http://defensetech.org/2006/10/25/rapid-fire-102506-updated-again/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 25 May 2012 09:49:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2006/10/25/rapid-fire-102506-updated-again/#comment-150384 rutty Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:07:22 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2190#comment-150384 The Times publishes something factually incorrect. The Pentagon then asks for a correction. The Times declines to print a correction. The Pentagon then prints its own correction. Noah describes this as "whaaaaa." Brilliant journalism. The Times publishes something factually incorrect. The Pentagon then asks for a correction. The Times declines to print a correction. The Pentagon then prints its own correction. Noah describes this as “whaaaaa.“
Brilliant journalism.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/10/25/rapid-fire-102506-updated-again/#comment-23425 G Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:53:18 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2190#comment-23425 Shouldn't the link read "CIA can't _Retain_ spies"? See the article. Shouldn’t the link read “CIA can’t _Retain_ spies”? See the article.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2006/10/25/rapid-fire-102506-updated-again/#comment-150383 Jos Bleau Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:53:44 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2190#comment-150383 35 years ago the Army initiated the "Low Maintenance Rifle" project by TRW. It was auto-fire only, and I don't know if it ever really worked well, but you can see here http://world.guns.ru/assault/as78-e.htm for more details. 35 years ago the Army initiated the “Low Maintenance Rifle” project by TRW.
It was auto-fire only, and I don’t know if it ever really worked well, but you can see here
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as78-e.htm
for more details.

]]>