<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: China Wants Weapons Whizzes</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: stormgun</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-223076</link> <dc:creator>stormgun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:36:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-223076</guid> <description>apparently they have been developing the tech for the last 6 years?? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLYZ200706018.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLYZ20...&lt;/a&gt; There is a LOT of material on that site that demonstrates how the Chinese have stolen Metal Storm IP and developed the technology independently... very strange the company is focussed on non-lethal applications and the Chinese are going after CIWS, hypervelocity anti-ballistic missile interception, etc. USA is asleep at the wheel? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently they have been developing the tech for the last 6 years?? <a href="http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLYZ200706018.htm" rel="nofollow">http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLYZ20…</a></p><p>There is a LOT of material on that site that demonstrates how the Chinese have stolen Metal Storm IP and developed the technology independently… very strange the company is focussed on non-lethal applications and the Chinese are going after CIWS, hypervelocity anti-ballistic missile interception, etc. USA is asleep at the wheel?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: beavis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-21974</link> <dc:creator>beavis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-21974</guid> <description>china needs to take a hike they just steal all their ideas or equipment from everyone else. china does not need metal storm they need to go build their own stuff. china even copied a whole street from london england including the buisnesses and got a bunch of people upset for using their buisness trademarks without their permission. china is a wanna be superpower plain and simple. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>china needs to take a hike they just steal all their ideas or equipment from everyone else. china does not need metal storm they need to go build their own stuff. china even copied a whole street from london england including the buisnesses and got a bunch of people upset for using their buisness trademarks without their permission. china is a wanna be superpower plain and simple.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wisperingdeath</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-21973</link> <dc:creator>wisperingdeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:38:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-21973</guid> <description>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wisperingdeath</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-21972</link> <dc:creator>wisperingdeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:35:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-21972</guid> <description>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wisperingdeath</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-21971</link> <dc:creator>wisperingdeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:32:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-21971</guid> <description>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HMMM</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-148981</link> <dc:creator>HMMM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:37:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-148981</guid> <description>China should give up communism, if they weren&#039;t and they agreed to all the treaties, i&#039;m sure China would have metal storm and whatever. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China should give up communism, if they weren’t and they agreed to all the treaties, i’m sure China would have metal storm and whatever.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-148980</link> <dc:creator>Will</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-148980</guid> <description>Two things, the Metal Storm has advanced technology that can be engineered into various forms.  China has more money than sense right now, and it&#039;s only getting worse. Second, you have to understand that a large portion of the intelectuals in China plagerise a large marjority of their research.  So, Chinese weapon designers may not be thinking out of the box.  This is purely an assumption on my part, but I think the Chinese are smart enough to know that communism is not the best enviorment for innovation. Finally, regardless of their intentions with the Metal Storm, China is positioning itself as a Superpower.  They have to be stopped. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things, the Metal Storm has advanced technology that can be engineered into various forms.  China has more money than sense right now, and it’s only getting worse.<br /> Second, you have to understand that a large portion of the intelectuals in China plagerise a large marjority of their research.  So, Chinese weapon designers may not be thinking out of the box.  This is purely an assumption on my part, but I think the Chinese are smart enough to know that communism is not the best enviorment for innovation.<br /> Finally, regardless of their intentions with the Metal Storm, China is positioning itself as a Superpower.  They have to be stopped.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-148979</link> <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:39:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-148979</guid> <description>You&#039;ve missed the point of metal storm, like most defence concepts, its a platform to build off, we might not need a million bullets a minute, but later on, there might be a need for a high rate of fire in a weapons platform, Metal storm is weapon in progress. The chinese can get their own hands on a really cool gun, hands off mine! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’ve missed the point of metal storm, like most defence concepts, its a platform to build off, we might not need a million bullets a minute, but later on, there might be a need for a high rate of fire in a weapons platform, Metal storm is weapon in progress. The chinese can get their own hands on a really cool gun, hands off mine!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Hambling</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-148978</link> <dc:creator>David Hambling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:15:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-148978</guid> <description>Nothing stupid about Metal Storm - it&#039;s not the answer to everything but, much like rocket pods, it has advantages over conventional tube-launched rounds for some applications. There are obvious advantages for smoke dischargers, for example. And is it being adopted for certain applications in the US and elsewhere. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing stupid about Metal Storm — it’s not the answer to everything but, much like rocket pods, it has advantages over conventional tube-launched rounds for some applications. There are obvious advantages for smoke dischargers, for example.<br /> And is it being adopted for certain applications in the US and elsewhere.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/03/china-wants-weapons-whizzes/#comment-148977</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:01:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2123#comment-148977</guid> <description>It must be a lot harder to recognize junk science when you&#039;re reading in a foreign language.  It wouldn&#039;t be the first time a foreign country was fooled by propaganda from westerners experienced in selling dubious technology projects.  Maybe they just liked the brochures, and didn&#039;t take the time to understand the limitations as they should have. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be a lot harder to recognize junk science when you’re reading in a foreign language.  It wouldn’t be the first time a foreign country was fooled by propaganda from westerners experienced in selling dubious technology projects.  Maybe they just liked the brochures, and didn’t take the time to understand the limitations as they should have.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:56:24 -->
