DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Info War » Army “Big Brother” Unit Targets Bloggers

Army “Big Brother” Unit Targets Bloggers

Bloggers: “Big Brother is not watch­ing you, but 10 mem­bers of a Virginia National Guard unit might be,” accord­ing to the Army. The Manassas-​​based Guardsmen are on a one-​​year assign­ment to clamp down on both “offi­cial and unof­fi­cial Army Web sites for oper­a­tional secu­rity vio­la­tions.“
OCPA-2006-10-12-110329.jpgThe team, work­ing “under the direc­tion of the Army Web Risk Assessment Cell” hunts for “doc­u­ments, pic­tures and other items that may com­pro­mise secu­rity” — and then orders the par­ties to take the offen­sive con­tent offline.
Not that the mate­r­ial is top secret or any­thing, an Army News Service arti­cle notes.

The most com­mon OPSEC [oper­a­tional secu­rity] vio­la­tions found on offi­cial sites are For Official Use Only (FOUO) doc­u­ments and lim­ited dis­tri­b­u­tion doc­u­ments, as well as home addresses, birth­dates and home phone num­bers.
Unofficial blogs often show pic­tures with sen­si­tive infor­ma­tion in the back­ground, includ­ing clas­si­fied doc­u­ments, entrances to camps or weapons. One Soldier showed his ammo belt, on which the tracer pat­tern was eas­ily identifiable.

Since the rel­a­tively wide-​​open days fol­low­ing the Iraq inva­sion in 2003, the Pentagon has been slowly tight­en­ing the screws on mil­i­tary blog­gers. Officers started bust­ing front­line diarists for their web­sites. In Iraq, new rules required blog­gers to check with their com­man­ders before post­ing. Then, in August, a mes­sage came high­est lev­els of the mil­i­tary that “EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, NO INFORMATION MAY BE PLACED ON WEBSITES THAT ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR SECURITY CONCERNS AND APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE MEMORANDUM WEB SITE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, DECEMBER 7, 1998.“
“So much for mil­i­tary blog­ging,” said one offi­cer, deployed in Iraq, when the rul­ing came down. Not that the offi­cer — an active blog­ger back in the States — was doing much pub­lic writ­ing while on the front lines. “The Army’s guid­ance on OPSEC [oper­a­tional secu­rity] has been broad and ambigu­ous enough to chill my speech,” he wrote to me. “Discretion is clearly the bet­ter part of valor where OPSEC rules are con­cerned, because the sen­si­tiv­ity of any par­tic­u­lar detail is in the eye of the beholder.“
Other sol­diers, even ones sta­tioned back home, took sim­i­lar mea­sures.

As of today, May 5th, 2006, I am offi­cially shut­ting down my blog… There are certin [sic] com­mands out there that do NOT want me to blog… they have been try­ing very hard to find out who I am and shut me down… I really don’t want to end my mil­i­tary career over a blog — it has got­ten THAT bad! 

Others — thou­sands of oth­ers — have con­tin­ued on, try­ing to stay within the rules. The Virginia National Guard Web-​​trolling team “uses sev­eral scan­ning tools to mon­i­tor [these] sites for OPSEC vio­la­tions,” the Army notes. “The tools search for such key words as ‘for offi­cial use only’ or ‘top secret,’ and records the num­ber of times they are used on a site. Analysts review the results to deter­mine which, if any, need fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion.“
“Pictures of [sol­diers’] com­pounds or weapons” are also con­sid­ered off-​​limits.
In an age when so many troops have access to the Internet — and “open source intel­li­gence” is becom­ing so crit­i­cal — it’s only nat­ural that mil­i­tary higher-​​ups have grown con­cerned about what’s posted online. But OPSEC isn’t the only dimen­sion to the counter-​​terror fight. This is, as the cliche goes, a bat­tle of hearts and minds, after all. That bat­tle largely takes place in the press, broadly defined. And, as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld observed ear­lier this year, “our ene­mies have skill­fully adapted to fight­ing wars in today’s media age, but… our coun­try has not adapted.” Just the other day, the New York Times shrieked about Iraqi insur­gents using YouTube to spread fear.
So you would think that the Defense Department would be doing every­thing it could to encour­age pos­i­tive cov­er­age of the war — to bring sto­ries of brave American troops, risk­ing their lives for Mideast democ­racy, to the Internet browsers every­where. But Rumsfeld’s pen­chant for secrecy — and the military’s fear that even the small­est, most innocu­ous detail about American oper­a­tions could give insur­gents the upper hand — has scut­tled this cru­cial media mission.

Share |

October 13th, 2006 | Info War | 215173 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/10/13/army-big-brother-unit-targets-bloggers/Army+%22Big+Brother%22+Unit+Targets+Bloggers2006-10-13+12%3A29%3A31jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « White Phosphorous vs. White Widow | Rapid Fire 10/​13/​06 (Updated) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JQP says:
    October 13, 2006 at 7:54 am

    Even after shut­ting a blog or site some infor­ma­tion may stil be lurk­ing deep within the cache of major searchengines.
    http://​www​.tech​world​.com/​s​e​c​u​r​i​t​y​/​n​e​w​s​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​c​f​m​?​n​e​w​s​I​D​=​7​0​8​3​&​a​m​p​;​p​a​g​t​y​p​e​=​all

    Reply
  2. Charlie H. says:
    October 13, 2006 at 7:57 am

    ” One Soldier showed his ammo belt, on which the tracer pat­tern was eas­ily iden­ti­fi­able. “
    Why is this bad OpSec ?

    Reply
  3. DS says:
    October 13, 2006 at 9:14 am

    for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret for offi­cial use only top secret :)

    Reply
  4. DS says:
    October 13, 2006 at 9:28 am

    hmmm…me thinks they need to start at ‘home’.
    http://www.google.com/search?q=%22for+official+use+only%22+site%3A.mil&btnG=Search&hl=en&lr=

    Reply
  5. Robot.Economist says:
    October 13, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    Sending national guards­men on wild goose chases after FOUO infor­ma­tion is such a ridicu­lous waste of Army resources.
    I imag­ine aver­age sol­diers will feel great know­ing that their Army trusts them so lit­tle. They prob­a­bly just as great as the tax­pay­ers who will fund this boondoggle.

    Reply
  6. Patrick says:
    October 13, 2006 at 1:50 pm

    These my friends are the actions of some­one
    who thinks there los­ing.
    It’s simple…“if you feel you have to con­trol every facet of everything…your not win­ning.“
    I’m a Vietnam Vet. I thought it was bad, then.
    I wouldn’t want to be in the Military, now.

    Reply
  7. bob johnson says:
    October 14, 2006 at 3:47 am

    i spent my entire child­hood wait­ing to be old enough to join the navy.i did at 18 and am retired now,the sto­ries i read about the mil­i­tary are not the mil­i­tary that i joined,nor is the coun­try that i served for so long the same country,all our ideals and val­ues have gone down the latrine dur­ing the last 6 yrs.i sup­port the men and women in the military,i have no respect for the cur­rent mil­i­tary leadership,they are pup­pets of the administration,thats not what the mil­i­tary was intended for.the retired mil­i­tary lead­ers speak­ing out today are the ones needed badly in the services.too bad,this isn‘t amer­ica anymore.

    Reply
  8. Prissy Patriot says:
    October 14, 2006 at 8:22 am

    Shame on the pen­ta­gon for turn­ing the Guard into spys against free speech. Like every­thing else this admin­is­tra­tion has done against the mil­i­tary, add this to the list of mis­uses.
    Ironic that sup­pos­edly our troops are “fight­ing for democ­racy in Iraq” –of which free­dom of speech is a major com­po­nent. (I’m not talk­ing about giv­ing away troop move­ments, etc.)
    If Bush doesn’t like free speech, he’s in the wrong coun­try. Try Saudi Arabia, fly boy.

    Reply
  9. Matt Hand says:
    October 14, 2006 at 10:24 am

    They should be more wor­ried about the mul­ti­tude of mem­ory sticks avail­able across Iraq con­tain­ing highly clas­si­fied info. You want some real top secret info? Just go to a local mar­ket in Baghdad.

    Reply
  10. The big Raven says:
    October 14, 2006 at 12:44 pm

    I was watch­ing date­line the other night and they arrested THREE MARINES for child molest­ing maybe spend some of that time watch­ing for all the per­verts in the us military.

    Reply
  11. sukabi says:
    October 14, 2006 at 1:17 pm

    my guess this op is not designed to keep OPSEC data out of the pub­lic square, but to silence sol­diers who may want to express their mis­giv­ings about their mis­sion and their lead­ers.… what bet­ter way to shut them up than to shut every­one down?

    Reply
  12. Trinity says:
    October 14, 2006 at 1:17 pm

    HUMINT THIS!
    F.U., A-​​HOLES!
    http://​home​town​.aol​.com/​p​h​a​n​t​o​m​o​f​l​f​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml
    FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH
    http://​home​town​.aol​.com/​a​c​h​t​u​n​g​7​7​7​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml
    NO ONE HERE GETS OUT ALIVE!
    http://​home​town​.aol​.com/​a​c​h​t​u​n​g​7​7​7​/​p​a​g​e​1​.​h​tml
    COVERT OPERATIONS
    http://​home​town​.aol​.com/​s​s​e​l​f​9​9​9​9​9​9​9​9​9​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml

    Reply
  13. Mr. X says:
    October 14, 2006 at 1:33 pm

    Does this mean there is going to be a change in the uni­forms sol­diers wear? If some­one knows how their unit patches and crests, they can fig­ure out a whole slew of infor­ma­tion about the unit the Soldier is assigned to right down the Company level.

    Reply
  14. Noah (the other one) says:
    October 14, 2006 at 6:23 pm

    From jour­nal­ists on the White House pay­roll (http://​www​.miami​.com/​m​l​d​/​m​i​a​m​i​h​e​r​a​l​d​/​n​e​w​s​/​l​o​c​a​l​/​1​5​5​1​3​4​7​0​.​htm), offi­cial video

    Reply
  15. BlueyBlogger says:
    October 14, 2006 at 10:54 pm

    It’s time the Bloggers of the world began tar­get­ting these “Big Brothers” from the army and gave them some of their own medicine!

    Reply
  16. quis says:
    October 15, 2006 at 1:49 am

    ATTENTION BLOGGERS: Your gov­ern­ment mas­ters are watch­ing you! In AmeriKKKa you will obey your government!

    Reply
  17. Sarah Meyer says:
    October 15, 2006 at 5:42 am

    The US /​ UK gov­ern­ments suc­cess­fully gagged free­dom of infor­ma­tion when they ‘embed­ded’ reporters, and even then, reporters were/​are not allowed to ‘see the action.’ Furthermore, Mainstream Media sup­presses infor­ma­tion on behalf of their cor­po­rate spon­sors. Press offices have been bombed, and reporters have been mur­dered. So the ONLY access the pub­lic have to the real­ity of war is through mil­blog­gers and ‘leaks.’ Whilst the pub­lic under­stand that some infor­ma­tion might be in the ‘inter­est of national secu­rity,’ this can­not, and does not, apply to ALL infor­ma­tion, Please keep milblogging

    Reply
  18. 5th of November says:
    October 15, 2006 at 6:10 am

    The 4th Reich has begun. Already the gestapo detains demon­stra­tors, bans books like “America Deceived” from Amazon, con­ducts warrant-​​less wire­taps, uses false-​​flag oper­a­tions (9/​11) and starts ille­gal wars based on lies. We are the new Hitler. Much of Germany did not know what was going on until it was too late. We can prob­a­bly agree that the WWII German pop­u­lace was far more intel­li­gent that today’s aver­age American. How long until they real­ize?
    Final link (before Google Books caves to pres­sure and drops the title):
    http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0–595-38523–0

    Reply
  19. dahreese says:
    October 15, 2006 at 12:23 pm

    The cor­po­rate con­trolled American gov­ern­ment is afraid of its own cit­i­zens.
    As an exam­ple, over two years ago, the Senate Select Committee, headed by Sen Roberts of Kansas, refused to release part two of its find­ings on the behav­ior of the White House regard­ing what the White House did with the pre-​​information it had regard­ing 9/​11.
    The senator’s posi­tion was that he didn’t want the report to influ­ence the upcom­ing elec­tions (thus influnc­ing the out­come any­way — his way). After the elec­tions, the sen­a­tor STILL REFUSED to release the report.
    Thus, how can the American cit­i­zen make an intel­li­gent choice about whom to vote for or what is best for his coun­try when his own gov­ern­ment refuses to be hon­est with him?
    If the past six year have shown any­thing, it’s just how cor­rupt and how eas­ily bought, the American gov­ern­ment it
    You don’t have to be a blind con­ser­v­a­tive not to see it, just an igno­rant one to deny it.

    Reply
  20. little joe says:
    October 15, 2006 at 3:49 pm

    It’s like every­thing else in the mil­i­tary.… When they twist your ballz and threaten to take your pay and/​or kick you out, you end up fol­low­ing along. So now they are twist­ing. I guess we can all start to follow!

    Reply
  21. John of Argghhh! says:
    October 16, 2006 at 2:32 pm

    Hee! Now I will be *ever* so tempted to add “FOUO” and work “Top Secret” into every post I post…
    Just to see if I get a traf­fic bump, if noth­ing else.
    It’s a tough bal­anc­ing act, and of course the nat­ural ten­dency on the part of the bureau­crat is to over-​​react, because of the poten­tial stakes involved.
    Not to men­tion weak com­man­ders who kill blogs to sti­fle Just crit­i­cism of Stupid Officer Tricks (Full dis­clo­sure, I *am* an offi­cer, albeit retired).
    I for one would wel­come the dis­cus­sion, should they send me a note telling me to take some­thing down (unlikely, as I think I do a decent OPSEC screen before­hand any­way, and *never* post some­thing with mark­ings. Of course, that self-​​imposed restric­tion (I say self-​​imposed, since the NYT and oth­ers seem to feel no such incli­na­tion) gets me scooped a lot.

    Reply
  22. T. K. Lee says:
    October 17, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    I’m not going to be accused of “salt­ing” the URLs so work with me here. Do a WWW search for ‘machine­gun’ and make a short list of the num­ber of gov­ern­ment, cor­po­rate and aca­d­e­mic sites that show the lay­out of trac­ers in US machine­gun ammu­ni­tion.
    If they’re really con­cerned about it, the might want to check those pesky NATO and the­ater com­mand web sites that give quotes from the var­i­ous reg­u­la­tions and stan­dard­iza­tion agree­ments that spec­ify ammo ratios, bul­let and car­tridge design, etc. As for entries to camps. Has any­body dri­ven down the road in front of Firebase Otter lately?

    Reply
  23. nonya says:
    October 29, 2006 at 8:52 pm

    Here’s an idea, mind your own. What I do at home is mine.

    Reply
  24. Anonymous says:
    December 30, 2006 at 7:13 pm

    http://​tor​.eff​.org/​o​v​e​r​v​i​e​w​.​h​tml
    http://​invis​i​blog​.com
    http://​www​.true​crypt​.org
    http://​www​.dynebolic​.org
    http://​www​.hal​turn​er​show​.com/​K​e​y​s​t​r​o​k​e​L​o​g​g​e​r​s​I​n​A​l​l​N​e​w​C​o​m​p​u​t​e​r​s​.​h​tml
    http://​www​.mail​vault​.com

    Reply
  25. ? says:
    April 28, 2008 at 5:06 am

    Why is this bad OpSec ?

    Reply
  26. ???? says:
    April 28, 2008 at 5:06 am

    Why is this bad OpSec ?

    Reply
  27. free psp games says:
    July 24, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    Give me more details please: about down­load­ing psp games and movies and music and more…

    Reply
  28. 2moons dil says:
    August 6, 2008 at 3:03 am

    At the begin­ning, I prac­ticed the rank to be very low, there­fore I must spent more 2moons dil to buy the high-​​quality weapon.

    Reply
  29. Todd says:
    August 15, 2008 at 2:30 am

    “Pictures of [sol­diers’] com­pounds or weapons” are also con­sid­ered off-​​limits.

    Reply
  30. Auto insurance coverage says:
    August 31, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    I was watch­ing date­line the other night and they arrested THREE MARINES for child molest­ing maybe spend some of that time watch­ing for all the per­verts in the us military.

    Reply
  31. Truck rental for moving says:
    September 2, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    Hello. Nice day. I have read­ing your site. It’s realy nec­es­sary and use­ful. Regards.

    Reply
  32. Rhys Hovey says:
    November 18, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Just let me set the record right on that Goddamn Rhys Hovey char­ac­ter. He

    Reply
  33. Rhys Paul Hovey says:
    November 20, 2008 at 2:04 am

    I AM THE GOD OF BLOG VANDALISM,… hsahahahahH!H!H!hhashahahsshass,. except I did not hurt any­thing,. and YOU DID NOT HAVE A DISCLAIMERS,… delete my ass!!
    Hi, I

    Reply
  34. mARn BABab says:
    November 20, 2008 at 2:05 am

    I will be framed as the worlds blog van­dal,.
    Hi, I

    Reply
  35. Rhys Hovey says:
    November 20, 2008 at 2:07 am

    Oh,. the fine line between just play­ing, goof­ing around, blog van­dal­ism,. and MASS MURDER,. AHAHHAHaHAH,.. schizo’s!!!!! WHERE IS YOUR REALITY!!
    Hi, I

    Reply
  36. ice says:
    November 25, 2008 at 2:17 am

    Air Jordan Cheap jor­dan cheap jor­dan ?cheap jor­dan ?cheap jor­dan ?cheap jor­dan cheap jor­dan ?cheap jor­dan cheap jor­dan cheap jor­dan ?cheap jordan ?

    Reply
  37. klara says:
    December 22, 2008 at 7:12 am

    Great post!

    Reply
  38. s reed says:
    July 11, 2009 at 9:19 am

    As long as the blogs do not give any mil­i­tary info out — then blog on — a gov. afraid of what we pro­tect and pro­mote? Get new bosses who have a clue!
    http://​www​.thesteven​reedle​gal​fund​.4t​.com Welcome To My Homepage
    What’s NewPlease Help Defend Democracy!
    BREAKING WORLD NEWS
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Contact: Steven Reed 417–882-2942 stevenlloydreed@​hotmail.​com
    Pro Freedom and Community/​Political Activist Steven L. Reed of Springfield Missouri filed an Appellant Brief with the Federal Appeals Court con­cern­ing his arrest in 2003 for hand­ing out

    Reply
  39. dung says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:44 am

    ??? ?????
    ??? ?????
    ??
    ??
    ??????
    ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ???????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      4. The Iraqi Rebels went underground to penetrate OUR and...
      Osher Doctorow
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      Some questions about the Gen. Petraeus Iraqi "Surge"...
      Osher Doctorow
    • The Non-lethal Claymore
      There is a non lethat weapon put out by laser energitics name daser...
      red
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      These guys seem to have had the right idea for a while,...
      TheBoogyMan
    • Airbag Defense
      Hey jack ass (fart) at any time durring that triade did you watch the video?...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This episode is another demonstration that there aren't good...
      Westerner
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage