DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Nork Fallout: Asia Arms Race?

Nork Fallout: Asia Arms Race?

So here we are, 36 hours later, and every­body is still talk­ing about North Korea’s nuclear test. But despite all the ner­vous chat­ter, not much has changed, at least in the short term. (Down the road is a much dif­fer­ent story.)
China-japan.jpgCondemnations of the Norths brazen act aside, China is no more will­ing now than they were last week to risk a col­lapsed regime on their bor­der — it almost assures a flood of refugees and a US mil­i­tary ally shar­ing a bor­der with China. The USs options are sim­i­larly lim­ited even if we know where all their nuclear sites are, its unlikely wed be will­ing to bet that the unpre­dictable Kim regime wouldnt retal­i­ate against Seoul. That leaves us to do what weve got­ten good at with North Korea: issu­ing a strong con­dem­na­tion and then hop­ing that CNN switches back over to cov­er­age of Jon Benet Ramsey.
The only big poten­tial short term impli­ca­tion is if the inter­na­tional com­mu­nity demon­strates that this test was a fake, or a dud. Then the North will be forced to up the ante to com­pen­sate for the embar­rass­ment (just as the nuke test was to com­pen­sate for the humil­i­at­ing fail­ure of the July long range mis­sile test).
The real impact of the Kim’s nuclear trial is in the long term. That’s when things have the poten­tial to get extremely scary. Not only do you get the pos­si­bil­ity of the Norks throw­ing a nuclear yard sale for ter­ror­ists. But for Japans new prime min­is­ter, Shinzo Abe, it ener­gizes his push to strengthen Japans secu­rity capac­ity like noth­ing else could have. Abe had already appointed a num­ber of fel­low con­ser­v­a­tives in Foreign Ministry and Defense posi­tions in the cab­i­net, hes declared his intent to mod­ify the con­sti­tu­tions lim­i­ta­tions on Japanese mil­i­tary capac­ity, and he mooted the pos­si­bil­ity for a Japanese pre-​​emptive strike against North Korea in the after­math of the July mis­sile tests. The paci­fist nature of Japans con­sti­tu­tion is rea­son­ably well-​​ingrained in Japanese polit­i­cal cul­ture, and he would have met a lot of resis­tance in these moves. That resis­tance will be dras­ti­cally weak­ened by the North Korean test. From there, its a short log­i­cal step to the usual sce­nar­ios of a Sino-​​Japanese arms race in East Asia. And there’s only one word for how that sce­nario plays out: Gulp.
– Matthew Tompkins

Share |

October 10th, 2006 | Nukes, Those Nutty Norks | 2139100 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/10/10/nork-fallout-asia-arms-race/Nork+Fallout%3A+Asia+Arms+Race%3F2006-10-10+16%3A23%3A06david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Korea Nuke: a ‘Fizzle?’ | Big War Machines Pushed for Korea Fight » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Brian says:
    October 10, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    The rise of Japan is some­thing China knows and under­stands, which is why they’ll agree to some degree of sanc­tions on NK. However much China fears a US pres­ence in Asia, they’ll take it any day over a newly mil­i­taris­tic Japan.

    Reply
  2. Shawn Hughes says:
    October 10, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    Something that I don’t see any­body talk­ing about is another rea­son for such a small yield: econ­omy of scale.
    When the US first began its’ nuclear pro­gram, the out­put of Special Nuclear Materials was mea­sured in ounces.
    They were so afraid of los­ing mate­r­ial that for the first test shot, a humon­gous metal doo­dad was erected at the site, ostenis­bly to con­tain the mate­r­ial in the case of a dud. They decided not to use it, and the rest is his­tory.
    You know Il is crack­ing the whip to make his tech­ni­cal com­mu­nity pro­duce. Maybe they only had enough mate­r­ial to pro­duce 1 giant weapon, or 2 smaller ones; one to demon­strate capa­bil­ity, and one to threaten and pos­ture with.
    Or, maybe they were so afraid of the accu­racy of the crit­i­cal nuclear weapons data they bought/​stole, that they didn’t want to risk the entirety of their nuclear stock­pile on it.
    A final guess is that they, like other nations, were con­cerned about a run­away device. In the FSSR, they could just aban­don a part of the coun­try. Where exactly do you run when you slime your ENTIRE coun­try? And, the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of crap­ping up a large part of the Chinese bor­der regions?
    So, they made their first test slightly above super­crit­i­cal­ity, and under­ground, to min­i­mize the pos­si­bil­ity of con­t­a­m­i­nat­ing their lands.
    At any rate, nuclear brief­cases are a writ­ers’ fan­tasy.
    Just some thoughts.
    –Shawn

    Reply
  3. Rolf Larsen says:
    October 11, 2006 at 6:17 am

    A com­ment on the scale of the North Koreans nuclear test : The yield of the device that was det­o­nated is not yet pre­cisely deter­mined .However ‚con­sid­er­ing the strained “econ­omy” and resources of the North Korean regime it is fairly safe to say that scarcity of resources is likely to be a major fac­tor in the some­what “small” design of said device .It is entirely pos­si­ble that the regime only had enough weapons grade plu­to­nium for this one det­o­na­tion, and that they felt their hand was bet­ter played if they det­o­nated at this par­tic­u­lar time .It is also pos­si­ble that they have just enough for one or sev­eral more devices,and that they are con­serv­ing because of this .It is unlikely , how­ever , given North Koreas tech­no­log­i­cal level , that they do in fact have a “bomb” i.e a device read­ily deployed by mis­sile or bomber .Eventually , given suf­fi­cient resource allo­ca­tion to this project ‚the regime will develop such a weapon .
    Rolf larsen

    Reply
  4. Rolf Larsen says:
    October 11, 2006 at 6:35 am

    The impli­ca­tions of regime change in North Korea — a com­ment :
    One of the things argued here is that the result of the North Koreans arm­ing them­selves with nuclear weapons could be a mil­i­taris­tic Japan , quite pos­si­bly armed with nuclear weapons .Considering the oblig­a­tions Japan has made to non pro­lif­er­a­tion and its econ­o­mys depen­dance on good rela­tions with the West, this seems a highly unlikely sce­nario even in a per­spec­tive of 25 years.However,a strength­en­ing of Japanese mil­i­tary capac­ity is not unlikely,given the latent unsta­bil­ity of the regions black sheep– North Korea.Both prac­ti­cal con­sid­er­a­tions such as the pos­si­bilty of infrac­tions on Japans ter­ri­to­r­ial integrity,and the domes­tic Japanese polit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion with a large per­cent­age clam­or­ing for the JDF to be expanded in capac­ity could pos­si­bly prompt such a pol­icy by Tokyo. That this should evolve into Japan emerg­ing as regional mil­i­tary power seems highly unlikely how­ever .
    Rolf Larsen

    Reply
  5. buy isk says:
    August 5, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    And I have expe­ri­enced many mat­ters, also met many friends, I have been deceived to buy isk by the unprin­ci­pled per­son, but I have been res­cued also by the friends of mine.

    Reply
  6. oyun says:
    August 6, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    Thanks very nice.

    Reply
  7. ? says:
    August 9, 2008 at 6:32 am

    ?

    Reply
  8. ????????????? says:
    August 9, 2008 at 6:32 am

    ?????????????

    Reply
  9. ? says:
    August 9, 2008 at 6:32 am

    sasasasa

    Reply
  10. ????????????? says:
    August 9, 2008 at 6:32 am

    sasasasa

    Reply
  11. wholesale says:
    August 11, 2008 at 10:54 pm

    good.

    Reply
  12. mabinogi gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 3:56 am

    So I spent some mabinogi gold to study. After school study the lov­able gray wolf became col­lapses at the first blow.

    Reply
  13. buy last chaos gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 4:00 am

    If we do not have the good for­tune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.

    Reply
  14. HYU says:
    August 17, 2008 at 7:44 pm

    ? ? ? ? ? ?g

    Reply
  15. HYU says:
    August 17, 2008 at 7:45 pm

    ? ff

    Reply
  16. Metin2 yang says:
    August 19, 2008 at 7:40 pm

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  17. Buy metin2 gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the com­pany. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply
  18. nnnas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 5:29 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-​​Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  19. nas says:
    August 31, 2008 at 5:30 am

    –
    12
    –
    345
    12
    ?
    1
    ? Lexus
    Honda
    Land Rover
    Jaguar
    Volkswagen
    ? ? Mercedes-​​Benz
    Maybach
    BMW
    ? Audi
    ? Mercury
    Jeep
    Hummer
    GMC
    ? Ford
    Dodge
    ? Cadillac
    ? Chrysler
    ? Chevrolet
    Toyota
    Nissan
    Infiniti
     

    Reply
  20. wholesale jewelry says:
    September 10, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    aypearl engaged in whole­sale jewelry,fashion jewelry,wholesale fash­ion jewelry,handmade jewelry,pearl jewelry,jewelry wholesale,discount jewelry,crystal jewelry,gemstone jewelry,turquoise jewelry,shell jewelry,coral jewelry

    Reply
  21. girlteam says:
    September 23, 2009 at 5:49 am

    Carrie Hamilton, Dochter van the carol bur­nett show dvd she.

    Reply
  22. girlteam says:
    September 23, 2009 at 5:56 am

    Het jaar na schei­d­ing Carol Burnett met Saroyan, Carol Burnett huwde pro­du­cent Joe Hamilton, met wie carol bur­nett show series drie kinderen met had.

    Reply
  23. George Matthews says:
    September 25, 2009 at 6:09 am

    Le gain en ligne est main­tenant con­cept tr?s facile pour vous main­tenant car vous avez l’option de la puis­sance se ven­dre aux per­son­nes par l’ add link add a link.

    Reply
  24. George Matthews says:
    September 25, 2009 at 6:11 am

    Le gain en ligne est main­tenant con­cept tr?s facile pour vous main­tenant car vous avez l’option de la puis­sance se ven­dre aux per­son­nes par l’ add link add a link.

    Reply
  25. girlteam says:
    September 26, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    Cuando viene dis­cu­tir como que es la marca super­ven­tas del mundo en t

    Reply
  26. girlteam says:
    September 26, 2009 at 9:55 pm

    Cuando viene dis­cu­tir como que es la marca super­ven­tas del mundo en t

    Reply
  27. girlteam says:
    October 12, 2009 at 11:27 pm

    It is surely an excel­lent option to go through a tooth whiten­ing sys­tems whiten­ing review before pur­chas­ing it.

    Reply
  28. girlteam says:
    October 12, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    Several options are there­fore avail­able to con­sumers all over the world seek­ing to pur­chase teeth whiten­ers whiten­ing products.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage