<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Milblogger Clamp Down Blows Up (Updated)</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/10/30/milblogger-clamp-down-blows-up-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/30/milblogger-clamp-down-blows-up-updated/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Obfuscated</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/30/milblogger-clamp-down-blows-up-updated/#comment-150443</link> <dc:creator>Obfuscated</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:23:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2198#comment-150443</guid> <description>What will happen is that the folks who are pro-Army and supportive but critical if things that don&#039;t work will shut down. The rest can just bounce content to anonymous blogs via other means. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will happen is that the folks who are pro-Army and supportive but critical if things that don’t work will shut down.<br /> The rest can just bounce content to anonymous blogs via other means.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noah Shachtman</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/30/milblogger-clamp-down-blows-up-updated/#comment-150442</link> <dc:creator>Noah Shachtman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:31:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2198#comment-150442</guid> <description>Done!  And there have been fake-o milblogs already: http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,55568,00.html http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002155.html </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done!  And there have been fake-o milblogs already:<br /> <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,55568,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,55568,00.html</a><br /> <a href="http://images.defensetech.org/archives/002155.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002155.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mrnitropb</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2006/10/30/milblogger-clamp-down-blows-up-updated/#comment-150441</link> <dc:creator>mrnitropb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2198#comment-150441</guid> <description>Shouldn&#039;t this have the &#039;eat DT&#039;s dust&#039; tag? ;) So does anyone else get the feeling that a hypothetical milblogg that didn&#039;t feature the most common sentiment in history; grunts b!tchin&#039; about everyday life in the service, which has been an ongoing thing since the history of armies; that they might not want it shut down nearly as badly? That its not that they want to shut down all information available to the intertube, just the less than posotive stuff. Why else would they really care about posts about zip-tied SAW&#039;s, sandstorms, and 101 uses for MRE heaters? Because it gives everyone else a semi-realistic view about what&#039;s goin on over there? Bets on seeing planted milbloggs that are sanctioned by the Army AND are nothing but posotive and borderline propaganda? And have a 90% chance of still breaking the opsec requirments. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn’t this have the ‘eat DT’s dust’ tag? ;)<br /> So does anyone else get the feeling that a hypothetical milblogg that didn’t feature the most common sentiment in history; grunts b!tchin’ about everyday life in the service, which has been an ongoing thing since the history of armies; that they might not want it shut down nearly as badly? That its not that they want to shut down all information available to the intertube, just the less than posotive stuff.<br /> Why else would they really care about posts about zip-tied SAW’s, sandstorms, and 101 uses for MRE heaters? Because it gives everyone else a semi-realistic view about what’s goin on over there?<br /> Bets on seeing planted milbloggs that are sanctioned by the Army AND are nothing but posotive and borderline propaganda? And have a 90% chance of still breaking the opsec requirments.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 666/670 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:03:14 -->
