<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Air Force Electronic Attacks Stymied</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/10/27/air-force-electronic-attacks-stymied/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/27/air-force-electronic-attacks-stymied/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: JhawkR</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/27/air-force-electronic-attacks-stymied/comment-page-1/#comment-150431</link> <dc:creator>JhawkR</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 05:00:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2195#comment-150431</guid> <description>North Korea - Nuke or Not ?
From the reports that I&#039;ve read &amp; heard, North Korea had a very low yeild explosion with nuclear emissions.
This would seem to indicate that they did in fact have a plutonium nuclear bomb constructed like &quot;Fat Man&quot; (the 2nd atomic bomb that the US dropped on Nagasaki) that did not implode simiutaneousily, resulting in a low yeild &quot;dirty bomb.&quot;
Resulting in North Korea getting nothing more than the effective result of using X-ray cobalt waste and high explosives to create a &quot;dirty bomb.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Korea — Nuke or Not ?<br
/> From the reports that I’ve read &amp; heard, North Korea had a very low yeild explosion with nuclear emissions.<br
/> This would seem to indicate that they did in fact have a plutonium nuclear bomb constructed like “Fat Man” (the 2nd atomic bomb that the US dropped on Nagasaki) that did not implode simiutaneousily, resulting in a low yeild “dirty bomb.“<br
/> Resulting in North Korea getting nothing more than the effective result of using X-ray cobalt waste and high explosives to create a “dirty bomb.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noah (the other one)</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/27/air-force-electronic-attacks-stymied/comment-page-1/#comment-150430</link> <dc:creator>Noah (the other one)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2195#comment-150430</guid> <description>The US continues gearing up for high-tech engagements when there is a utter lack of high-tech opponents. It&#039;s as if nobody noticed that the Cold War has been over for more than 15 years.
The primary convern seems to be with with defeating systems originally developed for the US that are now widely exported ... a twist on the concept of planned obsolence, with no winners except military contractors.
As to Byron&#039;s query, it is entirely irrelevant. The DPRK event will be played up or down by various governements and agencies according to their own specific agendas. The truth is entirely subjective and actual events will never be publicly disseminated. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US continues gearing up for high-tech engagements when there is a utter lack of high-tech opponents. It’s as if nobody noticed that the Cold War has been over for more than 15 years.<br
/> The primary convern seems to be with with defeating systems originally developed for the US that are now widely exported … a twist on the concept of planned obsolence, with no winners except military contractors.<br
/> As to Byron’s query, it is entirely irrelevant. The DPRK event will be played up or down by various governements and agencies according to their own specific agendas. The truth is entirely subjective and actual events will never be publicly disseminated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/27/air-force-electronic-attacks-stymied/comment-page-1/#comment-150429</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2195#comment-150429</guid> <description>GoodMorning Guys,
I know this post has nothing to do with the above story about Radar, but I&#039;ve been waiting a week or so for a follow up on North Korea&#039;s &quot;nuc&quot; here and it hasn&#039;t happened so, sorry Noah, I will change the subject.
I&#039;ve read over on other sites the post many of you have made in regard to the North Korea&#039;s recent weapons test. Many of you have posted very impressive &quot;facts&quot; that only can come from people involved on a daily basis with these types of questions. Some of you have gone to great efforts to try and determine exactly what happened and as usual our national media has droped this story like a hot rock.
So here is my question. There is international court that is trying to determine if the DPRK did in fact touch off a Nuclear Event. All of you out there are sitting on the jury, you have seen the evidence and have considered the &quot;facts&quot;, did the North Koreans set off a Nuclear Explosion or not?
Besides an up or down yes or no and unlike in a real court I would like your rational for how you reach your conclusion.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoodMorning Guys,<br
/> I know this post has nothing to do with the above story about Radar, but I’ve been waiting a week or so for a follow up on North Korea’s “nuc” here and it hasn’t happened so, sorry Noah, I will change the subject.<br
/> I’ve read over on other sites the post many of you have made in regard to the North Korea’s recent weapons test. Many of you have posted very impressive “facts” that only can come from people involved on a daily basis with these types of questions. Some of you have gone to great efforts to try and determine exactly what happened and as usual our national media has droped this story like a hot rock.<br
/> So here is my question. There is international court that is trying to determine if the DPRK did in fact touch off a Nuclear Event. All of you out there are sitting on the jury, you have seen the evidence and have considered the “facts”, did the North Koreans set off a Nuclear Explosion or not?<br
/> Besides an up or down yes or no and unlike in a real court I would like your rational for how you reach your conclusion.<br
/> ALLONS,<br
/> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/18 queries in 0.009 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-18 15:08:43 -->