DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Condi’s Rad Detectors: Not So Fab?

Condi’s Rad Detectors: Not So Fab?

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is push­ing North Korea’s neigh­bors to use more radi­a­tion detec­tors, to keep Kim & Co. from smug­gling nuclear mate­ri­als into or out of the coun­try.
rad_yellow_suit.jpgOf course, that assumes that the sen­sors can actu­ally han­dle the job. In many cases, they can’t.
The prob­lem is, most detec­tors today rely on solid crys­tals of sodium iodide, which light up when they’re hit with gamma rays. And those sodium sen­sors “can­not dis­tin­guish between a plu­to­nium bomb and the radioac­tive potassium-​​40 found in bananas,” New Scientist notes. “More impor­tantly, they fail to detect the most dan­ger­ous nuclear mate­r­ial of all: highly enriched ura­nium (HEU).”

Unlike plu­to­nium, which emits… high-​​energy gamma rays that are almost impos­si­ble to shield, HEU emits only low-​​energy gamma rays… If the ura­nium is shielded by just a thin layer of lead, or even wood, the detec­tors miss it.

There are bet­ter sen­sors in the works, Homeland Security Watch’s Christian Beckner says. They use “ger­ma­nium instead of sodium iodide, or [rely on] active detec­tion tech­nolo­gies, where you bom­bard the con­tainer with high-​​energy par­ti­cles that cre­ate new sig­na­tures which are eas­ier to detect.” Unfortunately, they cost a ton — seven times more than the cur­rent sen­sors. And they “haven’t been proven yet in the field.” Not here. And cer­tainly not in China or South Korea, where they would do the most good to con­tain the cur­rent cri­sis.
But not all is lost. Two U.S. gov­ern­ment pro­grams — the Container Security Initiative (CSI) and the Megaports Initiative — are help­ing for­eign inspec­tors get advanced x-​​ray machines which are bet­ter at see­ing through shield­ing. The machines can pick up fishy-​​looking shapes, if not radi­a­tion sig­na­tures.
CSI also puts American cus­toms offi­cers at “for­eign ports to liai­son with offi­cials there and get them to inspect [poten­tially risky] con­tain­ers,” Beckner says. It’s not a per­fect pro­gram, rely­ing “too much on the per­sonal rela­tion­ship between the American offi­cers and the for­eign port offi­cials; the for­mer don’t have the author­ity to force for­eign ports to com­ply, and Senate inves­ti­ga­tors have found that in many cases these for­eign ports aren’t fully respon­sive.“
But, over­all, Beckner thinks “it’s been a rel­a­tively effec­tive pro­gram.” And for right now, it’s really all we’ve got.

Share |

October 18th, 2006 | Nukes | 21663 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/10/18/condis-rad-detectors-not-so-fab/Condi%27s+Rad+Detectors%3A+Not+So+Fab%3F2006-10-18+20%3A00%3A37jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « New Space Policy? No Way! | Falcon Fills Blackbird’s Shoes » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage