Glenn says:
    October 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    IF this thing is feasable and operable, I also see a potential use in border patrolling. Illegal aliens and ‘coyotes’ would never know where sensors may be to avoid them. Cheaper and more effective than a 700 mile wall.

    Reply
  29. Brandon says:
    October 7, 2006 at 11:03 am

    I’d like to know why the kid on the left is sagging his pants in the picture. ANd the person on the right has a gut. I’m hoping that isn’t active military and just some yahoo actors!

    Reply
  30. ldwalaska says:
    October 7, 2006 at 9:01 pm

    Interesting concept.
    How useful, don’t know. Interesting configuration and a bit of out there in terms of novelty.

    Reply
  31. Kevin says:
    April 1, 2007 at 7:29 am

    I’d buy it for my kid brother

    Reply
  32. WR says:
    December 5, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    Damn, I built something like this twenty years ago, but it was just a single rotor RC.
    Would never think it could be used like that, neat ideal!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      My personal experience being on the ground in less...
      shark60
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      it wont make any differance what type...
      Roy M Brown
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Estimates on unit cost for new F-22s are at...
      Armchair Warlord
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Deal [;-)
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Hmmm. I suspect either: 1. It is raining/snowing...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Sorry, previous post meant to say the F16s were to be...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      There will be a reduced buy to save costs. That was...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We shouldn't even be using STOVL fighters anymore....
      Sean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes, but the 135 million price for the F35 factors in...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes because USAF logic says older is bad, no matter how...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage