DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Politricks » Iraq Vet Candidates Fall Short

Iraq Vet Candidates Fall Short

td_1.jpgWhen the election season started, there was a lot of noise about so-called “Fighting Dems” — dozens of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, almost all running for Congress on the Democratic ticket, and almost all fed up with how those wars were being run. “The party leadership is calculating that candidates who wore the uniform [could] offer a credible counterpoint on national security to Republicans who have dominated the debate from the campaign trail to Capitol Hill,” the Washington Post reported back in February. And with forceful, articulate candidates like double-amputee Tammy Duckworth attracting national attention, it seemed like the calculus was paying off.
But something strange happened last night, amid the Democratic sweep. Almost all of the Fighting Dems lost. Duckworth, running a Republican-leaning district, was defeated by a couple of percentage points. In Maryland, “Democrat Andrew Duck, a former Army intelligence officer in Iraq, lost to Republican Rep. Roscoe Bartlett,” USA Today notes. “Former naval officer Eric Massa lost to Rep. Randy Kuhl, R-N.Y.“
There were exceptions, of course: Admiral Joe Sestak beat shady Curt Weldon in Pennsylvania. Nearby, ex-JAG Patrick Murphy is basically tied up with his opponent. But for the most part, these veteran candidates came up short.
How come? Well, the majority of ‘em were political neophytes. And knocking off an incumbent Congressman is a tough job, even for an experienced pol. Several of the Fighting Dems never made it out of the primaries, the L.A. Times observes. “Andrew Horne, a Marine Corps reservist in Kentucky’s 3rd District, and David Ashe, a Marine lawyer, in Virginia’s 2nd. One vet, former Marine Tim Dunn, quit the race for North Carolina’s 8th District, citing financial pressures.“
More significant, perhaps, was that many of the veterans were running in districts ordinarily toxic to Democrats.
“They made each race much closer than it ever should have been,” Paul Rieckhoff, executive director of Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America, tells Defense Tech. “Tammy [Duckworth] should have been blown away. [Republican Peter] Roskam had so much more money and a district that always favors an R [Republican]. Her story, and her veteran status, are the only thing that kept her close.“
UPDATE 12:06 PM: Several recent veterans did win their Congressional races last night, including former Naval Intelligence officer Chris Carney and Army National Guard artilleryman Tim Walz. But they didn’t serve directly in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Share |

November 8th, 2006 | Politricks | 22276 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/08/iraq-vet-candidates-fall-short/Iraq+Vet+Candidates+Fall+Short2006-11-08+16%3A51%3A31jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Army a ‘Cinderella service’ | New Congress: Army Up? (Updated Again) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. AlphaGeek says:
    November 8, 2006 at 6:18 pm

    Not so fast there, guys.
    Massa has not conceded the race to Kuhl; the number of uncounted provisional and absentee ballots is significant, and Massa wants all of the votes to be counted. Remember, just because the talking heads have gotten bored with a race and “called” it doesn’t mean that it’s legally over.

    Reply
  2. C-Low says:
    November 8, 2006 at 10:10 pm

    “How come? “
    Maybe that whole “anti-Iraq” sentiment is not so much so.
    Maybe instead more result of what happens when a party allows a few thieves and flakes to infiltrate the party and totally forgets what the people sent them to do. Their is consequences for actions or even non-actions.
    The million dollar question I am waiting for to be answered is now the Dems have both houses who are they going to f*ck? By that I mean is it going to be the LLL radicals who have become their foundation by not forcing an immediate withdrawal cutting off funding ect.. like Huffington was screeching on CNN last night? OR will it be the majority of America and their hopes of 08′ by doing what the LLL radicals thing they bought?
    My money says their base gets it raw dog. Maybe a few Investigations/hearings for appeasement but NO Impeachment and NO cutting of funds or “change in strategy”. And those Conservative Dems who did win will not be too eager to sell their future reelection for some Berkley boy

    Reply
  3. Ken Green says:
    November 9, 2006 at 7:18 am

    It’s up to us! We cannot rest just because the Dems took over the House and Senate. I am going to continue to write letters and make phone calls. I want Bush and Cheney removed from office and tried for war crimes. This election is the beginning; not the end. We need to keep after the folks in office regardless of their party affiliation. I also feel emboldened. I feel that it is much less likely to face retribution for being an activist.
    For starters, there is a Do-It-Yourself impeachment kit that can be found here: http://​web​.mac​.com/​k​a​g​r​e​e​n​/​i​W​e​b​/​k​e​n​g​r​e​e​n​.​c​o​m​/​k​e​n​g​r​e​e​n​b​l​o​g​/​8​F​B​5​C​3​8​7​-​F​7​D​2​-​4​F​4​1​-​B​6​7​4​-​3​F​0​1​9​C​3​0​7​C​6​2​.​h​tml
    Tell everyone you can to fill these Memorials out and send them in. Make sure John Conyers has a huge stack of these to back him up. Do not let up on these people! THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE; EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM!
    Ken Green
    http://​www​.kengreen​.com

    Reply
  4. Amanda says:
    March 4, 2008 at 12:52 pm

    Why is it okay for straight soldiers to love and marry the love of there life and still serve there country comfortably…and gays can’t share the same life…why do gays have to be singled out we fight just as good and strong if not better than most straight soldiers now you tell me why GAY marriage in the military is so harmful to the military community?? bullshit

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Sorry, previous post meant to say the F16s were to be...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      There will be a reduced buy to save costs. That was...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We shouldn't even be using STOVL fighters anymore....
      Sean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes, but the 135 million price for the F35 factors in...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes because USAF logic says older is bad, no matter how...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Agree completely. I also go further though – STOVL...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You don't need to. The amphibious ships are primarily...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Has anyone calculated out the per unit cost once you...
      Blight
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I have always loved this idea. More survivable,...
      nraddin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      As an old ex-USAF cop, I am way out of my league...
      Sgt Ken
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage