DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » R.I.P.: Conventional Trident

R.I.P.: Conventional Trident

Trident_missile_image.jpgThis month’s Proceedings magazine is chock-full of techy goodness, including an in-depth essay by naval expert Norman Polmar on the recently defunct plan to put conventional warheads atop Trident D5 Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles.
(For the record, Congress effectively killed the conventional Trident by zeroing funding in the FY 2007 budget.)
The most common criticism of this plan to arm each of the Navy’s 14 boomer subs (SSBNs) with two conventional missiles — alongside 22 nuclear missiles — is that foreign powers might mistake the launch of a conventional missile for a nuclear one, and might respond with a nuke of their own. In short, the conventional Trident was a diplomatic nightmare.
But there are other flaws, as Polmar points out in his article, which is unfortunately not available online:

Following a Trident SLBM launch, the missile’s third-stage booster, weighing several thousand pounds, will fall to earth. This concern could greatly inhibit conventional SLBM launch locations with trajectories over friendly or neutral territory.

There’s more:

Perhaps one-half of the Navy’s 14 Trident submarines are at sea at any given time — about seven submarines world-wide. … The number of SSBNs available to cover such terrorist-threat areas as the Middle East and North Africa with conventional Tridents would be limited.

Polmar proposes that outfitting the Navy’s 100-plus attack subs, destroyers and cruisers with faster cruise missiles would more than take the place of conventional Tridents — and do so with fewer diplomatic complications.
The Navy is already on it, moving ahead with its RATTLRS hypersonic cruise missile, which will also come in air-launched models.
–David Axe

Share |

November 4th, 2006 | Missiles | 221724 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/04/r-i-p-conventional-trident/R.I.P.%3A+Conventional+Trident2006-11-05+04%3A19%3A01wonk You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Traveling Americans Get Terrorism Score | Pentagon Fights Back » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Robot.Economist says:
    November 6, 2006 at 10:37 am

    I saw that Proceedings article as well. When the U.S. Naval Institute’s editors let a pretty stiff indictment of the Trident component of Rumsfeld’s ‘Prompt Global Strike’ plans into Proceedings, you know the idea has become unpopular among Navy leadership.
    Hopefully that will be last we hear about that crack-pot scheme.

    Reply
  2. Eric Hundman says:
    November 6, 2006 at 10:48 am

    It should be noted that research on Trident conventionalization continues despite the lack of funds from Congress. DoD appears to have diverted funds from other programs to continue studying the problem, and Lockheed has gone ahead with research as well.

    Reply
  3. Archlord money says:
    August 5, 2008 at 3:07 am

    In the Beach City is such fearfulness, I am owning many Archlord money in my pocket.

    Reply
  4. cheap Habbo Coins says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!

    Reply
  5. LOTRO Gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    Finally, I gained have sufficed the LOTRO Gold, had the family. We were in together finally.

    Reply
  6. buy last chaos gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:40 pm

    If we do not have the good fortune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.

    Reply
  7. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    I was excited, originally it was such simple, and it also needs a little cheap mabinogi.

    Reply
  8. Metin2 yang says:
    August 18, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  9. Metin2 yang says:
    August 18, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  10. Buy metin2 gold says:
    August 18, 2008 at 11:49 pm

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the company. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    Recent Comments
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Nice to see my old trade is being brought into the 21st...
      Joe
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      minor info detail: Per an Oct09 brief, the Threshold...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Jack Murtha Hall of Fame
      So, Aaron, how long have you been a member of the Benedict Arnold...
      bdwilcox
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      On a side note, speaking from a combat engineer/EOD...
      Sodajones
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      Why not INCREASE the buy by a factor of...
      Dave Barnes
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      They started fielding the Army's 120mm to the Marines...
      TMB
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      The Marines are sticking to their...
      Armchair Warlord
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      So a country that can't even correctly produce a reverse...
      WJS
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Why would you give them to the Marines? 120 MM is...
      chucklonestar
    • Hurt Locker is a Blast Without the Spark
      Really enjoyed the film, but this is an article...
      Patrick
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage