DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eye on China » China Wants Weapons Whizzes

China Wants Weapons Whizzes

Forget buy­ing arms — the real way to develop your mil­i­tary is buy­ing arms design­ers.
RMB.jpg The seems to be the ver­dict of China’s People’s Liberation Army, any­way.
Remember the Australian Metal Storm sys­tem? You know, the one that fires more than a mil­lion rounds a minute? You might remem­ber Sharon Weinberger used it last month as an illus­tra­tive exam­ple of her new Stupid Weapons Score Card. Presumably it scores pretty high on the scale
Well, I guess the Chinese Government dis­agrees with that assess­ment, since they report­edly offered the sys­tems designer more than $100 mil­lion dol­lars to move to Beijing, after repeated attempts to by var­i­ous pieces of equip­ment [and after Al-​​Qaeda just put out a recruit­ing call to all nuclear sci­en­tists with a jihadist bent — ed]. Its hard to under­stand why he didnt head north to the Middle Kingdom after assur­ances like this: We dont need any Metal Storm weapons, we dont need any of the paper­work, none of that. What we want is you.
If noth­ing else, I guess its good to be wanted.
– Matthew Tompkins

Share |

October 3rd, 2006 | Eye on China | 212311 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/China+Wants+Weapons+Whizzes2006-10-03+21%3A04%3A55david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 10/​03/​06 | Amish Shooting: Dad’s Analysis » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Robot.Economist says:
    October 3, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    So the PLA is pick­ing up our sloppy sec­onds? I might be a smarter move to go after a suc­cess­ful defense com­pany. Metal Storm was a gim­ick com­pany whose tech­nol­ogy never caught on.
    I don’t see what buy­ing a Western arms firm gets the Chinese mil­i­tary. The Department of Commerce and Department of State would prob­a­bly catch them try­ing to use it as a front for export­ing. The mark of China would also fol­low any firm com­pet­ing for con­tracts in the U.S. or Europe.
    Maybe they need the firm’s busi­ness exper­tise? Most of China’s arms man­u­fac­tur­ers are state-​​owned enter­prises, which hemor­age money pretty badly. Corruption between the uni­forms that run the PLA and the for­mer uni­forms in the Chinese “defense indus­try” is pretty bad too.
    Definitely an inter­est, but puz­zling bit of news.

    Reply
  2. BT says:
    October 3, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    I agree. It might be use­ful to keep the riot­ing labor­ers and farm­ers inline though.
    I will say the only bad idea is the one that doesn’t make you any money, more power to Metal Storm.

    Reply
  3. Tim says:
    October 3, 2006 at 9:01 pm

    It must be a lot harder to rec­og­nize junk sci­ence when you’re read­ing in a for­eign lan­guage. It wouldn’t be the first time a for­eign coun­try was fooled by pro­pa­ganda from west­ern­ers expe­ri­enced in sell­ing dubi­ous tech­nol­ogy projects. Maybe they just liked the brochures, and didn’t take the time to under­stand the lim­i­ta­tions as they should have.

    Reply
  4. David Hambling says:
    October 4, 2006 at 11:15 am

    Nothing stu­pid about Metal Storm — it’s not the answer to every­thing but, much like rocket pods, it has advan­tages over con­ven­tional tube-​​launched rounds for some appli­ca­tions. There are obvi­ous advan­tages for smoke dis­charg­ers, for exam­ple.
    And is it being adopted for cer­tain appli­ca­tions in the US and elsewhere.

    Reply
  5. Matthew says:
    October 5, 2006 at 5:39 am

    You’ve missed the point of metal storm, like most defence con­cepts, its a plat­form to build off, we might not need a mil­lion bul­lets a minute, but later on, there might be a need for a high rate of fire in a weapons plat­form, Metal storm is weapon in progress. The chi­nese can get their own hands on a really cool gun, hands off mine!

    Reply
  6. Will says:
    October 5, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Two things, the Metal Storm has advanced tech­nol­ogy that can be engi­neered into var­i­ous forms. China has more money than sense right now, and it’s only get­ting worse.
    Second, you have to under­stand that a large por­tion of the int­elec­tu­als in China plagerise a large mar­jor­ity of their research. So, Chinese weapon design­ers may not be think­ing out of the box. This is purely an assump­tion on my part, but I think the Chinese are smart enough to know that com­mu­nism is not the best env­ior­ment for inno­va­tion.
    Finally, regard­less of their inten­tions with the Metal Storm, China is posi­tion­ing itself as a Superpower. They have to be stopped.

    Reply
  7. HMMM says:
    October 13, 2006 at 6:37 pm

    China should give up com­mu­nism, if they weren’t and they agreed to all the treaties, i’m sure China would have metal storm and whatever.

    Reply
  8. wisperingdeath says:
    February 1, 2007 at 4:32 am

    METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muz­zle flip!!

    Reply
  9. wisperingdeath says:
    February 1, 2007 at 4:35 am

    METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muz­zle flip!!

    Reply
  10. wisperingdeath says:
    February 1, 2007 at 4:38 am

    METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muz­zle flip!!

    Reply
  11. beavis says:
    October 30, 2007 at 8:59 pm

    china needs to take a hike they just steal all their ideas or equip­ment from every­one else. china does not need metal storm they need to go build their own stuff. china even copied a whole street from lon­don eng­land includ­ing the buis­nesses and got a bunch of peo­ple upset for using their buis­ness trade­marks with­out their per­mis­sion. china is a wanna be super­power plain and simple.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage