<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “TIA” 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/10/20/tia-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/20/tia-2-0/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/20/tia-2-0/#comment-23133</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2173#comment-23133</guid>
		<description>Notice the Third eye and the Pyramid in the IAO logo ? Yep it&#039;s &quot; Them &quot; all part of the &quot; secret &quot; but yet not so secret behind the visable system we live under.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the Third eye and the Pyramid in the IAO logo ? Yep it’s ” Them ” all part of the ” secret ” but yet not so secret behind the visable system we live under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valdis Kletnieks</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/20/tia-2-0/#comment-150094</link>
		<dc:creator>Valdis Kletnieks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2173#comment-150094</guid>
		<description>&quot;under current US law&quot; doesn&#039;t really matter anymore - as of the last week or so, if you wish to press the issue of something&#039;s legality or Constitutionality, the President can declare you an enemy combatant because you&#039;re interfering with the War on Terror, and stash you someplace for a *long* time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“under current US law” doesn’t really matter anymore — as of the last week or so, if you wish to press the issue of something’s legality or Constitutionality, the President can declare you an enemy combatant because you’re interfering with the War on Terror, and stash you someplace for a *long* time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Skinner</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/20/tia-2-0/#comment-150093</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2173#comment-150093</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Folks,
An interesting idea but under current U.S. law it wouldn&#039;t be very effective, I&#039;m afraid.
A better system of Airport Security would be to issue every passenger and their luggage an RFID, it would simply be printed on both the boarding pass and luggage check. Doing this would be simple enough at the check in counter. The printing of RFID&#039;s is no longer a big deal.
This tagging would allow the TSA to track every passenger and their bags while on the secure side of every airport that they would be in for their entire trip. If a passenger gets off their flight at the wrong airport red flags would go up the instant they left the secured area.
If the goal is to increase security while at the same time controling costs this may very well be the method of garding our airports. Any privacy issues are basicly a wash with other security measures already in place.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,<br />
An interesting idea but under current U.S. law it wouldn’t be very effective, I’m afraid.<br />
A better system of Airport Security would be to issue every passenger and their luggage an RFID, it would simply be printed on both the boarding pass and luggage check. Doing this would be simple enough at the check in counter. The printing of RFID’s is no longer a big deal.<br />
This tagging would allow the TSA to track every passenger and their bags while on the secure side of every airport that they would be in for their entire trip. If a passenger gets off their flight at the wrong airport red flags would go up the instant they left the secured area.<br />
If the goal is to increase security while at the same time controling costs this may very well be the method of garding our airports. Any privacy issues are basicly a wash with other security measures already in place.<br />
ALLONS,<br />
Byron Skinner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

